Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
學術論文審稿技能 — 以結構化四步驟流程完成深度論文審查，涵蓋批判性審查、分數預測、要點精煉與正式審稿產出。當使用者需要 review 一篇論文、模擬 reviewer 反應、評估論文能否被接收、或幫助判斷論文優缺點時，一定要使用此技能。觸發詞包括：review 這篇、幫我審稿、reviewer 會怎麼說、這篇能上嗎、paper review、給分數、找…
Install Paper Review
$ npx skills add voidful/academic-skills --skill paper-review -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install voidful/academic-skills paper-review --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/voidful/academic-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/paper-review .claude/skills/paper-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "paper-review" agent skill from https://github.com/voidful/academic-skills/tree/main/paper-review into .claude/skills/paper-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "paper-review", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/voidful/academic-skills/tree/main/paper-reviewType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add voidful/academic-skills --skill paper-review -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install voidful/academic-skills paper-review --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/voidful/academic-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/paper-review .agents/skills/paper-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "paper-review" agent skill from https://github.com/voidful/academic-skills/tree/main/paper-review into .agents/skills/paper-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "paper-review", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add voidful/academic-skills --skill paper-review -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install voidful/academic-skills paper-review --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/voidful/academic-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/paper-review .cursor/skills/paper-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "paper-review" agent skill from https://github.com/voidful/academic-skills/tree/main/paper-review into .cursor/skills/paper-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "paper-review", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/voidful/academic-skills.git --path paper-review--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add voidful/academic-skills --skill paper-review -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install voidful/academic-skills paper-review --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/voidful/academic-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/paper-review .gemini/skills/paper-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "paper-review" agent skill from https://github.com/voidful/academic-skills/tree/main/paper-review into .gemini/skills/paper-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "paper-review", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install voidful/academic-skills paper-reviewInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add voidful/academic-skills --skill paper-review -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/voidful/academic-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/paper-review .github/skills/paper-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "paper-review" agent skill from https://github.com/voidful/academic-skills/tree/main/paper-review into .github/skills/paper-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "paper-review", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add voidful/academic-skills --skill paper-review -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install voidful/academic-skills paper-review --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/voidful/academic-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/paper-review .opencode/skills/paper-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "paper-review" agent skill from https://github.com/voidful/academic-skills/tree/main/paper-review into .opencode/skills/paper-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "paper-review", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
paper-review- GitHub stars
- 134
- Token cost
- ~2k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 499 words
- Files
- 7 (incl. references)
- Skills in repo
- 8
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
學術論文審稿技能 — 以結構化四步驟流程完成深度論文審查，涵蓋批判性審查、分數預測、要點精煉與正式審稿產出。當使用者需要 review 一篇論文、模擬 reviewer 反應、評估論文能否被接收、或幫助判斷論文優缺點時，一定要使用此技能。觸發詞包括：review 這篇、幫我審稿、reviewer 會怎麼說、這篇能上嗎、paper review、給分數、找…
- Works in 9 steps: ：批判性審查（繁體中文） → ：分數預測（繁體中文） → ：要點精煉（繁體中文） → …
- Tasks that involve Peer review
- SKILL.md covers 概述, 四步驟審稿流程, 五大審查維度（詳細版） and 五大退稿模式, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Paper Review is an agent skill from voidful/academic-skills. 學術論文審稿技能 — 以結構化四步驟流程完成深度論文審查，涵蓋批判性審查、分數預測、要點精煉與正式審稿產出。當使用者需要 review 一篇論文、模擬 reviewer 反應、評估論文能否被接收、或幫助判斷論文優缺點時，一定要使用此技能。觸發詞包括：review 這篇、幫我審稿、reviewer 會怎麼說、這篇能上嗎、paper review、給分數、找 weakness。適用於任何學術論文的審稿模擬與評估。
Its SKILL.md is about 2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 8 other files, including reference files (for example `references/constructive-feedback.md`, `references/rejection-patterns.md` and `references/review-dimensions.md`). Compatibility notes: Works with Claude Code, ChatGPT/Codex CLI, and Gemini CLI.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: A complete academic research Skill suite. Supports Claude Code, ChatGPT / Codex CLI, and Gemini CLI. The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Tasks that involve Peer review
Example prompts
- “/paper-review”
Requirements
- Compatibility (from SKILL.md): Works with Claude Code, ChatGPT/Codex CLI, and Gemini CLI.
Workflow steps
9 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 71e9c42. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Compatibility
Works with Claude Code, ChatGPT/Codex CLI, and Gemini CLI.
From compatibility in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Context cost
Paper Review loads about 2k tokens when it runs, and up to ~12k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 55 tokens; SKILL.md has 499 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from voidful/academic-skills at commit 71e9c42, republished under its MIT licence (© voidful). 499 words, ~2,003 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/paper-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 6 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.- name
- paper-review
- description
- 學術論文審稿技能 — 以結構化四步驟流程完成深度論文審查，涵蓋批判性審查、分數預測、要點精煉與正式審稿產出。當使用者需要 review 一篇論文、模擬 reviewer 反應、評估論文能否被接收、或幫助判斷論文優缺點時，一定要使用此技能。觸發詞包括：review 這篇、幫我審稿、reviewer 會怎麼說、這篇能上嗎、paper review、給分數、找 weakness。適用於任何學術論文的審稿模擬與評估。
- compatibility
- Works with Claude Code, ChatGPT/Codex CLI, and Gemini CLI.
- license
- MIT
- metadata.author
- weed
- metadata.version
- 1.0.0
paper-review：學術論文審稿技能
概述
本技能提供一套系統化的學術論文審稿流程，適用於頂級會議（如 NeurIPS、ICML、ICLR、ACL、CVPR 等）與期刊的同儕審查。整個流程分為四個步驟，前三步以繁體中文進行深度分析，第四步產出符合會議格式的英文正式審稿。
核心理念
- 嚴謹但公平：審稿的目的是提升學術品質，而非打壓作者
- 具體而非模糊：所有批評都應指向具體段落、公式或實驗
- 建設性導向：指出問題的同時提供改進方向
- 多維度評估：不以單一標準論斷，全面考量論文各面向
四步驟審稿流程
總覽
| 步驟 | 名稱 | 語言 | 目的 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | 批判性審查 | 繁體中文 | 深入閱讀，找出優缺點 |
| Step 2 | 分數預測 | 繁體中文 | 各維度評分與整體分數預測 |
| Step 3 | 要點精煉 | 繁體中文 | 將發現整理為結構化要點 |
| Step 4 | 正式審稿 | 英文 | 產出符合會議格式的正式 review |
Step 1：批判性審查（繁體中文）
目標
以批判性思維深入閱讀論文，系統性地識別優點與缺點。此步驟為後續所有分析的基礎。
執行方式
第一遍：快速瀏覽（5 分鐘思維）
- 閱讀標題、摘要、導論、結論
- 瀏覽圖表與表格
- 形成初步印象：這篇論文在做什麼？聲稱了什麼貢獻？
第二遍：仔細閱讀（30 分鐘思維）
- 逐節閱讀，標記不清楚的地方
- 檢查數學推導的正確性
- 驗證實驗設置的合理性
- 確認 claims 是否有充分支持
第三遍：批判性分析（15 分鐘思維）
- 對照五大審查維度逐一評估
- 識別是否符合五大退稿模式
- 思考 missing baselines、missing ablations、missing analysis
輸出格式
## Step 1：批判性審查
### 論文基本資訊
- 標題：
- 作者：
- 投稿會議/期刊：
- 領域：
### 初步印象
（一段話總結論文做了什麼、聲稱了什麼）
### 優點列表
1. [S1] （具體描述優點，引用論文段落或頁碼）
2. [S2] ...
### 缺點列表
1. [W1] （具體描述缺點，說明為什麼這是問題）
2. [W2] ...
### 疑問列表
1. [Q1] （需要作者釐清的問題）
2. [Q2] ...
### 初步判斷
（對論文品質的初步判斷，包含是否達到會議門檻的直覺）注意事項
- 優點和缺點都要具體，避免「寫得不錯」「實驗不足」這類空泛評語
- 每個優缺點都應該能對應到論文的具體位置
- 疑問列表要區分「真正的疑問」與「修辭性的批評」
- 初步判斷只是直覺，不要被它錨定——後續步驟可能改變結論
Step 2：分數預測（繁體中文）
目標
基於 Step 1 的分析，對論文的五個維度分別評分，並預測整體分數。
五大審查維度
每個維度以 1-5 分評分。詳細評分標準見 references/scoring-rubric.md。
| 維度 | 說明 | 權重參考 |
|---|---|---|
| 貢獻新穎性 (Novelty & Contribution) | 想法是否新穎？貢獻是否足夠？ | 高 |
| 寫作清晰度 (Clarity & Writing) | 論文是否易讀？邏輯是否清晰？ | 中 |
| 實驗嚴謹性 (Experimental Rigor) | 實驗設計是否嚴謹？結果是否可靠？ | 高 |
| 評估完整性 (Evaluation Completeness) | 評估是否全面？是否有遺漏的比較？ | 中高 |
| 方法健全性 (Soundness of Method) | 方法是否正確？假設是否合理？ | 高 |
詳細的維度說明請參考 references/review-dimensions.md。
評分體系
- Overall Score（整體分數）：1-10 分，詳見
references/scoring-rubric.md - Confidence（信心度）：1-5 分，反映審稿者對自身評估的確信程度
- 各維度分數：1-5 分
輸出格式
## Step 2：分數預測
### 各維度評分
| 維度 | 分數 (1-5) | 簡要理由 |
|------|-----------|----------|
| 貢獻新穎性 | X | （一句話理由） |
| 寫作清晰度 | X | （一句話理由） |
| 實驗嚴謹性 | X | （一句話理由） |
| 評估完整性 | X | （一句話理由） |
| 方法健全性 | X | （一句話理由） |
### 整體分數預測
- **Overall Score**: X / 10
- **Confidence**: X / 5
### 分數推理
（解釋為什麼給這個整體分數，各維度如何影響最終判斷）
### 與接受門檻的比較
（討論這篇論文相對於目標會議的接受門檻如何，是 clear accept、borderline 還是 clear reject）注意事項
- 各維度分數應與 Step 1 的優缺點一致
- 整體分數不是各維度的簡單平均——有些致命缺陷會直接拉低整體分數
- Confidence 要誠實——如果你不熟悉這個子領域，信心度應該較低
- 考慮會議的接受率（如 NeurIPS ~25%、ICML ~25%、workshop ~50%）
Step 3：要點精煉（繁體中文）
目標
將 Step 1 和 Step 2 的分析整理為精煉的結構化要點，作為 Step 4 正式審稿的草稿。
執行方式
- 合併與去重：將 Step 1 的優缺點合併，去除重複
- 排序：按重要性排序，最重要的放最前面
- 補充細節：為每個要點補充具體的論文引用與建議
- 分類：區分 major concerns 和 minor concerns
- 撰寫建議：為每個缺點提供具體的改進建議
輸出格式
## Step 3：要點精煉
### 核心優點（按重要性排序）
1. [Major S1] （精煉描述 + 論文引用）
2. [Major S2] ...
### 重大問題（Major Concerns）
1. [Major W1] （精煉描述 + 為什麼重要 + 建議改進方向）
2. [Major W2] ...
### 次要問題（Minor Concerns）
1. [Minor W1] （精煉描述 + 建議改進方向）
2. [Minor W2] ...
### 必問問題（Questions for Authors）
1. [Q1] （精煉問題 + 為什麼這個答案很重要）
2. [Q2] ...
### 一句話總結
（用一句話總結對這篇論文的評價）注意事項
- Major 和 Minor 的區分要明確——Major 是會影響接受與否的問題
- 每個缺點都應該附帶建議，體現建設性審稿精神
- 問題要有策略性——好的問題能幫助你在 rebuttal 後做出更好的判斷
- 建設性回饋的寫法請參考
references/constructive-feedback.md
Step 4：正式審稿（英文）
目標
基於前三步的繁中分析，產出符合會議格式的英文正式 review。
執行方式
- 使用
templates/review-form.md中的模板 - 將 Step 3 的要點翻譯並潤飾為學術英文
- 確保語氣專業、客觀、建設性
- 檢查是否遺漏了重要的優缺點
正式審稿結構
## Summary
（2-4 句話總結論文的主要貢獻與方法）
## Strengths
1. [S1] ...
2. [S2] ...
## Weaknesses
1. [W1] ...
2. [W2] ...
## Questions for Authors
1. [Q1] ...
2. [Q2] ...
## Suggestions for Improvement
1. ...
2. ...
## Minor Issues
- （格式、typo、文法等小問題）
## Rating
- Overall: X/10
- Confidence: X/5
## Justification
（簡短解釋你的評分理由）語氣指引
- 避免：「This paper is bad.」「The authors clearly don't understand...」
- 推薦：「The paper would benefit from...」「It is unclear how...」「A potential concern is...」
- 使用學術審稿的慣用語（參考
references/constructive-feedback.md） - 批評要對事不對人——評論論文，不評論作者
注意事項
- Summary 要準確反映論文內容，讓作者知道你確實讀了論文
- Strengths 要真誠——即使你要拒稿，也要承認論文的優點
- Weaknesses 要具體——指出具體的段落、公式、實驗
- Questions 要有策略性——能幫助你在 rebuttal 後做決定
- 退稿模式的參考請見
references/rejection-patterns.md
五大審查維度（詳細版）
以下為五大審查維度的摘要。完整說明請參考 references/review-dimensions.md。
1. 貢獻新穎性 (Novelty & Contribution)
- 這個想法之前有人做過嗎？
- 貢獻的量和質是否足以支撐一篇完整論文？
- 相對於 prior work，增量有多大？
- 是技術新穎、應用新穎，還是視角新穎？
2. 寫作清晰度 (Clarity & Writing)
- 非專家能否理解論文的主要貢獻？
- 動機是否清晰？為什麼這個問題重要？
- 符號和術語是否一致？
- 圖表是否清晰且有助理解？
3. 實驗嚴謹性 (Experimental Rigor)
- 實驗設計是否足以驗證 claims？
- 是否有適當的 baselines？
- 是否報告了統計顯著性或誤差範圍？
- 超參數選擇是否合理？是否進行了公平比較？
4. 評估完整性 (Evaluation Completeness)
- 資料集是否足夠多樣？
- 是否有 ablation study？
- 是否有分析（error analysis、case study）？
- 是否討論了局限性？
5. 方法健全性 (Soundness of Method)
- 數學推導是否正確？
- 假設是否合理且被明確陳述？
- 方法是否能如聲稱般運作？
- 是否有理論保證或直覺性解釋？
五大退稿模式
以下為五大退稿模式的摘要。完整說明與範例請參考 references/rejection-patterns.md。
Show full SKILL.md (204 more words)Show less
模式 1：貢獻不足 (Insufficient Contribution)
- 症狀：增量改進、trivial extension、已知結果的簡單組合
- 典型觸發語：「This is a straightforward extension of [X].」
模式 2：不清楚 (Lack of Clarity)
- 症狀：讀不懂、邏輯跳躍、符號混亂、缺少直覺
- 典型觸發語：「The paper is difficult to follow.」
模式 3：效果弱 (Weak Results)
- 症狀：改進不顯著、cherry-picked results、缺乏統計測試
- 典型觸發語：「The improvements are marginal and may not be statistically significant.」
模式 4：評估不全 (Incomplete Evaluation)
- 症狀：缺少重要 baselines、資料集太少、沒有 ablation
- 典型觸發語：「Key baselines such as [X] are missing.」
模式 5：方法有缺 (Flawed Methodology)
- 症狀：數學錯誤、不合理的假設、data leakage、不公平比較
- 典型觸發語：「There appears to be an error in the derivation of Eq. (X).」
評分體系速查
Overall Score (1-10)
| 分數 | 含義 | 建議 |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 頂級論文，可直接接受 | Strong Accept |
| 8-9 | 優秀論文，明顯高於門檻 | Accept |
| 6-7 | 好論文，略高於或在門檻附近 | Weak Accept / Borderline |
| 5 | 在門檻上，有明顯的優缺點 | Borderline |
| 3-4 | 低於門檻，有重大問題 | Weak Reject / Reject |
| 1-2 | 明顯不合格 | Strong Reject |
Confidence (1-5)
| 分數 | 含義 |
|---|---|
| 5 | 非常確信——我是這個子領域的專家 |
| 4 | 確信——我熟悉這個領域 |
| 3 | 中等——我了解主要概念但非專家 |
| 2 | 不太確信——部分內容超出我的專業 |
| 1 | 不確信——這不是我的領域 |
完整評分標準請參考 references/scoring-rubric.md。
參考資料與模板
參考資料
references/review-dimensions.md— 五大審查維度的完整說明references/scoring-rubric.md— 完整評分標準references/rejection-patterns.md— 五大退稿模式的詳細說明與範例references/constructive-feedback.md— 建設性回饋的寫法指南
模板
templates/review-form.md— 標準審稿表模板templates/meta-review-form.md— AC meta-review 模板
相關技能
- paper-writing skill — 論文寫作技能，可搭配使用進行修改循環（revision cycle）
使用方式
基本使用
請幫我審查這篇論文：[貼上論文內容或提供 PDF 路徑]依序執行四個步驟，最終產出英文正式審稿。
指定步驟
請只執行 Step 1（批判性審查）
請從 Step 3 開始（我已經有前兩步的分析）指定會議
請以 NeurIPS 2026 的標準審查這篇論文
請以 ACL 2026 的標準審查，特別注意 reproducibilityMeta-review
以下是三位 reviewer 的意見，請幫我撰寫 meta-review：
[貼上三份 review]使用 templates/meta-review-form.md 模板。
審稿倫理提醒
- 保密性：審稿內容不得洩漏給第三方
- 利益衝突：如果你認識作者或與論文有利益關係，應主動迴避
- 尊重：即使論文品質不佳，也應以尊重的態度撰寫 review
- 時效性：在截止日期前完成審稿是審稿者的責任
- 一致性：你的評分應與你的文字評論一致——不要給高分卻寫滿缺點
- 建設性：審稿的最終目的是幫助作者改進論文，而非炫耀自己的知識
常見問題
Q：如果我不確定某個缺點是否正確怎麼辦？
寫在 Questions for Authors 中，讓作者在 rebuttal 中回應。不確定的批評不應作為拒稿的主要理由。
Q：如何處理 borderline 的論文？
仔細衡量優缺點的相對權重。如果優點明確且重大，而缺點可以在 camera-ready 中修復，傾向接受。如果核心方法有問題，傾向拒稿。
Q：meta-review 和 individual review 有什麼不同？
Meta-review 需要綜合所有 reviewer 的意見，找出共識與分歧，並做出最終建議。AC 需要判斷哪些 reviewer 的意見更有價值，以及 rebuttal 是否有效回應了主要問題。
Q：如何與 paper-writing 技能搭配使用？
在完成審稿後，可以將 review 中的建議傳遞給 paper-writing skill，指導作者進行修改。這形成了一個「審稿 -> 修改 -> 再審」的循環。
© voidful, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
SKILL.md and 6 other files (references) in paper-review of voidful/academic-skills.
- SKILL.md
- references/constructive-feedback.md
- references/rejection-patterns.md
- references/review-dimensions.md
- references/scoring-rubric.md
- templates/meta-review-form.md
- templates/review-form.md
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 71e9c42
Compare with similar skills
Paper Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paper Review this skillvoidful/academic-skills | 134 | — | ~2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from voidful/academic-skills
All 8 skills in this repoAcademic Research
voidful/academic-skills
Complete academic research skill suite covering the full pipeline: paper reading (read/explain papers with storytelling), idea generation (brainstorm research directions), experiment design (plan…
Experiment Design
voidful/academic-skills
學術研究實驗設計技能——從研究假設到可重現實驗計畫的完整流程。當使用者需要規劃實驗、設計 ablation study、選擇 baseline、確定評估指標，或問「我應該跑哪些實驗」時，一定要使用此技能。觸發詞包括：實驗設計、experiment design、ablation、baseline、跑什麼實驗、evaluation metric、如何驗證方法。適用於機器學習、NLP、CV…
Idea Generation
voidful/academic-skills
學術研究的 Idea 產生技能——從發散到收斂，系統化地產出高品質研究構想。當使用者想腦力激盪研究方向、找新 research idea、或問「我接下來可以做什麼研究」時，一定要使用此技能。觸發詞包括：brainstorm、想 idea、研究方向、下一步做什麼、有什麼可以研究的、找 gap、research proposal。適用於任何階段的學術研究構想生成。
Paper Reading
voidful/academic-skills
太奶讀論文 — 一位百歲阿嬤用繁體中文、生活比喻和動漫梗，帶你讀懂學術論文。當使用者提供論文 PDF、arXiv 連結、或貼上論文文字，並想理解論文內容時，一定要使用此技能。觸發詞包括：讀論文、解釋論文、看不懂、幫我理解這篇、這篇在說什麼、paper reading、explain this paper。適用於任何學術論文的直觀導讀。
Paper Writing
voidful/academic-skills
頂級會議論文寫作技能——以嚴格 reviewer 視角指導從草稿到終稿的完整寫作流程。當使用者要寫論文、改善論文草稿、修改特定章節（introduction、method、experiments、conclusion）、潤色學術英文、回應 reviewer 意見，或問「這段怎麼寫」時，一定要使用此技能。觸發詞包括：寫論文、paper writing、improve my…
Proof Writer
voidful/academic-skills
數學證明撰寫技能 — 從主張提取到 LaTeX 排版的完整證明工作流。當使用者需要撰寫或驗證數學定理、引理、命題的形式證明，或需要推導公式、整理理論分析時，一定要使用此技能。觸發詞包括：數學證明、prove、theorem、lemma、proposition、推導、理論分析、寫 proof、LaTeX 數學、formal…
Related
Categories
Questions about Paper Review
What does Paper Review do?
學術論文審稿技能 — 以結構化四步驟流程完成深度論文審查，涵蓋批判性審查、分數預測、要點精煉與正式審稿產出。當使用者需要 review 一篇論文、模擬 reviewer 反應、評估論文能否被接收、或幫助判斷論文優缺點時，一定要使用此技能。觸發詞包括：review 這篇、幫我審稿、reviewer 會怎麼說、這篇能上嗎、paper review、給分數、找…. Paper Review is an agent skill from voidful/academic-skills.
When should I use Paper Review?
Paper Review fits situations like: tasks that involve Peer review.
How do I install Paper Review in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add voidful/academic-skills --skill paper-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (paper-review in voidful/academic-skills) into .claude/skills/paper-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Paper Review in Codex?
Run `npx skills add voidful/academic-skills --skill paper-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (paper-review in voidful/academic-skills) into .agents/skills/paper-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Paper Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add voidful/academic-skills --skill paper-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/paper-review, .gemini/skills/paper-review, .github/skills/paper-review and .opencode/skills/paper-review in your project.
What does Paper Review need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Paper Review is instructions for the agent only. Compatibility (from SKILL.md): Works with Claude Code, ChatGPT/Codex CLI, and Gemini CLI..
Does Paper Review access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Paper Review safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Paper Review use?
Paper Review is published under the MIT licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Paper Review use?
About 2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 10k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.
What are the alternatives to Paper Review?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Paper Review: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Paper Review?
voidful (a GitHub user) maintains it in voidful/academic-skills, which has 134 GitHub stars. The repository holds 8 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on April 4, 2026.
Source: voidful/academic-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.