Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when a Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) revision decision has arrived and you must plan the revision and draft the point-by-point response —…
Install Jais Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jais-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jais-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-the-Association-for-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jais-rebuttal .claude/skills/jais-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "jais-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-the-Association-for-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jais-rebuttal into .claude/skills/jais-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jais-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-the-Association-for-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jais-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jais-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jais-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-the-Association-for-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jais-rebuttal .agents/skills/jais-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "jais-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-the-Association-for-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jais-rebuttal into .agents/skills/jais-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jais-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jais-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jais-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-the-Association-for-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jais-rebuttal .cursor/skills/jais-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "jais-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-the-Association-for-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jais-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/jais-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jais-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Journal-of-the-Association-for-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jais-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jais-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jais-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-the-Association-for-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jais-rebuttal .gemini/skills/jais-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jais-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-the-Association-for-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jais-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/jais-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jais-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jais-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jais-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-the-Association-for-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jais-rebuttal .github/skills/jais-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jais-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-the-Association-for-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jais-rebuttal into .github/skills/jais-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jais-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jais-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills jais-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Journal-of-the-Association-for-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jais-rebuttal .opencode/skills/jais-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "jais-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Journal-of-the-Association-for-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jais-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/jais-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "jais-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
jais-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.8k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 860 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when a Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) revision decision has arrived and you must plan the revision and draft the point-by-point response —…
- Answering theory- and method-specific concerns in their proper currency
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Revise first, then write the…, Anchor the revision in the… and Disagree only with evidence,…, plus 8 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Updating the required data materials
What it does
Jais Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when a Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) revision decision has arrived and you must plan the revision and draft the point-by-point response — prioritizing the Senior Editor's letter, answering theory- and method-specific concerns in their proper currency, updating the required data materials, and keeping the manuscript within its category budget and double-blind anonymity. Drafts the response after the manuscript is actually revised; interpret the decision first with jais-review-process.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.8k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Answering theory- and method-specific concerns in their proper currency
- Updating the required data materials
- Keeping the manuscript within its category budget and double-blind anonymity
Example prompts
- “/jais-rebuttal”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Jais Rebuttal loads about 1.8k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 134 tokens; SKILL.md has 860 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 860 words, ~1,790 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/jais-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- jais-rebuttal
- description
- Use when a Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) revision decision has arrived and you must plan the revision and draft the point-by-point response — prioritizing the Senior Editor's letter, answering theory- and method-specific concerns in their proper currency, updating the required data materials, and keeping the manuscript within its category budget and double-blind anonymity. Drafts the response after the manuscript is actually revised; interpret the decision first with jais-review-process.
Rebuttal & Response Letter (jais-rebuttal)
When to trigger
- You received a major or minor revision (or a reject-and-resubmit) from JAIS
- You have read the decision with
jais-review-processand revised the manuscript - You need a point-by-point response that the Senior Editor and reviewers can audit
- Reviewers conflict and you must decide which way to revise
Revise first, then write the response
Do not draft the response letter before the manuscript is actually revised. The response is a map to real changes, not a list of promises. For each point, make the change in the manuscript first; the letter then points to where and how. This matters more at JAIS because the process is developmental — the SE is engaging with the paper's trajectory, and an honest, concrete response shows you used the developmental opportunity rather than deflecting it.
Anchor the revision in the Senior Editor's letter
The Senior Editor owns the decision, so the SE's letter sets priorities. Build a triage table: SE-elevated concerns first, then AE and reviewer points, flagging where reviewers conflict. Resolve conflicts in the direction the SE signaled, and say so explicitly when you do. A revision that satisfies every reviewer but misses the SE's central concern fails; a revision that nails the SE's priorities and addresses reviewers proportionately succeeds.
Disagree only with evidence, and only where the SE has not ruled
JAIS's developmental ethos rewards engagement over deference, so you may push back on a reviewer point — but do it on evidence, not rhetoric, and never against a position the Senior Editor has already settled. When two reviewers conflict and the SE has signaled a direction, follow it and explain in the letter that you are resolving the conflict per the editor's guidance. A revision that quietly ignores the SE's call, or that argues with the editor's framing, reads as not having understood the developmental conversation — the fastest way to convert a promising R&R into a rejection.
Answer concerns in the currency of your tradition
JAIS reviewers span paradigms, so a persuasive response speaks the right dialect of rigor.
| Concern raised | A persuasive JAIS response… |
|---|---|
| Theory contribution unclear / incremental | sharpens the new construct or framework, restates the contribution sentence, and shows what the field now knows that it did not |
| Behavioral validity / common-method bias | adds procedural evidence, a marker/method-factor test, or shows interactions survive — not just a Harman test |
| Economics identification | adds placebo/event-study evidence, alternative specifications, sensitivity to the key assumption |
| Design science evaluation | adds baselines, ablations, or a field/expert evaluation tying results to design propositions |
| Qualitative trustworthiness | strengthens the data structure, audit trail, and representative evidence |
Note the first row: at JAIS, a "thin contribution" challenge is answered with theory, not with more robustness checks. Reviewers here will not accept additional analyses as a substitute for a sharpened theoretical payoff.
Update the required data materials
If the revision changes the empirical core, refresh the materials JAIS requires: the correlation/covariance matrix plus descriptives for SEM work, and the anonymized dataset that must be available on request to SEs/reviewers. Note in the letter what you updated.
Show full SKILL.md (353 more words)Show less
Keep length, anonymity, and category in check
Revisions grow papers, but JAIS still flags manuscripts over ~15,000 words and will not review beyond 65 pages. Plan offsetting cuts (tighter framing, consolidated exhibits) as part of the revision. Keep the manuscript double-blind — neutral self-citations, no identifying info — while it is still under review, and confirm the revised paper still fits its declared category.
Open the response with a contribution-and-changes summary
Senior Editors at JAIS are reading for whether the paper's trajectory has improved, so open the letter with a short synopsis: restate the sharpened contribution in one sentence, then list the two or three most consequential changes. This frames the point-by-point that follows and lets a developmental SE confirm quickly that you moved the paper where the editorial team hoped. Bury the contribution restatement at the end and you force the editor to reconstruct your logic from scattered replies.
Write a clean, auditable response
- Quote each comment, then give your response and point to the changed page/section.
- Be specific and gracious; disagree only with evidence and a clear rationale, and only when the SE has not already settled the point.
- Summarize the major changes at the top so the SE can see the arc quickly.
- Keep a developmental, collaborative tone that matches the journal's culture.
Checklist
- Manuscript revised before the letter was drafted
- SE-elevated points addressed first; reviewer conflicts resolved per the SE's signal
- A "thin contribution" challenge answered with sharpened theory, not just extra analysis
- Tradition-specific rigor concern answered in its proper currency
- Required data materials (matrix/descriptives, anonymized dataset) updated and referenced
- Revised manuscript within its category budget and ≤65pp; double-blind anonymity preserved
- Every comment quoted, answered, and cross-referenced to a change
- The letter opens with the sharpened contribution and the two or three biggest changes
Anti-patterns
- Drafting the response before making the changes.
- Treating all reviewers as equal and ignoring the SE's prioritization.
- Answering a theory-contribution concern with more robustness tests instead of better theory.
- Letting the revision balloon past the length budget by bolting on appendices.
- Breaking anonymity with "in our revised work" phrasing while still under double-blind review.
Output format
【Journal】Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS)
【Decision being answered】major / minor / reject-and-resubmit
【SE-first triage】ranked changes made
【Contribution response】theory sharpened (not substituted by analysis): yes/fix
【Rigor responses】behavioral / economics / design science / qualitative evidence added
【Data materials updated】matrix/descriptives + anonymized dataset: yes
【Length & anonymity】within budget; double-blind preserved: yes
【Response letter】point-by-point, cross-referenced: ready© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Journal-of-the-Association-for-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jais-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Jais Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jais Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Jais Rebuttal
What does Jais Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when a Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) revision decision has arrived and you must plan the revision and draft the point-by-point response —…. Jais Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when a Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) revision decision has arrived and you must plan the revision and draft the point-by-point response — prioritizing the Senior Editor's letter, answering theory- and method-specific concerns in their proper currency, updating the required data materials, and keeping the manuscript within its category budget and double-blind anonymity.
When should I use Jais Rebuttal?
Jais Rebuttal fits situations like: answering theory- and method-specific concerns in their proper currency; updating the required data materials; keeping the manuscript within its category budget and double-blind anonymity.
How do I install Jais Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jais-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-the-Association-for-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jais-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/jais-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Jais Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jais-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Journal-of-the-Association-for-Information-Systems-Skills/skills/jais-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/jais-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Jais Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jais-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/jais-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/jais-rebuttal, .github/skills/jais-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/jais-rebuttal in your project.
What does Jais Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Jais Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Jais Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Jais Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Jais Rebuttal use?
Jais Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Jais Rebuttal use?
About 1.8k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Jais Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Jais Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Jais Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.