Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when responding to a Current Anthropology (CA) decision OR writing the author's Reply to the published CA✩ Comments.
Install Curranthro Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill curranthro-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills curranthro-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-rebuttal .claude/skills/curranthro-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "curranthro-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-rebuttal into .claude/skills/curranthro-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "curranthro-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill curranthro-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills curranthro-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-rebuttal .agents/skills/curranthro-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "curranthro-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-rebuttal into .agents/skills/curranthro-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "curranthro-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill curranthro-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills curranthro-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-rebuttal .cursor/skills/curranthro-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "curranthro-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/curranthro-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "curranthro-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill curranthro-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills curranthro-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-rebuttal .gemini/skills/curranthro-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "curranthro-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/curranthro-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "curranthro-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills curranthro-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill curranthro-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-rebuttal .github/skills/curranthro-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "curranthro-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-rebuttal into .github/skills/curranthro-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "curranthro-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill curranthro-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills curranthro-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-rebuttal .opencode/skills/curranthro-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "curranthro-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/curranthro-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "curranthro-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
curranthro-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.5k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 631 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when responding to a Current Anthropology (CA) decision OR writing the author's Reply to the published CA✩ Comments.
- Works in 5 steps: Read the editor's letter as the rubric.… → One point-by-point response, every… → Concede or rebut explicitly, with… → …
- Responding to a Current Anthropology (CA) decision OR writing the authors Reply to the published CA✩ Comments
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Task A — the normal R&R letter…, Task B — the CA✩ Reply to… and Triage table, plus 3 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Curranthro Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when responding to a Current Anthropology (CA) decision OR writing the author's Reply to the published CA✩ Comments. CA has two distinct response tasks — a normal revise-and-resubmit letter to referees/editor before acceptance, and the public, signed Reply to invited commentators printed alongside an accepted Major Article. Structures both; it does not fabricate new evidence.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Responding to a Current Anthropology (CA) decision OR writing the authors Reply to the published CA✩ Comments
- Tasks that involve Peer review
Example prompts
- “/curranthro-rebuttal”
Workflow steps
5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Read the editor's letter as the rubric. Solve the decisive points first; headline them in the
- One point-by-point response, every comment addressed. Quote each comment, then respond. Silence
- Concede or rebut explicitly, with evidence. Say where you revised (new text/section), or push back
- Reconcile cross-subfield reviewers openly. Choose a principled path; answer each in that
- Protect the contribution and the people in it. Never add detail that de-anonymizes or endangers
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Curranthro Rebuttal loads about 1.5k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 101 tokens; SKILL.md has 631 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 631 words, ~1,456 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/curranthro-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- curranthro-rebuttal
- description
- Use when responding to a Current Anthropology (CA) decision OR writing the author's Reply to the published CA✩ Comments. CA has two distinct response tasks — a normal revise-and-resubmit letter to referees/editor before acceptance, and the public, signed Reply to invited commentators printed alongside an accepted Major Article. Structures both; it does not fabricate new evidence.
Rebuttal & the CA✩ Reply (curranthro-rebuttal)
CA gives you two response tasks, and they are not the same. Before acceptance, you may face a normal revise-and-resubmit — a private point-by-point letter to referees and the editor. After a Major Article is accepted, you face the distinctive CA✩ Reply: a public, signed response to the international Comments that will be printed alongside your article and its commentators. The Reply is not an R&R — it is a published piece of scholarship in its own right. Diagnose which task you are in, then use the matching playbook.
When to trigger
- An R&R decision arrived and you are planning the revision + private response letter
- Your Major Article was accepted and the editors sent you the Comments to reply to (the CA✩ Reply)
- Reviewers/commentators disagree with each other (often across subfields) and you must reconcile them
- A comment requests changes that would alter your interpretation or expose interlocutors
Task A — the normal R&R letter (before acceptance)
- Read the editor's letter as the rubric. Solve the decisive points first; headline them in the cover note.
- One point-by-point response, every comment addressed. Quote each comment, then respond. Silence reads as non-compliance.
- Concede or rebut explicitly, with evidence. Say where you revised (new text/section), or push back respectfully with a reason (ethnographic evidence, theoretical logic, or ethics).
- Reconcile cross-subfield reviewers openly. Choose a principled path; answer each in that tradition's idiom.
- Protect the contribution and the people in it. Never add detail that de-anonymizes or endangers
interlocutors to satisfy a reviewer (see
curranthro-transparency-and-data).
> [Quoted reviewer comment]
Response: [What we did / why we respectfully disagree].
Change: [Section/page/figure number where the revision appears].Task B — the CA✩ Reply to published Comments (after acceptance)
This is the signature CA task. The Comments are not gatekeeping — the article is already accepted — so the Reply's job is different: advance the debate in public while defending the core argument.
- It is published scholarship, not a rebuttal letter. Write for readers, not just commentators; it carries your name and stands beside the Comments permanently.
- Synthesize, don't itemize. With many commentators, group Comments by theme rather than answering line-by-line. Name the genuine disagreements and the productive extensions.
- Concede generously where the Comments improve the argument. Acknowledging a sharp point raises your standing; the format rewards intellectual generosity, not defensiveness.
- Defend the core, refine the edges. Hold the central intervention; use the Comments to sharpen scope conditions, clarify the concept, and answer the strongest critiques head-on.
- Honor the international range. Commentators come from many traditions and regions; engage them as peers in a worldwide conversation, including those who write from the communities you study.
- Protect interlocutors in public. The Reply is permanent and visible — never resolve a Comment by
exposing protected people or heritage (see
curranthro-transparency-and-data). - Mind the word budget and copyright. Replies are length-limited and assigned to Wenner-Gren like the article; confirm the current limit with the editors.
Show full SKILL.md (157 more words)Show less
Triage table
| Comment signal | Task | Default move |
|---|---|---|
| Editor flags it as decisive (pre-acceptance) | A (R&R) | solve first; headline in the cover note |
| Two referees want opposite things | A (R&R) | pick a principled path; explain the tradeoff openly |
| A commentator sharpens your concept (post-acceptance) | B (CA✩ Reply) | concede generously; fold the refinement into scope conditions |
| A commentator attacks the core intervention | B (CA✩ Reply) | defend head-on with evidence/logic; do not flinch |
| Any comment asks for de-anonymizing detail | A or B | decline on ethics grounds; explain the consent/harm constraint |
Anti-patterns
- Treating the CA✩ Reply like a private R&R letter (line-by-line, defensive, gatekeeping-anxious)
- Defensiveness or dismissiveness in a permanent, public, signed document
- Capitulating to a request that breaks the argument or endangers interlocutors
- Conceding so thoroughly the central intervention dissolves — the Reply should advance the debate
- Ignoring commentators from non-metropolitan traditions
- "We thank the commentator" with no substantive engagement
Output format
【Task】A: R&R letter / B: CA✩ Reply to published Comments
【Decisive points / themes】addressed first? [list]
【Coverage】every comment (A) or every theme (B) engaged? [Y/N]
【Concede vs defend】each tagged with evidence + (A) change location / (B) how it advances the debate
【Cross-subfield / international conflicts】reconciled and explained? [Y/N]
【Contribution + ethics protected】no dilution, no de-anonymization (esp. public Reply)? [Y/N]
【Next】resubmit via Editorial Manager (A) / submit the CA✩ Reply to the editors (B)Supplementary resources
../../resources/official-source-map.md— CA✩ Treatment, decision categories, copyright assignment
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Curranthro Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curranthro Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Curranthro Rebuttal
What does Curranthro Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when responding to a Current Anthropology (CA) decision OR writing the author's Reply to the published CA✩ Comments. Curranthro Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when responding to a Current Anthropology (CA) decision OR writing the author's Reply to the published CA✩ Comments.
When should I use Curranthro Rebuttal?
Curranthro Rebuttal fits situations like: responding to a Current Anthropology (CA) decision OR writing the authors Reply to the published CA✩ Comments; tasks that involve Peer review.
How do I install Curranthro Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill curranthro-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/curranthro-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Curranthro Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill curranthro-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Current-Anthropology-Skills/skills/curranthro-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/curranthro-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Curranthro Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill curranthro-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/curranthro-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/curranthro-rebuttal, .github/skills/curranthro-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/curranthro-rebuttal in your project.
What does Curranthro Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Curranthro Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Curranthro Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Curranthro Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Curranthro Rebuttal use?
Curranthro Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Curranthro Rebuttal use?
About 1.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Curranthro Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Curranthro Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Curranthro Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.