A skill your agent uses when an R&R or decision letter arrives for a Journal of the European Economic Association (JEEA) manuscript and a response-letter strategy and revision plan are needed.

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Jeea Rebuttal

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jeea-rebuttal -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jeea-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-the-European-Economic-Association-Skills/skills/jeea-rebuttal .claude/skills/jeea-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
jeea-rebuttal
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
646 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when an R&R or decision letter arrives for a Journal of the European Economic Association (JEEA) manuscript and a response-letter strategy and revision plan are needed.

  • Works in 5 steps: Co-editor's essential requests —… → Major referee points — identification,… → Minor points — exposition, citations,… → …
  • Tasks that involve Peer review
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, The JEEA revision reality…, Response-letter strategy and Revision plan structure, plus 5 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Jeea Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when an R&R or decision letter arrives for a Journal of the European Economic Association (JEEA) manuscript and a response-letter strategy and revision plan are needed. Plans and drafts the response; it does not produce new estimates or rewrite the paper.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Peer review

Example prompts

  • “/jeea-rebuttal”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Co-editor's essential requests — addressed first, completely.
  2. Major referee points — identification, model generality, robustness, contribution.
  3. Minor points — exposition, citations, exhibits.
  4. Conflicts — how you resolved contradictory requests (citing the co-editor).
  5. Replication — what changed in the package.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Jeea Rebuttal loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 68 tokens; SKILL.md has 646 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~68
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 646 words, ~1,327 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/jeea-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
jeea-rebuttal
description
Use when an R&R or decision letter arrives for a Journal of the European Economic Association (JEEA) manuscript and a response-letter strategy and revision plan are needed. Plans and drafts the response; it does not produce new estimates or rewrite the paper.

Rebuttal & Response Letter (jeea-rebuttal)

When to trigger

  • A JEEA decision letter arrived (R&R, major/minor revision, or reject-and-resubmit)
  • You need to triage referee + co-editor comments into a revision plan
  • You are drafting the point-by-point response and are unsure how to prioritize
  • Referees disagree with each other, or with the co-editor

The JEEA revision reality (source map refreshed 2026-06-20)

JEEA review is single-blind and co-editor-led: the co-editor's letter is the controlling document — it tells you which referee points are binding and which are optional. Resubmission also requires the submitting author to be a current EEA member. Empirical revisions must keep the replication package current because the Data Editor verifies it before formal acceptance. The editorial team works to a fast timeline, so a focused, complete revision is rewarded over a sprawling one. Address the general-interest contribution the co-editor cares about first; subfield minutiae second.

Response-letter strategy

  • Read the co-editor's letter as the priority map. Do exactly what it flags as essential; treat referee points it downgrades as lower priority (but still answer them).
  • Point-by-point, quote-then-respond. Reproduce each comment, then state precisely what you changed and where (section, table, page), or why you respectfully did not.
  • Concede gracefully, push back with evidence. Where a referee is right, fix it and say so. Where you disagree, disagree with an analysis or a citation, never with attitude (single-blind: they know who you are).
  • Resolve referee conflicts via the co-editor. When referees contradict each other, follow the co-editor's steer and say you did.
  • Show, don't assert. New robustness or a generalized proposition belongs in the paper and is pointed to from the letter, not merely promised.
  • Keep the replication package in sync with every new exhibit (jeea-replication-package).

Revision plan structure

  1. Co-editor's essential requests — addressed first, completely.
  2. Major referee points — identification, model generality, robustness, contribution.
  3. Minor points — exposition, citations, exhibits.
  4. Conflicts — how you resolved contradictory requests (citing the co-editor).
  5. Replication — what changed in the package.

Checklist

  • Co-editor letter parsed; essential vs. optional points separated
  • Every referee comment answered point-by-point (quote → response → location)
  • Changes are in the paper and pointed to, not just promised
  • Disagreements backed by analysis/citation, professional in tone
  • Referee conflicts resolved via the co-editor's guidance
  • Replication package updated for new exhibits; EEA membership current for resubmission
  • Revision is focused (matches the fast-timeline norm), not sprawling
Show full SKILL.md (261 more words)Show less

Response-letter anatomy (per comment)

For each referee point, use the same three-move structure so the editor can verify your revision quickly:

  1. Quote the comment verbatim (or faithfully paraphrased), numbered to match the referee.
  2. Respond with exactly what changed and where — "We now estimate with Callaway–Sant'Anna (Table 3, Section 4.2, p. 14)" — or a respectful, evidence-backed reason for not changing.
  3. Point to the specific new exhibit/passage so the editor need not hunt.

Open the letter with a short summary of the major changes, framed against the co-editor's essential requests, before the point-by-point.

Worked vignette (illustrative)

Referee 1 wants a structural model; Referee 2 calls the existing model "overbuilt." The co-editor's letter says the empirical contribution is the draw and the model should stay light. The rebuttal follows the co-editor: it trims the model (citing Referee 2), explains to Referee 1 that a fuller structural treatment is a separate paper the editor agreed was out of scope, and points to the leaner model section. The contradiction is resolved by deferring to the controlling document, stated explicitly and politely.

Anti-patterns

  • Treating all comments as equal weight instead of following the co-editor's priority map
  • Promising changes in the letter that are not actually in the revised paper
  • Defensive or dismissive tone toward a referee (single-blind — they know you)
  • Ignoring a contradiction between referees instead of resolving it via the co-editor
  • Letting the replication package fall out of sync with new results
  • Forgetting EEA membership is required again to resubmit
  • A response letter that argues without pointing to the changed text

Output format

【Co-editor essentials】[the binding requests]
【Major points】[referee → change → location]
【Minor points】[handled]
【Conflicts】[how resolved via co-editor]
【Replication】[package updated for new exhibits? Y/N]
【Membership】[submitting author EEA member for resubmission? Y/N]
【Next step】resubmit via the EEA portal

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-the-European-Economic-Association-Skills/skills/jeea-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Jeea Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Jeea Rebuttal compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Jeea Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg3.9k17 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg3.9k11 repos~3.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~16kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~11kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer2.4k2 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Peer Review

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 17 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Scholar Evaluation

    spacering-net/codeg

    Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 11 repos~3.2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Writing Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.

    51k GitHub stars~16k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Reviewer

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.

    51k GitHub stars~11k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Peer Review

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Academic Research Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.

    51k GitHub stars~15k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Jeea Rebuttal

What does Jeea Rebuttal do?

A skill your agent uses when an R&R or decision letter arrives for a Journal of the European Economic Association (JEEA) manuscript and a response-letter strategy and revision plan are needed. Jeea Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when an R&R or decision letter arrives for a Journal of the European Economic Association (JEEA) manuscript and a response-letter strategy and revision plan are needed.

When should I use Jeea Rebuttal?

Jeea Rebuttal fits situations like: tasks that involve Peer review.

How do I install Jeea Rebuttal in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jeea-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-the-European-Economic-Association-Skills/skills/jeea-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jeea-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Jeea Rebuttal in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jeea-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-the-European-Economic-Association-Skills/skills/jeea-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jeea-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Jeea Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jeea-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jeea-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/jeea-rebuttal, .github/skills/jeea-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/jeea-rebuttal in your project.

What does Jeea Rebuttal need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jeea Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.

Does Jeea Rebuttal access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Jeea Rebuttal safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Jeea Rebuttal use?

Jeea Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Jeea Rebuttal use?

About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Jeea Rebuttal?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jeea Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Jeea Rebuttal?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.