Skill collection
Owl-Listener/designer-skills agent skills
- skills
- 107
- GitHub stars
- 2.9k
GitHub description: “Designer Skills Collection: agentic skills, commands, and plugins for design — from research to systems, UI, interaction, and delivery.”
- Stars
- 2,871 (407 forks)
- Licence
- MIT
- Last push
- Sep 2026
- Created
- Mar 2026
- agentic
- agentic-ai
- ai
- ai-tools
- claude-code
- design-system
- design-systems
- prompt-engineering
- skills
- ux-design
Install all skills
npx skills add Owl-Listener/designer-skillsAdd --skill <name> for a single skill and -a <agent> to choose the agent (see the agent guides).
Skills in Owl-Listener/designer-skills, ranked
Ranked by score. Sort bymost stars,trending,newest,recently updated
| # | Skill | Repository | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Design an A/B experiment — hypothesis, variants, primary metric, and sample size. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~472 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 2 | Plan accessibility testing — assistive technologies, participant criteria, WCAG coverage, and session protocol. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~478 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 3 | Apply the Aesthetic-Usability Effect — polished, consistent interfaces are perceived as more usable and forgive minor friction. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~678 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 4 | Cluster many qualitative data points into themes and insight statements. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~520 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 5 | Apply animation principles — easing, staging, follow-through — to one specific UI motion. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~492 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 6 | Read financials, map competitive landscapes, and argue design decisions in the language of value. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~1.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 7 | Craft a portfolio case study with narrative arc, process evidence, and outcomes. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~523 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 8 | Define what content a product needs, how it is structured, and who owns it. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~852 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 9 | Critique a rendered screen's affordances — what looks clickable, state visibility, CTA clarity, and action discoverability. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~805 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 10 | Critique a rendered screen against mood.md, voice.md, and tokens.md. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~723 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 11 | Critique a rendered screen's colour — contrast ratios, palette coherence, and semantic meaning. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~791 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 12 | Critique a rendered screen's composition — balance, whitespace, rhythm, and gestalt grouping. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~773 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 13 | Critique a rendered screen's density — cognitive load, content prioritisation, scanning patterns, and progressive disclosure. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~848 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 14 | Critique a rendered screen's typography — scale usage, readability, consistency, and token compliance. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~824 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 15 | Critique a rendered screen's hierarchy — entry point, eye flow, weight distribution, and emphasis. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~608 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 16 | Select chart types and design data encodings — marks, axes, labels, and accessible chart styling. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~513 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 17 | Facilitate a structured team critique — framing, feedback rules, and actionable outcomes. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~513 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 18 | Inventory and prioritise accumulated design inconsistencies across a product. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 19 | Communicate design's contribution to business and user outcomes in stakeholder language. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 20 | Write rationale connecting decisions to user needs, business goals, and principles. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~465 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 21 | Establish review gates — criteria, checkpoints, and approval flow. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~455 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 22 | Plan and facilitate a design sprint from challenge framing through prototype testing. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~472 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 23 | Create adoption strategy and enablement materials to drive design system usage. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~546 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 24 | Define how the system evolves — contribution model, versioning, deprecation, and change management. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 25 | Audit token usage across a product for coverage, drift, and hard-coded values. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~483 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 26 | Apply the Doherty Threshold — keep system response under 400ms to preserve user flow. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~940 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 27 | 27.Empathy Map Build a Says, Thinks, Does, Feels map for one user or segment. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~488 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 28 | Design error prevention, detection, and recovery across a product — message content, placement, and escape routes. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~487 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 29 | Design confirmations, status updates, and notifications that tell users an action registered. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~528 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 30 | 30.Fitts Law Apply Fitts's Law — target acquisition time depends on size and distance. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~878 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 31 | 31.Form Design Design a form end to end — field order, grouping, validation, and completion. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~992 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 32 | Design gesture interactions for touch and pointer — swipe, drag, long-press, and their discoverability. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~501 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 33 | 33.Handoff Spec Write the implementation handoff — measurements, behaviours, assets, states, and edge cases. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~497 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 34 | Run an expert review against Nielsen's heuristics and domain criteria, with severity ratings. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~491 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 35 | 35.Hicks Law Apply Hick's Law — decision time grows with the number of simultaneous choices. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~665 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 36 | Define an illustration style guide — visual language, colour usage, and application rules. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~468 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 37 | Design content structure, hierarchy, labelling, and the navigation model. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~839 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 38 | Apply an emotional resonance lens to a UI that is technically correct but flat, prescribing changes at the copy, motion, and interaction layer. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~977 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 39 | 39.Journey Map Map one persona's end-to-end experience with stages, touchpoints, emotions, and pain points. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~518 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 40 | Apply the Law of Common Region — a shared container, background, or border groups elements regardless of spacing. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~744 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 41 | Apply the Law of Proximity — spatial closeness groups elements more strongly than any other cue. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~665 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 42 | Design waiting experiences — spinners, skeletons, optimistic updates, and progressive reveal. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~479 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 43 | Design for multiple languages, writing directions, and cultural contexts — text expansion, RTL mirroring, and locale formats. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 44 | Specify one micro-interaction completely — trigger, rules, feedback, loops, and modes. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~467 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 45 | 45.Millers Law Apply Miller's Law — chunk information into groups of about four to fit working memory. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~675 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 46 | Define motion tokens — durations, easing vocabulary, and reduced-motion handling — for consistency product-wide. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~1.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 47 | Select and design a navigation pattern — tabs, drawer, hierarchy, or hub — matched to product structure and user tasks. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
| 48 | Design the first-run experience — activation path, progressive disclosure, and time to first value. | Owl-Listener/ | 2.9k | 1 repo | ~1.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 1 mo ago |
Questions, answered from the data.
What is the best skill in Owl-Listener/designer-skills?
A B Test Design from Owl-Listener/designer-skills ranks first of the 107 skills in Owl-Listener/designer-skills listed here, with the highest score: its repository has 2.9k GitHub stars, 1 other GitHub owner carry a copy, its SKILL.md loads about 472 tokens and it passes the automated safety check with no findings. Next come Accessibility Test Plan and Aesthetic Usability.
Are the skills in Owl-Listener/designer-skills official?
None yet. All 107 skills in Owl-Listener/designer-skills listed here come from community repositories; a skill counts as official when the product's own GitHub organization publishes it.
How do I install all skills from Owl-Listener/designer-skills?
Run npx skills add Owl-Listener/designer-skills in your project: the open-source skills CLI installs the repository's skills into your coding agent's skills folder. To install a single skill, open its page here for the exact command.
How are these skills ranked?
By Skill Navigator score, which combines the GitHub stars of the skill's repository (shared across that repo's skills and discounted for large collections), how many other GitHub owners carry a copy of the skill, and automated SKILL.md quality checks, minus penalties for safety-check warnings and for each further skill from the same repository. Skills that fail the safety check are not listed.