Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
A skill your agent uses when responding to Economic Policy (EP) discussant comments and the panel debate — revising the paper for the camera-ready version that publishes alongside those comments.
Install Ecopol Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecopol-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ecopol-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Economic-Policy-Skills/skills/ecopol-rebuttal .claude/skills/ecopol-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "ecopol-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Economic-Policy-Skills/skills/ecopol-rebuttal into .claude/skills/ecopol-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ecopol-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Economic-Policy-Skills/skills/ecopol-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecopol-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ecopol-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Economic-Policy-Skills/skills/ecopol-rebuttal .agents/skills/ecopol-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "ecopol-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Economic-Policy-Skills/skills/ecopol-rebuttal into .agents/skills/ecopol-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ecopol-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecopol-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ecopol-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Economic-Policy-Skills/skills/ecopol-rebuttal .cursor/skills/ecopol-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "ecopol-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Economic-Policy-Skills/skills/ecopol-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/ecopol-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ecopol-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Economic-Policy-Skills/skills/ecopol-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecopol-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ecopol-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Economic-Policy-Skills/skills/ecopol-rebuttal .gemini/skills/ecopol-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ecopol-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Economic-Policy-Skills/skills/ecopol-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/ecopol-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ecopol-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ecopol-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecopol-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Economic-Policy-Skills/skills/ecopol-rebuttal .github/skills/ecopol-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ecopol-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Economic-Policy-Skills/skills/ecopol-rebuttal into .github/skills/ecopol-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ecopol-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecopol-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills ecopol-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Economic-Policy-Skills/skills/ecopol-rebuttal .opencode/skills/ecopol-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "ecopol-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Economic-Policy-Skills/skills/ecopol-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/ecopol-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "ecopol-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
ecopol-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.2k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 590 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when responding to Economic Policy (EP) discussant comments and the panel debate — revising the paper for the camera-ready version that publishes alongside those comments.
- Works in 3 steps: You cannot bury a concession in a… → Defending in the text, not in… → Tone is collegial and on the record.…
- Tasks that involve Peer review
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, EP rebuttal is unusual: your…, Triage every discussant point and Craft moves, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Ecopol Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when responding to Economic Policy (EP) discussant comments and the panel debate — revising the paper for the camera-ready version that publishes alongside those comments. Plans the post-panel response; it does not invent evidence or citations.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review and Citation management. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Tasks that involve Peer review
- Tasks that involve Citation management
Example prompts
- “/ecopol-rebuttal”
Workflow steps
3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- You cannot bury a concession in a private letter. If a discussant is right, fix it in the paper or address it openly — the reader sees…
- Defending in the text, not in correspondence. Where you disagree, the paper must contain the argument/evidence that answers the point…
- Tone is collegial and on the record. Discussants are named; the exchange is part of the published scholarly conversation, not an…
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Ecopol Rebuttal loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 66 tokens; SKILL.md has 590 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 590 words, ~1,229 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/ecopol-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- ecopol-rebuttal
- description
- Use when responding to Economic Policy (EP) discussant comments and the panel debate — revising the paper for the camera-ready version that publishes alongside those comments. Plans the post-panel response; it does not invent evidence or citations.
Post-Panel Rebuttal (ecopol-rebuttal)
When to trigger
- You have presented at an EP conference and have two discussants' written comments to address
- You are preparing the camera-ready version that will be published next to those comments
- The panel debate surfaced points that need a fix, a concession, or a counter-argument
- A coauthor is treating discussant comments like an anonymous referee report and missing the public, side-by-side nature
- You must decide, point by point, what to change vs. what to defend in the final text
EP rebuttal is unusual: your reply is published next to the critique
At EP there is no private response-to-referees letter. The two discussants' comments are published alongside your final paper, and a summary of the panel discussion may accompany it (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). So your "rebuttal" is mostly the revised paper itself: the reader will see the critique and your paper side by side and judge whether you answered it. This reshapes strategy:
- You cannot bury a concession in a private letter. If a discussant is right, fix it in the paper or address it openly — the reader sees both documents.
- Defending in the text, not in correspondence. Where you disagree, the paper must contain the argument/evidence that answers the point, because there is no separate venue to make your case.
- Tone is collegial and on the record. Discussants are named; the exchange is part of the published scholarly conversation, not an adversarial referee fight.
Triage every discussant point
| Point type | Response |
|---|---|
| Correct and fixable | fix in the paper; note the improvement where natural |
| Correct but unfixable (data/scope limit) | concede openly in the text; bound its impact on the conclusion |
| A genuine disagreement | add the argument/evidence to the paper that answers it; acknowledge the alternative view |
| A request beyond scope | address briefly; explain why it is a separate question |
| A policy-framing concern | sharpen the policy bottom line / units (ecopol-tables-figures, ecopol-writing-style) |
For each of the two discussants, work through every substantive point with this triage; do not cherry-pick the easy ones.
Show full SKILL.md (255 more words)Show less
Craft moves
- Map academic vs. policy comments separately. The academic discussant's points usually mean analysis changes (
ecopol-identification,ecopol-robustness); the policy discussant's usually mean framing/magnitude/legibility changes. - Strengthen the central magnitude if either discussant questioned its robustness — that is the most damaging unanswered critique given the side-by-side format.
- Address the top points in the main text, not only the appendix — the reader comparing the documents looks at the paper, not the footnotes.
- Be honest about what you did not change and why — an unanswered, visible critique is worse than a frank concession.
- Keep the policy conclusion coherent after revisions: if a fix moves the number, update the recommendation rather than leaving a stale headline.
Checklist
- Every substantive point from both discussants triaged (fix / concede / defend / scope)
- Corrections incorporated into the paper, not just promised
- Genuine disagreements answered with argument/evidence in the paper
- Central magnitude re-defended if its robustness was questioned
- Top points addressed in the main text, given the side-by-side publication
- Concessions stated openly and their impact on the conclusion bounded
- Policy bottom line still coherent after all revisions
- Tone collegial and on the record (discussants are named)
Anti-patterns
- Treating discussant comments like a private referee report you can answer in a hidden letter
- Cherry-picking the easy points and silently ignoring a hard one the reader will see next to your paper
- Defending a number a discussant credibly challenged without strengthening the robustness
- Conceding a point in correspondence but leaving the paper unchanged
- Leaving a stale policy recommendation after a revision moved the underlying estimate
Output format
【Journal】Economic Policy (EP)
【Skill】ecopol-rebuttal
【Format reality】discussant comments published alongside the paper
【Discussant 1 (academic)】points → fix/concede/defend
【Discussant 2 (policy)】points → fix/concede/defend
【Central magnitude】re-defended if challenged? Y/N
【Open concessions】stated in text + impact bounded? Y/N
【Policy bottom line】still coherent post-revision? Y/N
【Next step】finalize camera-ready → ecopol-submission (Stage 3)© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Economic-Policy-Skills/skills/ecopol-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Ecopol Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecopol Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Academic Research Suite for CodexImbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex | 12k | — | ~12k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Social Science Paper Writingfakerqwq/social-science-paper-writing-skill | 382 | — | ~7k | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| Review Papermaxwell2732/paper-replicate-agent-demo | 137 | 2 repos | ~1.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | None |
Similar skills
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Suite for Codex
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex
A router skill that sends academic work such as literature reviews, drafting, citation checks, peer review and revision to the right workflow in the ARS suite.
Social Science Paper Writing
fakerqwq/social-science-paper-writing-skill
Helps draft, diagnose, review and revise social science papers, from topic and research question to literature review, citation risks and pre-submission checks.
Review Paper
maxwell2732/paper-replicate-agent-demo
Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, econometric specification, citation completeness, and potential referee objections
00 Academic Router
agentscope-ai/OpenJudge
A skill your agent uses when the user wants help with academic papers or citations but it's unclear which specific workflow fits — reviewing a paper, checking a BibTeX file for fake references, or…
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Ecopol Rebuttal
What does Ecopol Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when responding to Economic Policy (EP) discussant comments and the panel debate — revising the paper for the camera-ready version that publishes alongside those comments. Ecopol Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when responding to Economic Policy (EP) discussant comments and the panel debate — revising the paper for the camera-ready version that publishes alongside those comments.
When should I use Ecopol Rebuttal?
Ecopol Rebuttal fits situations like: tasks that involve Peer review; tasks that involve Citation management.
How do I install Ecopol Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecopol-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Economic-Policy-Skills/skills/ecopol-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/ecopol-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Ecopol Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecopol-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Economic-Policy-Skills/skills/ecopol-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/ecopol-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Ecopol Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ecopol-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ecopol-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/ecopol-rebuttal, .github/skills/ecopol-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/ecopol-rebuttal in your project.
What does Ecopol Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Ecopol Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Ecopol Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Ecopol Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Ecopol Rebuttal use?
Ecopol Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Ecopol Rebuttal use?
About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Ecopol Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ecopol Rebuttal: Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars), Peer Review (K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer, 2.4k stars), Academic Research Suite for Codex (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex, 12k stars) and Social Science Paper Writing (fakerqwq/social-science-paper-writing-skill, 382 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Ecopol Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.