Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
Agent skill
Psychrev Review Process
by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when anticipating how a Psychological Review manuscript will be evaluated — masked peer review, the kinds of decisions, article types (full article vs.
Install Psychrev Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill psychrev-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills psychrev-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-review-process .claude/skills/psychrev-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "psychrev-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-review-process into .claude/skills/psychrev-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "psychrev-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill psychrev-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills psychrev-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-review-process .agents/skills/psychrev-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "psychrev-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-review-process into .agents/skills/psychrev-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "psychrev-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill psychrev-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills psychrev-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-review-process .cursor/skills/psychrev-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "psychrev-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-review-process into .cursor/skills/psychrev-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "psychrev-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill psychrev-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills psychrev-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-review-process .gemini/skills/psychrev-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "psychrev-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-review-process into .gemini/skills/psychrev-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "psychrev-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills psychrev-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill psychrev-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-review-process .github/skills/psychrev-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "psychrev-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-review-process into .github/skills/psychrev-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "psychrev-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill psychrev-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills psychrev-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-review-process .opencode/skills/psychrev-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "psychrev-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-review-process into .opencode/skills/psychrev-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "psychrev-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
psychrev-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.3k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 537 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when anticipating how a Psychological Review manuscript will be evaluated — masked peer review, the kinds of decisions, article types (full article vs.
- Anticipating how a Psychological Review manuscript will be evaluated — masked peer review
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How Psychological Review is…, Article types (confirm current… and What reviewers at a theory…, plus 4 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- The kinds of decisions
What it does
Psychrev Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when anticipating how a Psychological Review manuscript will be evaluated — masked peer review, the kinds of decisions, article types (full article vs. Theoretical Note), and what reviewers at a theory journal actually probe. Explains the process; it does NOT write the response document (that is psychrev-rebuttal) or run the submission preflight (psychrev-submission).
Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Anticipating how a Psychological Review manuscript will be evaluated — masked peer review
- The kinds of decisions
- Article types (full article vs
Example prompts
- “/psychrev-review-process”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Psychrev Review Process loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 100 tokens; SKILL.md has 537 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 537 words, ~1,299 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/psychrev-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- psychrev-review-process
- description
- Use when anticipating how a Psychological Review manuscript will be evaluated — masked peer review, the kinds of decisions, article types (full article vs. Theoretical Note), and what reviewers at a theory journal actually probe. Explains the process; it does NOT write the response document (that is psychrev-rebuttal) or run the submission preflight (psychrev-submission).
Understanding the Review Process (psychrev-review-process)
When to trigger
- Before submitting, to understand what you are walking into
- A decision letter has arrived and you must read it correctly before responding
- You are unsure whether your piece is a full article or a Theoretical Note
- You want to anticipate the theory-specific objections reviewers will raise
How Psychological Review is reviewed
- Masked (anonymous) peer review. Manuscripts are fully anonymized so the body carries no author-identifying content; the title page (authors, affiliations, ORCID, contact) is separate. (Verify current masking policy on the author page; 检索于 2026-06；以官网为准.)
- Handled through Editorial Manager (editorialmanager.com/rev, 检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
- Reviewers are drawn from the modeling/theory tradition you enter — typically proponents or
critics of the rival models you must beat. Positioning honestly (
psychrev-literature-positioning) matters precisely because the rivals' authors may review you. - The editor (currently Elena L. Grigorenko, PhD, editor since 2022; web-verified 2026-06-22, re-verify before relying) makes the call, weighing whether the theoretical contribution is genuine and general.
Article types (confirm current list on the author page)
- Theoretical articles — the main vehicle: a new theory/model, a formal account, or a major synthesis that yields new theory. No upper length bound, but texts over 15,000 words must be justified (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
- Theoretical Notes — shorter commentaries that advance a subfield: critiques of a theoretical approach, discussions of published work, or meta-theoretical argument. Pick this type when your contribution is a focused theoretical point, not a full new model.
- Replications are publishable only when relevant to / embedded in new or enhanced theory, and should be mentioned in the abstract (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
What reviewers at a theory journal actually probe
| Reviewer question | Where you should have answered it |
|---|---|
| Is this theory or a disguised empirical paper? | psychrev-topic-selection |
| Which standing models does it beat, and fairly? | psychrev-literature-positioning |
| Are the assumptions explicit and the mechanism real? | psychrev-theory-construction |
| Do the predictions follow, and could they be wrong? | psychrev-argument-development |
| Is the model identifiable; does a rival mimic it? | psychrev-boundary-conditions |
| Is the advance new, or a relabel / better fit? | psychrev-contribution-framing |
| For computational models: is the code available? | psychrev-submission |
Show full SKILL.md (197 more words)Show less
Decision types (typical scholarly-journal ladder; confirm specifics)
- Reject (often desk-level for empirical papers or insufficient theoretical advance)
- Major revision — the common "promising" outcome; the bar rises across rounds
- Minor revision — rare on a first decision for a theory paper
- Accept — usually only after one or more revision rounds
Multiple rounds are normal at a theory journal; treat a major revision as an invitation to strengthen the theory itself, not merely to answer comments.
Checklist
- Manuscript fully anonymized for masked review; separate title page prepared
- Correct article type chosen (full theoretical article vs. Theoretical Note)
- Anticipated reviewer objections mapped to the skill that should have addressed them
- If computational: model code prepared for sharing (see
psychrev-submission) - Decision letter (if any) read for the theoretical asks, not just surface edits
Anti-patterns
- Assuming a single round; the bar rises as the theory is pushed harder
- Treating reviewers as outsiders — they are often the rival modelers themselves
- Choosing a full article when the contribution is really a Theoretical Note (or vice versa)
- Reading a major revision as a list of edits rather than a mandate to strengthen the theory
- Leaving identifiability or rival-mimicry unaddressed and hoping reviewers miss it
Output format
【Review model】masked; Editorial Manager; reviewers from the rival tradition
【Article type】theoretical article | Theoretical Note (+ length justification if > limit)
【Anticipated objections】[objection → skill that addresses it] (table)
【Decision read】[if letter present: the theoretical asks beneath the comments]
【Next step】psychrev-submission (preflight) or psychrev-rebuttal (after a revise decision)© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Psychrev Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychrev Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Psychrev Review Process
What does Psychrev Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when anticipating how a Psychological Review manuscript will be evaluated — masked peer review, the kinds of decisions, article types (full article vs. Psychrev Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when anticipating how a Psychological Review manuscript will be evaluated — masked peer review, the kinds of decisions, article types (full article vs.
When should I use Psychrev Review Process?
Psychrev Review Process fits situations like: anticipating how a Psychological Review manuscript will be evaluated — masked peer review; the kinds of decisions; article types (full article vs.
How do I install Psychrev Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill psychrev-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/psychrev-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Psychrev Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill psychrev-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Psychological-Review-Skills/skills/psychrev-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/psychrev-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Psychrev Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill psychrev-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/psychrev-review-process, .gemini/skills/psychrev-review-process, .github/skills/psychrev-review-process and .opencode/skills/psychrev-review-process in your project.
What does Psychrev Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Psychrev Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Psychrev Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Psychrev Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Psychrev Review Process use?
Psychrev Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Psychrev Review Process use?
About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Psychrev Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Psychrev Review Process: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Psychrev Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.