Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when a Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) decision letter has arrived and you need a response-letter strategy — triaging an institutional-economist referee's…
Install Jleo Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jleo-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jleo-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Law-Economics-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jleo-rebuttal .claude/skills/jleo-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "jleo-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Law-Economics-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jleo-rebuttal into .claude/skills/jleo-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jleo-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Law-Economics-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jleo-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jleo-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jleo-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Law-Economics-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jleo-rebuttal .agents/skills/jleo-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "jleo-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Law-Economics-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jleo-rebuttal into .agents/skills/jleo-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jleo-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jleo-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jleo-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Law-Economics-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jleo-rebuttal .cursor/skills/jleo-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "jleo-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Law-Economics-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jleo-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/jleo-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jleo-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Journal-of-Law-Economics-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jleo-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jleo-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jleo-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Law-Economics-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jleo-rebuttal .gemini/skills/jleo-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jleo-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Law-Economics-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jleo-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/jleo-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jleo-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jleo-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jleo-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Law-Economics-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jleo-rebuttal .github/skills/jleo-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jleo-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Law-Economics-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jleo-rebuttal into .github/skills/jleo-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jleo-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jleo-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jleo-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Law-Economics-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jleo-rebuttal .opencode/skills/jleo-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jleo-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Law-Economics-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jleo-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/jleo-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jleo-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
jleo-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.4k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 686 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when a Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) decision letter has arrived and you need a response-letter strategy — triaging an institutional-economist referee's…
- Works in 3 steps: Find the editor's weighting. The… → Separate the conceptual from the… → Identify the deal-breakers. A challenge…
- A Journal of Law
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Reading a JLEO decision letter, Building the response and Drafting discipline, plus 4 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Jleo Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when a Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) decision letter has arrived and you need a response-letter strategy — triaging an institutional-economist referee's report into a credible revision and point-by-point reply. Plans the rebuttal; it does not redo the analysis (route back to the relevant jleo- skill).
Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- A Journal of Law
- Tasks that involve Peer review
Example prompts
- “/jleo-rebuttal”
Workflow steps
3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Find the editor's weighting. The editor's cover note usually signals which referee points are binding. Solve those first; treat the rest…
- Separate the conceptual from the technical. Institutional referees raise two kinds of point: "your mechanism is not what you claim / your…
- Identify the deal-breakers. A challenge to the identification of a self-selected governance form, or to the validity of a hand-coded…
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Jleo Rebuttal loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 86 tokens; SKILL.md has 686 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 686 words, ~1,437 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/jleo-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- jleo-rebuttal
- description
- Use when a Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) decision letter has arrived and you need a response-letter strategy — triaging an institutional-economist referee's report into a credible revision and point-by-point reply. Plans the rebuttal; it does not redo the analysis (route back to the relevant jleo-* skill).
Rebuttal Strategy (jleo-rebuttal)
When to trigger
- A JLEO R&R or major-revision letter arrived and you must plan the response before editing
- Two referees pull in opposite directions (one wants more theory, one more empirics) and you must reconcile
- A referee challenges the institutional mechanism or the identification of a chosen governance/institution
- The editor's letter signals which concerns are decisive and which are optional
- You need a point-by-point response that an institutional-economics referee will read as responsive, not evasive
Reading a JLEO decision letter
JLEO editors and referees come from the institutional and organizational economics communities, and their reports tend to probe the mechanism and the credibility of a chosen institutional object harder than the marginal estimate. Before drafting, decode the letter:
- Find the editor's weighting. The editor's cover note usually signals which referee points are binding. Solve those first; treat the rest as secondary unless cheap.
- Separate the conceptual from the technical. Institutional referees raise two kinds of point: "your mechanism is not what you claim / your contribution is smaller than stated" (conceptual — may require reframing or new tests) and "this robustness/inference is missing" (technical — usually a table). Triage accordingly.
- Identify the deal-breakers. A challenge to the identification of a self-selected governance form, or to the validity of a hand-coded institutional measure, is usually a deal-breaker that needs real work, not rhetoric.
Building the response
| Referee point type | Response strategy |
|---|---|
| "Mechanism is mislabeled / contribution oversold" | Reframe honestly; add a test that pins the mechanism, or scope the claim down — do not just reassert |
| "Governance/institution is endogenous" | New identification work (IV / shock / selection bound), then report it; route to jleo-identification |
| "Institutional measure is invalid" | Validate with an alternative measure; document coding; route to jleo-replication-package |
| "Model adds nothing" | Add a comparative static the intuition lacked, or cut the model to its working core |
| "Alternative mechanism" | Add a discriminating test; concede partial if the rival is genuinely live |
| "Missing robustness / inference" | Run it, add the table, point to it; route to jleo-robustness |
| Referees conflict | Let the editor's signal break the tie; explain the choice respectfully to both |
Drafting discipline
- Point-by-point, quote then respond. Reproduce each comment, then state what you changed and where (page/table). Institutional referees check that you actually moved the paper.
- Lead each reply with the action, not the argument. "We have added X (Table 3)" before "we believe the original was adequate."
- Concede where right; defend with evidence where not. A defended point needs a new exhibit or a citation, not just rhetoric. Never claim a change you did not make.
- Keep the institutional framing consistent. If you reframe the mechanism for one referee, propagate it through the abstract, intro, and the other referee's reply so the paper reads coherently.
- Summarize the major changes up front in a cover letter to the editor, mapped to the binding concerns.
Show full SKILL.md (215 more words)Show less
Checklist
- The editor's binding concerns are identified and solved first
- Every referee point has a quote-then-respond entry that names the change and its location
- Deal-breakers (endogeneity, measure validity, mechanism) got real work, not rhetoric
- Conflicting referees reconciled with reference to the editor's signal
- No claimed change is unsupported by an actual edit/exhibit
- The reframed institutional mechanism (if any) is consistent across the whole paper
Anti-patterns
- Reasserting the mechanism a referee challenged without new evidence or a scope-down
- Answering an endogeneity objection with prose where a new design or a bound is needed
- A response that argues with the referee instead of moving the paper
- Claiming a change ("we now address selection") that the manuscript does not actually contain
- Reframing for one referee while leaving the abstract/intro contradicting the new framing
Worked vignette (illustrative)
Referee 1 says the make-or-buy effect is selection, not governance; Referee 2 says the model is decorative; the editor flags Referee 1 as decisive. The plan: route to jleo-identification for a specificity-shock design that breaks the selection (the decisive fix), then trim the model to the single comparative static the data test (answering Referee 2 cheaply). The response letter leads with the new identification, maps it to the editor's binding concern, and shows the slimmed model now earns its place.
Output format
【Decision】R&R / major / minor; editor's binding concerns: ___
【Referee points triaged】conceptual vs. technical; deal-breakers: ___
【Action per point】quote → change → location (page/table)
【New work needed】route to jleo-identification / jleo-robustness / jleo-replication-package
【Referee conflict resolution】per editor's signal: ___
【Consistency】reframed mechanism propagated to abstract/intro? [Y/N]
【Next step】revise, then re-run jleo-submission preflight before resubmitting© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Law-Economics-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jleo-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Jleo Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jleo Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Jleo Rebuttal
What does Jleo Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when a Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) decision letter has arrived and you need a response-letter strategy — triaging an institutional-economist referee's…. Jleo Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when a Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) decision letter has arrived and you need a response-letter strategy — triaging an institutional-economist referee's report into a credible revision and point-by-point reply.
When should I use Jleo Rebuttal?
Jleo Rebuttal fits situations like: A Journal of Law; tasks that involve Peer review.
How do I install Jleo Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jleo-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Law-Economics-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jleo-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jleo-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Jleo Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jleo-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Law-Economics-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jleo-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jleo-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Jleo Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jleo-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jleo-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/jleo-rebuttal, .github/skills/jleo-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/jleo-rebuttal in your project.
What does Jleo Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jleo Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Jleo Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Jleo Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Jleo Rebuttal use?
Jleo Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Jleo Rebuttal use?
About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Jleo Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jleo Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Jleo Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.