Agent skill

Worlddev Referee Strategy

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when anticipating the objections a World Development (WD) manuscript will draw under double-anonymized, multidisciplinary review.

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Worlddev Referee Strategy

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill worlddev-referee-strategy -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills worlddev-referee-strategy --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/World-Development-Skills/skills/worlddev-referee-strategy .claude/skills/worlddev-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
worlddev-referee-strategy
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
583 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when anticipating the objections a World Development (WD) manuscript will draw under double-anonymized, multidisciplinary review.

  • Anticipating the objections a World Development (WD) manuscript will draw under double-anonymized
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, The WD review reality, War-gaming the two referee… and Predictable WD objections and…, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Multidisciplinary review

What it does

Worlddev Referee Strategy is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when anticipating the objections a World Development (WD) manuscript will draw under double-anonymized, multidisciplinary review. Pre-empts referee pushback before submission; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review and Citation management. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Anticipating the objections a World Development (WD) manuscript will draw under double-anonymized
  • Multidisciplinary review

Example prompts

  • “/worlddev-referee-strategy”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Worlddev Referee Strategy loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 62 tokens; SKILL.md has 583 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~62
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 583 words, ~1,291 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/worlddev-referee-strategy/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
worlddev-referee-strategy
description
Use when anticipating the objections a World Development (WD) manuscript will draw under double-anonymized, multidisciplinary review. Pre-empts referee pushback before submission; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Referee Strategy (worlddev-referee-strategy)

When to trigger

  • Before submitting, to war-game the reports the paper will draw
  • The paper sits between disciplines and could face one economist and one non-economist referee with incompatible standards
  • A previous WD or sibling-journal rejection cited objections that were never addressed
  • The development relevance is implicit and a referee could read the paper as "just an applied estimate"
  • You need to decide what to fix now vs. what to defend in the response letter

The WD review reality

WD review is double-anonymized: at least two independent referees, who cannot see who you are (and you cannot see them). Because WD is multidisciplinary, the referee pool is heterogeneous in method and standard — a single paper may be read by an applied economist who wants tighter identification and a development sociologist who wants richer context and reflexivity. The strategic implication: a WD paper must satisfy more than one evidentiary culture at once. A paper that is bulletproof to one referee community but illegible or naive to the other is the classic WD split-decision that stalls.

Anonymize hard, too — WD's double-blind model means self-citation patterns, "in our previous work," named local institutions, or a give-away acknowledgments line can unmask you and prejudice review.

War-gaming the two referee archetypes

Referee lensWhat they will attackPre-empt by
The methodologist (often an economist)identification, clustering, measurement, robustness, over-claimingTight design diagnostics; threat-organized robustness; claims matched to warrant
The contextualist (political scientist / sociologist / area expert)thin context, no mechanism, no reflexivity, decontextualized numbers, weak external relevanceGrounded institutional detail; a load-bearing framework; scope conditions; named place

The best WD papers anticipate both columns. Map each anticipated objection to a place in the paper that already answers it, and note where you will defend rather than concede.

Predictable WD objections and the fix

  • "Interesting, but what's the development contribution?" → Foreground stakes and policy/practice implication; this is the most common WD desk-or-referee killer.
  • "This is an applied paper that could be set anywhere." → Show what the development context specifically teaches; argue external relevance.
  • "OLS with controls is presented as causal." → Strengthen the design or downgrade the claim (see worlddev-identification).
  • "The qualitative evidence is cherry-picked." → Add negative cases and a systematic display.
  • "The framework is decorative." → Make it load-bearing or cut it.
  • "Generalizing from one site." → State scope conditions; do not claim more than the case supports.
  • "Numbers with no human meaning." → Translate magnitudes into development-relevant units.
Show full SKILL.md (181 more words)Show less

Suggesting reviewers (where the portal allows)

If Editorial Manager invites suggested/opposed reviewers, propose scholars who span the disciplines the paper bridges — not only co-authors' allies — to ensure the contextualist side is read by someone equipped to value it. Justify briefly. Oppose only with a concrete conflict, sparingly.

Checklist

  • Each likely objection from BOTH the methodologist and contextualist columns is mapped to where the paper answers it
  • The development contribution is explicit enough to survive the "so what?" referee
  • External relevance / scope conditions stated for single-site or single-case work
  • Manuscript fully anonymized (self-citation, prior-work phrasing, acknowledgments, identifying institutions)
  • Qualitative evidence pre-empts the "cherry-picked" charge with negative cases
  • Concede-vs-defend decided for each major anticipated objection
  • Suggested reviewers (if used) span the relevant disciplines

Anti-patterns

  • Optimizing only for the economist referee and ignoring the contextualist who will also be assigned
  • Leaving the development "so what" implicit and hoping the referee infers it
  • Self-citation or "our earlier study" that unmasks the authors under double-anonymization
  • Suggesting only friendly, same-method reviewers
  • Planning to defend every objection in rebuttal instead of fixing the cheap ones now

Output format

text
【Journal】World Development (WD)
【Skill】worlddev-referee-strategy
【Verdict】submission-ready / pre-empt first
【Methodologist objections】[objection → where answered / fix]
【Contextualist objections】[objection → where answered / fix]
【Development "so what"】explicit? [Y/N]
【Anonymization】clean for double-blind? [Y/N]
【Concede vs defend】split for major objections
【Source status】verified URL / 待核实 / not asserted
【Next skill】worlddev-submission

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in World-Development-Skills/skills/worlddev-referee-strategy of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Worlddev Referee Strategy next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Worlddev Referee Strategy compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Worlddev Referee Strategy this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~16kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer2.4k2 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Academic Research Suite for CodexImbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex12k—~12kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Social Science Paper Writingfakerqwq/social-science-paper-writing-skill375—~7kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Review Papermaxwell2732/paper-replicate-agent-demo1373 repos~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassNone

Similar skills

  • Academic Paper Writing Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.

    51k GitHub stars~16k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Peer Review

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Academic Research Suite for Codex

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex

    A router skill that sends academic work such as literature reviews, drafting, citation checks, peer review and revision to the right workflow in the ARS suite.

    12k GitHub stars~12k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Social Science Paper Writing

    fakerqwq/social-science-paper-writing-skill

    Helps draft, diagnose, review and revise social science papers, from topic and research question to literature review, citation risks and pre-submission checks.

    375 GitHub stars~7k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Review Paper

    maxwell2732/paper-replicate-agent-demo

    Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, econometric specification, citation completeness, and potential referee objections

    137 GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~1.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • 01 Paper Review

    agentscope-ai/OpenJudge

    Review academic papers for correctness, quality, and novelty using OpenJudge's multi-stage pipeline.

    868 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.4k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Worlddev Referee Strategy

What does Worlddev Referee Strategy do?

A skill your agent uses when anticipating the objections a World Development (WD) manuscript will draw under double-anonymized, multidisciplinary review. Worlddev Referee Strategy is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when anticipating the objections a World Development (WD) manuscript will draw under double-anonymized, multidisciplinary review.

When should I use Worlddev Referee Strategy?

Worlddev Referee Strategy fits situations like: anticipating the objections a World Development (WD) manuscript will draw under double-anonymized; multidisciplinary review.

How do I install Worlddev Referee Strategy in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill worlddev-referee-strategy -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (World-Development-Skills/skills/worlddev-referee-strategy in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/worlddev-referee-strategy in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Worlddev Referee Strategy in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill worlddev-referee-strategy -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (World-Development-Skills/skills/worlddev-referee-strategy in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/worlddev-referee-strategy in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Worlddev Referee Strategy in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill worlddev-referee-strategy -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/worlddev-referee-strategy, .gemini/skills/worlddev-referee-strategy, .github/skills/worlddev-referee-strategy and .opencode/skills/worlddev-referee-strategy in your project.

What does Worlddev Referee Strategy need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Worlddev Referee Strategy is instructions for the agent only.

Does Worlddev Referee Strategy access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Worlddev Referee Strategy safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Worlddev Referee Strategy use?

Worlddev Referee Strategy is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Worlddev Referee Strategy use?

About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Worlddev Referee Strategy?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Worlddev Referee Strategy: Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars), Peer Review (K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer, 2.4k stars), Academic Research Suite for Codex (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex, 12k stars) and Social Science Paper Writing (fakerqwq/social-science-paper-writing-skill, 375 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Worlddev Referee Strategy?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,219 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.