Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when writing the response to a Journal of Educational Psychology revise-and-resubmit.
Install Jedpsych Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jedpsych-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jedpsych-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal .claude/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "jedpsych-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal into .claude/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jedpsych-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jedpsych-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jedpsych-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal .agents/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "jedpsych-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal into .agents/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jedpsych-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jedpsych-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jedpsych-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal .cursor/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "jedpsych-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jedpsych-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jedpsych-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jedpsych-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal .gemini/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jedpsych-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jedpsych-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jedpsych-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jedpsych-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal .github/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jedpsych-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal into .github/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jedpsych-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jedpsych-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jedpsych-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal .opencode/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jedpsych-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jedpsych-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
jedpsych-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.6k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 581 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when writing the response to a Journal of Educational Psychology revise-and-resubmit.
- Works in 6 steps: Read the editor's letter as the rubric.… → Point-by-point, every comment. Quote… → Strengthen rigor, don't just defend.… → …
- Writing the response to a Journal of Educational Psychology revise-and-resubmit
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Strategy, Response-letter format and Worked micro-example…, plus 5 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Jedpsych Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when writing the response to a Journal of Educational Psychology revise-and-resubmit. JEP R&Rs often demand added methodological rigor (multilevel modeling, cluster-level power, mechanism tests), fuller JARS disclosure, or stronger transparency, and the response must address every point while keeping the paper within format and masked. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Writing the response to a Journal of Educational Psychology revise-and-resubmit
- Tasks that involve Peer review
Example prompts
- “/jedpsych-rebuttal”
Workflow steps
6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Read the editor's letter as the rubric. Solve the decisive points first; the handling editor
- Point-by-point, every comment. Quote each comment, then respond; never skip one.
- Strengthen rigor, don't just defend. Many requests (refit a multilevel model, re-power at the
- Manage the word budget. New robustness, full measurement models, and extra specifications usually
- Concede or rebut with evidence. Did what was asked (cite the location), or push back respectfully
- Keep the revision masked. No author names, grant numbers, site/IRB names, or first-person self-
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Jedpsych Rebuttal loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 107 tokens; SKILL.md has 581 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 581 words, ~1,633 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- jedpsych-rebuttal
- description
- Use when writing the response to a Journal of Educational Psychology revise-and-resubmit. JEP R&Rs often demand added methodological rigor (multilevel modeling, cluster-level power, mechanism tests), fuller JARS disclosure, or stronger transparency, and the response must address every point while keeping the paper within format and masked. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
R&R Rebuttal (jedpsych-rebuttal)
A Journal of Educational Psychology R&R (usually a major revision) typically asks for more methodological rigor (model the nesting, power at the cluster level, test the mechanism), fuller JARS disclosure, or stronger transparency — and all of it must fit back inside the format and stay masked. The response letter must convert every reviewer and reassure the handling editor on rigor and educational relevance, while keeping the manuscript within the word budget.
When to trigger
- An R&R arrived and you are planning the revision + response letter
- Reviewers requested multilevel reanalysis, added power, mechanism tests, disclosure, or open-science changes
- A requested analysis would change the claim
- Writing the cover note to the editor
Strategy
- Read the editor's letter as the rubric. Solve the decisive points first; the handling editor adjudicates among reviewers and synthesizes the required changes.
- Point-by-point, every comment. Quote each comment, then respond; never skip one.
- Strengthen rigor, don't just defend. Many requests (refit a multilevel model, re-power at the cluster level, add the mediation test, report effect sizes with CIs, fuller JARS disclosure, better data/code sharing) genuinely strengthen the paper — do them and say where. Update the Transparency and Openness subsection if deposits or preregistration status changed.
- Manage the word budget. New robustness, full measurement models, and extra specifications usually belong in online supplemental material; summarize briefly and point to the supplement so the body stays under the limit.
- Concede or rebut with evidence. Did what was asked (cite the location), or push back respectfully with a reason — don't add an analysis that quietly undercuts the claim without saying so.
- Keep the revision masked. No author names, grant numbers, site/IRB names, or first-person self-
citations in the revised manuscript or links; keep shared scripts/data in sync (see
jedpsych-open-science-and-transparency).
Response-letter format
For each reviewer comment:
> [Quoted reviewer comment]
Response: [What we did / why we respectfully disagree].
Change: [Main text section, supplement section, or table/figure number].Open with a short summary of the main changes to the editor; group by reviewer; end each entry with the location (note when content went to the supplement to protect the word budget).
Worked micro-example (illustrative response entries)
For the cluster-randomized reading trial, an R&R asked for multilevel reanalysis, the mechanism, and fuller disclosure.
> R2: The analysis treats students as independent; with classroom
> randomization, the SEs are too small.
Response: Agreed. We refit the primary analysis as a two-level model
(students within classrooms) with random classroom intercepts and a pretest
covariate. The effect remains educationally meaningful (g = 0.23, 95% CI
[0.06, 0.40]; ICC = 0.14). Cluster-level power is now justified in Method.
Change: Method (power), Results (two-level model, Table 1); robustness → Supplement S2.
> R1: You claim a strategy-instruction mechanism but never test it.
Response: We added the preregistered multilevel mediation: gains in
metacognitive monitoring mediate ~40% of the effect (indirect 95% CI
[0.02, 0.13]).
Change: Results (mediation, Figure 1); analysis code updated in the deposit.
> R3: Attrition handling is unclear.
Response: We now report attrition by arm and re-estimate under FIML; the
effect is unchanged (g = 0.21).
Change: Method (attrition), Results (robustness); JARS flow reported.Show full SKILL.md (223 more words)Show less
R&R triage — where each request lands
| Reviewer ask | Default home (protects the word budget) | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Refit multilevel / re-power at cluster level | Method + Results (it is the contribution) | report ICC; update power justification |
| Mechanism (mediation/moderation) test | Results | preregistered if possible; update deposit |
| Added robustness / specification grid | online supplemental material | summarize in one main-text sentence |
| Fuller disclosure (exclusions/attrition/measures) | Method + Transparency subsection | a table, not prose, to save words |
| "Soften the claim" | Discussion | scale wording to the CI and the setting studied |
| Effect-size/CI + educational interpretation | tables and inline | route exhibits to jedpsych-tables-figures |
Recurring R&R pushback and the venue fix
- "Clustering ignored" → refit a multilevel/random-effects model, report the ICC, re-justify cluster-level power; never argue the single-level p-value. "Mechanism asserted, not tested" → add the preregistered mediation/moderation and interpret it.
- "You added an analysis that weakens the effect" → disclose it, interpret it, adjust the claim; concealment is fatal here. "Revision busts the format" → push new robustness to the supplement, cite it.
Anti-patterns
- Ignoring or merging away a comment without a visible response
- Cramming new robustness into the body and busting the word limit
- Capitulating to a change that breaks the paper's logic
- Adding analyses that contradict the original claim without acknowledgment
- Letting shared data/scripts/Transparency subsection drift out of sync, or reintroducing identifying information into the masked revision
Output format
【Editor's decisive points】addressed first? [list]
【Coverage】every reviewer comment answered? [Y/N]
【Rigor strengthened】nesting/power/mechanism/disclosure improved? [Y/N]
【Word budget】new material in supplement; body ≤ 12,000? [Y/N]
【Open-science updated】scripts/data/Transparency subsection in sync? [Y/N]
【Masked】no identity reintroduced? [Y/N]
【Next】resubmit via Editorial ManagerSupplementary resources
../../resources/official-source-map.md— masked review, JARS, transparency, and format policy
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Jedpsych Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jedpsych Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Jedpsych Rebuttal
What does Jedpsych Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when writing the response to a Journal of Educational Psychology revise-and-resubmit. Jedpsych Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when writing the response to a Journal of Educational Psychology revise-and-resubmit.
When should I use Jedpsych Rebuttal?
Jedpsych Rebuttal fits situations like: writing the response to a Journal of Educational Psychology revise-and-resubmit; tasks that involve Peer review.
How do I install Jedpsych Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jedpsych-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Jedpsych Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jedpsych-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Jedpsych Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jedpsych-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal, .github/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal in your project.
What does Jedpsych Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jedpsych Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Jedpsych Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Jedpsych Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Jedpsych Rebuttal use?
Jedpsych Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Jedpsych Rebuttal use?
About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Jedpsych Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jedpsych Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Jedpsych Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.