Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when anticipating how a Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (JPAM) manuscript will be evaluated — desk screening, double-blind peer review, the article types and which…
Install Jpam Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jpam-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jpam-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Policy-Analysis-and-Management-Skills/skills/jpam-review-process .claude/skills/jpam-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "jpam-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Policy-Analysis-and-Management-Skills/skills/jpam-review-process into .claude/skills/jpam-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jpam-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Policy-Analysis-and-Management-Skills/skills/jpam-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jpam-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jpam-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Policy-Analysis-and-Management-Skills/skills/jpam-review-process .agents/skills/jpam-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "jpam-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Policy-Analysis-and-Management-Skills/skills/jpam-review-process into .agents/skills/jpam-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jpam-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jpam-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jpam-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Policy-Analysis-and-Management-Skills/skills/jpam-review-process .cursor/skills/jpam-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "jpam-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Policy-Analysis-and-Management-Skills/skills/jpam-review-process into .cursor/skills/jpam-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jpam-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Journal-of-Policy-Analysis-and-Management-Skills/skills/jpam-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jpam-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jpam-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Policy-Analysis-and-Management-Skills/skills/jpam-review-process .gemini/skills/jpam-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jpam-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Policy-Analysis-and-Management-Skills/skills/jpam-review-process into .gemini/skills/jpam-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jpam-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jpam-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jpam-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Policy-Analysis-and-Management-Skills/skills/jpam-review-process .github/skills/jpam-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jpam-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Policy-Analysis-and-Management-Skills/skills/jpam-review-process into .github/skills/jpam-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jpam-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jpam-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jpam-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Policy-Analysis-and-Management-Skills/skills/jpam-review-process .opencode/skills/jpam-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jpam-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Policy-Analysis-and-Management-Skills/skills/jpam-review-process into .opencode/skills/jpam-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jpam-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
jpam-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.1k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 440 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when anticipating how a Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (JPAM) manuscript will be evaluated — desk screening, double-blind peer review, the article types and which…
- Works in 4 steps: Desk screen. Editors may desk-reject… → Anonymized review preparation. Prepare… → Cross-disciplinary referees. Expect at… → …
- Anticipating how a Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (JPAM) manuscript will be evaluated — desk screening
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How JPAM evaluates (the…, Article types and peer review and What JPAM referees reward /…, plus 4 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Jpam Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when anticipating how a Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (JPAM) manuscript will be evaluated — desk screening, double-blind peer review, the article types and which are not peer-reviewed, decision categories, and what JPAM referees reward and punish. Sets expectations; it does not write the paper or the rebuttal.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Anticipating how a Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (JPAM) manuscript will be evaluated — desk screening
- Double-blind peer review
- The article types and which are not peer-reviewed
- Decision categories
Example prompts
- “/jpam-review-process”
Workflow steps
4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Desk screen. Editors may desk-reject without review for fit (not a credible policy
- Anonymized review preparation. Prepare an anonymized manuscript plus a separate title page; follow
- Cross-disciplinary referees. Expect at least one identification-focused reviewer and one
- Decision categories. Reject / major or minor revision (R&R) / accept (exact category labels vary;
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Jpam Review Process loads about 1.1k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 87 tokens; SKILL.md has 440 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 440 words, ~1,129 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/jpam-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- jpam-review-process
- description
- Use when anticipating how a Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (JPAM) manuscript will be evaluated — desk screening, double-blind peer review, the article types and which are not peer-reviewed, decision categories, and what JPAM referees reward and punish. Sets expectations; it does not write the paper or the rebuttal.
Review Process (jpam-review-process)
Knowing how JPAM judges papers lets you pre-empt the objections that sink them. JPAM is an APPAM / Wiley journal with an anonymized-review preflight and a stated right to desk-reject without review. The reviewer pool is cross-disciplinary, so a paper must satisfy an economist's identification standard and a policy reader's relevance standard at once. (Verify volatile specifics on the author page: 检索于 2026-06；以官网为准.)
When to trigger
- Before submission, to stress-test against likely referee objections
- Deciding which article type to target and whether it is peer-reviewed
- Interpreting a decision letter and planning next steps
- Understanding the desk-screen so you avoid an avoidable desk reject
How JPAM evaluates (the working model)
- Desk screen. Editors may desk-reject without review for fit (not a credible policy
evaluation / out of scope), inadequate identification, or insufficient significance. The submission
must also satisfy the membership-or-fee requirement before it is considered (see
jpam-submission). - Anonymized review preparation. Prepare an anonymized manuscript plus a separate title page; follow the live Research Exchange file labels and anonymity prompts. Anonymize self-references.
- Cross-disciplinary referees. Expect at least one identification-focused reviewer and one policy/field reviewer. Both must be satisfied — strong design, real relevance.
- Decision categories. Reject / major or minor revision (R&R) / accept (exact category labels vary; confirm on the live page). R&R is the common path to publication for promising papers.
Article types and peer review
| Type | Peer-reviewed? | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Feature Research Article | Yes | the main research format |
| Methods for Policy Analysis | Yes | methodological advances for analysts |
| Policy Retrospective | Typically (confirm) | reflective look-back |
| Point/Counterpoint | No (invited) | short scholarly debate |
| Policy Insights | No (invited; ≤ 3,000 words) | rapid, timely take |
| Book Reviews | No (invited/edited) | — |
Show full SKILL.md (167 more words)Show less
What JPAM referees reward / punish
- Reward: credible identification, a clear policy implication calibrated to the design, cost-benefit and distributional attention, cross-field relevance, and a reproducible package.
- Punish: overclaiming beyond the estimand, selection-on-observables dressed up as causal, naive TWFE on staggered policies, no policy takeaway, ignoring who bears the costs, and irreproducible code.
Checklist
- Manuscript survives a self-administered desk screen (fit, identification, significance)
- Correct article type chosen; peer-review status understood
- Double-blind anonymization done (text + self-cites + metadata)
- Design pre-tested against the reviewer-objection checklist
- Both an identification reviewer and a policy reviewer would be satisfied
- Replication package staged so it is not a late surprise
Anti-patterns
- Submitting a paper that an editor will desk-reject for obvious fit/identification gaps
- Pitching a full research paper into the non-reviewed Point/Counterpoint or Policy Insights slots
- Satisfying the identification reviewer while ignoring the policy reviewer (or vice versa)
- Leaving anonymization, fee/membership, or the data package to the last moment
Output format
【Desk-screen risk】fit / identification / significance — clear? [Y/N]
【Article type】+ peer-reviewed? [Y/N]
【Anonymization】text + self-cites + metadata clean? [Y/N]
【Referee coverage】identification + policy reviewers both satisfied? [Y/N]
【Package staged】replication materials ready? [Y/N]
【Next】jpam-submissionSupplementary resources
../../../shared-resources/empirical-methods/reviewer-objection-checklist.md— objections by identification strategy../../resources/official-source-map.md— review model, article types, decision-category guardrails
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Policy-Analysis-and-Management-Skills/skills/jpam-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Jpam Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jpam Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Jpam Review Process
What does Jpam Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when anticipating how a Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (JPAM) manuscript will be evaluated — desk screening, double-blind peer review, the article types and which…. Jpam Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when anticipating how a Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (JPAM) manuscript will be evaluated — desk screening, double-blind peer review, the article types and which are not peer-reviewed, decision categories, and what JPAM referees reward and punish.
When should I use Jpam Review Process?
Jpam Review Process fits situations like: anticipating how a Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (JPAM) manuscript will be evaluated — desk screening; double-blind peer review; the article types and which are not peer-reviewed; decision categories.
How do I install Jpam Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jpam-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Policy-Analysis-and-Management-Skills/skills/jpam-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jpam-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Jpam Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jpam-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Policy-Analysis-and-Management-Skills/skills/jpam-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jpam-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Jpam Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jpam-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jpam-review-process, .gemini/skills/jpam-review-process, .github/skills/jpam-review-process and .opencode/skills/jpam-review-process in your project.
What does Jpam Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jpam Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Jpam Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Jpam Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Jpam Review Process use?
Jpam Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Jpam Review Process use?
About 1.1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Jpam Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jpam Review Process: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Jpam Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.