Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when drafting the response to reviewers and the revision plan for an Organization Studies (OS) R&R — turning developmental, theory-level reviewer comments into a credible…
Install Orgstud Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgstud-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills orgstud-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-rebuttal .claude/skills/orgstud-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "orgstud-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-rebuttal into .claude/skills/orgstud-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "orgstud-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgstud-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills orgstud-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-rebuttal .agents/skills/orgstud-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "orgstud-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-rebuttal into .agents/skills/orgstud-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "orgstud-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgstud-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills orgstud-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-rebuttal .cursor/skills/orgstud-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "orgstud-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/orgstud-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "orgstud-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgstud-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills orgstud-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-rebuttal .gemini/skills/orgstud-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "orgstud-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/orgstud-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "orgstud-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills orgstud-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgstud-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-rebuttal .github/skills/orgstud-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "orgstud-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-rebuttal into .github/skills/orgstud-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "orgstud-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgstud-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills orgstud-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-rebuttal .opencode/skills/orgstud-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "orgstud-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/orgstud-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "orgstud-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
orgstud-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.3k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 592 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when drafting the response to reviewers and the revision plan for an Organization Studies (OS) R&R — turning developmental, theory-level reviewer comments into a credible…
- Drafting the response to reviewers and the revision plan for an Organization Studies (OS) R&R — turning developmental
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, OS rebuttals are…, Structure the response and Triage the comments, plus 4 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Theory-level reviewer comments into a credible point-by-point reply and revised manuscript
What it does
Orgstud Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting the response to reviewers and the revision plan for an Organization Studies (OS) R&R — turning developmental, theory-level reviewer comments into a credible point-by-point reply and revised manuscript. Plans and drafts the response; it does not redo the underlying analysis (route back to the specialist skills).
Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Drafting the response to reviewers and the revision plan for an Organization Studies (OS) R&R — turning developmental
- Theory-level reviewer comments into a credible point-by-point reply and revised manuscript
Example prompts
- “/orgstud-rebuttal”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Orgstud Rebuttal loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 87 tokens; SKILL.md has 592 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 592 words, ~1,323 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/orgstud-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- orgstud-rebuttal
- description
- Use when drafting the response to reviewers and the revision plan for an Organization Studies (OS) R&R — turning developmental, theory-level reviewer comments into a credible point-by-point reply and revised manuscript. Plans and drafts the response; it does not redo the underlying analysis (route back to the specialist skills).
Rebuttal Strategy (orgstud-rebuttal)
When to trigger
- An OS R&R arrived (read it first with
orgstud-review-process) and you are drafting the response - Reviewers disagree with each other and you must reconcile their asks without breaking the paper
- A reviewer wants a theoretical reframing, deeper engagement, or a different conceptual lens
- You need to decide which asks to accept, which to negotiate, and which to (carefully) decline
OS rebuttals are developmental, not adversarial
OS review is developmental: reviewers often co-build the theory across rounds, so the response letter is a collaboration, not a defense. The tone is respectful and substantive; the goal is to show that you took each reviewer's intellectual contribution seriously and that the paper is stronger for it. The editor reads the letter to judge whether you have engaged in good faith with the theory-level asks — those carry the decision.
Structure the response
- Open with a synthesis. A short cover note to the editor summarizing the main changes and how you handled the central threads — especially where reviewers diverged.
- Point-by-point, verbatim comments. Quote each comment, then respond; never paraphrase away a reviewer's concern.
- Show, don't assert. For each accepted point, name the change and quote/locate the revised passage (page/section). "We have clarified the mechanism" is not enough; show the new text.
- Group related comments when several reviewers circle the same issue, so the editor sees one coherent fix rather than three partial ones.
Triage the comments
| Comment type | Default stance | How to handle |
|---|---|---|
| Theory-level (mechanism, contribution, engagement) | Accept and develop | These are the decision; route to orgstud-theory-development / orgstud-contribution-framing and report the substantive change |
| Use of social theory ("engage Bourdieu/logics properly") | Accept | Deepen with the framework's real machinery (orgstud-literature-positioning) |
| Method/analysis transparency | Accept | Add the data structure, negative cases, robustness (orgstud-data-analysis, orgstud-tables-figures) |
| Reflexivity / positionality | Accept (substantive at OS) | Add a genuine reflexive account, not a token line |
| Reviewer disagreement | Reconcile | Take the editor's signal; explain your choice to both reviewers |
| A change that would break the contribution | Negotiate / decline | Decline respectfully with theoretical reasoning, and offer an alternative that meets the underlying concern |
Show full SKILL.md (250 more words)Show less
Handling the hard cases
- Conflicting reviewers: follow the editor's letter, then write a single integrated solution and explain to each reviewer why it serves their concern. Do not silently side with one.
- An ask you cannot meet: never ignore it. State the reason theoretically, show what you did do to address the underlying worry, and let the editor adjudicate.
- A request to become a different paper: if a reviewer wants a paper you did not write, hold the contribution and explain the scope — but only after confirming with
orgstud-review-processthat this is not the editor's essential thread. - Over-revision risk: do not pile on changes that dilute the contribution to placate every comment; a sharper paper beats a longer one (mind the 13,000-word cap).
Checklist
- A cover synthesis names the main changes and how divergent reviews were reconciled
- Every comment quoted verbatim and answered; none paraphrased away
- Each accepted point shows the revised text with a location
- Theory-level asks are developed substantively, not patched cosmetically
- Declined points are declined respectfully with theoretical reasoning + an alternative
- Reflexivity/positionality requests addressed genuinely
- Revisions keep the contribution sharp and the manuscript within the word cap
Anti-patterns
- A defensive, point-scoring tone in a developmental culture
- "We have addressed this" with no shown text or location
- Paraphrasing a reviewer's concern into something easier to answer
- Silently siding with one reviewer when two conflict
- Ignoring a comment you cannot fully meet instead of reasoning about it
- Over-revising into a bloated paper that loses the theoretical move
Output format
【Outcome being answered】major / reject-resubmit / minor
【Cover synthesis】main changes + reconciliation of divergent reviews
【Comment triage】accepted-and-developed / accepted / negotiated / declined-with-reason
【Theory-level fixes】mechanism / contribution / social-theory engagement (with locations)
【Reflexivity added】genuine account? (Y/N)
【Resubmission state】contribution intact + within 13,000 words? (Y/N)
【Next step】finalize response letter + revised manuscript; re-run orgstud-submission before resubmitting© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Orgstud Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orgstud Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Orgstud Rebuttal
What does Orgstud Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when drafting the response to reviewers and the revision plan for an Organization Studies (OS) R&R — turning developmental, theory-level reviewer comments into a credible…. Orgstud Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting the response to reviewers and the revision plan for an Organization Studies (OS) R&R — turning developmental, theory-level reviewer comments into a credible point-by-point reply and revised manuscript.
When should I use Orgstud Rebuttal?
Orgstud Rebuttal fits situations like: drafting the response to reviewers and the revision plan for an Organization Studies (OS) R&R — turning developmental; theory-level reviewer comments into a credible point-by-point reply and revised manuscript.
How do I install Orgstud Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgstud-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/orgstud-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Orgstud Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgstud-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Organization-Studies-Skills/skills/orgstud-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/orgstud-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Orgstud Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill orgstud-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/orgstud-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/orgstud-rebuttal, .github/skills/orgstud-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/orgstud-rebuttal in your project.
What does Orgstud Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Orgstud Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Orgstud Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Orgstud Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Orgstud Rebuttal use?
Orgstud Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Orgstud Rebuttal use?
About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Orgstud Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Orgstud Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Orgstud Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.