Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) decision letter arrives and you must plan a revision and response that satisfies a cross-disciplinary referee pair.
Install Jegeo Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jegeo-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jegeo-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-rebuttal .claude/skills/jegeo-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "jegeo-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-rebuttal into .claude/skills/jegeo-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jegeo-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jegeo-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jegeo-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-rebuttal .agents/skills/jegeo-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "jegeo-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-rebuttal into .agents/skills/jegeo-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jegeo-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jegeo-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jegeo-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-rebuttal .cursor/skills/jegeo-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "jegeo-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/jegeo-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jegeo-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jegeo-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jegeo-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-rebuttal .gemini/skills/jegeo-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jegeo-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/jegeo-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jegeo-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jegeo-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jegeo-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-rebuttal .github/skills/jegeo-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jegeo-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-rebuttal into .github/skills/jegeo-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jegeo-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jegeo-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jegeo-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-rebuttal .opencode/skills/jegeo-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jegeo-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/jegeo-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jegeo-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
jegeo-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.8k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 937 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) decision letter arrives and you must plan a revision and response that satisfies a cross-disciplinary referee pair.
- Works in 5 steps: Open with the editor's framing. Restate… → Point-by-point, grouped by theme, not… → Quote each comment, then answer with… → …
- Tasks that involve Peer review
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Read the panel before you…, Drafting the response and The cross-disciplinary…, plus 6 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Jegeo Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) decision letter arrives and you must plan a revision and response that satisfies a cross-disciplinary referee pair. Structures the rebuttal; it does not invent results or concede the core claim.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.8k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Tasks that involve Peer review
Example prompts
- “/jegeo-rebuttal”
Workflow steps
5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Open with the editor's framing. Restate the decision's main concerns in one paragraph and how the revision addresses them — editors at JEG…
- Point-by-point, grouped by theme, not strictly by referee, so a fix that answers both communities is shown once and credited to both.
- Quote each comment, then answer with evidence — the new table/map/SE, with a precise location ("now Section 4.2, Figure 3"). Show, do not…
- Where you decline, decline with a reason — a substantive argument or an honest scope limit, never silence. Declining is acceptable at JEG…
- Protect the core claim. Concede the bounded points; do not let an accumulation of small concessions dissolve the contribution.
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Jegeo Rebuttal loads about 1.8k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 64 tokens; SKILL.md has 937 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 937 words, ~1,803 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/jegeo-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- jegeo-rebuttal
- description
- Use when a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) decision letter arrives and you must plan a revision and response that satisfies a cross-disciplinary referee pair. Structures the rebuttal; it does not invent results or concede the core claim.
Rebuttal Strategy (jegeo-rebuttal)
When to trigger
- An R&R or major-revision letter arrived and you must triage the reports
- The two referees pull in opposite directions — the economist wants more identification, the geographer wants more mechanism/context
- A referee asks for spatial work (different scale, weight matrix, spillover analysis) and you must decide how far to go
- You need a response letter that reads as responsive to both communities and to the editor
Read the panel before you write a word
At JEG the reports almost always come from both communities, and the most common rebuttal failure is answering the referee you understand and brushing off the other. Before drafting, classify every comment by where it comes from and what it really wants:
| Comment type | Likely source | What it actually demands |
|---|---|---|
| "not identified / selection / weak IV" | economist | a design fix or honest bound, not more prose |
| "inference overstated / spatial correlation" | economist | Conley SEs / corrected clustering |
| "where is the geography / just a fixed effect" | geographer | place made analytically central; mechanism in prose |
| "no mechanism / no theory it speaks to" | geographer | a conceptual frame the result engages |
| "wrong scale / MAUP" | either | re-estimate across scales; justify the unit |
| "over-formalized / flattens real places" | geographer | interpretation and context, not more math |
Drafting the response
- Open with the editor's framing. Restate the decision's main concerns in one paragraph and how the revision addresses them — editors at JEG weigh whether you bridged both reports.
- Point-by-point, grouped by theme, not strictly by referee, so a fix that answers both communities is shown once and credited to both.
- Quote each comment, then answer with evidence — the new table/map/SE, with a precise location ("now Section 4.2, Figure 3"). Show, do not promise.
- Where you decline, decline with a reason — a substantive argument or an honest scope limit, never silence. Declining is acceptable at JEG if argued; ignoring is fatal.
- Protect the core claim. Concede the bounded points; do not let an accumulation of small concessions dissolve the contribution.
The cross-disciplinary balancing act
- A change that pleases the economist (more formalism, more controls) can provoke the geographer ("now even more black-box") — when you add machinery, add the matching mechanism/interpretation so both reports stay satisfied.
- When the two referees genuinely conflict (e.g., one wants the model expanded, one wants it simplified), surface the tension to the editor and propose a resolution rather than silently siding with one.
- Re-run the spatial robustness a referee requested honestly — if a different scale or W weakens the result, report the bounded version; JEG referees reward candor over a defended asterisk.
Checklist
- Every comment classified by community and by what it actually demands
- Response opens with the editor's framing and the bridge across both reports
- Point-by-point, each comment quoted then answered with located evidence
- Added machinery is paired with added mechanism/interpretation (both sides stay satisfied)
- Genuine referee conflicts surfaced to the editor with a proposed resolution
- Declines are argued, never silent; core claim protected from concession creep
- Requested spatial checks (scale/W/spillover) re-run honestly and reported even if weakening
Show full SKILL.md (433 more words)Show less
Spatial requests need a decision rule
Referees at JEG often ask for additional spatial work — another scale, a different weight matrix, a spillover model, a finer unit. Decide each with a rule, not reflexively:
- Do it now if the request targets a load-bearing assumption (the scale the headline depends on, the inference that could be overstated). Re-run it honestly and report even an unfavorable result.
- Argue the decline if the request would not change the conclusion or rests on a misreading of the design — show why, with a small bound or a logical argument.
- Offer partially when a full request (e.g., re-geocoding everything at a finer resolution) is disproportionate; provide a targeted version that answers the underlying worry.
Reporting a bounded result after a requested spatial check is a strength signal at JEG; quietly dropping the check or reporting only the favorable version is the fastest way to lose the editor's trust on resubmission.
Anti-patterns
- Answering the economist's report thoroughly and waving off the geographer's, or vice versa
- Promising changes ("we will consider...") instead of showing the revised exhibit
- Adding controls/formalism to satisfy one referee while ignoring the mechanism objection from the other
- Silently ignoring a comment you find unreasonable instead of arguing the decline
- Letting many small concessions erode the central spatial contribution
- Reporting only the favorable scale/W after a referee asked you to test alternatives
Worked vignette (illustrative)
A major-revision letter has an economist referee demanding the agglomeration elasticity be estimated structurally rather than reduced-form, and a geographer referee warning that "more modeling will bury the regional story." These pull in opposite directions. The losing move is to side silently with one. The winning move: add the structural estimate the economist wants, but pair it in the same revision with a tightened mechanism paragraph and a map that keeps the regional story visible for the geographer — then, in the response letter, name the tension explicitly to the editor and explain how the revision serves both. If the structural estimate moves the headline number (say from 0.08 to 0.06, illustrative), report it honestly; a bounded, candid number survives a JEG panel better than a defended original.
Editor-facing framing (often decisive)
JEG editors sit on the bridge and weigh whether your revision reconciled two reports rather than placating one. Make their job easy: open with their letter's framing, show in one paragraph how the revision addresses the cross-disciplinary tension, and where the referees conflict, propose the resolution rather than forcing the editor to adjudicate. A response that visibly bridges the two reports is the strongest signal you understood what JEG is.
Output format
【Journal】Journal of Economic Geography
【Skill】jegeo-rebuttal
【Decision】R&R / major / minor
【Economist-report fixes】comment → located evidence (done/declined+reason)
【Geographer-report fixes】comment → located evidence (done/declined+reason)
【Conflicts surfaced to editor】tension + proposed resolution
【Core claim status】protected / adjusted (how)
【Next step】resubmit via ScholarOne; route new bottlenecks through jegeo-workflow© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Jegeo Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jegeo Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Jegeo Rebuttal
What does Jegeo Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) decision letter arrives and you must plan a revision and response that satisfies a cross-disciplinary referee pair. Jegeo Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when a Journal of Economic Geography (JEG) decision letter arrives and you must plan a revision and response that satisfies a cross-disciplinary referee pair.
When should I use Jegeo Rebuttal?
Jegeo Rebuttal fits situations like: tasks that involve Peer review.
How do I install Jegeo Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jegeo-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jegeo-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Jegeo Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jegeo-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Economic-Geography-Skills/skills/jegeo-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jegeo-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Jegeo Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jegeo-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jegeo-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/jegeo-rebuttal, .github/skills/jegeo-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/jegeo-rebuttal in your project.
What does Jegeo Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jegeo Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Jegeo Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Jegeo Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Jegeo Rebuttal use?
Jegeo Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Jegeo Rebuttal use?
About 1.8k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Jegeo Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jegeo Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Jegeo Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.