Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when writing the response to a European Sociological Review (ESR) revise-and-resubmit.
Install Eursr Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eursr-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eursr-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-rebuttal .claude/skills/eursr-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "eursr-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-rebuttal into .claude/skills/eursr-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "eursr-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eursr-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eursr-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-rebuttal .agents/skills/eursr-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "eursr-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-rebuttal into .agents/skills/eursr-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "eursr-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eursr-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eursr-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-rebuttal .cursor/skills/eursr-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "eursr-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/eursr-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "eursr-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eursr-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eursr-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-rebuttal .gemini/skills/eursr-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "eursr-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/eursr-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "eursr-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eursr-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eursr-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-rebuttal .github/skills/eursr-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "eursr-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-rebuttal into .github/skills/eursr-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "eursr-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eursr-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills eursr-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-rebuttal .opencode/skills/eursr-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "eursr-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/eursr-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "eursr-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
eursr-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.6k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 629 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when writing the response to a European Sociological Review (ESR) revise-and-resubmit.
- Works in 6 steps: Read the editor's letter as the rubric.… → One point-by-point response, every… → Concede or rebut explicitly, with… → …
- Writing the response to a European Sociological Review (ESR) revise-and-resubmit
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Strategy, Response-letter format and Triage grid for an ESR R&R, plus 6 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Eursr Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when writing the response to a European Sociological Review (ESR) revise-and-resubmit. ESR R&Rs typically demand substantial revision and reviewers focus on comparative design, measurement equivalence, and modeling, so the response must convert each reviewer while keeping the editor confident. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Writing the response to a European Sociological Review (ESR) revise-and-resubmit
- Tasks that involve Peer review
Example prompts
- “/eursr-rebuttal”
Workflow steps
6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Read the editor's letter as the rubric. The editor flags which points are decisive — solve those
- One point-by-point response, every comment addressed. Quote each comment, then respond. Never
- Concede or rebut explicitly, with evidence. For each: did what was asked (say where, with the new
- Answer modeling and measurement demands on their own terms. A request for invariance tests,
- Protect the contribution. Add robustness, invariance, and clarifications; resist changes that
- Keep anonymity intact in the revised manuscript, and update the **Data Availability Statement and
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Eursr Rebuttal loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 95 tokens; SKILL.md has 629 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 629 words, ~1,561 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/eursr-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- eursr-rebuttal
- description
- Use when writing the response to a European Sociological Review (ESR) revise-and-resubmit. ESR R&Rs typically demand substantial revision and reviewers focus on comparative design, measurement equivalence, and modeling, so the response must convert each reviewer while keeping the editor confident. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
R&R Rebuttal (eursr-rebuttal)
An ESR R&R is the normal road to publication for a promising paper — and it usually asks for substantial revision. Reviewers focus on the comparative design, measurement equivalence, and the modeling (level, clustering, few-cluster inference), so the response letter must satisfy a quantitative skeptic without breaking the paper, while the editor adjudicates.
When to trigger
- An R&R decision arrived and you are planning the revision + response letter
- Reviewers disagree (e.g., one wants more countries, another a different estimator)
- A reviewer requests analyses or measurement changes that would change the claims
- Writing the cover note to the editor summarizing the revision
Strategy
- Read the editor's letter as the rubric. The editor flags which points are decisive — solve those first; the editor adjudicates conflicts among reviewers.
- One point-by-point response, every comment addressed. Quote each comment, then respond. Never skip one — silence reads as non-compliance.
- Concede or rebut explicitly, with evidence. For each: did what was asked (say where, with the new text/table number), or push back respectfully with a reason (theory, design, or measurement). A well-argued disagreement beats a capitulation that weakens the paper.
- Answer modeling and measurement demands on their own terms. A request for invariance tests, df-aware SEs, a leave-one-country-out check, or an alternative harmonization should be run and reported honestly — these are ESR's core review currency.
- Protect the contribution. Add robustness, invariance, and clarifications; resist changes that dilute the portable mechanism or the comparative leverage that earned the R&R.
- Keep anonymity intact in the revised manuscript, and update the Data Availability Statement and
replication package so any new tables/figures stay reproducible (see
eursr-transparency-and-data).
Response-letter format
For each reviewer comment:
> [Quoted reviewer comment]
Response: [What we did / why we respectfully disagree].
Change: [Section/page/table-figure number where the revision appears].Open with a short summary of the main changes to the editor; group by reviewer; end each entry with the location of the change so the editor can verify quickly.
Triage grid for an ESR R&R
| Comment type | Default response |
|---|---|
| Editor's decisive point | do it; never argue these away |
| Modeling/measurement check you can run (invariance, df SEs, LOO) | run it; report honestly even if mixed |
| "Add more countries / waves" | add if feasible; if not, justify the set and bound the claim |
| Request that dilutes the mechanism or comparative leverage | rebut respectfully with a reason |
Show full SKILL.md (256 more words)Show less
Worked micro-example (illustrative)
A comparative attitudes paper gets an R&R where R1 doubts measurement equivalence and R2 thinks the macro effect rests on too few clusters.
R1: "Are the attitude scales comparable across countries?"
Response: Added configural/metric/scalar invariance tests (Appendix Table A3); scalar fails for 3
countries → re-estimated with partial scalar invariance; substantive conclusion unchanged. Change: §4.2.
R2: "24 countries can't support that macro claim."
Response: Re-ran macro inference with a wild cluster bootstrap and a Bayesian two-level model
(Table 5); interaction CI widens but excludes zero; macro claim tempered. Change: §5.1, Appendix B.The letter concedes where evidence warrants, runs the modeling checks on their own terms, and protects the contribution by showing the cross-level result survives the stricter inference.
Referee pushback → ESR-specific fix
- "The revision didn't change anything." → End each entry with an exact location; visible change beats a thank-you.
- "You ignored the invariance issue." → Run the invariance tests, report the level reached, and state what partial invariance licenses.
- "You over-claim from few clusters." → Re-estimate with df-aware or Bayesian methods and temper the macro claim rather than defending the original SEs.
Calibration anchors
- The editor's letter is the rubric. At ESR the editor weights reviewers; solving the decisive points first converts an R&R.
- Run the modeling checks. Invariance, few-cluster inference, and leave-one-country-out are ESR's review currency — running them honestly is more persuasive than arguing them away.
- Substantial means substantial. Plan for a heavy revision; a light pass reads as non-engagement.
Anti-patterns
- Ignoring or merging away a comment without a visible response
- Capitulating to a request that breaks the paper's logic just to please a reviewer
- Dismissing a measurement-equivalence or few-cluster objection instead of addressing it
- "We thank the reviewer" with no actual change or argued reason
- New analyses that quietly contradict the original claim without acknowledgment
- Reintroducing identifying information into the revised (still anonymous) manuscript
Output format
【Editor's decisive points】addressed first? [list]
【Coverage】every reviewer comment answered? [Y/N]
【Concede vs rebut】each tagged with evidence + change location
【Modeling/measurement checks】invariance / few-cluster / LOO run and reported? [Y/N]
【Contribution protected】no dilution of mechanism / comparative leverage? [Y/N]
【Anonymity + DAS/package updated】[Y/N]
【Next】resubmit via ScholarOneSupplementary resources
../../resources/external_tools.md— invariance, few-cluster, and Bayesian multilevel tooling../../resources/official-source-map.md— ESR review model and ethics
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Eursr Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eursr Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Eursr Rebuttal
What does Eursr Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when writing the response to a European Sociological Review (ESR) revise-and-resubmit. Eursr Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when writing the response to a European Sociological Review (ESR) revise-and-resubmit.
When should I use Eursr Rebuttal?
Eursr Rebuttal fits situations like: writing the response to a European Sociological Review (ESR) revise-and-resubmit; tasks that involve Peer review.
How do I install Eursr Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eursr-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/eursr-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Eursr Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eursr-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (European-Sociological-Review-Skills/skills/eursr-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/eursr-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Eursr Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill eursr-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/eursr-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/eursr-rebuttal, .github/skills/eursr-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/eursr-rebuttal in your project.
What does Eursr Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Eursr Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Eursr Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Eursr Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Eursr Rebuttal use?
Eursr Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Eursr Rebuttal use?
About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Eursr Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Eursr Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Eursr Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.