Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
Agent skill
Epsl Revision And Rebuttal
by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL) revision decision.
Install Epsl Revision And Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill epsl-revision-and-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills epsl-revision-and-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal .claude/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "epsl-revision-and-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal into .claude/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "epsl-revision-and-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill epsl-revision-and-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills epsl-revision-and-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal .agents/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "epsl-revision-and-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal into .agents/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "epsl-revision-and-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill epsl-revision-and-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills epsl-revision-and-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal .cursor/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "epsl-revision-and-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "epsl-revision-and-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill epsl-revision-and-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills epsl-revision-and-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal .gemini/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "epsl-revision-and-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "epsl-revision-and-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills epsl-revision-and-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill epsl-revision-and-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal .github/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "epsl-revision-and-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal into .github/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "epsl-revision-and-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill epsl-revision-and-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills epsl-revision-and-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal .opencode/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "epsl-revision-and-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "epsl-revision-and-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
epsl-revision-and-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.4k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 549 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL) revision decision.
- Works in 6 steps: Mine the editor's letter first. The… → Answer every point, point-by-point.… → Route additions to the supplement. New… → …
- Responding to an Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL) revision decision
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Strategy, Triaging EPSL referee asks and Response-letter format, plus 4 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Epsl Revision And Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when responding to an Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL) revision decision. EPSL decisions are made by a subject editor on the advice of referees who often span two sub-fields, so the response must satisfy each specialist with evidence while keeping the Letter concise. It structures the revision and response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Responding to an Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL) revision decision
- Tasks that involve Peer review
Example prompts
- “/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal”
Workflow steps
6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Mine the editor's letter first. The handling editor is a specialist and usually signals which
- Answer every point, point-by-point. Quote each comment, respond beneath it, and cite the exact
- Route additions to the supplement. New robustness tests, standards tables, and sensitivity
- Rebut with data, concede with grace. A disagreement backed by a new calculation or a cited
- Reconcile cross-field conflicts explicitly. When the geochemist wants more caveats and the
- Keep numbers synchronized. Any re-reduction or added analysis updates the manuscript, the
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Epsl Revision And Rebuttal loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 98 tokens; SKILL.md has 549 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 549 words, ~1,444 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- epsl-revision-and-rebuttal
- description
- Use when responding to an Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL) revision decision. EPSL decisions are made by a subject editor on the advice of referees who often span two sub-fields, so the response must satisfy each specialist with evidence while keeping the Letter concise. It structures the revision and response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
Revision & Rebuttal (epsl-revision-and-rebuttal)
An EPSL revision has a specific tension: referees ask for additions — more standards data, another sensitivity case, an alternative-hypothesis discussion — while the letters format refuses to grow. The craft is to satisfy every technical demand in the supplement and deposit while the main text stays near the cap, and to remember that the subject editor, not the referees, makes the call.
When to trigger
- A major/minor revision decision arrived and you are planning the response
- Referees from different sub-fields pull in different directions
- A requested addition would blow the word cap
- Drafting the summary-of-changes note to the editor
Strategy
- Mine the editor's letter first. The handling editor is a specialist and usually signals which referee points are decisive; resolve those with new evidence, not prose.
- Answer every point, point-by-point. Quote each comment, respond beneath it, and cite the exact location of the change (section, figure, table, supplement item, repository DOI). Unanswered comments read as evasion.
- Route additions to the supplement. New robustness tests, standards tables, and sensitivity cases go to the supplementary material and repositories; the main text absorbs only conclusions. State this routing openly — EPSL editors know the format's constraint and respect it.
- Rebut with data, concede with grace. A disagreement backed by a new calculation or a cited constraint is persuasive; a disagreement backed by adjectives is not. Where the referee is right, fix it and say so plainly.
- Reconcile cross-field conflicts explicitly. When the geochemist wants more caveats and the geodynamicist wants a bolder claim, choose a principled position and explain the trade-off to the editor — the adjudicator — rather than splitting the difference incoherently.
- Keep numbers synchronized. Any re-reduction or added analysis updates the manuscript, the supplement, and the deposited tables together; a mismatch discovered in round two is fatal to trust.
Show full SKILL.md (245 more words)Show less
Triaging EPSL referee asks
| Referee ask | Default mode | What to show |
|---|---|---|
| "Report full standards/blank data" | concede → supplement | the per-session traceability table |
| "The feature may be a resolution artifact" | test, then rebut or scope | the recovery test at that node |
| "Consider alternative hypothesis H" | engage seriously | a discriminating calculation, or an honest scope limit |
| "Harmonize with published ages" | concede | recalculated comparison, constants stated |
| "Expand the regional context" | resist politely | letters format; one sentence + citations |
| "Tone down the global claim" | negotiate | keep the portable claim, bound its domain |
Response-letter format
> [Quoted referee comment]
Response: [what changed / why we respectfully disagree, with evidence].
Change: [Section X / Fig. Y / Table S3 / EarthChem DOI updated].Open with a one-paragraph summary of the major changes for the editor; group by referee; keep the tone even toward a hostile review — the editor reads your temperament as a proxy for your rigor.
Worked micro-example (illustrative — answering a resolution objection)
Referee 2 (seismologist, illustrative): "The low-velocity conduit lies near the edge of ray coverage; I suspect vertical smearing."
> The low-velocity conduit lies near the edge of ray coverage; I suspect
> vertical smearing.
Response: We agree coverage thins there and have tested the concern directly.
A synthetic conduit restricted to <80 km depth, run through the identical
inversion, does not reproduce the observed anomaly at 120 km; recovery at the
key node is 78% (illustrative). The feature therefore cannot be explained as
smearing of shallow structure. New Supplementary Fig. S7 shows the full test;
the main text now states the recovery value where the conduit is first named.
Change: Section 4.2 (one sentence); Fig. S7; inversion configs updated at
Zenodo (DOI: illustrative).The pattern: reproduce the referee's alternative inside your own machinery, show it fails, and spend one main-text sentence on it — the rest lives in the supplement.
Anti-patterns
- Growing the main text past the cap to appease referees instead of routing to the supplement
- Answering a technical objection with rhetoric or seniority
- Silently dropping a comment, or merging two comments to avoid one
- Capitulating on the portable claim, leaving a Letter with no letter-worthy result
- Updated figures whose underlying deposited tables were never refreshed
Output format
【Editor's decisive points】listed + resolved with evidence
【Coverage】every comment quoted and answered? [Y/N]
【Routing】additions → supplement/deposit; main text within cap? [Y/N]
【Rebuttals】each backed by a calculation/citation? [Y/N]
【Cross-field conflicts】reconciled for the editor? [Y/N or N/A]
【Sync】manuscript = supplement = deposit? [Y/N]
【Next】resubmit via Editorial ManagerSupplementary resources
../../resources/external_tools.md— tooling for referee-requested tests../../resources/official-source-map.md— decision flow and policy links
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Epsl Revision And Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epsl Revision And Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Epsl Revision And Rebuttal
What does Epsl Revision And Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL) revision decision. Epsl Revision And Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when responding to an Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL) revision decision.
When should I use Epsl Revision And Rebuttal?
Epsl Revision And Rebuttal fits situations like: responding to an Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL) revision decision; tasks that involve Peer review.
How do I install Epsl Revision And Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill epsl-revision-and-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Epsl Revision And Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill epsl-revision-and-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Earth-and-Planetary-Science-Letters-Skills/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Epsl Revision And Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill epsl-revision-and-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal, .github/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/epsl-revision-and-rebuttal in your project.
What does Epsl Revision And Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Epsl Revision And Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Epsl Revision And Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Epsl Revision And Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Epsl Revision And Rebuttal use?
Epsl Revision And Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Epsl Revision And Rebuttal use?
About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Epsl Revision And Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Epsl Revision And Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Epsl Revision And Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.