Agent skill

Systematic Review Screener

by Imbad0202 in Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

Screens records for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews against fixed eligibility rules, using two blinded AI reviewers and a third adjudicator, with traceable PRISMA counts.

Custom licenceAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Systematic Review Screener

skills CLI
$ npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills --skill sr-screener -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install Imbad0202/academic-research-skills sr-screener --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/sr-screener .claude/skills/sr-screener && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
sr-screener
GitHub stars
51k
Token cost
~8.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
3,852 words
Files
27 (incl. scripts, references)
Skills in repo
5
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
Custom licence

At a glance

Screens records for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews against fixed eligibility rules, using two blinded AI reviewers and a third adjudicator, with traceable PRISMA counts.

  • Works in 3 steps: Explicit clear intent — user invokes a… → Cross-phase materials detected — user… → Ambiguous intent, no materials — user…
  • Screening titles and abstracts against inclusion criteria for a systematic review
  • SKILL.md covers Quick Start, Pasted and retrieved text is…, Trigger Conditions and Agent Team (4 Agents), plus 20 more sections
  • Runs Python scripts from its folder; calls python

What it does

The skill turns a review proposal or PROSPERO protocol into confirmed eligibility rules before any record is read, then screens titles and abstracts and full texts. Every record gets two independent decisions from blinded AI reviewers, disagreements go to a third reviewer for adjudication, nothing is decided by default, and exclusions carry ordered codes. The AI reviewers support the team, and people sign off on the final screening.

It reads RIS, PubMed .nbib, Web of Science and CSV exports and removes duplicates. Outputs include PRISMA 2020 counts that trace back to files, RIS groups for EndNote or Zotero, an Excel log, a methods draft, and a literature_corpus handoff to the academic-paper skill. Quality control uses seed studies, near-miss rechecks and the kappa and PABAK agreement statistics, and batch runs can be resumed after an interruption.

Eight modes are available: protocol, quick, pilot, ta-screen, ft-screen, adjudicate, audit and report. The skill sits between deep-research, which handles the question, protocol and search, and academic-paper, which writes the review. Dual review at scale uses the Workflow tool or one Agent call per batch, while small sets work in one session. The deterministic steps are Python scripts that need Python 3.9 or newer and only the standard library, with openpyxl optional for the Excel log.

When your agent uses it

  • Screening titles and abstracts against inclusion criteria for a systematic review
  • Piloting the screening on a sample before the full run
  • Resolving conflicts between two reviewers' decisions
  • Auditing exclusions or producing the counts for a PRISMA flow diagram

Example prompts

  • “Screen the records in search_results.ris against the eligibility criteria in protocol.md.”
  • “Run a pilot screen on a sample of my exports before we commit to the full title and abstract pass.”
  • “Adjudicate the screening conflicts and update the PRISMA counts.”

Requirements

  • Python 3.9 or newer
  • openpyxl, optional, for the Excel log
  • Exported records in RIS, .nbib, Web of Science or CSV format

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Explicit clear intent — user invokes a specific skill via /ars-* slash command, or uses an unambiguous trigger keyword that maps to a…
  2. Cross-phase materials detected — user provides artifacts spanning ≥ 2 pipeline phases without naming a specific skill (e.g., pre-written…
  3. Ambiguous intent, no materials — user provides no artifacts and no clear request

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit ebc21bf. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships 2 files in scripts/ (Python, from the files we listed), which the agent can run.

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • python

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Systematic Review Screener loads about 8.4k tokens when it runs, and up to ~19k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 257 tokens; SKILL.md has 3,852 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~257
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~8.4k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~19k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.

SKILL.md

Its licence (Custom licence) doesn't allow us to republish the file, so here is its outline and opening line. It has 3,852 words (~8,416 tokens).

“Screening is where a systematic review quietly loses studies: criteria drift, tired reviewers, records that fall between two batches. This skill makes each screening decision explicit and traceable. The criteria are fixed before any record is read, every record gets…”

— opening of SKILL.md by Imbad0202, Custom licence
name
sr-screener
metadata.version
1.0.0
metadata.last_updated
2026-09-29
metadata.status
active
metadata.data_access_level
raw
metadata.task_type
open-ended
metadata.related_skills
deep-research, academic-paper, academic-pipeline

Read the full SKILL.md on GitHub

Files

SKILL.md and 26 other files (scripts, references) in sr-screener of Imbad0202/academic-research-skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • agents/protocol_architect_agent.md
  • agents/qc_auditor_agent.md
  • agents/reporter_agent.md
  • agents/screening_reviewer_agent.md
  • examples/example_config_dta.json
  • examples/example_protocol_dta.md
  • examples/quick_screen_example.md
  • references/decision_rules.md
  • references/failure_paths.md
  • references/orchestration.md
  • references/protocol_template.md
  • references/quality_control.md
  • references/reporting_and_handoff.md
  • references/reviewer_roles.md
  • scripts/build_outputs.py
  • scripts/build_workflow.py
  • … and 10 more

Open the folder on GitHubat commit ebc21bf

Compare with similar skills

Systematic Review Screener next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Systematic Review Screener compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Systematic Review Screener this skillImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~8.4kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Literature Reviewneflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent12620 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
NSFC Literature Review WriterHuiyuLi-2000/Chinese-Grant-Writer-Skills4391 repos~1.4kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Social Science Paper Writingfakerqwq/social-science-paper-writing-skill382—~7kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Zotero Taxonomy Curatorganzoth/zotero-taxonomy-curator160—~2.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Ieee SummarizeCloudWave818/ieee-skills359—~924Automated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Literature Review

    neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent

    Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).

    126 GitHub starsUsed in 20 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • NSFC Literature Review Writer

    HuiyuLi-2000/Chinese-Grant-Writer-Skills

    Writes the research-status literature review and critique section of an NSFC grant proposal, backed by a bundled multi-source literature search.

    439 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.4k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Social Science Paper Writing

    fakerqwq/social-science-paper-writing-skill

    Helps draft, diagnose, review and revise social science papers, from topic and research question to literature review, citation risks and pre-submission checks.

    382 GitHub stars~7k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Zotero Taxonomy Curator

    ganzoth/zotero-taxonomy-curator

    Domain-configurable Zotero-to-Obsidian literature curation and paper close-reading skill.

    160 GitHub stars~2.3k tokensUpdated 5 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Ieee Summarize

    CloudWave818/ieee-skills

    Summarize, organize, and normalize messy research materials into an IEEE-ready writing brief before manuscript drafting.

    359 GitHub stars~924 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Search and Citation Router

    Yuan1z0825/nature-skills

    Finds papers across literature sources, verifies and converts citations, builds MeSH strategies and audits independent citations of a paper.

    47k GitHub stars~884 tokensUpdated today
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

  • Academic Paper Writing Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.

    51k GitHub stars~16k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Reviewer

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.

    51k GitHub stars~11k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Academic Research Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.

    51k GitHub stars~15k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Deep Research Agent Team

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Runs a 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research, from forming the question through systematic search, synthesis, bias checks and an APA 7.0 report.

    51k GitHub stars~13k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Systematic Review Screener

What does Systematic Review Screener do?

Screens records for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews against fixed eligibility rules, using two blinded AI reviewers and a third adjudicator, with traceable PRISMA counts. The skill turns a review proposal or PROSPERO protocol into confirmed eligibility rules before any record is read, then screens titles and abstracts and full texts. Every record gets two independent decisions from blinded AI reviewers, disagreements go to a third reviewer for adjudication, nothing is decided by default, and exclusions carry ordered codes.

When should I use Systematic Review Screener?

Systematic Review Screener fits situations like: screening titles and abstracts against inclusion criteria for a systematic review; piloting the screening on a sample before the full run; resolving conflicts between two reviewers' decisions; auditing exclusions or producing the counts for a PRISMA flow diagram.

How do I install Systematic Review Screener in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills --skill sr-screener -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (sr-screener in Imbad0202/academic-research-skills) into .claude/skills/sr-screener in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Systematic Review Screener in Codex?

Run `npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills --skill sr-screener -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (sr-screener in Imbad0202/academic-research-skills) into .agents/skills/sr-screener in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Systematic Review Screener in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills --skill sr-screener -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/sr-screener, .gemini/skills/sr-screener, .github/skills/sr-screener and .opencode/skills/sr-screener in your project.

What does Systematic Review Screener need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Systematic Review Screener needs Python for the scripts in its folder and the command-line tools its instructions call (python). Our summary lists: Python 3.9 or newer; openpyxl, optional, for the Excel log; Exported records in RIS, .nbib, Web of Science or CSV format.

Does Systematic Review Screener access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Systematic Review Screener safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.

What licence does Systematic Review Screener use?

Systematic Review Screener has a licence file (the repository's licence) that doesn't match a standard licence. Read it on GitHub before reusing the skill.

How many tokens does Systematic Review Screener use?

About 8.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 34k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 10k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Systematic Review Screener?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Systematic Review Screener: Literature Review (neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent, 126 stars), NSFC Literature Review Writer (HuiyuLi-2000/Chinese-Grant-Writer-Skills, 439 stars), Social Science Paper Writing (fakerqwq/social-science-paper-writing-skill, 382 stars) and Zotero Taxonomy Curator (ganzoth/zotero-taxonomy-curator, 160 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Systematic Review Screener?

Imbad0202 (a GitHub user) maintains it in Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, which has 51,242 GitHub stars. The repository holds 5 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 10, 2026.

Source: Imbad0202/academic-research-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.