Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when drafting the response-to-reviewers and revision for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) R&R — turning a developmental, often multi-round decision letter into a…
Install Jms Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jms-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jms-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Management-Studies-Skills/skills/jms-rebuttal .claude/skills/jms-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "jms-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Management-Studies-Skills/skills/jms-rebuttal into .claude/skills/jms-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jms-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Management-Studies-Skills/skills/jms-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jms-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jms-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Management-Studies-Skills/skills/jms-rebuttal .agents/skills/jms-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "jms-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Management-Studies-Skills/skills/jms-rebuttal into .agents/skills/jms-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jms-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jms-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jms-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Management-Studies-Skills/skills/jms-rebuttal .cursor/skills/jms-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "jms-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Management-Studies-Skills/skills/jms-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/jms-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jms-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Journal-of-Management-Studies-Skills/skills/jms-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jms-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jms-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Management-Studies-Skills/skills/jms-rebuttal .gemini/skills/jms-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jms-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Management-Studies-Skills/skills/jms-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/jms-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jms-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jms-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jms-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Management-Studies-Skills/skills/jms-rebuttal .github/skills/jms-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jms-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Management-Studies-Skills/skills/jms-rebuttal into .github/skills/jms-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jms-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jms-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jms-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Management-Studies-Skills/skills/jms-rebuttal .opencode/skills/jms-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jms-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Management-Studies-Skills/skills/jms-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/jms-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jms-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
jms-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.2k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 535 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when drafting the response-to-reviewers and revision for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) R&R — turning a developmental, often multi-round decision letter into a…
- Works in 4 steps: Opening to the editor. Thank the editor… → Point-by-point, comment-by-comment.… → Where you disagree. Disagree only when… → …
- Drafting the response-to-reviewers and revision for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) R&R — turning a developmental
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, The JMS rebuttal bar, Structure the response letter and Handling the signature JMS asks, plus 4 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Jms Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting the response-to-reviewers and revision for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) R&R — turning a developmental, often multi-round decision letter into a point-by-point response that satisfies the handling editor. Drafts the rebuttal; it does not re-plan the review reading (jms-review-process) or rebuild the theory from scratch (jms-theory-development).
Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Drafting the response-to-reviewers and revision for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) R&R — turning a developmental
- Often multi-round decision letter into a point-by-point response that satisfies the handling editor
Example prompts
- “/jms-rebuttal”
Workflow steps
4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Opening to the editor. Thank the editor and reviewers; state the overall change — how the contribution and paper have improved — in a…
- Point-by-point, comment-by-comment. Reproduce each comment verbatim, then respond. For each: (a) what you changed, (b) where…
- Where you disagree. Disagree only when you must, with evidence and theory — never with attitude. Offer a compromise (a clarification, a…
- Reviewer conflicts. When reviewers contradict each other, surface it explicitly and explain the path you took, deferring to the editor's…
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Jms Rebuttal loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 96 tokens; SKILL.md has 535 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 535 words, ~1,213 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/jms-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- jms-rebuttal
- description
- Use when drafting the response-to-reviewers and revision for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) R&R — turning a developmental, often multi-round decision letter into a point-by-point response that satisfies the handling editor. Drafts the rebuttal; it does not re-plan the review reading (jms-review-process) or rebuild the theory from scratch (jms-theory-development).
Rebuttal Strategy (jms-rebuttal)
When to trigger
- A JMS R&R (major or minor) has arrived and you are drafting the response letter
- Reviewers disagree and you must decide whom to follow without alienating the other
- A reviewer demands a change that would weaken the paper and you need to push back gracefully
- The contribution must be re-sharpened in response to "the theoretical contribution is unclear"
- You are entering round 2+ and need to show the editor decisive progress
The JMS rebuttal bar
JMS review is developmental and multi-round, so the response letter is itself a piece of scholarship: it must be respectful, point-by-point, and complete, and it must convince the handling editor (not just placate reviewers) that the contribution is now clear and the rigor demands are met. The most consequential thread is almost always the theoretical contribution — center your response there, then handle method/analysis/framing/writing.
Structure the response letter
- Opening to the editor. Thank the editor and reviewers; state the overall change — how the contribution and paper have improved — in a short paragraph. Signal that you took the development seriously.
- Point-by-point, comment-by-comment. Reproduce each comment verbatim, then respond. For each: (a) what you changed, (b) where (section/page/table number in the revision), (c) the brief reasoning. Quote the new text where it helps.
- Where you disagree. Disagree only when you must, with evidence and theory — never with attitude. Offer a compromise (a clarification, a bounded claim, an added robustness check or quote) rather than a flat refusal.
- Reviewer conflicts. When reviewers contradict each other, surface it explicitly and explain the path you took, deferring to the editor's framing.
Handling the signature JMS asks
| Reviewer ask | Strong response |
|---|---|
| "Contribution to theory is unclear" | Re-state the one-sentence contribution up front; show the revised intro/discussion; do not just add citations |
| "This is description, not theory" (qual) | Strengthen the data-structure → model abstraction; add propositions; do not bolt on hypotheses |
| "Endogeneity / CMB unaddressed" (quant) | Add the identification strategy or robustness; report it; state residual limits honestly |
| "Mechanism is asserted, not shown" | Add mediation evidence or richer process tracing; tie it back to the theorised mechanism |
| "Out of scope / wrong conversation" | Re-anchor positioning in a JMS conversation; or concede if truly mis-fit |
Show full SKILL.md (167 more words)Show less
Round-2+ discipline
By later rounds the editor is watching for responsiveness and convergence. Make every prior promise visibly kept; flag anything you could not do and why; avoid reopening settled points. A change log mapping comment → action → location speeds the editor's check.
Checklist
- Every comment addressed individually; none silently skipped
- Each response states what changed, where (section/page/exhibit), and why
- The theoretical contribution is re-centered and visibly strengthened
- Disagreements are evidence-based, respectful, and offer a compromise
- Reviewer conflicts surfaced for the editor, not silently resolved
- Qualitative asks answered in the qualitative idiom (no bolted-on hypotheses)
- Tone is collegial and developmental throughout; a change log aids the editor
Anti-patterns
- Defensive or dismissive tone — fatal in a developmental culture
- Cosmetic compliance — claiming a change without actually making it (editors check)
- Citation-stuffing the contribution instead of re-articulating it
- Adding hypotheses to a qualitative paper because a reviewer used quant language
- Silently siding with one reviewer against another without telling the editor
- Reopening settled points in later rounds, signalling non-convergence
Output format
【Decision】R&R major / minor (round N)
【Editor headline】one-paragraph overall improvement statement
【Contribution re-center】revised one-sentence contribution + where shown
【Point-by-point】comment → change → location (section/page/exhibit) → reasoning
【Disagreements】point · evidence · compromise offered
【Conflicts surfaced】… (deferred to editor)
【Change log】comment → action → location
【Next step】resubmit via ScholarOne; if rejected, jms-topic-selection to reframe© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Management-Studies-Skills/skills/jms-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Jms Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jms Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Jms Rebuttal
What does Jms Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when drafting the response-to-reviewers and revision for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) R&R — turning a developmental, often multi-round decision letter into a…. Jms Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting the response-to-reviewers and revision for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) R&R — turning a developmental, often multi-round decision letter into a point-by-point response that satisfies the handling editor.
When should I use Jms Rebuttal?
Jms Rebuttal fits situations like: drafting the response-to-reviewers and revision for a Journal of Management Studies (JMS) R&R — turning a developmental; often multi-round decision letter into a point-by-point response that satisfies the handling editor.
How do I install Jms Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jms-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Management-Studies-Skills/skills/jms-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jms-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Jms Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jms-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Management-Studies-Skills/skills/jms-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jms-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Jms Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jms-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jms-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/jms-rebuttal, .github/skills/jms-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/jms-rebuttal in your project.
What does Jms Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jms Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Jms Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Jms Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Jms Rebuttal use?
Jms Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Jms Rebuttal use?
About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Jms Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jms Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Jms Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.