Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when planning the response-to-referees after a Review of Economic Dynamics (RED) revise-and-resubmit — structuring a point-by-point reply for a single-anonymized, two-referee…
Install Red Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill red-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills red-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-rebuttal .claude/skills/red-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "red-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-rebuttal into .claude/skills/red-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "red-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill red-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills red-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-rebuttal .agents/skills/red-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "red-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-rebuttal into .agents/skills/red-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "red-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill red-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills red-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-rebuttal .cursor/skills/red-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "red-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/red-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "red-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill red-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills red-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-rebuttal .gemini/skills/red-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "red-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/red-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "red-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills red-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill red-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-rebuttal .github/skills/red-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "red-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-rebuttal into .github/skills/red-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "red-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill red-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills red-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-rebuttal .opencode/skills/red-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "red-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/red-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "red-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
red-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.3k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 547 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when planning the response-to-referees after a Review of Economic Dynamics (RED) revise-and-resubmit — structuring a point-by-point reply for a single-anonymized, two-referee…
- Two-referee process
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How to respond at RED, Checklist and Anti-patterns, plus 5 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Prioritizing model/quantitative concerns
What it does
Red Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when planning the response-to-referees after a Review of Economic Dynamics (RED) revise-and-resubmit — structuring a point-by-point reply for a single-anonymized, two-referee process, prioritizing model/quantitative concerns, and remembering that second-and-later resubmissions are exempt from the submission fee. Strategy; it does not write the paper.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Two-referee process
- Prioritizing model/quantitative concerns
- Remembering that second-and-later resubmissions are exempt from the submission fee
Example prompts
- “/red-rebuttal”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Red Rebuttal loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 92 tokens; SKILL.md has 547 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 547 words, ~1,324 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/red-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- red-rebuttal
- description
- Use when planning the response-to-referees after a Review of Economic Dynamics (RED) revise-and-resubmit — structuring a point-by-point reply for a single-anonymized, two-referee process, prioritizing model/quantitative concerns, and remembering that second-and-later resubmissions are exempt from the submission fee. Strategy; it does not write the paper.
Rebuttal Strategy for RED (red-rebuttal)
When to trigger
- An R&R has arrived from RED and you are planning the revision and reply
- Reconciling comments from the (minimum) two referees and the editor
- Deciding how to handle requests that touch the model, calibration, or code archive
How to respond at RED
- Point-by-point, per referee. RED uses single-anonymized review with at least two referees; structure a clear, numbered response to each, plus a short letter to the Coordinating Editor summarizing the main changes. Quote each comment, then state the change and where it lives in the revised paper.
- Lead with the model/quantitative concerns. Referees at a dynamic-economics journal care most about whether the mechanism, assumptions/regularity conditions, calibration discipline, and numerical accuracy hold up. Address those first; presentation comments after.
- Re-run and re-archive. If you change the model, calibration, or estimation, re-run everything and update the data/code archive (and its readme.txt: seeds, execution order, runtime), since RED's code-first culture means reviewers expect the archive to track the revision.
- Fee note. A second-or-later resubmission is exempt from the submission fee — the review clock, not a new fee, governs the next round.
- Disagree respectfully, with evidence. Where you decline a change, give a model-based or quantitative reason (a robustness result, an accuracy check, a theoretical argument), not just an assertion.
Checklist
- Separate, numbered point-by-point replies for each referee, plus an editor cover letter
- Model/quantitative concerns addressed first; every change cross-referenced to the manuscript
- Code/data archive re-run and updated to match the revision
- Declined requests answered with quantitative/theoretical evidence
- Resubmission handled as fee-exempt
Anti-patterns
- A single undifferentiated reply that blurs the two referees' distinct concerns
- Revising the model but not re-running or re-archiving the code
- Treating a resubmission as if it requires a new fee
- Brushing off a substantive identification/accuracy concern instead of confronting it
Rerun rule
Any revision that changes a parameter, calibration target, solution method, sample, or shock definition requires rerunning the affected exhibits and updating the archive README. If the response letter says "results are unchanged," cite the rerun script and output date.
Show full SKILL.md (207 more words)Show less
Response-letter skeleton for a RED R&R
Dear [Coordinating Editor],
Summary of changes (one page max):
1. [Model/mechanism change] — new Section X, new Figure Y
2. [Calibration/estimation change] — Table Z re-estimated; archive updated
3. [New robustness] — Appendix C: accuracy checks / alternative targets
Referee 1
Comment 1.1 (quoted). Response: [change + manuscript location].
Rerun: run_all.sh, [date], seeds unchanged.
Comment 1.2 (quoted). Response: we respectfully maintain [claim] because
[quantitative evidence: robustness table / accuracy check / proposition].
Referee 2
...
Archive note: data/code archive v[X.Y] resubmitted; readme.txt updated
(execution order, expected runtime, random seeds).Date-stamping each rerun and versioning the archive is cheap and signals the code-first discipline RED's data/code policy institutionalizes.
Frequent RED referee demands and how to absorb them
| Demand | Cost | Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| "Redo the counterfactual under an alternative calibration" | compute hours–days | run it; report in an appendix; flag heavy runtime in the letter |
| "Show the mechanism in a simplified version" | modeling time | add a two-period or representative-agent special case isolating the force |
| "Your solution may be inaccurate near the constraint" | re-solving | refine the grid near the kink; report Euler errors before and after |
| "Estimate parameter X rather than calibrating it" | substantial | negotiate: SMM on a focused moment set, or a sensitivity band with a reason estimation is infeasible |
| "Compare against [referee's preferred model]" | varies | implement a stripped-down version if central; otherwise differentiate analytically and bound the horse race out of scope |
Triage order for the revision
Address concerns in this order: (1) anything questioning whether the mechanism exists, (2) calibration and estimation discipline, (3) numerical accuracy, (4) extra experiments, (5) exposition. A reply that fixes typos first and the accuracy concern last reads as evasive to quantitative-macro referees.
Supplementary resources
red-review-process— the review model this reply addressesred-replication-and-data-policy— updating the archive on revision
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Red Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Red Rebuttal
What does Red Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when planning the response-to-referees after a Review of Economic Dynamics (RED) revise-and-resubmit — structuring a point-by-point reply for a single-anonymized, two-referee…. Red Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when planning the response-to-referees after a Review of Economic Dynamics (RED) revise-and-resubmit — structuring a point-by-point reply for a single-anonymized, two-referee process, prioritizing model/quantitative concerns, and remembering that second-and-later resubmissions are exempt from the submission fee.
When should I use Red Rebuttal?
Red Rebuttal fits situations like: two-referee process; prioritizing model/quantitative concerns; remembering that second-and-later resubmissions are exempt from the submission fee.
How do I install Red Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill red-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/red-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Red Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill red-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Review-of-Economic-Dynamics-Skills/skills/red-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/red-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Red Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill red-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/red-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/red-rebuttal, .github/skills/red-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/red-rebuttal in your project.
What does Red Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Red Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Red Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Red Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Red Rebuttal use?
Red Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Red Rebuttal use?
About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Red Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Red Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Red Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.