Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when writing the response to a Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions revise-and-resubmit.
Install Govern Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill govern-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills govern-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-rebuttal .claude/skills/govern-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "govern-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-rebuttal into .claude/skills/govern-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "govern-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill govern-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills govern-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-rebuttal .agents/skills/govern-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "govern-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-rebuttal into .agents/skills/govern-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "govern-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill govern-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills govern-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-rebuttal .cursor/skills/govern-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "govern-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/govern-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "govern-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill govern-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills govern-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-rebuttal .gemini/skills/govern-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "govern-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/govern-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "govern-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills govern-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill govern-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-rebuttal .github/skills/govern-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "govern-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-rebuttal into .github/skills/govern-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "govern-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill govern-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills govern-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-rebuttal .opencode/skills/govern-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "govern-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/govern-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "govern-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
govern-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.8k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 779 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when writing the response to a Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions revise-and-resubmit.
- Works in 6 steps: Read the editor's letter as the rubric.… → One point-by-point response, every… → Concede or rebut explicitly, with… → …
- Writing the response to a Governance: An International Journal of Policy
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Strategy, Comparative-reviewer concerns:… and Response-letter format, plus 5 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Govern Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when writing the response to a Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions revise-and-resubmit. The response must convert each of the ≥ 2 referees and the editor, answering comparative-reviewer concerns (case selection, generalizability across countries, measurement of institutions, alternative institutional explanations) point by point. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.8k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Writing the response to a Governance: An International Journal of Policy
- Institutions revise-and-resubmit
Example prompts
- “/govern-rebuttal”
Workflow steps
6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Read the editor's letter as the rubric. The editor signals which points are decisive and
- One point-by-point response, every comment addressed. Quote each comment, then respond. Never
- Concede or rebut explicitly, with evidence. For each comment: did what was asked (say where, with
- Reconcile conflicting referees openly. When R1 wants more cases and R2 wants a deeper single-case
- Protect the contribution. Add robustness and clarifications; resist changes that dilute the
- Keep anonymity intact in the revised manuscript (still double-blind), and **update the replication
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Govern Rebuttal loads about 1.8k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 116 tokens; SKILL.md has 779 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 779 words, ~1,767 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/govern-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- govern-rebuttal
- description
- Use when writing the response to a Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions revise-and-resubmit. The response must convert each of the ≥ 2 referees and the editor, answering comparative-reviewer concerns (case selection, generalizability across countries, measurement of institutions, alternative institutional explanations) point by point. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
R&R Rebuttal (govern-rebuttal)
A Governance R&R means at least two referees and the editor see a real comparative/institutional contribution worth saving. It is an invitation, not an acceptance. The response letter must move every referee toward yes while keeping the editor confident the revision is convergent — and at this journal the recurring battleground is whether the claim travels across countries and institutions, so the letter has to defend or honestly re-scope the comparative reach, not retreat to a single-country result.
When to trigger
- An R&R decision arrived and you are planning the revision + response letter
- Referees disagree with each other and you must reconcile their demands
- A referee requests analyses (more cases, different institutional measures) that could change the claim
- Writing the cover memo to the editor summarizing the revision
Strategy
- Read the editor's letter as the rubric. The editor signals which points are decisive and adjudicates disagreements among referees. Solve those first.
- One point-by-point response, every comment addressed. Quote each comment, then respond. Never skip one — silence reads as non-compliance to a referee who must be won over.
- Concede or rebut explicitly, with evidence. For each comment: did what was asked (say where, with the new text/table/figure number), or push back respectfully with a reason grounded in theory, design, or evidence. A well-argued disagreement earns more respect than a hollow capitulation that weakens the comparative claim.
- Reconcile conflicting referees openly. When R1 wants more cases and R2 wants a deeper single-case process trace, say so, choose a principled path, and explain the tradeoff to the editor rather than silently satisfying one.
- Protect the contribution. Add robustness and clarifications; resist changes that dilute the comparative/institutional reach that earned the R&R. Defend scope conditions rather than over-claiming.
- Keep anonymity intact in the revised manuscript (still double-blind), and update the replication
materials and the Data Availability Statement so new exhibits remain reproducible (see
govern-transparency-and-data).
Comparative-reviewer concerns: concede vs defend
| Comment signal | Who owns the call | Default move in the response |
|---|---|---|
| Editor flags it as decisive | editor | solve first, headline it in the cover memo |
| "Why these countries/cases?" (selection) | author + editor | justify the sample on inferential grounds; if selected on outcome, fix or re-scope and say so |
| "Does it generalize beyond these cases?" | author | state scope conditions honestly; add cases/tests if feasible, do not over-claim |
| "Your institutional measure isn't comparable across cases" | author | defend the operationalization or add an alternative measure; show robustness |
| "You ignored an alternative institutional explanation" | author | run/discuss the rival account and show why yours survives |
| Two referees want opposite things | editor | pick a principled path, explain the tradeoff openly |
Concede readily on measurement robustness, added rival tests, and clarifications. Defend — with reasons — the core comparative framing, defensible case selection, and honestly bounded scope conditions.
Show full SKILL.md (318 more words)Show less
Response-letter format
For each referee comment:
> [Quoted referee comment]
Response: [What we did / why we respectfully disagree].
Change: [Section/page/table-figure number where the revision appears].Open with a short cover memo to the editor summarizing the main changes (lead with the editor's decisive points), then group responses by referee, ending each entry with the location of the change so the editor can verify quickly.
Checklist
- Editor's decisive points identified and solved first; headlined in the cover memo
- Every referee comment quoted and answered (no silent merges)
- Each response tagged: conceded (with change location) or rebutted (with a reason)
- Case-selection, generalizability, and institutional-measurement concerns addressed head-on
- Conflicting referees reconciled with a principled, openly explained tradeoff
- Comparative/institutional reach protected — no retreat to a parochial single-country result
- Revised manuscript still double-blind; replication materials + Data Availability Statement updated
Anti-patterns
- Ignoring or merging away a comment without a visible, quoted response
- Retreating to a single-country result to dodge a generalizability comment (kills the contribution)
- Capitulating to a request that breaks the paper's logic just to please a referee
- Defensive or dismissive tone toward referees
- Adding cases/analyses that quietly contradict the original claim without acknowledging it
- Letting the revised manuscript or new exhibits drift out of sync with the replication materials
Worked micro-example (illustrative)
A hypothetical R&R draws three reviews. The editor names two decisive points (case selection and the comparability of the state-capacity measure). R1 wants two more countries added; R2 wants the existing cases traced in more depth. The disciplined letter opens with a three-sentence memo to the editor, addresses case selection and measurement first with new text/table locations, then reconciles R1/R2 by adding one well-justified case and deepening the process trace for the two original cases — stating the tradeoff openly rather than silently siding with one referee. Of 27 total comments, 27 receive a quoted response; 19 are conceded with a change location, 8 are rebutted with a reason. (Counts illustrative.)
Output format
【Editor's decisive points】addressed first? [list]
【Coverage】every referee comment answered? [Y/N]
【Concede vs rebut】each tagged with evidence + change location
【Comparative reach protected】no retreat to a parochial single-country result? [Y/N]
【Referee conflicts】reconciled and explained to editor? [Y/N]
【Anonymity + materials/DAS updated】[Y/N]
【Next】resubmit via govern-submission (or govern-review-process for the next round)Supplementary resources
../../resources/external_tools.md— added-analysis and robustness tooling for the revision../../resources/official-source-map.md— Governance decision categories and resubmission policy
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Govern Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Govern Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Govern Rebuttal
What does Govern Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when writing the response to a Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions revise-and-resubmit. Govern Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when writing the response to a Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions revise-and-resubmit.
When should I use Govern Rebuttal?
Govern Rebuttal fits situations like: writing the response to a Governance: An International Journal of Policy; institutions revise-and-resubmit.
How do I install Govern Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill govern-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/govern-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Govern Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill govern-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Governance-Journal-Skills/skills/govern-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/govern-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Govern Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill govern-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/govern-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/govern-rebuttal, .github/skills/govern-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/govern-rebuttal in your project.
What does Govern Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Govern Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Govern Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Govern Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Govern Rebuttal use?
Govern Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Govern Rebuttal use?
About 1.8k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Govern Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Govern Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Govern Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.