Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when explaining how the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) review process works — double-anonymous peer review, the seven-Managing-Editor structure, the…
Install Jfqa Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jfqa-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jfqa-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Financial-and-Quantitative-Analysis-Skills/skills/jfqa-review-process .claude/skills/jfqa-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "jfqa-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Financial-and-Quantitative-Analysis-Skills/skills/jfqa-review-process into .claude/skills/jfqa-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jfqa-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Financial-and-Quantitative-Analysis-Skills/skills/jfqa-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jfqa-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jfqa-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Financial-and-Quantitative-Analysis-Skills/skills/jfqa-review-process .agents/skills/jfqa-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "jfqa-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Financial-and-Quantitative-Analysis-Skills/skills/jfqa-review-process into .agents/skills/jfqa-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jfqa-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jfqa-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jfqa-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Financial-and-Quantitative-Analysis-Skills/skills/jfqa-review-process .cursor/skills/jfqa-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "jfqa-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Financial-and-Quantitative-Analysis-Skills/skills/jfqa-review-process into .cursor/skills/jfqa-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jfqa-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Journal-of-Financial-and-Quantitative-Analysis-Skills/skills/jfqa-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jfqa-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jfqa-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Financial-and-Quantitative-Analysis-Skills/skills/jfqa-review-process .gemini/skills/jfqa-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jfqa-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Financial-and-Quantitative-Analysis-Skills/skills/jfqa-review-process into .gemini/skills/jfqa-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jfqa-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jfqa-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jfqa-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Financial-and-Quantitative-Analysis-Skills/skills/jfqa-review-process .github/skills/jfqa-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jfqa-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Financial-and-Quantitative-Analysis-Skills/skills/jfqa-review-process into .github/skills/jfqa-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jfqa-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jfqa-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jfqa-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Financial-and-Quantitative-Analysis-Skills/skills/jfqa-review-process .opencode/skills/jfqa-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jfqa-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Financial-and-Quantitative-Analysis-Skills/skills/jfqa-review-process into .opencode/skills/jfqa-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jfqa-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
jfqa-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.2k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 596 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when explaining how the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) review process works — double-anonymous peer review, the seven-Managing-Editor structure, the…
- Works in 4 steps: What variation identifies the headline… → What is the magnitude in finance units,… → Which two or three nearest papers does… → …
- Explaining how the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) review process works — double-anonymous peer review
- SKILL.md covers Who decides, The review model, Fee and the desk-screen… and Selectivity, plus 6 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Jfqa Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when explaining how the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) review process works — double-anonymous peer review, the seven-Managing-Editor structure, the $350 fee with $275 refund if not sent to a reviewer, and the under-9-percent acceptance reality. Use to set expectations for what happens after you submit and how decisions are made.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Explaining how the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) review process works — double-anonymous peer review
- The seven-Managing-Editor structure
- The $350 fee with $275 refund if not sent to a reviewer
- The under-9-percent acceptance reality
Example prompts
- “/jfqa-review-process”
Workflow steps
4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- What variation identifies the headline estimate?
- What is the magnitude in finance units, and what is it scaled against?
- Which two or three nearest papers does this change, and how?
- Why is the paper exactly as long as it is?
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Jfqa Review Process loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 95 tokens; SKILL.md has 596 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 596 words, ~1,234 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/jfqa-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- jfqa-review-process
- description
- Use when explaining how the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) review process works — double-anonymous peer review, the seven-Managing-Editor structure, the $350 fee with $275 refund if not sent to a reviewer, and the under-9-percent acceptance reality. Use to set expectations for what happens after you submit and how decisions are made.
JFQA Review Process (jfqa-review-process)
Use this skill to understand what happens to a JFQA manuscript after submission, so you submit informed and read decision letters correctly.
Who decides
- JFQA has no single Editor-in-Chief. It is led by a team of seven Managing Editors (as of 2026): Hendrik Bessembinder, Ran Duchin, Thierry Foucault, Jarrad Harford, Kai Li, George Pennacchi, and Stephan Siegel, supported by advisory editors and 50+ associate editors.
- A Managing Editor is assigned per paper; that editor decides whether to desk-reject or send the paper to reviewer(s). (The specific handling editor is assigned per submission — 待核实 for any individual case.)
The review model
- Double-anonymous peer review (Cambridge Core terminology). Author-identifying information is removed and the manuscript PDF is sent blind to the reviewer(s). Anonymize accordingly (see jfqa-writing-style / jfqa-submission).
Fee and the desk-screen economics
- A $350 submission fee (credit card only) is charged up front. If the Managing Editor elects not to send the paper to a reviewer, $275 is refunded — so a desk reject still costs you $75 in handling. Budget for this.
Selectivity
- JFQA prints less than 9% of the more than 1,000 manuscripts submitted annually. Most papers do not clear review; a clean, well-identified, well-formatted submission is how you survive the first screen.
What to expect
- A desk decision (reject, or send to review), then — if reviewed — referee reports and an editor decision (reject / R&R / rarely accept). R&Rs are demanding; see jfqa-rebuttal.
Decision-letter decoding
| Letter outcome | Realistic meaning | Next move |
|---|---|---|
| Desk reject ($275 refunded) | failed the Managing Editor's fit/quality screen | diagnose which screen (scope, abstract, length, identification) before retargeting |
| Reject after review | the paper may return only if substantially modified — and the prior rejection must be disclosed in the cover letter | weigh a deep rebuild vs. another outlet; never quietly resubmit |
| R&R, major | a genuine path, with heavy identification/robustness asks | jfqa-rebuttal, full triage |
| Conditional accept | execute the remaining items precisely | finish edits, then build the Dataverse archive (jfqa-replication-and-data-policy) |
Show full SKILL.md (275 more words)Show less
What the assigned Managing Editor screens first
- Field match: the seven-editor structure means your paper lands with an editor whose own research spans your subfield (microstructure, corporate, asset pricing, banking, institutions) — sloppiness in that subfield's standard methods is visible immediately.
- Hard-constraint compliance: the one-paragraph ≤ 100-word abstract, the prescribed formatting, a text-searchable PDF, and intact anonymization.
- Substance signals: a named source of identifying variation, economic magnitudes alongside t-statistics, and length proportionate to the contribution.
- The screening rubric itself is not published — confirm against the journal's current author guidelines rather than assuming any one factor dominates.
Timeline and fee posture
- Turnaround varies with the handling editor and reviewer availability; published averages go stale quickly, so plan conference cycles around an uncertain clock and resist querying the editorial office in the first weeks.
- Fee math compounds: each desk reject costs $75 plus calendar time, so two failed screens cost $150 and a semester. Spending an extra week on jfqa-topic-selection and jfqa-submission preflight is the cheap insurance.
- If reviewer reports conflict, the Managing Editor — not a vote count — decides; read the editor's own paragraph in the letter as the binding signal.
Four answers to have ready before the screen
Draft a one-sentence answer to each, because the manuscript will be read for exactly these:
- What variation identifies the headline estimate?
- What is the magnitude in finance units, and what is it scaled against?
- Which two or three nearest papers does this change, and how?
- Why is the paper exactly as long as it is?
If any answer takes more than one sentence, route back through the relevant jfqa-* skill before paying the fee.
Output format
【Editor】per-paper Managing Editor (7-person panel)
【Model】double-anonymous; blind to reviewers
【Fee math】$350 paid; $75 retained on desk reject
【Odds】<9% printed of 1,000+; expect attrition
【Next step】jfqa-submission (preflight) → jfqa-rebuttal (on R&R)© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Financial-and-Quantitative-Analysis-Skills/skills/jfqa-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Jfqa Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jfqa Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Jfqa Review Process
What does Jfqa Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when explaining how the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) review process works — double-anonymous peer review, the seven-Managing-Editor structure, the…. Jfqa Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when explaining how the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) review process works — double-anonymous peer review, the seven-Managing-Editor structure, the $350 fee with $275 refund if not sent to a reviewer, and the under-9-percent acceptance reality.
When should I use Jfqa Review Process?
Jfqa Review Process fits situations like: explaining how the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (JFQA) review process works — double-anonymous peer review; the seven-Managing-Editor structure; the $350 fee with $275 refund if not sent to a reviewer; the under-9-percent acceptance reality.
How do I install Jfqa Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jfqa-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Financial-and-Quantitative-Analysis-Skills/skills/jfqa-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jfqa-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Jfqa Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jfqa-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Financial-and-Quantitative-Analysis-Skills/skills/jfqa-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jfqa-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Jfqa Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jfqa-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jfqa-review-process, .gemini/skills/jfqa-review-process, .github/skills/jfqa-review-process and .opencode/skills/jfqa-review-process in your project.
What does Jfqa Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jfqa Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Jfqa Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Jfqa Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Jfqa Review Process use?
Jfqa Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Jfqa Review Process use?
About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Jfqa Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jfqa Review Process: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Jfqa Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,228 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.