Video Understand
calesthio/OpenMontage
Understand video content locally using ffmpeg frame extraction and Whisper transcription.
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Aaag Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aaag-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-review-process .claude/skills/aaag-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "aaag-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-review-process into .claude/skills/aaag-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aaag-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aaag-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-review-process .agents/skills/aaag-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "aaag-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-review-process into .agents/skills/aaag-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aaag-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aaag-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-review-process .cursor/skills/aaag-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "aaag-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-review-process into .cursor/skills/aaag-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aaag-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aaag-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-review-process .gemini/skills/aaag-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "aaag-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-review-process into .gemini/skills/aaag-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aaag-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aaag-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-review-process .github/skills/aaag-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "aaag-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-review-process into .github/skills/aaag-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aaag-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aaag-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-review-process .opencode/skills/aaag-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "aaag-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-review-process into .opencode/skills/aaag-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aaag-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
aaag-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.3k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 532 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
- 1-3 referees (one being the editor
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How the Annals reviews (verify…, What gets a paper… and Area-aware reviewer expectations, plus 6 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Decision categories
What it does
Aaag Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by area, 1-3 referees (one being the editor or designate), decision categories, and what desk-rejects a paper. Sets expectations; it does not write the paper or the response letter.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- 1-3 referees (one being the editor
- Decision categories
- What desk-rejects a paper
Example prompts
- “/aaag-review-process”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Aaag Review Process loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 93 tokens; SKILL.md has 532 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 532 words, ~1,349 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/aaag-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- aaag-review-process
- description
- Use when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by area, 1-3 referees (one being the editor or designate), decision categories, and what desk-rejects a paper. Sets expectations; it does not write the paper or the response letter.
Review Process (aaag-review-process)
Knowing how the Annals judges a paper lets you pre-empt the objections that sink it. Submissions are routed to a subject editor by area, reviewed double-anonymously, and held to the broad four-area flagship's bar. Confirm volatile specifics on the official pages (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
When to trigger
- Before submission, to stress-test against likely reviewer and editor objections
- Choosing the area so the right subject editor and reviewers handle the paper
- Interpreting a decision letter before drafting a response (
aaag-rebuttal)
How the Annals reviews (verify current wording)
- Editorial structure. A subject editor leads each area — Geographic Methods; Human Geography; Nature and Society; Physical Geography, Earth & Environmental Sciences — plus a General Geography / cross-disciplinary editor and a Cartography Editor. Editors serve four-year terms (current editors are volatile — 检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
- Review model. Double-anonymous peer review for Articles, Special Issues, Forums, and Commentaries, by one to three referees, one of whom is the editor or a designate. Commentary Responses undergo single-anonymous review.
- Decision categories. Accept / minor revision / major revision (revise-and-resubmit) / reject — exact labels vary; treat a major revision as a genuine, scoped invitation.
What gets a paper desk-rejected or rejected early
| Trigger | Why it fails | Pre-empt with |
|---|---|---|
| Not really geography | space/place/scale is decorative | aaag-topic-selection (delete-test) |
| Wrong area / wrong venue | specialty-venue increment to the flagship | aaag-topic-selection, aaag-literature-positioning |
| Over the word cap / format off | exceeds 11,000 inclusive; non-Chicago | aaag-writing-style, aaag-submission |
| Spatial method not defended | autocorrelation/MAUP/validation ignored | aaag-research-design, aaag-data-analysis |
| Atheoretical | descriptive mapping, no concept | aaag-theory-building |
| Cartography below standard | artifactual maps, no projection/legend | aaag-tables-figures |
Area-aware reviewer expectations
- Methods reviewers probe inference, generality beyond one dataset, and spatial assumptions.
- Human reviewers probe theoretical engagement, positionality, and interpretive rigor.
- Nature-Society reviewers check that both sides are theorized and integrated.
- Physical / RS reviewers check measurement validity, validation samples, and uncertainty.
Show full SKILL.md (242 more words)Show less
Reading a decision letter
| Decision | What it means | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| Accept (rare on first pass) | publishable | final-submission guidelines; production |
| Minor revision | small, scoped changes | address fully and quickly (aaag-rebuttal) |
| Major revision (R&R) | promising, but real gaps | treat as a genuine invitation; rebuild where asked |
| Reject (with encouragement) | not now, but resubmittable | if invited, address substance before any resubmission |
| Desk reject | scope/fit/format failure | re-evaluate venue and the geography fit |
Editors weigh strong, geographically-grounded support across referees plus their own judgment; a single enthusiastic review rarely carries a paper, and a fixable methods gap need not sink one.
Self-screen before you submit (pre-empt the desk)
- Could a generalist geographer state the contribution and the area in one sentence?
- Is every map and spatial method defensible to an area specialist and a methods reviewer?
- Are anonymity and the inclusive word cap genuinely satisfied?
Checklist
- Area declared so the right subject editor receives it
- Manuscript double-anonymized (text, self-refs, file metadata)
- Likely area-specific objections pre-empted in the design and exhibits
- Word cap and Chicago style satisfied before submission
- Maps meet cartographic standard; spatial methods defended
Anti-patterns
- Letting the system pick the area for you (lands with the wrong editor/reviewers)
- Submitting work whose geography is decorative and hoping reviewers overlook it
- Treating a major revision as a rejection rather than a scoped path to acceptance
- Ignoring the Cartography Editor's standard for maps
Output format
【Area / editor】Methods / Human / Nature-Society / Physical / General
【Review model】double-anonymous, 1-3 referees (one editor/designate)
【Top 3 likely objections】by area, each with its pre-emption
【Desk-reject risk】geography decorative? cap/format? [Y/N]
【Next】aaag-submission (pre-submit) or aaag-rebuttal (post-decision)Supplementary resources
../../resources/official-source-map.md— editorial structure, review model, decision categories../../resources/README.md— shared reviewer-objection-checklist background
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Aaag Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaag Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Video Understandcalesthio/OpenMontage | 66k | — | ~841 | Automated safety check: Pass | AGPL-3.0 | |
| Understand ExplainEgonex-AI/Understand-Anything | 86k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Understanding by Design PlannerTHU-MAIC/OpenMAIC | 40k | — | ~548 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Understand Diff AnalysisEgonex-AI/Understand-Anything | 86k | — | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Understand Issuemastra-ai/mastra | 29k | — | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence |
Similar skills
Understand Explain
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything
Gives an in-depth explanation of one file, function or module by reading the project's knowledge graph and checking that the graph is still fresh.
Understanding by Design Planner
THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC
Plans an OpenMAIC lesson or course series by backward design: enduring understandings and essential questions first, then performance evidence, then learning activities.
Understand Diff Analysis
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything
Reads your git changes or a pull request against a prebuilt knowledge graph of the project to explain what changed, which components are affected and what is risky.
Understand Issue
mastra-ai/mastra
Investigate a GitHub issue or reported bug the way a seasoned maintainer would — form an independent model before reading the thread's theories, trace the mechanism and history, verify the…
Understand PR
mastra-ai/mastra
Review a PR the way a seasoned maintainer would — build an independent model before seeing the diff, investigate the implementation and history, verify material claims, and return a concise briefing.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Aaag Tables Figures
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when building maps, figures, and tables for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript.
Questions about Aaag Review Process
What does Aaag Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…. Aaag Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by area, 1-3 referees (one being the editor or designate), decision categories, and what desk-rejects a paper.
When should I use Aaag Review Process?
Aaag Review Process fits situations like: 1-3 referees (one being the editor; decision categories; what desk-rejects a paper.
How do I install Aaag Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/aaag-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Aaag Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Annals-of-the-American-Association-of-Geographers-Skills/skills/aaag-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/aaag-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Aaag Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aaag-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/aaag-review-process, .gemini/skills/aaag-review-process, .github/skills/aaag-review-process and .opencode/skills/aaag-review-process in your project.
What does Aaag Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Aaag Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Aaag Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Aaag Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Aaag Review Process use?
Aaag Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Aaag Review Process use?
About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Aaag Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Aaag Review Process: Video Understand (calesthio/OpenMontage, 66k stars), Understand Explain (Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything, 86k stars), Understanding by Design Planner (THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC, 40k stars) and Understand Diff Analysis (Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything, 86k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Aaag Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.