A skill your agent uses when the conceptual or analytical framework is the bottleneck for a World Development (WD) manuscript — development theory that organizes the evidence, not necessarily a…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Worlddev Theory Model

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill worlddev-theory-model -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills worlddev-theory-model --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/World-Development-Skills/skills/worlddev-theory-model .claude/skills/worlddev-theory-model && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
worlddev-theory-model
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
667 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when the conceptual or analytical framework is the bottleneck for a World Development (WD) manuscript — development theory that organizes the evidence, not necessarily a…

  • Works in 5 steps: State the mechanism in one sentence… → Derive what we should observe if the… → Map each prediction to a specific piece… → …
  • Analytical framework is the bottleneck for a World Development (WD) manuscript — development theory that organizes the evidence
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, What "theory" means at WD, Choosing the right framework… and Making the framework…, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Worlddev Theory Model is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when the conceptual or analytical framework is the bottleneck for a World Development (WD) manuscript — development theory that organizes the evidence, not necessarily a formal model. Makes the framework do real analytical work; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Citation management. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Analytical framework is the bottleneck for a World Development (WD) manuscript — development theory that organizes the evidence
  • Not necessarily a formal model

Example prompts

  • “/worlddev-theory-model”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. State the mechanism in one sentence before any formalism: "X improves Y because it shifts the bargaining power of Z."
  2. Derive what we should observe if the mechanism holds — and crucially what we should not observe (a discriminating prediction).
  3. Map each prediction to a specific piece of evidence later in the paper (a coefficient, a case contrast, an interview pattern).
  4. State scope conditions — where the mechanism should and should not operate. WD readers care intensely about context-dependence; a…
  5. Return to the framework in the discussion — show what the evidence taught you about the theory, not just about the world.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Worlddev Theory Model loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 74 tokens; SKILL.md has 667 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~74
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 667 words, ~1,390 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/worlddev-theory-model/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
worlddev-theory-model
description
Use when the conceptual or analytical framework is the bottleneck for a World Development (WD) manuscript — development theory that organizes the evidence, not necessarily a formal model. Makes the framework do real analytical work; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Conceptual & Analytical Framework (worlddev-theory-model)

When to trigger

  • The paper has a "theory" or "conceptual framework" section that is decorative — cited and then never used
  • Reviewers say the empirics are fine but the paper "doesn't add up to an argument"
  • A formal model is included by reflex, when a clear conceptual framework would serve WD's readers better
  • The mechanism connecting cause and outcome is asserted, not theorized
  • A qualitative paper's themes are described but not organized by any analytical lens

What "theory" means at WD

WD is not a journal that demands a formal model. For most WD papers, "theory" means a conceptual or analytical framework drawn from development scholarship — a structured account of the mechanism that tells the reader what to look for, why the variables matter, and how the pieces connect. A formal model is welcome when it earns its place (it disciplines an argument that prose cannot), but a model bolted on for prestige is a liability: WD's multidisciplinary referees punish "theory theater" — equations that do no work the empirics depend on.

The test of a good WD framework is load-bearing: remove it and the paper's interpretation collapses. It should generate the hypotheses (quant) or sensitizing concepts (qual), define the scope conditions, and frame what the findings mean for development.

Choosing the right framework vehicle

VehicleUse whenWD caution
Formal modelA precise mechanism with non-obvious comparative statics the data testMust connect to estimands; no model for ornament
Conceptual framework (boxes-and-arrows / theory-of-change)A multi-step development mechanism (e.g. aid → institutions → service delivery)Each arrow must be defended and ideally evidenced
Analytical lens (capabilities, political settlements, institutional bricolage, livelihoods, commons governance)The contribution reinterprets evidence through a development-theory traditionApply the lens; do not just invoke its name
Grounded / inductiveQualitative work building concepts from dataMake the build explicit; show how data generated the categories

Pick one primary vehicle. Stacking a formal model, a theory-of-change diagram, and three analytical lenses signals that none is doing the work.

Making the framework load-bearing — a sequence

  1. State the mechanism in one sentence before any formalism: "X improves Y because it shifts the bargaining power of Z."
  2. Derive what we should observe if the mechanism holds — and crucially what we should not observe (a discriminating prediction).
  3. Map each prediction to a specific piece of evidence later in the paper (a coefficient, a case contrast, an interview pattern).
  4. State scope conditions — where the mechanism should and should not operate. WD readers care intensely about context-dependence; a framework that claims universality is suspect.
  5. Return to the framework in the discussion — show what the evidence taught you about the theory, not just about the world.
Show full SKILL.md (221 more words)Show less

A worked example (illustrative)

A paper argues microcredit raises women's autonomy. A decorative version cites empowerment theory and runs regressions. A load-bearing WD version specifies the mechanism (credit relaxes a liquidity constraint that previously forced dependence on a spouse), derives a discriminating prediction (effects concentrate where women lacked independent income, not everywhere), maps it to a heterogeneity test, and states the scope condition (no effect where social norms bar women from controlling the loan). Now the theory predicts the pattern of effects, not merely their existence.

Checklist

  • One primary framework vehicle chosen, fit to the contribution
  • The mechanism is stated in plain language before any formalism
  • The framework generates a discriminating prediction (or sensitizing concepts) used in the empirics
  • Each prediction maps to a specific exhibit, case, or pattern
  • Scope conditions / context-dependence are explicit
  • The discussion revisits the framework in light of the evidence
  • No formal model included purely for prestige; no lens merely name-checked

Anti-patterns

  • "Theory theater": equations or a diagram that the empirical strategy never uses
  • Citing a development-theory tradition (capabilities, political settlements) and then ignoring it in analysis
  • Asserting the mechanism instead of theorizing it, leaving the reader to infer the logic
  • Claiming a universal mechanism with no scope conditions — WD distrusts context-free claims
  • A qualitative paper whose themes float free of any analytical organizing principle

Output format

text
【Journal】World Development (WD)
【Skill】worlddev-theory-model
【Vehicle】formal model / conceptual framework / analytical lens / grounded
【Mechanism】one plain-language sentence
【Discriminating prediction】what we should and should NOT observe
【Prediction→evidence map】which exhibit/case tests each
【Scope conditions】where the mechanism does / does not operate
【Source status】verified URL / 待核实 / not asserted
【Next skill】worlddev-robustness

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in World-Development-Skills/skills/worlddev-theory-model of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Worlddev Theory Model next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Worlddev Theory Model compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Worlddev Theory Model this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Content Research Writerweapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss1.9k25 repos~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
NetworkxzLanqing/codex-claude-academic-skills4.6k16 repos~3.2kAutomated safety check: PassBSD-3-Clause
Citation Verification GuideGalaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar5.7k3 repos~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Systematic Review ScreenerImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~8.4kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Literature Reviewneflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent12621 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Content Research Writer

    weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss

    Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section.

    1.9k GitHub starsUsed in 25 repos~3.5k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Networkx

    zLanqing/codex-claude-academic-skills

    Comprehensive toolkit for creating, analyzing, and visualizing complex networks and graphs in Python.

    4.6k GitHub starsUsed in 16 repos~3.2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Citation Verification Guide

    Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar

    Reference guidance for checking every citation in academic writing against canonical sources such as DOI, arXiv, CrossRef and Semantic Scholar, to catch fake or wrong references.

    5.7k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~1.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Systematic Review Screener

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Screens records for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews against fixed eligibility rules, using two blinded AI reviewers and a third adjudicator, with traceable PRISMA counts.

    51k GitHub stars~8.4k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Literature Review

    neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent

    Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).

    126 GitHub starsUsed in 21 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Citation Management

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Finds papers in OpenAlex, PubMed and Google Scholar, turns DOIs, PMIDs and arXiv IDs into clean BibTeX, and validates citations for a manuscript or thesis.

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~3.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Worlddev Theory Model

What does Worlddev Theory Model do?

A skill your agent uses when the conceptual or analytical framework is the bottleneck for a World Development (WD) manuscript — development theory that organizes the evidence, not necessarily a…. Worlddev Theory Model is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when the conceptual or analytical framework is the bottleneck for a World Development (WD) manuscript — development theory that organizes the evidence, not necessarily a formal model.

When should I use Worlddev Theory Model?

Worlddev Theory Model fits situations like: analytical framework is the bottleneck for a World Development (WD) manuscript — development theory that organizes the evidence; not necessarily a formal model.

How do I install Worlddev Theory Model in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill worlddev-theory-model -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (World-Development-Skills/skills/worlddev-theory-model in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/worlddev-theory-model in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Worlddev Theory Model in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill worlddev-theory-model -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (World-Development-Skills/skills/worlddev-theory-model in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/worlddev-theory-model in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Worlddev Theory Model in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill worlddev-theory-model -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/worlddev-theory-model, .gemini/skills/worlddev-theory-model, .github/skills/worlddev-theory-model and .opencode/skills/worlddev-theory-model in your project.

What does Worlddev Theory Model need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Worlddev Theory Model is instructions for the agent only.

Does Worlddev Theory Model access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Worlddev Theory Model safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Worlddev Theory Model use?

Worlddev Theory Model is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Worlddev Theory Model use?

About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Worlddev Theory Model?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Worlddev Theory Model: Content Research Writer (weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss, 1.9k stars), Networkx (zLanqing/codex-claude-academic-skills, 4.6k stars), Citation Verification Guide (Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar, 5.7k stars) and Systematic Review Screener (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Worlddev Theory Model?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,219 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.