Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Install Aaag Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aaag-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-rebuttal .claude/skills/aaag-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "aaag-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-rebuttal into .claude/skills/aaag-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aaag-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aaag-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-rebuttal .agents/skills/aaag-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "aaag-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-rebuttal into .agents/skills/aaag-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aaag-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aaag-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-rebuttal .cursor/skills/aaag-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "aaag-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/aaag-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aaag-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aaag-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-rebuttal .gemini/skills/aaag-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "aaag-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/aaag-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aaag-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aaag-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-rebuttal .github/skills/aaag-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "aaag-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-rebuttal into .github/skills/aaag-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aaag-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aaag-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-rebuttal .opencode/skills/aaag-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "aaag-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/aaag-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aaag-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
aaag-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.4k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 557 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
- Works in 4 steps: Open with a synthesis. A short note to… → Point-by-point, quote each comment.… → Show, don't assert. For each accepted… → …
- Tasks that involve Peer review
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Build the response, Annals-specific moves and When referees conflict, plus 6 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Aaag Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and 1-3 referees across the journal's four areas. Structures the response and revisions; it does not fabricate results.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Tasks that involve Peer review
Example prompts
- “/aaag-rebuttal”
Workflow steps
4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Open with a synthesis. A short note to the editor summarizing the main changes and how the
- Point-by-point, quote each comment. Reproduce each referee/editor comment verbatim, then respond
- Show, don't assert. For each accepted point, quote the revised text and give the
- Disagree carefully. Where you decline, give a reasoned, evidence-based rationale and, where
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Aaag Rebuttal loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 77 tokens; SKILL.md has 557 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 557 words, ~1,424 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/aaag-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- aaag-rebuttal
- description
- Use when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and 1-3 referees across the journal's four areas. Structures the response and revisions; it does not fabricate results.
Revision & Rebuttal (aaag-rebuttal)
A major revision at the Annals is a scoped invitation, not a rejection. The response letter is judged alongside the manuscript by the subject editor who handled it and the 1-3 referees (one of whom is the editor or designate). Win by addressing every point, respectfully and concretely, and by strengthening the geographic argument, not just patching mechanics.
When to trigger
- A decision letter arrived: minor revision, major revision (R&R), or reject-with-encouragement
- Multiple referees disagree, or a referee challenges the area framing, spatial methods, or cartography
- You need to decide what to concede, what to push back on, and how to show the changes
Build the response
- Open with a synthesis. A short note to the editor summarizing the main changes and how the revision strengthens the geographic contribution and addresses the area's concerns.
- Point-by-point, quote each comment. Reproduce each referee/editor comment verbatim, then respond directly beneath it. Number them (R1.1, R1.2 …) for easy cross-reference.
- Show, don't assert. For each accepted point, quote the revised text and give the manuscript location (page/section); for new analyses, name the exhibit.
- Disagree carefully. Where you decline, give a reasoned, evidence-based rationale and, where possible, a partial accommodation — never dismiss a referee.
Annals-specific moves
- Reconcile cross-area referees. Reviewers may come from different traditions (e.g., a quantitative and a qualitative reviewer). Address each on its own terms rather than forcing one standard; show the revision satisfies both where they pull in different directions.
- Strengthen the geography, not only the stats. If a referee called the paper descriptive, the fix
is a sharper geographic concept (
aaag-theory-building), not just more robustness tables. - Cartography & spatial-method fixes are first-order. Re-projecting maps, fixing classification, adding spatial-CV or MAUP sensitivity, or an accuracy/error panel are concrete wins editors notice.
- Honor the cap on the way back. Revisions add words; re-check the 11,000-word inclusive cap and trim or move detail to supplementary material.
Show full SKILL.md (239 more words)Show less
When referees conflict
- Name the conflict for the editor and propose a resolution; do not silently satisfy one and ignore the other.
- If a requested change would harm the paper, explain the trade-off and let the editor adjudicate.
Response micro-template (illustrative)
R2.3 (verbatim): "The OLS results ignore spatial autocorrelation; I am not convinced the relationships
are real rather than artifacts of clustering."
Response: We agree this was a gap. We now test residual spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I = 0.31,
p<0.01 in the OLS) and re-estimate with a spatial error model; the focal relationship persists and
weakens modestly (new Table 3, p. 14). We also add a MAUP sensitivity panel across three areal units
(Appendix B) showing the result is not a unit artifact. Revised text: "…accounting for residual
spatial dependence, the association remains…" (p. 14, ¶2).This concedes the point, shows the new analysis and its location, and quotes the revised sentence — the move editors reward over "we have addressed this."
Decision triage (how hard to fight)
| Referee ask | Posture |
|---|---|
| Valid spatial-method / validation gap | Concede and fix; it is first-order at this venue |
| "Make it quantitative" on a qualitative paper | Push back on its own terms; do not abandon the method |
| Cross-area standard clash | Reconcile; name the clash for the editor |
| Out-of-scope new study | Decline with rationale; offer a scoped alternative |
Checklist
- Every comment quoted and answered (numbered, point-by-point)
- Revised text quoted with manuscript locations; new exhibits named
- Cross-area referees each addressed on their own methodological terms
- Geographic argument strengthened where "descriptive" was the charge
- Spatial-method / cartography fixes made and described
- Re-checked against the inclusive word cap and house style
Anti-patterns
- A response that asserts "we have addressed this" without showing the change
- Dismissing or arguing combatively with a referee
- Satisfying a quantitative referee by abandoning the qualitative contribution (or vice versa)
- Adding requested analyses but blowing past the word cap
- Patching mechanics while leaving the "atheoretical" critique unanswered
Output format
【Decision】minor / major (R&R) / reject-with-encouragement
【Editor synthesis】2-3 lines on the main changes
【Point-by-point】each comment quoted + response + revised-text location
【Cross-area reconciliation】how divergent referees were each satisfied
【Geography strengthened】concept/spatial-method/cartography improvements
【Cap re-check】within inclusive limit after revisions? [Y/N]
【Next】resubmit via ScholarOne (aaag-submission for final preflight)Supplementary resources
../../resources/official-source-map.md— review model, editors, and decision categories../../resources/README.md— shared reviewer-objection-checklist background
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Aaag Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaag Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Aaag Tables Figures
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when building maps, figures, and tables for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript.
Related
Categories
Questions about Aaag Rebuttal
What does Aaag Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…. Aaag Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and 1-3 referees across the journal's four areas.
When should I use Aaag Rebuttal?
Aaag Rebuttal fits situations like: tasks that involve Peer review.
How do I install Aaag Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/aaag-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Aaag Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/aaag-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Aaag Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/aaag-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/aaag-rebuttal, .github/skills/aaag-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/aaag-rebuttal in your project.
What does Aaag Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Aaag Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Aaag Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Aaag Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Aaag Rebuttal use?
Aaag Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Aaag Rebuttal use?
About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Aaag Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Aaag Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Aaag Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.