Threejs World Generation
calesthio/OpenMontage
Build deterministic, editable, free-viewpoint Three.js worlds from text or structured briefs.
A skill your agent uses when deciding whether a development-economics question fits The World Bank Economic Review (WBER) — and how to frame it so both halves of the WBER bar (credible empirics AND…
MITAuto-check passed
Install Wber Topic Selection
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wber-topic-selection -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wber-topic-selection --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/World-Bank-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/wber-topic-selection .claude/skills/wber-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "wber-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/World-Bank-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/wber-topic-selection into .claude/skills/wber-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "wber-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/World-Bank-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/wber-topic-selectionType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wber-topic-selection -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wber-topic-selection --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/World-Bank-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/wber-topic-selection .agents/skills/wber-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "wber-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/World-Bank-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/wber-topic-selection into .agents/skills/wber-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "wber-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wber-topic-selection -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wber-topic-selection --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/World-Bank-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/wber-topic-selection .cursor/skills/wber-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "wber-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/World-Bank-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/wber-topic-selection into .cursor/skills/wber-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "wber-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path World-Bank-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/wber-topic-selection--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wber-topic-selection -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wber-topic-selection --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/World-Bank-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/wber-topic-selection .gemini/skills/wber-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "wber-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/World-Bank-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/wber-topic-selection into .gemini/skills/wber-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "wber-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wber-topic-selectionInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wber-topic-selection -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/World-Bank-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/wber-topic-selection .github/skills/wber-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "wber-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/World-Bank-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/wber-topic-selection into .github/skills/wber-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "wber-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wber-topic-selection -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills wber-topic-selection --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/World-Bank-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/wber-topic-selection .opencode/skills/wber-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "wber-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/World-Bank-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/wber-topic-selection into .opencode/skills/wber-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "wber-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
wber-topic-selection- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.9k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 955 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when deciding whether a development-economics question fits The World Bank Economic Review (WBER) — and how to frame it so both halves of the WBER bar (credible empirics AND…
- Works in 2 steps: Credible empirics — a design or… → Development-policy relevance — the…
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, The WBER two-part bar, Decision table by candidate… and How to sharpen the question, plus 6 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Wber Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding whether a development-economics question fits The World Bank Economic Review (WBER) — and how to frame it so both halves of the WBER bar (credible empirics AND policy relevance) are visible. Locks the question and outlet; it does not run the analysis or write the prose.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
Example prompts
- “/wber-topic-selection”
Workflow steps
2 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Credible empirics — a design or measurement that a sophisticated applied economist trusts (this is the JDE-grade half).
- Development-policy relevance — the result changes how a development practitioner, finance ministry, or World Bank task team would think or…
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Wber Topic Selection loads about 1.9k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 77 tokens; SKILL.md has 955 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 955 words, ~1,869 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/wber-topic-selection/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- wber-topic-selection
- description
- Use when deciding whether a development-economics question fits The World Bank Economic Review (WBER) — and how to frame it so both halves of the WBER bar (credible empirics AND policy relevance) are visible. Locks the question and outlet; it does not run the analysis or write the prose.
Topic Selection (wber-topic-selection)
When to trigger
- You have a developing-country result but are unsure it is "general" enough for WBER
- The work could plausibly go to JDE, World Development, the Research Observer, or WBER and the outlet is undecided
- The paper reads like a single-program project report rather than evidence on a mechanism
- A reviewer or coauthor says "interesting, but is this a World Bank paper?"
- You are weighing a full-length article vs. a WBER short-format policy note
The WBER two-part bar
WBER's stated mission is to publish innovative theoretical and empirical research that identifies, analyzes, measures, and evaluates the macro- and micro-economic forces that promote or impede economic development. The selection test is a logical AND, not an OR:
- Credible empirics — a design or measurement that a sophisticated applied economist trusts (this is the JDE-grade half).
- Development-policy relevance — the result changes how a development practitioner, finance ministry, or World Bank task team would think or act. Importantly, "policy-relevant" does not mean "aligned with World Bank policy": editorial independence is explicit — consistency with Bank policy plays no role in selection.
A paper that is methodologically immaculate but has no developing-country policy stake reads as "send to a general field journal." A paper with a vivid policy story but a fragile design reads as "send to World Development or a report series." WBER wants both.
Decision table by candidate paper
| Your paper looks like... | WBER fit | Move |
|---|---|---|
| Single RCT/evaluation of one program in one place | Conditional | Reframe around the mechanism and what it teaches development policy broadly; argue external validity / scale-up |
| Quasi-experiment on a developing-country policy reform | Strong | Foreground the reform as a policy lever; quantify the counterfactual |
| New measurement of poverty/inequality/welfare in LDCs | Strong | Lead with what the measure changes for targeting/policy; nail data construction |
| Methods paper / new estimator | Weak | Send to an econometrics or methods outlet unless the application is the development contribution |
| Survey / literature overview / framework piece | Wrong outlet | Route to the World Bank Research Observer (surveys, not refereed in the WBER sense) |
| Rich-country labor/finance study | Wrong outlet | Send to a general field journal; WBER is developing-country focused |
How to sharpen the question
- Name the policy decision. "Should a government means-test transfers vs. give universally?" beats "we evaluate a transfer program."
- Name the development force. Tie the result to a recognized margin: human-capital accumulation, market frictions, credit/insurance constraints, state capacity, trade exposure, informality.
- State the population and the data spine early. WBER readers expect developing-country data — administrative records, LSMS, DHS, censuses, firm registries, or original surveys — and will judge whether the question is answerable with what you have.
- Decide full-length vs. short-format. If the contribution is one clean, timely policy-relevant result, the short-format track may be the faster, better-fit home; do not pad it into a full article.
Full-length vs. short-format
WBER runs two tracks, and the topic should pick the track:
- Short-format fits a single, sharp, timely policy-relevant result with one clean design — a focused evaluation, a new fact, a quick policy-relevant test. Do not pad it with a literature tour or a decorative model; its virtue is speed and focus.
- Full-length fits a result that needs multiple designs, a mechanism investigation, heterogeneity, or a model-based counterfactual to land. If the contribution genuinely requires that scaffolding, do not amputate it into a short paper.
Choosing the wrong track is a real fit error: a thin paper stretched to full length reads as padded; a rich paper compressed to short format reads as underdeveloped.
Show full SKILL.md (377 more words)Show less
Worked vignette (illustrative)
A team has an RCT of an agricultural-extension app in one region showing a 6% yield gain. As a topic it is a "project report." The WBER reframe asks: what force does this speak to? They reposition it as evidence on information frictions in technology adoption — a central development margin — and ask the policy question "should governments subsidize digital vs. in-person extension?" The data spine (administrative plot records plus the app's usage logs) is named up front, external validity is flagged (one agro-climatic zone), and because the contribution is a single clean result on a timely question, they choose the short-format track. The topic now passes both halves of the bar.
Checklist
- One sentence states the development question AND the policy decision it informs
- The result is framed as evidence on a mechanism/force, not a project write-up
- The setting is developing-country and the data spine (LSMS/DHS/admin/survey) is named
- Policy relevance is argued without claiming alignment with World Bank policy (independence)
- Sibling outlets explicitly ruled out (not JDE-as-pure-method, not WD-as-interdisciplinary, not Research Observer-as-survey)
- Full-length vs. short-format track chosen deliberately
Anti-patterns
- Pitching a methods innovation with a thin development application as if WBER were a methods journal
- A "project report" framing: evaluating one program with no claim about a transferable mechanism
- Conflating "policy-relevant" with "endorses a World Bank position" — selection is independent of Bank policy
- Sending a survey/overview to WBER instead of the Research Observer
- Assuming any developing-country dataset makes a paper a WBER paper without a policy stake
The desk-reject screen
Before investing further, run the question through the screen a WBER editor applies in the first pass:
- Developing-country setting? If the data and policy are rich-country, it is a desk reject regardless of quality.
- Original empirics (or genuine theory)? A survey or synthesis is a reroute to the Research Observer, not a WBER paper.
- A policy stake a practitioner would recognize? "Interesting to economists only" is not enough for WBER's dual audience.
- A credible path to identification? A vivid policy story with no plausible design will not clear the rigor half.
A question that fails any one of these should be re-scoped or re-homed now, before the design, exhibits, and writing skills are invoked on a paper the editor will return unread.
Output format
【Target】The World Bank Economic Review
【Development question】one sentence
【Policy decision informed】who acts differently and how
【Development force / mechanism】the margin the result speaks to
【Data spine】LSMS / DHS / admin / firm / original survey
【Track】full-length / short-format
【Sibling ruled out】why not JDE / World Development / Research Observer
【Next skill】wber-literature-positioning© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in World-Bank-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/wber-topic-selection of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Wber Topic Selection next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wber Topic Selection this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Threejs World Generationcalesthio/OpenMontage | 65k | — | ~2k | Automated safety check: Pass | AGPL-3.0 | |
| Table Fitasgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks | 69k | — | ~772 | Automated safety check: Pass | CC0-1.0 | |
| Furniture Fit Checkpascalorg/editor | 25k | — | ~5.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| TopicsZimoLiao/scholaraio | 576 | — | ~294 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Topic Modelingbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills | 4.5k | — | ~3.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence |
Similar skills
Table Fit
asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks
Keep a Markdown table readable in a narrow terminal of about 100 display columns - a wide table or one carrying prose in its cells wraps into unreadable ragged rows.
Furniture Fit Check
pascalorg/editor
Checks whether a sofa, table, bed or appliance fits in a measured Pascal room and reports only what the evidence supports, or asks for the missing measurements.
Topics
ZimoLiao/scholaraio
A skill your agent uses when the user asks about research themes, topic distribution, BERTopic clustering, topic overview, topic papers, topic merges, or HTML topic visualizations.
Topic Modeling
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
Structural topic modeling: STM spec, topic count, coherence-exclusivity.
Five Questions
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
Deeply analyze any empirical economics PDF using the five-question framework (五问框架): research question, identification strategy, core estimand, robustness logic, and scholarly contribution.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Wber Topic Selection
What does Wber Topic Selection do?
A skill your agent uses when deciding whether a development-economics question fits The World Bank Economic Review (WBER) — and how to frame it so both halves of the WBER bar (credible empirics AND…. Wber Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding whether a development-economics question fits The World Bank Economic Review (WBER) — and how to frame it so both halves of the WBER bar (credible empirics AND policy relevance) are visible.
How do I install Wber Topic Selection in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wber-topic-selection -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (World-Bank-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/wber-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/wber-topic-selection in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Wber Topic Selection in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wber-topic-selection -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (World-Bank-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/wber-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/wber-topic-selection in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Wber Topic Selection in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill wber-topic-selection -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/wber-topic-selection, .gemini/skills/wber-topic-selection, .github/skills/wber-topic-selection and .opencode/skills/wber-topic-selection in your project.
What does Wber Topic Selection need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Wber Topic Selection is instructions for the agent only.
Does Wber Topic Selection access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Wber Topic Selection safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Wber Topic Selection use?
Wber Topic Selection is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Wber Topic Selection use?
About 1.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Wber Topic Selection?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Wber Topic Selection: Threejs World Generation (calesthio/OpenMontage, 65k stars), Table Fit (asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks, 69k stars), Furniture Fit Check (pascalorg/editor, 25k stars) and Topics (ZimoLiao/scholaraio, 576 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Wber Topic Selection?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,219 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.