Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when writing the response to a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) revise-and-resubmit.
Install Joap Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill joap-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills joap-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills/skills/joap-rebuttal .claude/skills/joap-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "joap-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills/skills/joap-rebuttal into .claude/skills/joap-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "joap-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills/skills/joap-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill joap-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills joap-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills/skills/joap-rebuttal .agents/skills/joap-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "joap-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills/skills/joap-rebuttal into .agents/skills/joap-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "joap-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill joap-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills joap-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills/skills/joap-rebuttal .cursor/skills/joap-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "joap-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills/skills/joap-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/joap-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "joap-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills/skills/joap-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill joap-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills joap-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills/skills/joap-rebuttal .gemini/skills/joap-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "joap-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills/skills/joap-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/joap-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "joap-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills joap-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill joap-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills/skills/joap-rebuttal .github/skills/joap-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "joap-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills/skills/joap-rebuttal into .github/skills/joap-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "joap-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill joap-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills joap-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills/skills/joap-rebuttal .opencode/skills/joap-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "joap-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills/skills/joap-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/joap-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "joap-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
joap-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.6k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 560 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when writing the response to a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) revise-and-resubmit.
- Works in 6 steps: Read the editor's letter as the rubric.… → Point-by-point, every comment. Quote… → Strengthen the contribution, don't just… → …
- Writing the response to a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) revise-and-resubmit
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Strategy, Response-letter format and Worked micro-example…, plus 5 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Joap Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when writing the response to a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) revise-and-resubmit. JAP R&Rs typically demand stronger theory, added rigor (alternative models, CMV checks, robustness), and fuller transparency across multiple reviewers and an action editor. The response must address every point, strengthen the contribution, and keep masking intact. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate results.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Writing the response to a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) revise-and-resubmit
- Tasks that involve Peer review
Example prompts
- “/joap-rebuttal”
Workflow steps
6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Read the editor's letter as the rubric. The action editor adjudicates among reviewers and tells
- Point-by-point, every comment. Quote each comment, then respond; never skip or silently merge one.
- Strengthen the contribution, don't just defend. Many requests (sharper mechanism, alternative
- Test rival explanations head-on. JAP reviewers raise alternative models and method artifacts;
- Place new material wisely. Core new evidence belongs in the manuscript; extended robustness,
- Keep masking and transparency in sync. Maintain anonymization in the revised manuscript and
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Joap Rebuttal loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 109 tokens; SKILL.md has 560 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 560 words, ~1,578 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/joap-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- joap-rebuttal
- description
- Use when writing the response to a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) revise-and-resubmit. JAP R&Rs typically demand stronger theory, added rigor (alternative models, CMV checks, robustness), and fuller transparency across multiple reviewers and an action editor. The response must address every point, strengthen the contribution, and keep masking intact. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate results.
R&R Rebuttal (joap-rebuttal)
A JAP R&R is demanding and usually multi-round. Reviewers and the action editor typically ask for a sharper theoretical contribution, added methodological rigor (alternative models, CMV diagnostics, robustness, measurement evidence), and fuller transparency. The response letter must convert every reviewer, reassure the editor on the dual gate (theory + rigor), and keep the masked manuscript anonymized.
When to trigger
- An R&R arrived and you are planning the revision + response letter
- Reviewers requested added analyses, alternative models, robustness, or open-science changes
- A requested analysis would change the claim or the contribution
- Writing the cover note to the action editor
Strategy
- Read the editor's letter as the rubric. The action editor adjudicates among reviewers and tells you which points are decisive — solve those first and visibly.
- Point-by-point, every comment. Quote each comment, then respond; never skip or silently merge one.
- Strengthen the contribution, don't just defend. Many requests (sharper mechanism, alternative
models tested, CMV diagnostics, measurement invariance, robustness) make the paper stronger — do them
and say where. If the theory advance is the weak point, rebuild it (route to
joap-theory-and-hypotheses). - Test rival explanations head-on. JAP reviewers raise alternative models and method artifacts; run and report them rather than hand-waving — concede where a rival fits better, defend with evidence where it does not.
- Place new material wisely. Core new evidence belongs in the manuscript; extended robustness, invariance, and alternative-model tables usually go to online supplemental materials, summarized in one sentence in the main text.
- Keep masking and transparency in sync. Maintain anonymization in the revised manuscript and
repository links, and reflect new analyses in the shared data/code and the data-availability
statement (see
joap-open-science-and-transparency).
Response-letter format
For each reviewer comment:
> [Quoted reviewer comment]
Response: [What we did / why we respectfully disagree, with evidence].
Change: [Main text section, supplement section, or table/figure number].Open with a short summary of the main changes to the action editor; group by reviewer; end each entry with the location.
Worked micro-example (illustrative response entries)
For the servant-leadership package, an R&R asked for an alternative model, a CMV check, and a sharper boundary.
> R2: Could reverse causality or a third variable explain the safety→
> performance path? An alternative model should be tested.
Response: We agree. We now test (a) the reversed mediation and (b) a model with
prior team performance (Wave 0) as a control; the hypothesized 2-2-2 model fits
better (ΔCFI > .01) and the indirect effect remains (.11, 95% CI [.04, .20]).
The lab experiment provides the causal warrant for the safety path.
Change: Results (alternative models); robustness grid → Supplement S4.
> R1: Same-source bias may inflate the field correlations.
Response: Predictor and outcome were separated by wave and source (member-rated
leadership/safety; supervisor-rated performance). We add a CFA marker-variable
test; estimates are essentially unchanged.
Change: Method (design separation), Results (marker test), Transparency statement.Show full SKILL.md (231 more words)Show less
R&R triage — where each request lands
| Reviewer ask | Default home | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Alternative / reverse-causal model | Results (core) + supplement detail | this often decides the paper |
| CMV diagnostic (marker, ULMC) | Method + Results | pair with the procedural remedies already used |
| Measurement invariance / extra validity | supplement | summarize one sentence in main text |
| Robustness / sensitivity grid | supplement | cite from one main-text sentence |
| "Sharpen the contribution" | Introduction + Theory | rebuild the mechanism/boundary, don't just reword |
| "Soften causal language" | throughout | scale verbs to the design; reserve causation for the experiment |
Recurring R&R pushback and the venue fix
- "Theory is still thin" → do not just expand the literature; articulate the new mechanism/boundary and
rederive the hypotheses (route to
joap-theory-and-hypotheses). - "You didn't rule out the alternative" → run the rival model and report the comparison; this is the most common reason a JAP R&R fails.
- "Added analysis quietly weakens the effect" → disclose it, interpret it, adjust the claim; concealment is the cardinal sin.
- "Data/code don't reflect the revision" → update the deposit and the data-availability statement.
Anti-patterns
- Ignoring or merging away a comment without a visible response
- Defending against an alternative model instead of testing it
- Adding analyses that contradict the original claim without acknowledgment
- Rewording the introduction and calling it a strengthened contribution
- Letting shared data/code/transparency statement drift out of sync with the revision
- Reintroducing identifying information into the masked revision
Output format
【Editor's decisive points】addressed first? [list]
【Coverage】every reviewer comment answered? [Y/N]
【Contribution strengthened】mechanism/boundary sharpened? [Y/N]
【Rigor strengthened】alternative models + CMV + robustness added? [Y/N]
【Placement】core in main text, extended in supplement? [Y/N]
【Open-science + masking】data/code/statement updated; anonymization intact? [Y/N]
【Next】resubmit via Editorial ManagerSupplementary resources
../../resources/official-source-map.md— masked review model, action-editor process, TOP weighting
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills/skills/joap-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Joap Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joap Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Joap Rebuttal
What does Joap Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when writing the response to a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) revise-and-resubmit. Joap Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when writing the response to a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) revise-and-resubmit.
When should I use Joap Rebuttal?
Joap Rebuttal fits situations like: writing the response to a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) revise-and-resubmit; tasks that involve Peer review.
How do I install Joap Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill joap-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills/skills/joap-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/joap-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Joap Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill joap-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills/skills/joap-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/joap-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Joap Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill joap-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/joap-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/joap-rebuttal, .github/skills/joap-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/joap-rebuttal in your project.
What does Joap Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Joap Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Joap Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Joap Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Joap Rebuttal use?
Joap Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Joap Rebuttal use?
About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Joap Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Joap Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Joap Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.