Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when anticipating referee objections for a Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (JMCB) manuscript before submission (or before resubmitting), so the paper pre-empts the…
Install Jmcb Referee Strategy
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmcb-referee-strategy -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jmcb-referee-strategy --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Money-Credit-and-Banking-Skills/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy .claude/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "jmcb-referee-strategy" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Money-Credit-and-Banking-Skills/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy into .claude/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jmcb-referee-strategy", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Money-Credit-and-Banking-Skills/skills/jmcb-referee-strategyType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmcb-referee-strategy -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jmcb-referee-strategy --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Money-Credit-and-Banking-Skills/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy .agents/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "jmcb-referee-strategy" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Money-Credit-and-Banking-Skills/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy into .agents/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jmcb-referee-strategy", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmcb-referee-strategy -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jmcb-referee-strategy --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Money-Credit-and-Banking-Skills/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy .cursor/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "jmcb-referee-strategy" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Money-Credit-and-Banking-Skills/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy into .cursor/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jmcb-referee-strategy", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Journal-of-Money-Credit-and-Banking-Skills/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmcb-referee-strategy -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jmcb-referee-strategy --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Money-Credit-and-Banking-Skills/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy .gemini/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jmcb-referee-strategy" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Money-Credit-and-Banking-Skills/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy into .gemini/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jmcb-referee-strategy", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jmcb-referee-strategyInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmcb-referee-strategy -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Money-Credit-and-Banking-Skills/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy .github/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jmcb-referee-strategy" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Money-Credit-and-Banking-Skills/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy into .github/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jmcb-referee-strategy", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmcb-referee-strategy -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jmcb-referee-strategy --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Money-Credit-and-Banking-Skills/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy .opencode/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jmcb-referee-strategy" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Money-Credit-and-Banking-Skills/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy into .opencode/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jmcb-referee-strategy", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
jmcb-referee-strategy- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~2k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 987 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when anticipating referee objections for a Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (JMCB) manuscript before submission (or before resubmitting), so the paper pre-empts the…
- Works in 5 steps: List the three objections most likely to… → For each, decide whether to fix it now… → Benchmark your magnitudes against the… → …
- Anticipating referee objections for a Journal of Money
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Who reviews at JMCB, and what…, Building the pre-emption map and The standard objection arsenal…, plus 7 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Jmcb Referee Strategy is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when anticipating referee objections for a Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (JMCB) manuscript before submission (or before resubmitting), so the paper pre-empts the predictable monetary/banking pushbacks. Hardens the paper against its own reviewers; it does not draft the response letter (see jmcb-rebuttal).
Its SKILL.md is about 2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Anticipating referee objections for a Journal of Money
- Credit and Banking (JMCB) manuscript before submission (or before resubmitting)
- So the paper pre-empts the predictable monetary/banking pushbacks
Example prompts
- “/jmcb-referee-strategy”
Workflow steps
5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- List the three objections most likely to sink the paper, by referee type, ranked by damage.
- For each, decide whether to fix it now (add the analysis), answer it in the text (a paragraph that defuses it), or flag it as a scoped…
- Benchmark your magnitudes against the canonical literature — a transmission elasticity or deposit beta that is an order of magnitude off…
- Address the sibling-journal reflex — a referee may think "this belongs at JME/JBF." Make the policy/monetary framing in the intro answer…
- Pre-write the hard-question answers so that, if the report comes, the analysis already exists (this feeds jmcb-rebuttal).
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Jmcb Referee Strategy loads about 2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 85 tokens; SKILL.md has 987 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 987 words, ~1,976 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- jmcb-referee-strategy
- description
- Use when anticipating referee objections for a Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (JMCB) manuscript before submission (or before resubmitting), so the paper pre-empts the predictable monetary/banking pushbacks. Hardens the paper against its own reviewers; it does not draft the response letter (see jmcb-rebuttal).
Referee Strategy (jmcb-referee-strategy)
When to trigger
- The paper is near submission and you want to find the objections before a referee does
- You are unsure which editorial desk / referee type the paper will draw and how to address each
- A prior rejection's reports show a recurring objection you have not yet defused
- The contribution is sound but the paper has obvious unguarded flanks (shock cleanliness, demand contamination, inference)
Who reviews at JMCB, and what they attack
JMCB papers are typically refereed by monetary/banking specialists who hold strong priors about mechanisms and are quick to spot the field's classic failures. Anticipate the reviewer type your paper will draw and pre-empt their reflexes:
| Referee type | What they reliably attack | Pre-empt by |
|---|---|---|
| Monetary-macro empiricist | shock contamination (information effect, anticipation); SVAR ordering; IRF inference | clean, info-robust shock; ordering/restriction sensitivity in the body |
| Banking micro-econometrician | demand vs. supply; clustering; M&A/identifier hygiene | firm×time FE; two-way clustering; merger-adjusted panel |
| Structural/quant modeler | what disciplines parameters; policy-invariance of the counterfactual | parameter-to-moment map; Lucas-critique defense |
| Policy-oriented reader | "so what for a central bank?"; magnitude plausibility | explicit policy lever; magnitudes benchmarked to known estimates |
Building the pre-emption map
- List the three objections most likely to sink the paper, by referee type, ranked by damage.
- For each, decide whether to fix it now (add the analysis), answer it in the text (a paragraph that defuses it), or flag it as a scoped limitation (honest boundary). Most should be fixed or answered in the body, not deferred.
- Benchmark your magnitudes against the canonical literature — a transmission elasticity or deposit beta that is an order of magnitude off the consensus will draw fire; pre-empt by situating it.
- Address the sibling-journal reflex — a referee may think "this belongs at JME/JBF." Make the policy/monetary framing in the intro answer that before it is raised.
- Pre-write the hard-question answers so that, if the report comes, the analysis already exists (this feeds
jmcb-rebuttal).
The standard objection arsenal at JMCB
These recur often enough that you should assume at least two will appear; pre-empting them in the body converts a likely revision round into a faster one:
- "Your monetary shock is not exogenous." The information effect, anticipation, and policy-rule endogeneity are the first things a macro referee tests. Have the info-robust version ready.
- "This is demand, not supply." For any bank-lending result, the demand-vs-supply identification is the reflexive objection. Firm×time fixed effects (or the single-vs-multi-bank-firm split) is the expected answer.
- "Inference is overstated." Two-way clustering, few-cluster corrections, and serial-correlation-robust bands are checked routinely on panels and time series.
- "The magnitude is implausible / off-consensus." A number far from the canonical literature without explanation reads as an artifact.
- "Why JMCB and not JME/JBF?" Implicitly a scope objection; if unanswered it can become a transfer recommendation rather than a revision.
- "It does not replicate / the data are not reproducible." Given the journal's archive history, vagueness about data construction or code draws fire early.
Editor desk awareness
JMCB runs multiple editors with different specializations (monetary-macro vs. banking). The desk a paper draws shapes which referees and which objections dominate. You cannot choose the desk, but you can make the cover letter and intro speak to whichever lens is most likely — a banking paper should pre-empt the banking-econometrics objections most forcefully, a monetary-macro paper the shock-identification ones. Confirm current desks (待核实) before tailoring the cover letter.
Checklist
- Top three likely objections listed by referee type and ranked by damage
- Each objection has a decided response: fix now / answer in text / scoped limitation
- Shock cleanliness (info effect) and demand-vs-supply pre-empted if applicable
- Inference (clustering, few-cluster, serial correlation) pre-empted
- Headline magnitudes benchmarked against the canonical literature
- The "why JMCB not JME/JBF" reflex answered in the intro
- Hard-question analyses pre-built so the rebuttal can cite them
Show full SKILL.md (363 more words)Show less
Anti-patterns
- Submitting with an obvious unguarded flank (raw-residual shock, one-way clustering) and hoping no one notices
- Treating every objection as fixable by an appendix table rather than a tightened argument
- Ignoring magnitude plausibility — a result far off consensus with no explanation invites rejection
- Leaving the sibling-journal question unanswered, so a referee recommends transfer instead of revision
- Writing defensive prose now that pre-argues with a referee who has not yet objected
Limitations, stated on your terms
A short, honest limitations passage in the paper disarms referees more effectively than silence. State the scope conditions a referee would otherwise flag — the local nature of the estimate, the single-country sample, the regime the result is identified in — and frame each as a bounded claim rather than a weakness to be discovered. The aim is that the referee's objection is already acknowledged and scoped in your words, leaving them to evaluate the contribution rather than to "catch" an unstated flaw.
Worked vignette (illustrative)
Before submitting a paper on monetary transmission through bank capital, the authors war-game the reviews. The banking referee will ask whether the lending response is demand; they pre-empt with firm×quarter fixed effects and say so in the body. The macro referee will question the shock; they use info-robust surprises and add an ordering-sensitivity panel. The policy reader will ask "so what?"; the intro now names capital regulation as the targetable lever. When the actual report later raises exactly the demand objection, the answer — and the table — already exist, turning a potential reject into a one-round revision.
Turn the war-game into pre-built defenses
The payoff of anticipating objections is that the analysis exists before the report does. For each top objection, run the defensive analysis now and keep it ready — even if it lives in the online appendix at submission. When the report later raises that exact point, the response is "see Appendix B.4, which we already provide," and the revision is a single round rather than two. This is the highest-leverage use of pre-submission time: the objections you cannot pre-empt in the body, you pre-answer in the drawer. It also feeds directly into jmcb-rebuttal, where these pre-built tables become the point-by-point responses.
Output format
【Journal】Journal of Money, Credit and Banking
【Skill】jmcb-referee-strategy
【Likely referee types】which specialists this paper draws
【Top objections】3 ranked by damage, tagged by referee type
【Response per objection】fix now / answer in text / scoped limitation
【Magnitude benchmark】headline situated vs. canonical estimates
【Sibling reflex】how the intro answers "why not JME/JBF"
【Feeds】jmcb-rebuttal (pre-built answers) / back to jmcb-robustness or jmcb-identification if a fix is needed
【Next skill】jmcb-rebuttal© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Money-Credit-and-Banking-Skills/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Jmcb Referee Strategy next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jmcb Referee Strategy this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Jmcb Referee Strategy
What does Jmcb Referee Strategy do?
A skill your agent uses when anticipating referee objections for a Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (JMCB) manuscript before submission (or before resubmitting), so the paper pre-empts the…. Jmcb Referee Strategy is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when anticipating referee objections for a Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (JMCB) manuscript before submission (or before resubmitting), so the paper pre-empts the predictable monetary/banking pushbacks.
When should I use Jmcb Referee Strategy?
Jmcb Referee Strategy fits situations like: anticipating referee objections for a Journal of Money; credit and Banking (JMCB) manuscript before submission (or before resubmitting); so the paper pre-empts the predictable monetary/banking pushbacks.
How do I install Jmcb Referee Strategy in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmcb-referee-strategy -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Money-Credit-and-Banking-Skills/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Jmcb Referee Strategy in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmcb-referee-strategy -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Money-Credit-and-Banking-Skills/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Jmcb Referee Strategy in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmcb-referee-strategy -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy, .gemini/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy, .github/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy and .opencode/skills/jmcb-referee-strategy in your project.
What does Jmcb Referee Strategy need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jmcb Referee Strategy is instructions for the agent only.
Does Jmcb Referee Strategy access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Jmcb Referee Strategy safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Jmcb Referee Strategy use?
Jmcb Referee Strategy is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Jmcb Referee Strategy use?
About 2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Jmcb Referee Strategy?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jmcb Referee Strategy: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Jmcb Referee Strategy?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.