Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) decision letter arrives (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) and a response-to-referees letter plus revision plan must be drafted.
Install Jhe Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhe-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jhe-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-rebuttal .claude/skills/jhe-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "jhe-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-rebuttal into .claude/skills/jhe-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jhe-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhe-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jhe-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-rebuttal .agents/skills/jhe-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "jhe-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-rebuttal into .agents/skills/jhe-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jhe-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhe-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jhe-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-rebuttal .cursor/skills/jhe-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "jhe-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/jhe-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jhe-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhe-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jhe-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-rebuttal .gemini/skills/jhe-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jhe-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/jhe-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jhe-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jhe-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhe-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-rebuttal .github/skills/jhe-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jhe-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-rebuttal into .github/skills/jhe-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jhe-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhe-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jhe-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-rebuttal .opencode/skills/jhe-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jhe-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/jhe-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jhe-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
jhe-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~2k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 978 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) decision letter arrives (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) and a response-to-referees letter plus revision plan must be drafted.
- Works in 6 steps: Opening summary — thank the editor and… → Point-by-point — quote each comment,… → Tone — gracious, concrete,… → …
- A Journal of Health Economics (JHE) decision letter arrives (R&R
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, How to read a JHE decision, Response-letter structure and Triage table, plus 8 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Jhe Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) decision letter arrives (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) and a response-to-referees letter plus revision plan must be drafted. Plans and structures the response; it does not run the new analysis (jhe-identification / jhe-robustness) or the submission preflight.
Its SKILL.md is about 2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- A Journal of Health Economics (JHE) decision letter arrives (R&R
- Reject-and-resubmit) and a response-to-referees letter plus revision plan must be drafted
Example prompts
- “/jhe-rebuttal”
Workflow steps
6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Opening summary — thank the editor and referees; state the 3–5 substantive changes that define the revision, leading with the…
- Point-by-point — quote each comment, then respond with: what you did, where in the paper (section/table/page), and the result. Keep one…
- Tone — gracious, concrete, non-defensive. Concede valid points fully; where you disagree, argue with evidence and institutional fact.
- Triage discipline — every comment is done (changed + located), partially done (with reason), or respectfully declined (with an…
- Quote the decisive number. If a referee doubted the design, show the heterogeneity-robust estimate / honest-DID bound / selection bound /…
- Reconcile conflicting referees by naming the trade-off and the choice the editor's priorities imply.
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Jhe Rebuttal loads about 2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 79 tokens; SKILL.md has 978 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 978 words, ~1,974 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/jhe-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- jhe-rebuttal
- description
- Use when a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) decision letter arrives (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) and a response-to-referees letter plus revision plan must be drafted. Plans and structures the response; it does not run the new analysis (jhe-identification / jhe-robustness) or the submission preflight.
Rebuttal and Response Letter (jhe-rebuttal)
When to trigger
- A JHE R&R or reject-and-resubmit decision letter has arrived
- You need to triage referee comments into must-do / argue / defer
- You are drafting the response-to-referees document and the revision plan
- Two referees disagree and you need a strategy that satisfies the editor
How to read a JHE decision
The editor's letter is the priority signal: it tells you which referee concerns are binding. At JHE the binding asks cluster around design credibility (selection, concurrent policy, staggered-DiD bias, inference) and honest scope (a coverage/utilization effect is not welfare) before exposition. Because review is single-anonymized and the referees are health economists, expect institution-specific pushback you must answer with evidence, not assertion. With ≥2 reviewers you will sometimes face conflicting requests; the editor's letter, not a majority vote, resolves them — address the editor's stated priorities first and in full.
Response-letter structure
- Opening summary — thank the editor and referees; state the 3–5 substantive changes that define the revision, leading with the identification/selection/scope changes.
- Point-by-point — quote each comment, then respond with: what you did, where in the paper (section/table/page), and the result. Keep one consistent format per point.
- Tone — gracious, concrete, non-defensive. Concede valid points fully; where you disagree, argue with evidence and institutional fact.
- Triage discipline — every comment is done (changed + located), partially done (with reason), or respectfully declined (with an evidence-based argument). Nothing is silently dropped.
- Quote the decisive number. If a referee doubted the design, show the heterogeneity-robust estimate / honest-DID bound / selection bound / placebo explicitly, with its SE and location.
- Reconcile conflicting referees by naming the trade-off and the choice the editor's priorities imply.
Triage table
| Referee ask | Default response |
|---|---|
| Selection / identification doubt (binding per editor) | do it in full; show the new estimate or bound + SE; update the paper |
| Concurrent-policy / institutional confound | add the placebo / timing argument in the institutional section |
| Staggered-DiD or inference fix | re-estimate with CS/SA; wild-cluster bootstrap; report stability |
| "Coverage effect ≠ welfare" | add the demand-and-cost model; rescope the claim honestly |
| Additional health outcome/subgroup | run with MHT; or argue out of scope with a reason |
| Exposition / institutional clarity | revise; cheap and builds goodwill |
| Out-of-scope new paper | respectfully decline with a one-line reason |
Checklist
- Editor's stated priorities identified and addressed first, in full
- Every referee comment answered: done / partial / declined — none ignored
- Each "done" response cites the exact section/table/page and the new result
- Decisive identification/selection/robustness evidence quoted with numbers and SEs
- Conflicting referee requests reconciled by reference to the editor's priorities
- Scope claims rematched to the design where a referee flagged overreach
- Replication package and DAS updated to match the revised exhibits (
jhe-replication-package) - Tone gracious and concrete; disagreements argued with evidence and institutions
Coordinating the rebuttal with the rest of the pack
A response letter is only as strong as the new evidence behind it. When a binding concern requires fresh analysis, route the work to the owning skill before drafting the point: jhe-identification for a design fix, jhe-robustness for a stability check, jhe-theory-model for a welfare rescope. Then update exhibits (jhe-tables-figures) and the package and Data Availability Statement (jhe-replication-package) so the revised paper, the letter, and the deposit all tell the same story. A letter that quotes a number the revised paper does not contain is the fastest way to lose editor trust.
Anti-patterns
- Answering the referees but ignoring the editor's prioritization
- Defensive or dismissive tone; arguing by assertion instead of new evidence
- Claiming a change without saying where in the paper it landed
- A wall of new tables that dodges the actual selection/identification concern
- Splitting the difference between conflicting referees instead of following the editor
- Letting the replication package or DAS drift out of sync with the revised paper
Show full SKILL.md (364 more words)Show less
Timing and the resubmission cover note
Elsevier R&Rs do not run on a fixed clock the way some society journals do; do the work properly rather than rushing, but do not let a revision go stale — a multi-year gap invites a fresh referee pool and new objections. Open the resubmission with a short cover note to the editor (separate from the point-by-point) that lists, in three to five bullets, how each binding concern was resolved and where. Editors triage resubmissions from that note; make it carry the decisive numbers and locations so the editor can verify the binding asks were met without re-reading the whole letter.
What "resolved" means at JHE
A JHE revision is judged on whether the design and scope concerns are genuinely settled, not on the count of new tables. "Resolved" means: the selection/identification doubt is answered with an estimate or bound (not more controls); the institutional confound is ruled out with a placebo or timing argument; and any welfare/scope overreach the referee flagged is rematched to what the design identifies. A revision that adds analysis but leaves the binding concern technically un-addressed will not clear, however thick it is.
Worked vignette (illustrative)
Referee 1 calls the staggered Medicaid-expansion DiD biased and the parallel-trends story thin; Referee 2 wants more outcomes; the editor flags Referee 1 as binding. A weak response argues TWFE "should be fine." The JHE response: re-estimate with Callaway–Sant'Anna (new ATT 4.0pp, s.e. 1.1, vs. 4.6pp under TWFE), add event-study leads and a Goodman-Bacon decomposition, run an honest-DID bound, and rule out the concurrent marketplace launch with a placebo — then in the letter quote the new number, cite the exact figure/table, and note the conclusion is unchanged but now robust. Referee 2's extra outcomes are added with MHT where central and declined-with-reason where out of scope, explicitly subordinated to the editor's binding concern.
Output format
【Decision type】R&R / reject-and-resubmit / conditional accept
【Editor priorities】[binding asks, in order]
【Triage】done: [...] | partial: [...] | declined (with reason): [...]
【Decisive evidence】new identification/selection result + number(SE) + location
【Conflicting referees】reconciled via editor priorities? [Y/N]
【Scope discipline】overclaim rescoped to design? [Y/N]
【Package sync】replication + DAS updated to match revision? [Y/N]
【Next step】jhe-submission (resubmit) → re-enter jhe-workflow if further roundsHandoff boundary
This skill plans and structures the response and the revision; it does not produce the new evidence (that is jhe-identification / jhe-robustness / jhe-theory-model) nor run the resubmission preflight (jhe-submission). When the letter is drafted and every binding concern has its evidence and location, hand off to jhe-submission to resubmit through Editorial Manager.
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Jhe Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jhe Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Jhe Rebuttal
What does Jhe Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) decision letter arrives (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) and a response-to-referees letter plus revision plan must be drafted. Jhe Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when a Journal of Health Economics (JHE) decision letter arrives (R&R or reject-and-resubmit) and a response-to-referees letter plus revision plan must be drafted.
When should I use Jhe Rebuttal?
Jhe Rebuttal fits situations like: A Journal of Health Economics (JHE) decision letter arrives (R&R; reject-and-resubmit) and a response-to-referees letter plus revision plan must be drafted.
How do I install Jhe Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhe-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jhe-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Jhe Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhe-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Health-Economics-Skills/skills/jhe-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jhe-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Jhe Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jhe-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jhe-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/jhe-rebuttal, .github/skills/jhe-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/jhe-rebuttal in your project.
What does Jhe Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jhe Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Jhe Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Jhe Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Jhe Rebuttal use?
Jhe Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Jhe Rebuttal use?
About 2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Jhe Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jhe Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Jhe Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.