Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when reasoning about IEEE S&P (Oakland) peer review, including the rounds inside each cycle, early-reject notices, the rebuttal for second-round papers, the…
Install Ieeesp Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ieeesp-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-review-process .claude/skills/ieeesp-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "ieeesp-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-review-process into .claude/skills/ieeesp-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ieeesp-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ieeesp-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-review-process .agents/skills/ieeesp-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "ieeesp-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-review-process into .agents/skills/ieeesp-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ieeesp-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ieeesp-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-review-process .cursor/skills/ieeesp-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "ieeesp-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-review-process into .cursor/skills/ieeesp-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ieeesp-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ieeesp-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-review-process .gemini/skills/ieeesp-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ieeesp-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-review-process into .gemini/skills/ieeesp-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ieeesp-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ieeesp-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-review-process .github/skills/ieeesp-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ieeesp-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-review-process into .github/skills/ieeesp-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ieeesp-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ieeesp-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-review-process .opencode/skills/ieeesp-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ieeesp-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-review-process into .opencode/skills/ieeesp-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ieeesp-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
ieeesp-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.3k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 566 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when reasoning about IEEE S&P (Oakland) peer review, including the rounds inside each cycle, early-reject notices, the rebuttal for second-round papers, the…
- Reasoning about IEEE S&P (Oakland) peer review
- SKILL.md covers Rounds inside a cycle, The three-way decision, and…, The Research Ethics Committee… and Where author leverage lives, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Including the rounds inside each cycle
What it does
Ieeesp Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when reasoning about IEEE S&P (Oakland) peer review, including the rounds inside each cycle, early-reject notices, the rebuttal for second-round papers, the Accept/Revise/Reject decision set, the Research Ethics Committee, shepherding of accepted papers, and the one-year resubmission embargo.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Reasoning about IEEE S&P (Oakland) peer review
- Including the rounds inside each cycle
- Early-reject notices
- The rebuttal for second-round papers
Example prompts
- “/ieeesp-review-process”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Ieeesp Review Process loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 80 tokens; SKILL.md has 566 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 566 words, ~1,301 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/ieeesp-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- ieeesp-review-process
- description
- Use when reasoning about IEEE S&P (Oakland) peer review, including the rounds inside each cycle, early-reject notices, the rebuttal for second-round papers, the Accept/Revise/Reject decision set, the Research Ethics Committee, shepherding of accepted papers, and the one-year resubmission embargo.
IEEE S&P Review Process
Use this to model what happens to an S&P submission after upload and where author effort still moves the outcome. The structural constant across recent cycles is a round structure inside each cycle ending in a three-way decision; the dates below are the verified Cycle 2 timetable for S&P 2027 (sp2027.ieee-security.org/cfpapers.html, checked 2026-07-08).
Rounds inside a cycle
| Stage | 2027 Cycle 2 date | What actually happens |
|---|---|---|
| Submission closes | Nov 17, 2026 | Record frozen; REC screening begins where flagged |
| First round | — | A subset of the PC reads; weakest papers cut |
| Early-reject notice | Jan 18, 2027 | Cut papers exit without rebuttal |
| Reviews released | Feb 11, 2027 | Surviving papers see full reviews |
| Rebuttal due | Feb 16, 2027 | ~5 days; second-round papers only |
| Decision | Mar 5, 2027 | Accept / Revise / Reject |
The asymmetry to plan around: first-round papers never get to answer their
reviewers. The introduction, threat model, and evaluation summary must
survive a skeptical first read on their own — that is why ieeesp-writing-style
front-loads the adversary and the evidence map.
The three-way decision, and why Revise is the signature
- Accept comes with a draft meta-review listing remaining concerns and a shepherd who strikes each concern once the camera-ready resolves it — acceptance at S&P is conditional in substance even when not in name.
- Revise invites a limited set of papers to submit a structured major revision against a written summary of expectations, re-reviewed (ideally by the same reviewers). It is the venue's mechanism for "the contribution is real, the evidence is not finished." Which later cycle a Revise resubmits into is cycle-specific — 待核实 on the live pages every time.
- Reject starts the one-year embargo from the original submission date; a future submission with roughly ≥40% overlap counts as a resubmission.
Treat a Revise as the best non-accept outcome in security publishing: the expectations document is a contract. Deliver exactly what it lists, map each expectation to a change, and do not use the revision to add unrequested new material that reopens settled questions.
Show full SKILL.md (235 more words)Show less
The Research Ethics Committee is a separate track
S&P registers an Ethics Considerations entry for every paper at submission time, and papers raising concerns are routed to a Research Ethics Committee that can recommend rejection on ethical grounds regardless of technical merit. The named baseline is the Menlo Report. Reviewers also expect IRB approval/waiver status disclosed where human subjects or user data are involved, and harm-mitigation discussion whenever PII is touched. The REC evaluates what you did — disclosure sent, data minimized, approvals obtained — months before submission; nothing written during review can substitute for actions not taken.
Where author leverage lives
Leverage map (S&P cycle):
Before registration ████████ abstract routes reviewers; ethics record set
First round ─ none: paper speaks alone; no rebuttal if cut
Rebuttal window ████ high on misreadings, moderate on evidence gaps
(5 days: pre-draft the likely objections)
Reviewer discussion ─ only via the rebuttal already filed
Revise window ██████ a written contract you can fully satisfy
Camera-ready ███ shepherd negotiation over concrete concernsReading reviews from this PC
The S&P pool reads adversarially by profession. Expect objections shaped as:
"the adaptive attacker breaks this defense," "the threat model assumes
capabilities that make the attack uninteresting," "the measurement sample is
biased toward <population>," "the ethics section does not say who approved
this." Classify each review point by whether it disputes the claim, the
evidence, or the ethics record — the three need different responses
(ieeesp-author-response).
Process misfires
- A review that misstates the paper's mechanism is rebuttal material: quote the submission with section numbers, without heat.
- Ethics allegations are answered with documentation (dates, approval IDs, disclosure timelines), never with indignation.
- Suspected reviewer misconduct goes privately to the PC chairs.
- After a final Reject there is no appeal track; the embargo clock and a sibling venue are the real options.
Output format
[Stage] pre-submission / round 1 / rebuttal / decision wait / revise / shepherding
[Next transition] <date from current cycle pages> (待核实 if unverified)
[Survival read] early-reject risk: low / med / high (why)
[Objection forecast] claim: <..> · evidence: <..> · ethics: <..>
[If Revise] expectations doc summarized? resubmission cycle confirmed?© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Ieeesp Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ieeesp Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Ieeesp Review Process
What does Ieeesp Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when reasoning about IEEE S&P (Oakland) peer review, including the rounds inside each cycle, early-reject notices, the rebuttal for second-round papers, the…. Ieeesp Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when reasoning about IEEE S&P (Oakland) peer review, including the rounds inside each cycle, early-reject notices, the rebuttal for second-round papers, the Accept/Revise/Reject decision set, the Research Ethics Committee, shepherding of accepted papers, and the one-year resubmission embargo.
When should I use Ieeesp Review Process?
Ieeesp Review Process fits situations like: reasoning about IEEE S&P (Oakland) peer review; including the rounds inside each cycle; early-reject notices; the rebuttal for second-round papers.
How do I install Ieeesp Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/ieeesp-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Ieeesp Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (IEEE-SP-Skills/skills/ieeesp-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/ieeesp-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Ieeesp Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieeesp-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ieeesp-review-process, .gemini/skills/ieeesp-review-process, .github/skills/ieeesp-review-process and .opencode/skills/ieeesp-review-process in your project.
What does Ieeesp Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Ieeesp Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Ieeesp Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Ieeesp Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Ieeesp Review Process use?
Ieeesp Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Ieeesp Review Process use?
About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Ieeesp Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ieeesp Review Process: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Ieeesp Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.