Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when writing the response to a Developmental Psychology (APA) revise-and-resubmit.
Install Devpsych Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills devpsych-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-rebuttal .claude/skills/devpsych-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "devpsych-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-rebuttal into .claude/skills/devpsych-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "devpsych-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills devpsych-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-rebuttal .agents/skills/devpsych-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "devpsych-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-rebuttal into .agents/skills/devpsych-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "devpsych-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills devpsych-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-rebuttal .cursor/skills/devpsych-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "devpsych-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/devpsych-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "devpsych-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills devpsych-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-rebuttal .gemini/skills/devpsych-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "devpsych-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/devpsych-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "devpsych-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills devpsych-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-rebuttal .github/skills/devpsych-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "devpsych-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-rebuttal into .github/skills/devpsych-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "devpsych-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills devpsych-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-rebuttal .opencode/skills/devpsych-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "devpsych-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/devpsych-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "devpsych-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
devpsych-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.6k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 574 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when writing the response to a Developmental Psychology (APA) revise-and-resubmit.
- Works in 6 steps: Read the editor's letter as the rubric.… → Point-by-point, every comment. Quote… → Strengthen the developmental claim,… → …
- Writing the response to a Developmental Psychology (APA) revise-and-resubmit
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Strategy, Response-letter format and Worked micro-example…, plus 5 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Devpsych Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when writing the response to a Developmental Psychology (APA) revise-and-resubmit. Reviews here often demand measurement-invariance tests, attrition analyses, added robustness, fuller JARS disclosure, or stronger transparency. The response must address every point and strengthen the developmental claim while staying in the length tier and masked. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Writing the response to a Developmental Psychology (APA) revise-and-resubmit
- Tasks that involve Peer review
Example prompts
- “/devpsych-rebuttal”
Workflow steps
6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Read the editor's letter as the rubric. Solve the decisive developmental-credibility points first
- Point-by-point, every comment. Quote each comment, then respond; never skip one.
- Strengthen the developmental claim, don't just defend. Most requests — report invariance, model
- Manage the length tier. New robustness usually belongs in online supplemental material so the
- Concede or rebut with evidence. Did what was asked (cite the location), or push back respectfully
- Keep masking and sync deposits. Keep the revised manuscript and links anonymized if review is
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Devpsych Rebuttal loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 109 tokens; SKILL.md has 574 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 574 words, ~1,569 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/devpsych-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- devpsych-rebuttal
- description
- Use when writing the response to a Developmental Psychology (APA) revise-and-resubmit. Reviews here often demand measurement-invariance tests, attrition analyses, added robustness, fuller JARS disclosure, or stronger transparency. The response must address every point and strengthen the developmental claim while staying in the length tier and masked. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
R&R Rebuttal (devpsych-rebuttal)
A Developmental Psychology R&R typically asks for a measurement-invariance test, an attrition analysis, added robustness, fuller JARS disclosure, or stronger transparency — and all of it must fit back inside the length tier, with masking intact if review is masked. The response letter must convert every reviewer and reassure the handling editor that the developmental claim is credible.
When to trigger
- An R&R arrived and you are planning the revision + response letter
- Reviewers requested invariance, attrition, added analyses, or open-science changes
- A requested analysis would change the trajectory or the claim
- Writing the cover note to the editor
Strategy
- Read the editor's letter as the rubric. Solve the decisive developmental-credibility points first (often: invariance, age-vs-cohort, attrition); the editor adjudicates among reviewers.
- Point-by-point, every comment. Quote each comment, then respond; never skip one.
- Strengthen the developmental claim, don't just defend. Most requests — report invariance, model attrition with FIML/MI, add a robustness model, justify N, share data — make the paper stronger. Do them and say where; update the data-availability statement if sharing changed.
- Manage the length tier. New robustness usually belongs in online supplemental material so the main text stays within budget; summarize briefly in the main text and point to the supplement.
- Concede or rebut with evidence. Did what was asked (cite the location), or push back respectfully with a reason — and never add an analysis that quietly undercuts the change claim without disclosing it.
- Keep masking and sync deposits. Keep the revised manuscript and links anonymized if review is
masked, and ensure new analyses are reflected in the shared scripts/data
(see
devpsych-open-science-and-transparency).
Response-letter format
For each reviewer comment:
> [Quoted reviewer comment]
Response: [What we did / why we respectfully disagree].
Change: [Main text section, supplement section, or table/figure number].Open with a short summary of the main changes to the editor; group by reviewer; end each entry with the location (note when content went to the supplement to protect the length tier).
Worked micro-example (illustrative response entries)
For the three-wave effortful-control package, an R&R asked for invariance, attrition handling, and N.
> R2: You interpret growth, but is the measure invariant across ages 4-8?
Response: A fair and important point. We now test measurement invariance
before interpreting change: configural, metric, and scalar invariance hold
across waves (ΔCFI < .01; table now in Results). Mean change is therefore
interpretable on a common metric.
Change: Results (new invariance subsection + Table 2); Method (test plan).
> R1: Attrition (18%) could bias the trajectory.
Response: We refit all models with FIML under MAR and compared completers
and dropouts on baseline covariates (no differences). A pattern-mixture
sensitivity analysis leaves the slope and interaction unchanged.
Change: Results (FIML); attrition + sensitivity analysis → Supplement S2.Show full SKILL.md (246 more words)Show less
R&R triage — where each request lands
| Reviewer ask | Default home (protects the length tier) | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Measurement-invariance test | Method + Results (it underwrites the claim) | compact table; full fit indices to supplement |
| Attrition / missing-data analysis | Results + supplement | FIML/MI in text; full table in supplement |
| Added robustness / alternative model | online supplemental material | one summarizing sentence in main text |
| "Address age vs. cohort" | Discussion (+ design note) | reframe or add covariate/sequential argument |
| Fuller JARS disclosure | Method + data-availability statement | a table, not prose, to save words |
| Effect-size/CI reporting | tables and inline | route exhibits to devpsych-tables-figures |
Recurring R&R pushback and the venue fix
- "Trajectory without invariance" → add the configural→metric→scalar test and interpret change only at the level achieved; this is the single most common developmental R&R request.
- "You deleted dropouts" → refit with FIML/MI and add the attrition analysis; never argue from completers alone.
- "Added analysis quietly weakens the effect" → disclose it, interpret it, and scale the claim; concealment is the cardinal sin.
- "Revision busts the tier" → push new robustness to online supplemental material and cite it.
Anti-patterns
- Ignoring or merging away a comment without a visible response
- Cramming new robustness into the main text and busting the length tier
- Capitulating to a change that breaks the developmental logic
- Adding analyses that contradict the change claim without acknowledgment
- Letting shared data/scripts/data-availability statement drift out of sync with the revision
- Reintroducing identifying information into the masked revision
Output format
【Editor's decisive points】addressed first? [list]
【Coverage】every reviewer comment answered? [Y/N]
【Claim strengthened】invariance/attrition/power/disclosure improved? [Y/N]
【Length tier】new material in supplement; main text within limit? [Y/N]
【Transparency updated】scripts/data/data-availability statement in sync? [Y/N]
【Masking intact】[Y/N/NA]
【Next】resubmit via Editorial ManagerSupplementary resources
../../resources/official-source-map.md— review model, JARS, TOP, and length tiers../../resources/external_tools.md— invariance/SEM, missing-data, and power tooling
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Devpsych Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devpsych Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Devpsych Rebuttal
What does Devpsych Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when writing the response to a Developmental Psychology (APA) revise-and-resubmit. Devpsych Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when writing the response to a Developmental Psychology (APA) revise-and-resubmit.
When should I use Devpsych Rebuttal?
Devpsych Rebuttal fits situations like: writing the response to a Developmental Psychology (APA) revise-and-resubmit; tasks that involve Peer review.
How do I install Devpsych Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/devpsych-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Devpsych Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Developmental-Psychology-Skills/skills/devpsych-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/devpsych-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Devpsych Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill devpsych-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/devpsych-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/devpsych-rebuttal, .github/skills/devpsych-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/devpsych-rebuttal in your project.
What does Devpsych Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Devpsych Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Devpsych Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Devpsych Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Devpsych Rebuttal use?
Devpsych Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Devpsych Rebuttal use?
About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Devpsych Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Devpsych Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Devpsych Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.