Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when executing a Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) revise-and-resubmit — the response letter, converting reviewer demands into analyses or studies, and defending…
Install Jppm Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jppm-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jppm-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-rebuttal .claude/skills/jppm-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "jppm-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-rebuttal into .claude/skills/jppm-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jppm-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jppm-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jppm-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-rebuttal .agents/skills/jppm-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "jppm-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-rebuttal into .agents/skills/jppm-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jppm-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jppm-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jppm-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-rebuttal .cursor/skills/jppm-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "jppm-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/jppm-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jppm-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jppm-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jppm-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-rebuttal .gemini/skills/jppm-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jppm-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/jppm-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jppm-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jppm-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jppm-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-rebuttal .github/skills/jppm-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jppm-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-rebuttal into .github/skills/jppm-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jppm-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jppm-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jppm-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-rebuttal .opencode/skills/jppm-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jppm-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/jppm-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jppm-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
jppm-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.5k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 699 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when executing a Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) revise-and-resubmit — the response letter, converting reviewer demands into analyses or studies, and defending…
- Executing a Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) revise-and-resubmit — the response letter
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Answer with work, weighted by…, Converting the standard JPP&M… and Structuring the letter, plus 4 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Converting reviewer demands into analyses
What it does
Jppm Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when executing a Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) revise-and-resubmit — the response letter, converting reviewer demands into analyses or studies, and defending policy claims without slipping into advocacy. Drafts the rebuttal; letter-reading and feasibility calls are jppm-review-process.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Executing a Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) revise-and-resubmit — the response letter
- Converting reviewer demands into analyses
- Defending policy claims without slipping into advocacy
Example prompts
- “/jppm-rebuttal”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Jppm Rebuttal loads about 1.5k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 80 tokens; SKILL.md has 699 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 699 words, ~1,508 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/jppm-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- jppm-rebuttal
- description
- Use when executing a Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) revise-and-resubmit — the response letter, converting reviewer demands into analyses or studies, and defending policy claims without slipping into advocacy. Drafts the rebuttal; letter-reading and feasibility calls are jppm-review-process.
Rebuttal Strategy (jppm-rebuttal)
When to trigger
- A JPP&M major or minor revision is in hand and the response letter must be drafted
- "Strengthen the policy contribution" needs to become concrete revisions, not adjectives
- An identification critique of your DiD/RDD demands new analyses under the page cap
- A methods reviewer and a policy reviewer want opposite things
- You disagree with a comment and must push back productively
Answer with work, weighted by the letter
The winning JPP&M response converts each substantive comment into visible work — a new estimator, a robustness table, a re-fielded condition, a rewritten Policy Contribution Statement — and reports the result in the letter itself, with the number. Prose-only replies persuade only on genuine matters of interpretation. Because the reviewer pool mixes camps, tailor the register: the identification reviewer gets estimates, diagnostics, and sensitivity bounds; the policy reviewer gets stakeholder mapping, institutional accuracy, and realism. Both read the whole letter, so keep every answer legible to both.
Converting the standard JPP&M demands
| Demand | The response that closes it |
|---|---|
| "Policy contribution is thin" | rewrite the statement around a live decision; add the decision-unit translation table; add marketer-facing implications; if the contested margin was untested, add the condition or analysis that tests it |
| "Parallel trends unconvincing" | event-study with pre-period placebos; honest-DiD sensitivity; alternative comparison group; report how conclusions move |
| "Staggered DiD concerns" | re-estimate with Callaway–Sant'Anna / Sun–Abraham; show the Bacon decomposition; reconcile with the original estimate |
| "RDD manipulation risk" | density test, donut estimates, covariate smoothness — presented together |
| "Stimuli not realistic / not mandatable" | re-field with formats from the actual rulemaking, or bound the claim explicitly to tested formats |
| "What about firm response?" | supplementary supply-side evidence (reformulation, pricing, channel shifts) or an explicit bounding argument |
| "Sample can't support vulnerability claims" | re-field with the target population, or narrow the claim and say so plainly |
| "Reads as advocacy" | recalibrate verbs, add the trade-off paragraph, report the results that cut against the recommendation |
Structuring the letter
- Open with the contract: one paragraph restating the AE/editor's binding concern and the two or three biggest things the revision did about it — with headline numbers.
- Point-by-point: quote each comment verbatim, respond beneath it, cite the page/section/exhibit where the change lives, and excerpt new text when it settles the issue.
- Cross-reference shared themes once, answer fully at first occurrence, and point later instances back — reviewers notice both evasion and padding.
- Keep the manuscript inside the 50-page cap: state explicitly what moved to the web appendix to make room, so no one thinks material was deleted to dodge a comment.
- Flag fact updates: if the policy landscape shifted during review (a rule finalized, an enforcement action), update the framing and tell the reviewers you did.
Show full SKILL.md (256 more words)Show less
Disagreeing well
- Concede the observation before contesting the inference: "the reviewer is right that X; the data nonetheless support Y because…"
- Bring evidence to the disagreement — a supplementary analysis, an institutional citation (the statute or guidance itself), or a boundary statement.
- On institutional-accuracy disputes (what an agency can or cannot do), cite the primary source; authority questions are checkable, and being casually wrong is costly.
- If a requested revision would push the paper into advocacy or beyond the evidence, decline on exactly those grounds — editors at this journal respect calibrated refusal.
- Align every pushback with the AE's framing; never relitigate a point the AE has already adjudicated.
Checklist
- Letter opens with the binding concern and the headline of what changed
- Every comment quoted and answered with work, location, and (where relevant) the number
- Identification comments answered with the modern-estimator battery, results reported
- Policy-contribution comments answered in the statement and implications, not just the letter
- Manuscript still ≤50 pages; web-appendix moves documented
- Disagreements evidence-based, source-cited, AE-aligned
- Landscape changes during review incorporated and flagged
Anti-patterns
- Adjective inflation: strengthening the "policy contribution" with rhetoric instead of evidence or sharper mapping
- Battery dumping: forty unexplained robustness rows in place of the one diagnostic the reviewer asked to see
- Camp favoritism: satisfying the methods reviewer while the policy reviewer's realism concern festers (or vice versa)
- Silent trimming: cutting content to fit the cap without telling reviewers where it went
- Stale landscape: resubmitting with framing the intervening rulemaking has overtaken
- Relitigating the AE: fighting a settled point in round two
Output format
【Binding concern】restated in one line + what the revision did about it
【Work ledger】comment → analysis/study/reframe → result (with numbers) → manuscript location
【Camp balance】methods asks and policy asks both closed? [Y/N]
【Page cap】≤50 pages after additions; appendix moves listed
【Disagreements】where, on what evidence, AE-aligned
【Next step】resubmit via mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ama_jppm; if rejected, jppm-review-process to reroute© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Jppm Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jppm Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Jppm Rebuttal
What does Jppm Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when executing a Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) revise-and-resubmit — the response letter, converting reviewer demands into analyses or studies, and defending…. Jppm Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when executing a Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) revise-and-resubmit — the response letter, converting reviewer demands into analyses or studies, and defending policy claims without slipping into advocacy.
When should I use Jppm Rebuttal?
Jppm Rebuttal fits situations like: executing a Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) revise-and-resubmit — the response letter; converting reviewer demands into analyses; defending policy claims without slipping into advocacy.
How do I install Jppm Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jppm-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jppm-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Jppm Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jppm-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jppm-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Jppm Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jppm-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jppm-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/jppm-rebuttal, .github/skills/jppm-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/jppm-rebuttal in your project.
What does Jppm Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jppm Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Jppm Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Jppm Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Jppm Rebuttal use?
Jppm Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Jppm Rebuttal use?
About 1.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Jppm Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jppm Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Jppm Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.