Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when drafting the response letter and revision for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) R&R — turning reviewer process concerns into new studies, writing the point-by-point…
Install Jcp Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jcp-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-rebuttal .claude/skills/jcp-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "jcp-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-rebuttal into .claude/skills/jcp-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jcp-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jcp-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-rebuttal .agents/skills/jcp-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "jcp-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-rebuttal into .agents/skills/jcp-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jcp-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jcp-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-rebuttal .cursor/skills/jcp-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "jcp-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/jcp-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jcp-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jcp-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-rebuttal .gemini/skills/jcp-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jcp-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/jcp-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jcp-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jcp-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-rebuttal .github/skills/jcp-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jcp-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-rebuttal into .github/skills/jcp-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jcp-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jcp-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-rebuttal .opencode/skills/jcp-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jcp-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/jcp-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jcp-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
jcp-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.3k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 611 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when drafting the response letter and revision for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) R&R — turning reviewer process concerns into new studies, writing the point-by-point…
- Writing the point-by-point response
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, The JCP rebuttal is mostly new…, Structuring the response letter and Handling the recurring JCP…, plus 4 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Showing the mechanism is now nailed
What it does
Jcp Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting the response letter and revision for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) R&R — turning reviewer process concerns into new studies, writing the point-by-point response, and showing the mechanism is now nailed. Drafts the rebuttal; for reading the letter and feasibility see jcp-review-process.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Marketing psychology and Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Writing the point-by-point response
- Showing the mechanism is now nailed
Example prompts
- “/jcp-rebuttal”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Jcp Rebuttal loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 82 tokens; SKILL.md has 611 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 611 words, ~1,275 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/jcp-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- jcp-rebuttal
- description
- Use when drafting the response letter and revision for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) R&R — turning reviewer process concerns into new studies, writing the point-by-point response, and showing the mechanism is now nailed. Drafts the rebuttal; for reading the letter and feasibility see jcp-review-process.
Rebuttal Strategy (jcp-rebuttal)
When to trigger
- You have a JCP major revision and must write the response letter and revise
- A reviewer demands a mechanism study and you need to convert that into a concrete design + response
- You disagree with a reviewer but must push back without antagonizing the editor
- The revision adds studies and you need to show the process claim is now established
- You are unsure how to structure a point-by-point response for a multi-reviewer letter
The JCP rebuttal is mostly new evidence, not argument
At a process journal, you rarely win an R&R by argument alone. The strongest JCP responses to "the mechanism isn't established" run the study the reviewer implies — a manipulated-mediator or moderation-of-process experiment that turns the effect off when the process is blocked — and then say, plainly, "We agree this was a gap; Study 4 now demonstrates the process directly." Reviewers in the SCP community respond well to authors who treat the critique as a chance to strengthen the mechanism rather than to defend the original draft. Lead with what you did, not with why the reviewer is wrong.
Structuring the response letter
- Open with a synthesis: a short paragraph naming the editor's binding concern and how the revision addresses it (new studies, ruled-out alternatives, higher power).
- Point-by-point, verbatim: quote each comment, then respond. State the change, point to the manuscript page/study, and quote the new text where useful.
- Group by theme where reviewers overlap (the common "mechanism unclear" thread) so you answer the real issue once and reference it.
- Show, don't assert: report the new study's result (effect size + CI) in the letter, not just "we added a study."
- Be concise and respectful: the editor re-reads this; a defensive or sprawling letter hurts you.
Handling the recurring JCP demands
| Reviewer demand | Winning response |
|---|---|
| "Effect in search of a process" | Add a manipulated-mediator / moderation-of-process study; report it as the new centerpiece |
| "Alternative explanation X" | Add a study whose moderation your process predicts but X does not; or measure and rule out X |
| "Underpowered / not pre-registered" | Pre-register and replicate the key study at adequate power; report the OSF link |
| "Stimulus-bound" | Add a study with a new operationalization/population or a consequential behavioral DV |
| "Measured mediation is weak" | Upgrade to experimental mediation; reframe the original as supporting, not dispositive |
Show full SKILL.md (229 more words)Show less
When you must disagree
- Disagree with evidence, not assertion: a new analysis, a citation, or a study that addresses the underlying worry.
- Acknowledge the reviewer's logic before explaining why the data point the other way.
- If a request would damage the paper (e.g., a study that tests a different theory), explain the conceptual reason and offer an alternative that addresses the spirit of the comment.
- Never go over the editor's head on a point the editor endorsed; align with the editor's letter.
Checklist
- The letter opens with the editor's binding concern and how the revision resolves it
- Every comment is quoted and answered point-by-point, with manuscript locations
- The "mechanism unclear" thread is answered with a new process study, results reported in the letter
- Alternative explanations are ruled out by design/data, not just argued away
- New confirmatory studies are pre-registered; links provided
- Disagreements are evidence-backed and aligned with the editor's framing
- Tone is concise, professional, and non-defensive throughout
Anti-patterns
- Argue-don't-run: rebutting a "need a mechanism study" comment with prose and reanalysis only
- Defensive letter: reasserting the original draft instead of strengthening the process
- Buried results: "we added Study 4" without reporting what it showed
- Reviewer whack-a-mole: answering each comment in isolation while missing the shared concern
- Editor end-run: fighting a point the editor's letter endorsed
- Over-promise gap: claiming a study addresses a concern it does not actually test
Output format
【Editor's binding concern】restated in one line
【New studies added】which, and the result (effect size + CI) reported in the letter
【Mechanism now established by】the manipulated-mediator / moderation-of-process study
【Alternatives ruled out】how (design/data)
【Disagreements】where, with what evidence, aligned with editor
【Tone check】concise, respectful, non-defensive? [Y/N]
【Next step】resubmit via ScholarOne; if reject, jcp-review-process to reroute© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Jcp Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jcp Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Jcp Rebuttal
What does Jcp Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when drafting the response letter and revision for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) R&R — turning reviewer process concerns into new studies, writing the point-by-point…. Jcp Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting the response letter and revision for a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) R&R — turning reviewer process concerns into new studies, writing the point-by-point response, and showing the mechanism is now nailed.
When should I use Jcp Rebuttal?
Jcp Rebuttal fits situations like: writing the point-by-point response; showing the mechanism is now nailed.
How do I install Jcp Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jcp-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Jcp Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jcp-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Jcp Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jcp-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/jcp-rebuttal, .github/skills/jcp-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/jcp-rebuttal in your project.
What does Jcp Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jcp Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Jcp Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Jcp Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Jcp Rebuttal use?
Jcp Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Jcp Rebuttal use?
About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Jcp Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jcp Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Jcp Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.