Agent skill

Etp Contribution Framing

by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

A skill your agent uses when sharpening the headline claim of an Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) manuscript into a contribution to entrepreneurship theory AND practice.

MITAuto-check passedMarketing & SEO

Install Etp Contribution Framing

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill etp-contribution-framing -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills etp-contribution-framing --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-contribution-framing .claude/skills/etp-contribution-framing && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
etp-contribution-framing
GitHub stars
1.2k
Token cost
~1.8k tokens
SKILL.md length
878 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
2,387
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when sharpening the headline claim of an Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) manuscript into a contribution to entrepreneurship theory AND practice.

  • Marketing & SEO work in your project
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, ETP's dual contribution standard, Build the contribution as a… and The one-sentence claim test, plus 7 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Etp Contribution Framing is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when sharpening the headline claim of an Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) manuscript into a contribution to entrepreneurship theory AND practice. Frames the "so what"; it does not build the mechanism (etp-theory-development) or position against the literature (etp-literature-positioning).

Its SKILL.md is about 1.8k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Marketing & SEO. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Marketing & SEO work in your project

Example prompts

  • “so what”
  • “/etp-contribution-framing”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Etp Contribution Framing loads about 1.8k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 82 tokens; SKILL.md has 878 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~82
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.8k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 878 words, ~1,791 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/etp-contribution-framing/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
etp-contribution-framing
description
Use when sharpening the headline claim of an Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) manuscript into a contribution to entrepreneurship theory AND practice. Frames the "so what"; it does not build the mechanism (etp-theory-development) or position against the literature (etp-literature-positioning).

Contribution Framing (etp-contribution-framing)

When to trigger

  • A reviewer or coauthor asks "what is the contribution, in one sentence?" and you stumble
  • The paper has results but the "so what for theory" is buried or implied
  • The "implications for practice" section is generic boilerplate
  • The contribution claimed in the abstract does not match what the evidence delivers
  • You cannot say which entrepreneurship belief your paper changes

ETP's dual contribution standard

ETP's identity is theory AND practice. A passing ETP contribution makes a specific theoretical claim — a new construct, a mechanism, a boundary condition, a reconciliation — and a specific, mechanism-derived practice claim. Both must be true, both must be earned by the evidence, and the practice claim cannot be a decorative afterthought. This is the single most ETP-specific framing demand: many strong-theory papers fail at ETP because their practice section reads as an obligatory paragraph.

Build the contribution as a matched pair

LayerThe claim must…Failure tell
TheoryName what changes in a specific entrepreneurship conversation"We contribute to the literature" (which one? what changes?)
PracticeFollow from the mechanism; name who acts differently and how"Managers should consider…" (generic, not mechanism-derived)
CalibrationMatch the strength of the claim to the evidence (extend ≠ overturn)Abstract overclaims relative to results

Write the pair as two sentences and test them against each other: if the practice sentence does not follow from the theory sentence, one of them is wrong.

The one-sentence claim test

Force the headline into: "We show that [entrepreneurial mechanism] explains [outcome] under [boundary condition], which means [theory move] and implies [practitioner action]." If you cannot fill every slot with something specific and non-obvious, the contribution is not yet framed. The boundary condition is doing real work here — at ETP a contribution that holds "always, for everyone" usually means the scope was never thought through.

Calibrate the claim to the evidence

  • An inductive paper contributes a model/construct, not a tested effect — frame the contribution as theory-building, and be explicit that generalizability is for future work.
  • A single-context quantitative paper contributes a tested mechanism with stated boundaries — do not generalize beyond the sample's frame.
  • A conceptual paper contributes a new way of seeing — its "evidence" is logical coherence and generative power, and the practice implication should be illustrative, clearly flagged as conjectural.

Don't let the practice section sink you

ETP's USASBE heritage means a reviewer may be a practitioner-facing scholar. The practice implication should be (1) derived from your mechanism, (2) actionable by a named actor (founder, investor, family-firm successor, educator, policymaker), and (3) honest about what is not yet known. "Entrepreneurs should be alert to opportunities" is not a contribution; "investors should weight a founder's prior failure as a learning signal rather than a red flag, because failure speeds subsequent pivoting" is.

Show full SKILL.md (417 more words)Show less

Three contribution shapes ETP rewards

Not every contribution is a "new effect." Naming the shape you are claiming helps you frame it honestly and helps a reviewer see it.

  • A new construct or measure — you give the field a name and an operationalization for something it could not previously study (e.g., a validated entrepreneurial-identity-centrality scale). The bar is construct clarity, discriminant validity, and demonstrated usefulness.
  • A boundary or contingency — you show a known relationship reverses or vanishes under an entrepreneurial condition. The contribution is the scope condition, so it must be theorized, not just a significant interaction term.
  • A reconciliation — you resolve a standing contradiction in an ETP conversation by identifying the contingency under which each side holds. The bar is that the reconciliation is generative, not a split-the-difference truce.

State which shape you claim before you draft the abstract; a paper that claims "new effect" but actually offers a "boundary" usually reads as overclaimed to an ETP reviewer.

Checklist

  • The theory contribution names a specific conversation and what changes in it
  • The practice contribution follows from the mechanism and names who acts differently
  • The two contributions are mutually consistent (practice follows from theory)
  • The claim strength matches the evidence (no overturn-on-an-extension)
  • A boundary condition scopes the claim
  • The abstract's promise equals the paper's delivery

Anti-patterns

  • Practice as ornament — a generic "implications for managers" paragraph the mechanism does not generate
  • Contribution-by-citation — "we contribute to the X literature" with no stated change
  • Overclaiming — the abstract promises more than the design supports
  • Boundary-free claims — an effect asserted to hold universally
  • Mismatched pair — a practice tip that does not follow from the theory mechanism

Worked vignette (illustrative)

A paper finds that founders who reason via affordable loss (rather than expected return) survive longer in highly uncertain markets. A weak framing says: "We contribute to the effectuation literature and managers should consider affordable loss." An ETP-strength framing builds the matched pair. Theory: it qualifies the effectuation–causation debate by showing effectual logic's survival advantage is conditional on market uncertainty — under low uncertainty, predictive (causal) logic does as well or better; the boundary condition is the contribution, not the main effect. Practice: because the advantage is conditional, the implication is specific — investors and accelerators should not treat predictive business plans as a universal quality signal; in genuinely uncertain markets they should reward evidence of affordable-loss experimentation instead. The two sentences are mutually consistent (the practice tip follows directly from the boundary condition), and the claim is calibrated to "qualify," not "overturn."

Output format

text
【Journal】Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
【Theory contribution】what changes in <named conversation>
【Practice contribution】who does what differently, derived from the mechanism
【One-sentence claim】We show [mechanism] → [outcome] under [boundary], meaning [theory] and implying [action]
【Calibration】claim strength vs. evidence (inductive/quant/conceptual)
【Abstract = delivery?】Y/N
【Next skill】etp-tables-figures

© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-contribution-framing of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23

Compare with similar skills

Etp Contribution Framing next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Etp Contribution Framing compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Etp Contribution Framing this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.2k—~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Geo Fundamentalswasp-lang/wasp19k9 repos~861Automated safety check: PassMIT
Ab Testingcoreyhaines31/marketingskills54k3 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Hreflang and International SEOAgriciDaniel/claude-seo19k5 repos~3.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Referralscoreyhaines31/marketingskills54k2 repos~2.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
SEO GeoReScienceLab/opc-skills1.8k4 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • Geo Fundamentals

    wasp-lang/wasp

    Generative Engine Optimization for AI search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity).

    19k GitHub starsUsed in 9 repos~861 tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Ab Testing

    coreyhaines31/marketingskills

    When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program.

    54k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~3.1k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Hreflang and International SEO

    AgriciDaniel/claude-seo

    Audits, validates and generates hreflang tags for multi-language and multi-region sites in HTML, HTTP headers or XML sitemaps, flagging common code and return-tag mistakes.

    19k GitHub starsUsed in 5 repos~3.4k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Referrals

    coreyhaines31/marketingskills

    When the user wants to create, optimize, or analyze a referral program, affiliate program, or word-of-mouth strategy.

    54k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.6k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • SEO Geo

    ReScienceLab/opc-skills

    SEO & GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) for websites. An agent skill from ReScienceLab/opc-skills.

    1.8k GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~2.1k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Ad Creative

    LeoYeAI/openclaw-marketing-skills

    When the user wants to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative — headlines, descriptions, primary text, or full ad variations — for any paid advertising platform.

    1k GitHub starsUsed in 8 repos~3.4k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

All 2,387 skills in this repo
  • Aaag Data Analysis

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Literature Positioning

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Rebuttal

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Research Design

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Review Process

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aaag Submission

    brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…

    1.2k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 13 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Etp Contribution Framing

What does Etp Contribution Framing do?

A skill your agent uses when sharpening the headline claim of an Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) manuscript into a contribution to entrepreneurship theory AND practice. Etp Contribution Framing is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when sharpening the headline claim of an Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) manuscript into a contribution to entrepreneurship theory AND practice.

When should I use Etp Contribution Framing?

Etp Contribution Framing fits situations like: marketing & SEO work in your project.

How do I install Etp Contribution Framing in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill etp-contribution-framing -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-contribution-framing in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/etp-contribution-framing in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Etp Contribution Framing in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill etp-contribution-framing -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Entrepreneurship-Theory-and-Practice-Skills/skills/etp-contribution-framing in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/etp-contribution-framing in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Etp Contribution Framing in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill etp-contribution-framing -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/etp-contribution-framing, .gemini/skills/etp-contribution-framing, .github/skills/etp-contribution-framing and .opencode/skills/etp-contribution-framing in your project.

What does Etp Contribution Framing need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Etp Contribution Framing is instructions for the agent only.

Does Etp Contribution Framing access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Etp Contribution Framing safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Etp Contribution Framing use?

Etp Contribution Framing is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Etp Contribution Framing use?

About 1.8k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.2k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Etp Contribution Framing?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Etp Contribution Framing: Geo Fundamentals (wasp-lang/wasp, 19k stars), Ab Testing (coreyhaines31/marketingskills, 54k stars), Hreflang and International SEO (AgriciDaniel/claude-seo, 19k stars) and Referrals (coreyhaines31/marketingskills, 54k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Etp Contribution Framing?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.