A skill your agent uses when planning a revision and drafting the point-by-point response letter for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) R&R — prioritizing the editor's decisive…

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Jams Rebuttal

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jams-rebuttal -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jams-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-rebuttal .claude/skills/jams-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
jams-rebuttal
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.8k tokens
SKILL.md length
810 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when planning a revision and drafting the point-by-point response letter for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) R&R — prioritizing the editor's decisive…

  • Strengthening both the theoretical and managerial contribution
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Sequence: revise first, then…, Build the response letter and Address JAMS-specific concerns…, plus 7 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Preserving double-anonymized rules

What it does

Jams Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when planning a revision and drafting the point-by-point response letter for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) R&R — prioritizing the editor's decisive concerns, strengthening both the theoretical and managerial contribution, and preserving double-anonymized rules. Plans and drafts the response; it does not interpret the original decision (jams-review-process).

Its SKILL.md is about 1.8k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Strengthening both the theoretical and managerial contribution
  • Preserving double-anonymized rules

Example prompts

  • “/jams-rebuttal”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Jams Rebuttal loads about 1.8k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 100 tokens; SKILL.md has 810 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~100
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.8k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 810 words, ~1,756 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/jams-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
jams-rebuttal
description
Use when planning a revision and drafting the point-by-point response letter for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) R&R — prioritizing the editor's decisive concerns, strengthening both the theoretical and managerial contribution, and preserving double-anonymized rules. Plans and drafts the response; it does not interpret the original decision (jams-review-process).

R&R Revision & Response (jams-rebuttal)

When to trigger

  • You received a JAMS major/minor revision and need a plan and a response letter
  • A reviewer challenged the theoretical contribution, managerial relevance, construct validity, or identification
  • You must revise before writing the response (do not draft the letter on an unrevised paper)
  • A subsequent round arrived and you need to show movement since the last revision

Sequence: revise first, then respond

JAMS R&Rs are developmental and often multi-round. Revise the manuscript first; the response letter documents changes that already exist. Lead the work with the editor's decisive concerns, which at JAMS almost always include the two gates: a genuine theoretical contribution and a clear managerial contribution. A revision that polishes peripheral points but leaves a gate unaddressed will not advance — and area editors track whether each round actually moves on the issues they flagged.

Build the response letter

  • Open with a brief summary of the most important changes and how the paper is now stronger on both the theory and managerial bars.
  • Point-by-point: restate each comment, then state the change, with section/page or quoted-text pointers to the revised manuscript (cite sections/pages or quote the revised text; do not rely on line numbers that shift).
  • Quote new text inline so the editor and reviewers see the change without hunting.
  • Stay anonymized: no author-revealing language anywhere in the letter or revised files; keep preregistration/repository links anonymized.
  • Be candid on disagreements: where you decline a suggestion, explain respectfully with evidence; never silently ignore a comment.

Address JAMS-specific concerns head-on

  • "Theoretical contribution is incremental / new context" → foreground the new mechanism, contingency, reconciliation, or validated construct; revise the contribution sentences (see jams-contribution-framing) and the conceptual model (see jams-theory-development).
  • "So what for managers?" → add or sharpen the managerial-implications subsection: name the decision, quantify the stake in managerial units, and state the guardrails (boundary conditions).
  • "Common method variance" (survey) → add a marker-variable / CFA-marker test and design-based defenses; report discriminant validity via HTMT (see jams-methods).
  • "Endogeneity / identification is weak" (secondary data) → add the design-appropriate fix (instrument, Gaussian-copula control, modern DiD, robustness/placebo) per jams-data-analysis.
  • "Effect sizes / magnitude missing" → ensure standardized effects, CIs, and managerial magnitudes appear throughout.

Prepare transparency deliverables

If the revision is heading toward conditional acceptance, prepare the data and code availability statement and any repository deposit (e.g., OSF / Mendeley Data) per Springer policy, so acceptance is not a scramble. Keep deposited materials and links anonymized while review continues.

Triage the comments before you start revising

Not every comment carries equal weight. Sort them into a working table so effort follows priority:

TierWhat it isHow to handle
DecisiveEditor-flagged "must address"; touches the theory or managerial gateDo first; lead the response and the revision with these
SubstantiveValidity/identification (CMV, endogeneity), positioning, missing analysisAddress fully with new analysis or reframing
ClarifyingExposition, construct naming, exhibit readabilityFix and note briefly
DeclineA request that would harm the paper or exceeds the designDecline respectfully, with evidence and reasoning

The fastest way to lose a JAMS R&R is to spend the revision on tier-3 polish while a decisive tier-1 concern is met with a paragraph instead of new work.

Show full SKILL.md (289 more words)Show less

Show movement across rounds

JAMS R&Rs are often multi-round, and area editors track whether each revision actually moves on the concerns they flagged. In a second-round letter, briefly remind the editor what changed since the prior round and how the remaining concerns were addressed, so progress is visible rather than buried. Avoid re-litigating points already settled in an earlier round; reopening a resolved issue signals that the paper is going backward. The trajectory the editor wants to see is a paper that is demonstrably stronger on the theory and managerial gates with each pass.

Handle conflicting reviewers

When two reviewers pull in opposite directions, do not silently side with one. State the tension to the editor in the response letter, explain the choice you made and why (often deferring to the editor's stated priorities), and where feasible offer a compromise (e.g., a robustness analysis in the appendix that satisfies the second reviewer). Surfacing the conflict is read as candor; ignoring one reviewer to please the other is read as evasion and usually resurfaces in the next round.

Checklist

  • Manuscript revised before the letter was drafted
  • Editor's decisive concerns addressed first
  • Theoretical-contribution and managerial-relevance challenges answered explicitly
  • Validity/identification fixes (CMV, endogeneity) completed where requested
  • Effect sizes and managerial magnitudes verified throughout after revision
  • Point-by-point letter with section/page pointers and quoted new text
  • Anonymization preserved in letter and files (incl. prereg/repository links)
  • Data/code availability statement prepared if nearing acceptance

Anti-patterns

  • Letter before revision — promising changes not yet made
  • Cosmetic edits to a gatekeeping (theory/managerial) concern
  • Defensive non-answers that dodge a reviewer's point
  • Reintroducing identity in the response or revised files
  • Over-claiming new results beyond what the added analysis supports
  • Answering the theory comments while leaving the managerial-relevance comments thin

Output format

text
【Revision done first】yes/no
【Editor decisive concerns addressed】[...]
【Theory + managerial answers】[...]
【Validity/identification additions】CMV / endogeneity / robustness: [...]
【Effect-size + magnitude check】verified post-revision? yes/fix
【Letter】point-by-point with pointers + quoted text drafted?
【Anonymization】preserved (incl. links)?
【Transparency】data/code statement + deposit if nearing acceptance: [...]
【Next step】resubmit via Editorial Manager → jams-review-process for the next round

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Jams Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Jams Rebuttal compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Jams Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg3.9k17 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg3.9k11 repos~3.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~16kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~11kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer2.4k2 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Peer Review

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 17 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Scholar Evaluation

    spacering-net/codeg

    Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 11 repos~3.2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Writing Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.

    51k GitHub stars~16k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Reviewer

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.

    51k GitHub stars~11k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Peer Review

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Academic Research Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.

    51k GitHub stars~15k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Jams Rebuttal

What does Jams Rebuttal do?

A skill your agent uses when planning a revision and drafting the point-by-point response letter for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) R&R — prioritizing the editor's decisive…. Jams Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when planning a revision and drafting the point-by-point response letter for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) R&R — prioritizing the editor's decisive concerns, strengthening both the theoretical and managerial contribution, and preserving double-anonymized rules.

When should I use Jams Rebuttal?

Jams Rebuttal fits situations like: strengthening both the theoretical and managerial contribution; preserving double-anonymized rules.

How do I install Jams Rebuttal in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jams-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jams-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Jams Rebuttal in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jams-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-the-Academy-of-Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/jams-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jams-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Jams Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jams-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jams-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/jams-rebuttal, .github/skills/jams-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/jams-rebuttal in your project.

What does Jams Rebuttal need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jams Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.

Does Jams Rebuttal access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Jams Rebuttal safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Jams Rebuttal use?

Jams Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Jams Rebuttal use?

About 1.8k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Jams Rebuttal?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jams Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Jams Rebuttal?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.