Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when pre-morteming a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript against the objections its health-economist referees raise before submission.
Install Jhe Referee Strategy
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhe-referee-strategy -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jhe-referee-strategy --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-referee-strategy .claude/skills/jhe-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "jhe-referee-strategy" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-referee-strategy into .claude/skills/jhe-referee-strategy/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jhe-referee-strategy", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-referee-strategyType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhe-referee-strategy -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jhe-referee-strategy --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-referee-strategy .agents/skills/jhe-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "jhe-referee-strategy" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-referee-strategy into .agents/skills/jhe-referee-strategy/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jhe-referee-strategy", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhe-referee-strategy -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jhe-referee-strategy --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-referee-strategy .cursor/skills/jhe-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "jhe-referee-strategy" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-referee-strategy into .cursor/skills/jhe-referee-strategy/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jhe-referee-strategy", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-referee-strategy--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhe-referee-strategy -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jhe-referee-strategy --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-referee-strategy .gemini/skills/jhe-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jhe-referee-strategy" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-referee-strategy into .gemini/skills/jhe-referee-strategy/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jhe-referee-strategy", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jhe-referee-strategyInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhe-referee-strategy -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-referee-strategy .github/skills/jhe-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jhe-referee-strategy" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-referee-strategy into .github/skills/jhe-referee-strategy/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jhe-referee-strategy", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhe-referee-strategy -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jhe-referee-strategy --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-referee-strategy .opencode/skills/jhe-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jhe-referee-strategy" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-referee-strategy into .opencode/skills/jhe-referee-strategy/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jhe-referee-strategy", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
jhe-referee-strategy- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.9k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 995 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when pre-morteming a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript against the objections its health-economist referees raise before submission.
- Works in 5 steps: Rank the objections by how fatal they… → Write the introduction to answer the… → Pre-place the diagnostic exhibit. If a… → …
- Pre-morteming a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript against the objections its health-economist referees raise before submission
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Who reviews at JHE and how, The JHE referee pre-mortem… and How to use the pre-mortem, plus 8 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Jhe Referee Strategy is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when pre-morteming a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript against the objections its health-economist referees raise before submission. Anticipates and disarms likely pushback; it does not draft the response letter after a decision (jhe-rebuttal) or run the submission preflight.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Pre-morteming a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript against the objections its health-economist referees raise before submission
- Tasks that involve Peer review
Example prompts
- “/jhe-referee-strategy”
Workflow steps
5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Rank the objections by how fatal they are, and put the defense to the top one or two in the main text, not the appendix.
- Write the introduction to answer the first objection — if selection is the obvious worry, the intro should already gesture at how you…
- Pre-place the diagnostic exhibit. If a referee will ask for an event-study or a placebo, it should already be Figure 2.
- Name the sibling-journal reroute risk and disarm it with the contribution framing, so no referee suggests "send it elsewhere."
- Suggest referees thoughtfully if the system allows: experts who know the institution will judge the design fairly; avoid only…
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Jhe Referee Strategy loads about 1.9k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 78 tokens; SKILL.md has 995 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 995 words, ~1,887 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/jhe-referee-strategy/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- jhe-referee-strategy
- description
- Use when pre-morteming a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript against the objections its health-economist referees raise before submission. Anticipates and disarms likely pushback; it does not draft the response letter after a decision (jhe-rebuttal) or run the submission preflight.
Referee Strategy (jhe-referee-strategy)
When to trigger
- The paper is near-final and you want to find the objections before a referee does
- You suspect a specific weakness (selection, concurrent policy, overclaiming) a health economist will name
- You are choosing what to put in the main text versus the appendix to pre-empt pushback
- You want to write the introduction so it answers the first question a JHE referee will ask
Who reviews at JHE and how
Review is single-anonymized (referees know the authors; you do not know them) and suitable papers typically go to at least two reviewers for independent expert assessment (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). The referees are health economists — they hold the field's canonical results and the institutional facts of the program/market you study. The implication for strategy: you cannot hide behind anonymity, and you cannot bluff institutions. Anticipate the health-econ-specific objection, not the generic one, and answer it in the paper before it is asked.
The JHE referee pre-mortem (objections in the order they arrive)
| Likely objection | Pre-empt by |
|---|---|
| "This is selection, not the effect you claim" | model/bound the selection; show take-up vs. crowd-out vs. moral hazard separately |
| "Your policy variation is confounded by a concurrent reform" | placebo on ineligible group/period; rule out simultaneous reforms explicitly in the institutional section |
| "Staggered DiD here is biased" | heterogeneity-robust estimator + event-study leads + honest-DID bound already in the main text |
| "A coverage/utilization effect is not a welfare effect" | add the demand-and-cost model that maps utilization to welfare; do not overclaim |
| "Health spending is skewed; OLS is wrong" | defended two-part/GLM estimator with the zero mass shown |
| "Few states; your SEs are too small" | wild-cluster bootstrap / randomization inference, clustering at the policy level |
| "This belongs in AJHE / Health Economics / JPubE" | sharpen the health-econ contribution and the boundary in the intro |
| "Your data cannot be reproduced" | honest DAS + shared code + access path (jhe-replication-package) |
How to use the pre-mortem
- Rank the objections by how fatal they are, and put the defense to the top one or two in the main text, not the appendix.
- Write the introduction to answer the first objection — if selection is the obvious worry, the intro should already gesture at how you handle it.
- Pre-place the diagnostic exhibit. If a referee will ask for an event-study or a placebo, it should already be Figure 2.
- Name the sibling-journal reroute risk and disarm it with the contribution framing, so no referee suggests "send it elsewhere."
- Suggest referees thoughtfully if the system allows: experts who know the institution will judge the design fairly; avoid only methodologists who will miss the health-policy stakes.
Checklist
- The two most fatal objections are identified and answered in the main text
- Selection and concurrent-policy threats are pre-empted, not left for the referee
- Staggered-bias and few-cluster inference are handled before submission
- Welfare claims are matched to what the design identifies (no overreach to invite the obvious objection)
- The sibling-journal reroute risk is disarmed by the contribution framing
- The introduction answers the first question a health economist will ask
- Reproducibility objection pre-empted with an honest DAS and shared code
- Suggested referees (if allowed) know the institution, not only the method
Handoff boundary
This skill is a pre-submission pre-mortem; it anticipates objections and decides what to pre-place where. It is not the post-decision response letter (jhe-rebuttal) and it does not run the analysis that answers an objection — route a flagged gap to jhe-identification, jhe-robustness, or jhe-theory-model first, then come back to decide placement. When the pre-mortem is clean and the defenses are in the main text, hand off to jhe-submission.
Show full SKILL.md (405 more words)Show less
Anti-patterns
- Burying the defense to the most likely objection in an appendix a referee may not reach
- Pre-empting generic econometric worries while ignoring the health-econ-specific one (selection, institutions)
- Overclaiming welfare and then hoping no referee notices
- Ignoring the few-state inference problem until a referee forces it
- Treating single-anonymized review as if institutions could be glossed over
Main-text vs. appendix: what to pre-place where
The single highest-leverage referee-strategy decision is what earns a place in the main text. Put in the main text anything a referee needs to believe the design; demote to the appendix anything that merely reassures. At JHE that means: the heterogeneity-robust estimate, the key placebo/falsification, the selection bound, and the headline distribution figure belong in the body — the controls sweep, alternative bandwidths, and secondary outcomes go to the online appendix. A defense a referee cannot find is a defense that does not exist.
Reading two referees who disagree
With ≥2 health-economist reviewers, disagreement is common and is not yours to adjudicate by majority — the editor's letter does that. When you anticipate conflict (one wants a structural model, one wants reduced-form transparency), prepare a framing that serves both: a reduced-form headline with a model in support, each labeled for what it identifies. Pre-empting the conflict in the paper's structure is better than trying to win it in the response letter later.
Worked vignette (illustrative)
Before submitting a hospital-payment-reform paper, the pre-mortem flags the two fatal objections: patient selection (sicker patients sort to reformed hospitals) and a concurrent quality-reporting mandate. Rather than wait, the authors move the selection bound (Oster δ) and the placebo on the unreformed service line into the main text as Table 3 and Figure 2, add a paragraph in the institutional section ruling out the simultaneous mandate by timing, and frame the contribution as a provider-incentive result (not a generic policy evaluation) to forestall a "send to AJHE" suggestion. The first referee's likely two questions are answered before they are asked.
Output format
【Journal】Journal of Health Economics
【Skill】jhe-referee-strategy
【Review model】single-anonymized; ≥2 reviewers (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准)
【Top objections (ranked)】1) ... 2) ... 3) ...
【Pre-empts in main text】[which defense goes where]
【Welfare/scope discipline】claim matched to design? [Y/N]
【Reroute risk disarmed】vs. AJHE / Health Economics / JPubE? [Y/N]
【Next skill】jhe-submissionA quick self-test before you stop
Read your own introduction as the harshest health economist you know. If you can name the objection you would raise and it is not answered by the end of the paper's main text, the pre-mortem is not finished. The goal is that the first two questions a referee writes are questions you have already answered in figures and tables they can find — not questions you are hoping they will not ask.
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-referee-strategy of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Jhe Referee Strategy next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jhe Referee Strategy this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Jhe Referee Strategy
What does Jhe Referee Strategy do?
A skill your agent uses when pre-morteming a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript against the objections its health-economist referees raise before submission. Jhe Referee Strategy is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when pre-morteming a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript against the objections its health-economist referees raise before submission.
When should I use Jhe Referee Strategy?
Jhe Referee Strategy fits situations like: pre-morteming a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) manuscript against the objections its health-economist referees raise before submission; tasks that involve Peer review.
How do I install Jhe Referee Strategy in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhe-referee-strategy -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-referee-strategy in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jhe-referee-strategy in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Jhe Referee Strategy in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhe-referee-strategy -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-referee-strategy in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jhe-referee-strategy in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Jhe Referee Strategy in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhe-referee-strategy -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jhe-referee-strategy, .gemini/skills/jhe-referee-strategy, .github/skills/jhe-referee-strategy and .opencode/skills/jhe-referee-strategy in your project.
What does Jhe Referee Strategy need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jhe Referee Strategy is instructions for the agent only.
Does Jhe Referee Strategy access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Jhe Referee Strategy safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Jhe Referee Strategy use?
Jhe Referee Strategy is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Jhe Referee Strategy use?
About 1.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Jhe Referee Strategy?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jhe Referee Strategy: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Jhe Referee Strategy?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.