A skill your agent uses when responding to a World Development (WD) decision letter — major/minor revision or reject-and-resubmit — under double-anonymized, multidisciplinary review.

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Worlddev Rebuttal

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill worlddev-rebuttal -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills worlddev-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/World-Development-Skills/skills/worlddev-rebuttal .claude/skills/worlddev-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
worlddev-rebuttal
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
636 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when responding to a World Development (WD) decision letter — major/minor revision or reject-and-resubmit — under double-anonymized, multidisciplinary review.

  • Works in 5 steps: Open with gratitude and a one-paragraph… → Reproduce every comment verbatim, then… → For each comment, state the action:… → …
  • Responding to a World Development (WD) decision letter — major/minor revision
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Reading a WD decision letter, Building the response letter and Triage: concede, strengthen,…, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Worlddev Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when responding to a World Development (WD) decision letter — major/minor revision or reject-and-resubmit — under double-anonymized, multidisciplinary review. Builds the response-letter strategy; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review and Citation management. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Responding to a World Development (WD) decision letter — major/minor revision
  • Reject-and-resubmit — under double-anonymized
  • Multidisciplinary review

Example prompts

  • “/worlddev-rebuttal”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Open with gratitude and a one-paragraph summary of the major changes — let the editor see the shape before the detail.
  2. Reproduce every comment verbatim, then respond beneath each, in the referees' order. Number them (R1.1, R1.2, …) so nothing is missed.
  3. For each comment, state the action: changed (with location and a quoted snippet of the new text), or respectfully declined (with reasoned…
  4. Show, don't assert. "We have added a Callaway–Sant'Anna estimate (Table 5, p. 18) confirming the result" beats "we addressed this."
  5. Handle the referee split openly: state the tension, explain the synthesis, and tell the editor why it serves the paper — e.g., "R1 sought…

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Worlddev Rebuttal loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 65 tokens; SKILL.md has 636 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~65
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 636 words, ~1,314 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/worlddev-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
worlddev-rebuttal
description
Use when responding to a World Development (WD) decision letter — major/minor revision or reject-and-resubmit — under double-anonymized, multidisciplinary review. Builds the response-letter strategy; it does not invent evidence or citations.

Rebuttal Strategy (worlddev-rebuttal)

When to trigger

  • A WD decision letter arrived: major revision, minor revision, or reject-and-resubmit
  • Two referees pull in opposite directions (the methodologist vs. the contextualist split)
  • A referee misread the paper and the instinct is to argue rather than to clarify
  • The required changes are large and you must triage what to do vs. what to defend
  • You are deciding whether to resubmit to WD or redirect to a sibling

Reading a WD decision letter

WD revisions are shaped by double-anonymized, multidisciplinary review, so two patterns recur. First, the editor's letter is the binding contract — referee reports advise, the editor decides; weight the editor's framing above any single referee. Second, because referees come from different evidentiary cultures, you will often face conflicting demands: one wants tighter identification, the other wants thicker context or reflexivity. You cannot satisfy both by capitulating to each; you must find the synthesis the editor will accept, and say so explicitly. Treat a reject-and-resubmit as a genuine second chance — WD uses it as a substantive invitation, not a soft no, but the bar is high and the cover letter must show real movement.

Building the response letter

  1. Open with gratitude and a one-paragraph summary of the major changes — let the editor see the shape before the detail.
  2. Reproduce every comment verbatim, then respond beneath each, in the referees' order. Number them (R1.1, R1.2, …) so nothing is missed.
  3. For each comment, state the action: changed (with location and a quoted snippet of the new text), or respectfully declined (with reasoned evidence). Never silently ignore a point.
  4. Show, don't assert. "We have added a Callaway–Sant'Anna estimate (Table 5, p. 18) confirming the result" beats "we addressed this."
  5. Handle the referee split openly: state the tension, explain the synthesis, and tell the editor why it serves the paper — e.g., "R1 sought a stronger design and R2 richer context; we strengthened the design (Sec. 4) and added the institutional account R2 requested (Sec. 5), which together make the mechanism more credible."
Show full SKILL.md (297 more words)Show less

Triage: concede, strengthen, or defend

SituationMove
Cheap fix, improves the paperConcede and do it — bank goodwill
Costly but rightStrengthen; show the new evidence
Referee misread the paperClarify (it is your exposition that failed); revise the text so the next reader can't misread, then note it
Referee wrong on substanceDefend with evidence and citation, courteously, sparingly — pick these battles
Demand would change the paper into a different (e.g. JDE-style) paperDefend the WD framing; explain why the development contribution is the point

Distinctive WD rebuttal traps

  • Conceding so much to the methodologist that the development relevance erodes — protect the contribution that made it a WD paper.
  • Dismissing the contextualist's reflexivity/ethics points as "not rigorous" — WD takes them seriously.
  • Arguing instead of clarifying when a referee misunderstood — that reads as defensive and rarely persuades.
  • Forgetting that the revised manuscript stays anonymized if the journal sends it back to the same blinded referees.
  • A cover letter that summarizes changes the manuscript does not actually contain.

Checklist

  • Editor's letter parsed first; its priorities weighted above any single referee
  • Every comment reproduced and answered; none silently dropped
  • Each response names the action + exact location of the change
  • The referee split is addressed openly with a stated synthesis
  • New analyses actually appear in the revised manuscript (no phantom changes)
  • The development contribution is protected, not bargained away
  • Revised manuscript remains anonymized for re-review
  • Declined points are declined with evidence, courteously

Anti-patterns

  • "We thank the reviewer and have addressed this" with no specifics or location
  • Capitulating to every methodologist demand until the paper is no longer a development paper
  • Treating reflexivity/ethics comments as unserious
  • Arguing with a referee who simply misread, instead of fixing the exposition
  • A response letter that claims changes the manuscript does not contain

Output format

text
【Journal】World Development (WD)
【Skill】worlddev-rebuttal
【Decision】major / minor / reject-and-resubmit
【Editor's binding priorities】top 2–3 from the letter
【Per-comment plan】[R#.# → concede / strengthen / clarify / defend + location]
【Referee split】tension + stated synthesis
【Contribution guard】how the WD development relevance is protected
【Anonymization】revision still blinded? [Y/N]
【Source status】verified URL / 待核实 / not asserted
【Next step】finalize response letter → re-run worlddev-submission preflight; if redirecting, worlddev-workflow

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in World-Development-Skills/skills/worlddev-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Worlddev Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Worlddev Rebuttal compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Worlddev Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~16kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer2.4k2 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Academic Research Suite for CodexImbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex12k—~12kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Social Science Paper Writingfakerqwq/social-science-paper-writing-skill382—~7kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Review Papermaxwell2732/paper-replicate-agent-demo1372 repos~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassNone

Similar skills

  • Academic Paper Writing Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.

    51k GitHub stars~16k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Peer Review

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Academic Research Suite for Codex

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex

    A router skill that sends academic work such as literature reviews, drafting, citation checks, peer review and revision to the right workflow in the ARS suite.

    12k GitHub stars~12k tokensUpdated 7 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Social Science Paper Writing

    fakerqwq/social-science-paper-writing-skill

    Helps draft, diagnose, review and revise social science papers, from topic and research question to literature review, citation risks and pre-submission checks.

    382 GitHub stars~7k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Review Paper

    maxwell2732/paper-replicate-agent-demo

    Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, econometric specification, citation completeness, and potential referee objections

    137 GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~1.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • 00 Academic Router

    agentscope-ai/OpenJudge

    A skill your agent uses when the user wants help with academic papers or citations but it's unclear which specific workflow fits — reviewing a paper, checking a BibTeX file for fake references, or…

    871 GitHub stars~976 tokensUpdated 29 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Worlddev Rebuttal

What does Worlddev Rebuttal do?

A skill your agent uses when responding to a World Development (WD) decision letter — major/minor revision or reject-and-resubmit — under double-anonymized, multidisciplinary review. Worlddev Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when responding to a World Development (WD) decision letter — major/minor revision or reject-and-resubmit — under double-anonymized, multidisciplinary review.

When should I use Worlddev Rebuttal?

Worlddev Rebuttal fits situations like: responding to a World Development (WD) decision letter — major/minor revision; reject-and-resubmit — under double-anonymized; multidisciplinary review.

How do I install Worlddev Rebuttal in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill worlddev-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (World-Development-Skills/skills/worlddev-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/worlddev-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Worlddev Rebuttal in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill worlddev-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (World-Development-Skills/skills/worlddev-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/worlddev-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Worlddev Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill worlddev-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/worlddev-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/worlddev-rebuttal, .github/skills/worlddev-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/worlddev-rebuttal in your project.

What does Worlddev Rebuttal need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Worlddev Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.

Does Worlddev Rebuttal access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Worlddev Rebuttal safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Worlddev Rebuttal use?

Worlddev Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Worlddev Rebuttal use?

About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Worlddev Rebuttal?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Worlddev Rebuttal: Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars), Peer Review (K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer, 2.4k stars), Academic Research Suite for Codex (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex, 12k stars) and Social Science Paper Writing (fakerqwq/social-science-paper-writing-skill, 382 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Worlddev Rebuttal?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.