Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when planning and drafting the response to a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) major/minor revision — a point-by-point reply to the EIC, Associate Editor, and…
Install Jmis Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmis-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jmis-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-rebuttal .claude/skills/jmis-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "jmis-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-rebuttal into .claude/skills/jmis-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jmis-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmis-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jmis-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-rebuttal .agents/skills/jmis-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "jmis-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-rebuttal into .agents/skills/jmis-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jmis-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmis-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jmis-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-rebuttal .cursor/skills/jmis-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "jmis-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/jmis-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jmis-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmis-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jmis-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-rebuttal .gemini/skills/jmis-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jmis-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/jmis-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jmis-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jmis-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmis-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-rebuttal .github/skills/jmis-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jmis-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-rebuttal into .github/skills/jmis-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jmis-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmis-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jmis-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-rebuttal .opencode/skills/jmis-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jmis-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/jmis-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jmis-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
jmis-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.8k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 886 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when planning and drafting the response to a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) major/minor revision — a point-by-point reply to the EIC, Associate Editor, and…
- Works in 3 steps: Fit / contribution concerns first. If… → Identification / measurement /… → Cosmetic / clarity. Batch and resolve…
- Associate Editor
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Triage before you draft, Weight the AE over a divergent… and Draft the point-by-point…, plus 7 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Jmis Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when planning and drafting the response to a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) major/minor revision — a point-by-point reply to the EIC, Associate Editor, and double-anonymized referees that resolves identification, measurement, contribution, and robustness concerns. Plans and drafts the response; revisit earlier jmis- skills to execute the underlying fixes.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.8k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Associate Editor
- Double-anonymized referees that resolves identification
- Robustness concerns
Example prompts
- “/jmis-rebuttal”
Workflow steps
3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Fit / contribution concerns first. If the AE or EIC doubts the IS-management contribution, no robustness check rescues it — re-run…
- Identification / measurement / robustness. Classify each as a real fix (new analysis), a clarification (already in the paper, surface it)…
- Cosmetic / clarity. Batch and resolve quickly.
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Jmis Rebuttal loads about 1.8k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 99 tokens; SKILL.md has 886 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 886 words, ~1,817 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/jmis-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- jmis-rebuttal
- description
- Use when planning and drafting the response to a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) major/minor revision — a point-by-point reply to the EIC, Associate Editor, and double-anonymized referees that resolves identification, measurement, contribution, and robustness concerns. Plans and drafts the response; revisit earlier jmis-* skills to execute the underlying fixes.
Rebuttal Strategy (jmis-rebuttal)
When to trigger
- A JMIS major- or minor-revision letter arrived and you need a response plan
- Referee and AE comments conflict and you must decide whom to follow
- A reviewer asks for analysis you have not run, or challenges the contribution's IS relevance
- You need a point-by-point response letter that the EIC and AE can adjudicate quickly
Triage before you draft
JMIS revisions come back through an EIC-led, double-anonymized process: the EIC and Associate Editor weigh the referees, so your response is read by people deciding whether you have resolved concerns, not merely answered them. Triage every comment:
- Fit / contribution concerns first. If the AE or EIC doubts the IS-management contribution, no robustness check rescues it — re-run
jmis-contribution-framingand lead the letter with the reframe. - Identification / measurement / robustness. Classify each as a real fix (new analysis), a clarification (already in the paper, surface it), or a defensible decline (explain why the request is not appropriate, with evidence).
- Cosmetic / clarity. Batch and resolve quickly.
Weight the AE over a divergent referee, but answer everyone
When referees conflict, the AE's letter is the decision signal — prioritize the concerns the AE foregrounds, and where two referees disagree, say how you reconciled them and why. Never silently side with one referee against another; make the resolution explicit so the AE can see your reasoning. Answer every comment, even the ones you decline.
Draft the point-by-point response
- Lead with a summary of the major changes and how the contribution is now sharper for IS management.
- Quote each comment, then respond with what you changed, where (section/table/page), and the result. Show, do not assert: paste the new estimate, the new validity figure, the new robustness column.
- Where you decline, give a reasoned, evidence-backed explanation — politely and without defensiveness.
- Keep the revised paper inside ≤50 pages even after additions; if new analyses crowd the body, move support to the online appendix rather than overrunning the limit.
- Maintain anonymization in the revised manuscript and respect the numbered-reference style throughout.
Match the fix to the right skill
| Referee concern | Where the real fix happens |
|---|---|
| Contribution unclear / incremental | jmis-contribution-framing (+ jmis-literature-positioning) |
| Endogeneity / weak identification | jmis-data-analysis (+ jmis-methods) |
| Construct validity / common-method bias | jmis-data-analysis |
| Not robust / not generalizable | jmis-data-analysis |
| Exhibits unclear | jmis-tables-figures |
| Prose / abstract / framing | jmis-writing-style |
Checklist
- Every comment is triaged: real fix / clarification / reasoned decline
- Fit/contribution concerns are addressed first and lead the letter
- AE's emphasis is prioritized; conflicting referees explicitly reconciled
- Each response names the change, its location, and the result (with new numbers)
- Declines are justified with evidence, not asserted
- Revised manuscript stays ≤50pp, anonymized, with numbered references
- The letter opens with a one-page summary of major changes
- Every response carries a verifiable pointer (section/table/page) the AE can check
Worked move: converting a contested request into a resolved concern (illustrative)
A referee demands an instrument you do not have. Arguing "no valid instrument exists" reads as a dodge. The resolving move triangulates: add the within-unit/quasi-experimental evidence you can produce, run a selection-sensitivity analysis showing how large unobserved confounding would have to be to overturn the result, and state plainly the residual limitation in the discussion. You did not give the referee the exact tool requested, but you addressed the underlying worry — endogeneity — with evidence, and you let the AE see that the concern is now bounded rather than ignored. That is what "resolved, not just answered" means in an EIC-led process.
Show full SKILL.md (320 more words)Show less
Anti-patterns
- A defensive letter that argues with referees instead of resolving concerns
- Answering robustness asks while leaving the contribution doubt untouched
- Silently following one referee against another without explaining the reconciliation
- "We have addressed this" with no pointer to the change or new evidence
- Letting added analyses push the paper past 50 pages or break anonymization
- A response the AE cannot verify against the manuscript without hunting for the change
- Answering a contested request literally instead of resolving the underlying concern with available evidence
- Reintroducing identifying details in the revision letter or revised manuscript
Structure the response document for fast adjudication
The EIC and AE adjudicate faster when the letter is built for scanning. Open with a one-page summary of major changes that states how the contribution is now sharper and lists the three or four biggest revisions. Then take each reviewer in turn, quoting every comment verbatim in a distinct font or block, followed by your response in plain text with an explicit pointer ("see revised Section 4.2, Table 3, p. 18") and the new result stated inline. Where the same concern came from multiple reviewers, answer it once and cross-reference, so the AE sees consistency rather than contradictions. Close each reviewer's section by inviting them to the specific changed passages. A response that the AE can verify against the manuscript without hunting is itself evidence that you took the review seriously.
Route the underlying work, then write the letter
The response letter documents fixes; it does not perform them. Before drafting, send each substantive concern to the skill that owns the real change — identification and measurement to jmis-data-analysis, contribution doubts to jmis-contribution-framing, exhibit problems to jmis-tables-figures — and complete those revisions in the manuscript first. Then write the letter against the finished revision, so every "we have done X" points to a change that already exists. A letter written ahead of the work invariably overpromises and underdelivers.
Output format
【Decision type】major / minor revision
【Lead change】how the IS-management contribution is now sharper
【Comment triage】#fixes / #clarifications / #reasoned-declines
【AE emphasis】the concerns prioritized; conflicts reconciled
【Response letter】point-by-point, each with location + new result
【Constraints kept】≤50pp / anonymized / numbered refs
【Underlying fixes routed to】jmis-data-analysis / jmis-contribution-framing / jmis-tables-figures / …© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Jmis Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jmis Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Jmis Rebuttal
What does Jmis Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when planning and drafting the response to a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) major/minor revision — a point-by-point reply to the EIC, Associate Editor, and…. Jmis Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when planning and drafting the response to a Journal of Management Information Systems (JMIS) major/minor revision — a point-by-point reply to the EIC, Associate Editor, and double-anonymized referees that resolves identification, measurement, contribution, and robustness concerns.
When should I use Jmis Rebuttal?
Jmis Rebuttal fits situations like: associate Editor; double-anonymized referees that resolves identification; robustness concerns.
How do I install Jmis Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmis-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jmis-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Jmis Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmis-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Management-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jmis-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jmis-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Jmis Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmis-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jmis-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/jmis-rebuttal, .github/skills/jmis-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/jmis-rebuttal in your project.
What does Jmis Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jmis Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Jmis Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Jmis Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Jmis Rebuttal use?
Jmis Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Jmis Rebuttal use?
About 1.8k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Jmis Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jmis Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Jmis Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.