A skill your agent uses when a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) decision letter arrives and a response-to-referees strategy is needed — triaging a revise-and-resubmit, ordering…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Jebo Rebuttal

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jebo-rebuttal -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jebo-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Economic-Behavior-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jebo-rebuttal .claude/skills/jebo-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
jebo-rebuttal
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.2k tokens
SKILL.md length
553 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) decision letter arrives and a response-to-referees strategy is needed — triaging a revise-and-resubmit, ordering…

  • Ordering concessions vs
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Read the editor's letter first, Triage every comment and JEBO-specific revision moves, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Tasks that involve Peer review

What it does

Jebo Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) decision letter arrives and a response-to-referees strategy is needed — triaging a revise-and-resubmit, ordering concessions vs. pushback, and re-running experiments where required. Plans the revision and response letter; it does not run the new analysis.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Ordering concessions vs
  • Tasks that involve Peer review

Example prompts

  • “/jebo-rebuttal”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Jebo Rebuttal loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 83 tokens; SKILL.md has 553 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~83
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.2k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 553 words, ~1,179 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/jebo-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
jebo-rebuttal
description
Use when a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) decision letter arrives and a response-to-referees strategy is needed — triaging a revise-and-resubmit, ordering concessions vs. pushback, and re-running experiments where required. Plans the revision and response letter; it does not run the new analysis.

Rebuttal & Revision (jebo-rebuttal)

When to trigger

  • A JEBO R&R (or reject-and-resubmit) arrived and you must plan the response
  • Two referees disagree and you need a coherent strategy across both
  • A referee demands a new treatment / additional subjects and you must scope it
  • You are deciding which points to concede and which to defend
  • You need to structure the point-by-point response letter for the editor

Read the editor's letter first

The decision letter, not the referee reports, sets the priorities. The editor signals which concerns are conditions for acceptance and which are optional. With single-anonymized review, the editor can also weigh your standing and the field context. Build the revision around the editor's emphasis; address every referee point but invest most where the editor pointed.

Triage every comment

Sort each referee point into four bins before writing anything:

BinAction
Cheap + improves the paperDo it; thank the referee; show the new exhibit/text.
Costly but a genuine condition (new treatment, more subjects)Scope it, run it, report it; this is usually the make-or-break for a JEBO experimental R&R.
Based on a misreadingClarify and edit the text that allowed the misreading — never just say "the referee misunderstood."
Wrong / out of scopePush back with evidence, respectfully; concede the framing even while holding the substance.

JEBO-specific revision moves

  • New experimental treatment / sessions. Experimental R&Rs at JEBO frequently require running an additional arm (e.g., the demand-effect control or a mechanism-separating treatment a referee asked for). Plan the timeline; report the new arm with the same rigor (pre-register the addition if feasible).
  • Mechanism vs. alternative. If a referee proposed a rival channel, add the test that separates them rather than arguing verbally.
  • Multiplicity after adding analyses. New outcomes added in revision must be folded into the MHT correction; do not quietly expand the comparison set.
  • External validity. If asked to generalize, either add a pool/field replication or bound the claim explicitly and say so.
Show full SKILL.md (233 more words)Show less

Writing the response letter

  • One document; quote each referee comment, then respond directly beneath it; point to the exact section/table/page where the change lives.
  • Lead each response with the action taken ("We added Treatment D…"), not with justification.
  • Keep a respectful, non-defensive tone — single-anonymized review means the relationship is not anonymous on your side.
  • Summarize the major changes in a short cover note to the editor mapped to the editor's stated priorities.
  • Maintain a change log so co-authors and the editor can see the manuscript's evolution.

Checklist

  • Editor's letter parsed; conditions vs. optional points separated
  • Every referee comment binned (do / scope-and-run / clarify+edit / push back)
  • New experimental arms or subjects scoped with a realistic timeline
  • Rival-mechanism objections answered with a test, not prose
  • New analyses folded into MHT correction; comparison set not silently expanded
  • Response letter quotes each comment, leads with the action, cites exact locations
  • Tone respectful (single-anonymized — not anonymous on author side)
  • Misreadings fixed in the text, not merely rebutted

Anti-patterns

  • Responding to referees while ignoring the editor's stated priorities
  • "The referee misunderstood" with no edit to the text that caused it
  • Verbally dismissing a rival-mechanism concern instead of running the test
  • Quietly adding outcomes in revision without updating the multiplicity correction
  • A defensive or curt tone toward a referee whose identity the editor knows
  • Promising a robustness check in the letter but not actually adding it to the paper

Output format

text
【Decision】R&R / major / minor / reject-and-resubmit
【Editor's priorities】<conditions the editor emphasized>
【Comment triage】do / scope-and-run / clarify+edit / push-back (counts)
【New experiment needed?】<arm/sessions + timeline, or none>
【Mechanism-vs-alternative test added?】[Y/N]
【Response letter】quote-then-respond, action-first, locations cited [Y/N]
【Next step】resubmit via Editorial Manager → jebo-workflow if re-triage needed

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Economic-Behavior-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jebo-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Jebo Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Jebo Rebuttal compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Jebo Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg3.9k17 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg3.9k11 repos~3.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~16kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~11kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer2.4k2 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Peer Review

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 17 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Scholar Evaluation

    spacering-net/codeg

    Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 11 repos~3.2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Writing Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.

    51k GitHub stars~16k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Reviewer

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.

    51k GitHub stars~11k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Peer Review

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Academic Research Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.

    51k GitHub stars~15k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Jebo Rebuttal

What does Jebo Rebuttal do?

A skill your agent uses when a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) decision letter arrives and a response-to-referees strategy is needed — triaging a revise-and-resubmit, ordering…. Jebo Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when a Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (JEBO) decision letter arrives and a response-to-referees strategy is needed — triaging a revise-and-resubmit, ordering concessions vs.

When should I use Jebo Rebuttal?

Jebo Rebuttal fits situations like: ordering concessions vs; tasks that involve Peer review.

How do I install Jebo Rebuttal in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jebo-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Economic-Behavior-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jebo-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jebo-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Jebo Rebuttal in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jebo-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Economic-Behavior-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jebo-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jebo-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Jebo Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jebo-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jebo-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/jebo-rebuttal, .github/skills/jebo-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/jebo-rebuttal in your project.

What does Jebo Rebuttal need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jebo Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.

Does Jebo Rebuttal access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Jebo Rebuttal safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Jebo Rebuttal use?

Jebo Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Jebo Rebuttal use?

About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Jebo Rebuttal?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jebo Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Jebo Rebuttal?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.