Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when drafting the response to a Human Relations (HR) R&R after the manuscript has been revised — structuring the response letter and handling reviewer/editor comments in HR's…
Install Humrel Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill humrel-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills humrel-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-rebuttal .claude/skills/humrel-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "humrel-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-rebuttal into .claude/skills/humrel-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "humrel-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill humrel-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills humrel-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-rebuttal .agents/skills/humrel-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "humrel-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-rebuttal into .agents/skills/humrel-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "humrel-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill humrel-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills humrel-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-rebuttal .cursor/skills/humrel-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "humrel-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/humrel-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "humrel-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill humrel-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills humrel-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-rebuttal .gemini/skills/humrel-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "humrel-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/humrel-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "humrel-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills humrel-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill humrel-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-rebuttal .github/skills/humrel-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "humrel-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-rebuttal into .github/skills/humrel-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "humrel-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill humrel-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills humrel-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-rebuttal .opencode/skills/humrel-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "humrel-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/humrel-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "humrel-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
humrel-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.3k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 593 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when drafting the response to a Human Relations (HR) R&R after the manuscript has been revised — structuring the response letter and handling reviewer/editor comments in HR's…
- Works in 3 steps: Cover note to the editors. Thank the… → Point-by-point responses, grouped by… → A summary of major changes at the top…
- Theory-first culture
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Mindset for an HR revision, Structure of the response and Handling hard cases, plus 4 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Humrel Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting the response to a Human Relations (HR) R&R after the manuscript has been revised — structuring the response letter and handling reviewer/editor comments in HR's developmental, theory-first culture. Drafts the response; it does not perform the underlying revisions (do those first).
Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Theory-first culture
- Tasks that involve Peer review
Example prompts
- “/humrel-rebuttal”
Workflow steps
3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Cover note to the editors. Thank the team; summarize the 3–5 most important changes and how the contribution is now sharper. Address the…
- Point-by-point responses, grouped by reviewer, then by comment. For each
- A summary of major changes at the top helps editors tracking a multi-round file.
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Humrel Rebuttal loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 79 tokens; SKILL.md has 593 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 593 words, ~1,264 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/humrel-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- humrel-rebuttal
- description
- Use when drafting the response to a Human Relations (HR) R&R after the manuscript has been revised — structuring the response letter and handling reviewer/editor comments in HR's developmental, theory-first culture. Drafts the response; it does not perform the underlying revisions (do those first).
R&R Rebuttal (humrel-rebuttal)
When to trigger
- You have an HR R&R and have already revised the manuscript
- You need to structure a point-by-point response document
- Reviewers disagree and you must navigate between them without contradicting yourself
- The editor's letter asks you to "deepen the theoretical contribution" and you must answer with substance
Revise the paper first. The response letter documents changes you made; it is not a substitute for making them. If you have not revised yet, return to the relevant humrel-* skill.
Mindset for an HR revision
HR review is developmental and theory-first. Reviewers and the handling editor (under Co-Editors-in-Chief Smriti Anand and Penny Dick, 检索于 2026-06；以官网为准) took the idea seriously; the winning posture is gracious, responsive, and intellectually serious. The central question they will ask is "did the theoretical contribution mature?" — consistent with HR's gate of a "unique and substantive theoretical contribution." A letter that reads as a checklist of mechanical robustness additions — adequate at some quantitative-leaning venues — will underperform here if the theoretical insight and the social-relational argument have not sharpened.
Structure of the response
- Cover note to the editors. Thank the team; summarize the 3–5 most important changes and how the contribution is now sharper. Address the editors' central theoretical ask explicitly and up front.
- Point-by-point responses, grouped by reviewer, then by comment. For each:
- Quote the comment verbatim (or faithfully paraphrase).
- State your response: Accepted / Partially accepted / Respectfully disagree.
- Describe the exact change and cite the new location (page, section, table).
- Where you disagree, give the reasoned case with evidence, and offer a compromise where possible.
- A summary of major changes at the top helps editors tracking a multi-round file.
Handling hard cases
- "Deepen the contribution": the most common HR ask. Show concretely how the theory is now sharper, the mechanism more specified, the social-relational stakes clearer — not just more tables or more cases.
- Reviewers disagree: state both positions, explain your resolution, and let the editor see you reasoned it through. Do not silently side with one and ignore the other.
- A request would harm the paper: explain why (theoretical or evidentiary cost), propose an alternative that meets the underlying concern, and defer to the editors.
- "It reads like a sibling-journal paper": answer by re-foregrounding the relational/theoretical contribution that makes it HR, not by adding managerial implications.
- Out-of-scope requests: politely note scope and, if useful, flag as future work.
Show full SKILL.md (196 more words)Show less
Tone, craft, and compliance
- Respectful, specific, and confident — never defensive or dismissive ("the reviewer misunderstood").
- Make the editors' job easy: clear navigation, change locations, a quotable summary.
- Keep the letter self-contained; a reviewer should not need the tracked-changes file to follow it.
- Ensure consistency: a change for Reviewer 1 must not contradict a response to Reviewer 2.
- Keep the revised manuscript anonymized (double-anonymous), within the 13k word cap, and re-declare any AI use in the cover letter if applicable.
Checklist
- Manuscript revised before writing the letter
- Editors' central theoretical ask addressed first and explicitly
- Every comment answered; none skipped or merged away
- Each response states accept/partial/disagree + the exact change location
- "Deepen the contribution" answered with theoretical substance, not just additions
- Reviewer conflicts navigated without internal contradictions
- Revised file still anonymized, within 13k, AI re-declared if used
- Tone gracious and serious throughout; letter is self-contained
Anti-patterns
- Writing the response before actually revising
- Defensive or dismissive replies
- Claiming a change was made without pointing to where
- Answering "deepen the contribution" with cosmetic additions or extra robustness
- Satisfying one reviewer in a way that contradicts another's response
- Re-introducing author-identifying traces or busting the word cap during revision
Output format
【Journal】Human Relations
【Skill】humrel-rebuttal
【Round】1st / 2nd / later
【Editors' core ask addressed】how + where
【Comments handled】N / N (none skipped)
【Disagreements】[...] + evidence/compromise
【Contribution deepened】how the theory matured
【Compliance】anonymized, ≤13k, AI re-declared (yes/no)
【Next step】resubmit via ScholarOne© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Humrel Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Humrel Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Humrel Rebuttal
What does Humrel Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when drafting the response to a Human Relations (HR) R&R after the manuscript has been revised — structuring the response letter and handling reviewer/editor comments in HR's…. Humrel Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when drafting the response to a Human Relations (HR) R&R after the manuscript has been revised — structuring the response letter and handling reviewer/editor comments in HR's developmental, theory-first culture.
When should I use Humrel Rebuttal?
Humrel Rebuttal fits situations like: theory-first culture; tasks that involve Peer review.
How do I install Humrel Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill humrel-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/humrel-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Humrel Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill humrel-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Human-Relations-Skills/skills/humrel-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/humrel-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Humrel Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill humrel-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/humrel-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/humrel-rebuttal, .github/skills/humrel-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/humrel-rebuttal in your project.
What does Humrel Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Humrel Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Humrel Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Humrel Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Humrel Rebuttal use?
Humrel Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Humrel Rebuttal use?
About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Humrel Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Humrel Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Humrel Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.