Marketing Psychology
nexu-io/open-design
Apply psychological principles and behavioral science to copy and design.
Agent skill
Cogpsych Topic Selection
by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when deciding whether a cognition project fits Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) and what contribution shape to target.
MITAuto-check passed
Install Cogpsych Topic Selection
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cogpsych-topic-selection -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cogpsych-topic-selection --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Cognitive-Psychology-Skills/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection .claude/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "cogpsych-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Cognitive-Psychology-Skills/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection into .claude/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cogpsych-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Cognitive-Psychology-Skills/skills/cogpsych-topic-selectionType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cogpsych-topic-selection -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cogpsych-topic-selection --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Cognitive-Psychology-Skills/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection .agents/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "cogpsych-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Cognitive-Psychology-Skills/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection into .agents/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cogpsych-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cogpsych-topic-selection -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cogpsych-topic-selection --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Cognitive-Psychology-Skills/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection .cursor/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "cogpsych-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Cognitive-Psychology-Skills/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection into .cursor/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cogpsych-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Cognitive-Psychology-Skills/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cogpsych-topic-selection -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cogpsych-topic-selection --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Cognitive-Psychology-Skills/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection .gemini/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "cogpsych-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Cognitive-Psychology-Skills/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection into .gemini/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cogpsych-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cogpsych-topic-selectionInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cogpsych-topic-selection -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Cognitive-Psychology-Skills/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection .github/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "cogpsych-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Cognitive-Psychology-Skills/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection into .github/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cogpsych-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cogpsych-topic-selection -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills cogpsych-topic-selection --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Cognitive-Psychology-Skills/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection .opencode/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "cogpsych-topic-selection" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Cognitive-Psychology-Skills/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection into .opencode/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "cogpsych-topic-selection", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
cogpsych-topic-selection- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.6k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 585 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when deciding whether a cognition project fits Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) and what contribution shape to target.
- Works in 4 steps: Theoretical advance, not an effect. It… → Integrative scope. The contribution is… → Formal/computational backbone where apt.… → …
- Deciding whether a cognition project fits Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) and what contribution shape to target
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, The fit test, Contribution shape and Fit scoring — worked example…, plus 6 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Cogpsych Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding whether a cognition project fits Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) and what contribution shape to target. The journal favors longer, integrative, model-driven work that produces a substantial theoretical advance — not a single isolated effect. Frames the question and the model-or-theory payoff; it does not collect data.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Deciding whether a cognition project fits Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) and what contribution shape to target
Example prompts
- “/cogpsych-topic-selection”
Workflow steps
4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Theoretical advance, not an effect. It changes a theory of cognition — adjudicates between
- Integrative scope. The contribution is carried by a program (multiple experiments and/or a
- Formal/computational backbone where apt. Cognition here is often expressed as a model that is
- Reproducible and shareable. You can deposit data, model/analysis code, and materials so the
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Cogpsych Topic Selection loads about 1.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 91 tokens; SKILL.md has 585 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 585 words, ~1,566 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- cogpsych-topic-selection
- description
- Use when deciding whether a cognition project fits Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) and what contribution shape to target. The journal favors longer, integrative, model-driven work that produces a substantial theoretical advance — not a single isolated effect. Frames the question and the model-or-theory payoff; it does not collect data.
Topic Selection & Fit (cogpsych-topic-selection)
Cognitive Psychology publishes longer, integrative articles that have a major impact on theories of cognition. The bar is a substantial theoretical advance — usually carried by a multi-experiment program tied to a formal/computational model, an incisive experimental series, or a modeling/review contribution. Use this skill to pressure-test fit before investing.
When to trigger
- Choosing among possible projects or framings for Cognitive Psychology
- A reader said the work feels "one effect," "atheoretical," or "better as a short report"
- Deciding whether the contribution needs a formal model, more experiments, or both
- A modeling or review project you want to place
The fit test
A strong Cognitive Psychology paper usually clears all four:
- Theoretical advance, not an effect. It changes a theory of cognition — adjudicates between accounts, formalizes a mechanism, or maps a phenomenon's boundary — rather than adding one more demonstration. State the theory it moves.
- Integrative scope. The contribution is carried by a program (multiple experiments and/or a model fit to data), not a single study. Each piece must add inference.
- Formal/computational backbone where apt. Cognition here is often expressed as a model that is
fit and compared; if your account can be formalized, the venue rewards doing so (see
cogpsych-theory-and-hypotheses). - Reproducible and shareable. You can deposit data, model/analysis code, and materials so the
modeling is reproducible (see
cogpsych-open-science-and-transparency).
Contribution shape
- Multi-experiment empirical — a controlled series that jointly constrains a theory (each experiment rules out an alternative or extends scope).
- Experiment + model — the journal's signature shape: experiments designed to discriminate models, with a formal model fit to the data and compared to rivals.
- Modeling-led — a new model (or analysis) tested by fitting, model recovery, and comparison against existing or new data.
- Theoretical / integrative review — a synthesis that delivers a substantive theoretical advance, not a literature catalogue.
Fit scoring — worked example (illustrative)
Score a candidate against the four gates before investing. A recognition-memory project, two framings:
Candidate A (off-fit): one N = 40 experiment showing a novel list-length
effect, described verbally, no model, request-only data.
Theoretical advance ✗ (one effect) Integrative scope ✗ (single study)
Formal backbone ✗ (verbal only) Reproducible ✗ (request-only)
Verdict: off-fit → either grow into a model-driven program or place as a
short report elsewhere.
Candidate B (strong): three experiments that separate unequal-variance signal
detection from a dual-process account, both models fit and
compared, open data + model code.
Theoretical advance ✓ (adjudicates two theories) Integrative scope ✓
Formal backbone ✓ (fit + compared) Reproducible ✓ (code deposited)
Verdict: strong fit → Experiment + model contribution.Show full SKILL.md (265 more words)Show less
Contribution-type decision rules
| If the work is... | Target shape | Why |
|---|---|---|
| A controlled series constraining one theory | Multi-experiment empirical | the integrative arc the venue expects |
| Experiments that can discriminate formal models | Experiment + model | the journal's signature, highest-impact shape |
| A new model tested by fitting + recovery + comparison | Modeling-led | formal contribution to theory |
| A synthesis with a genuine theoretical advance | Integrative review | not a catalogue; must reframe the field |
| One surprising effect, no theory, no model | wrong venue (reframe) | belongs in a short-report journal |
Sibling-journal fit guard
- Cognition (Elsevier) also takes cognition papers but is broader and more effect-/phenomenon-led; Cognitive Psychology skews longer and more model-driven.
- JEP: General (APA) overlaps but Cognitive Psychology leans harder into formal modeling and the multi-experiment program.
- Psychological Science wants short, single-finding reports — the opposite length/ambition.
- Journal of Memory and Language is the natural home for memory/language work that is narrower in scope; bring the integrative-model contribution here.
Reviewer / editor pushback at the fit stage
- "This is one effect" → identify the theory it adjudicates and the further experiments/model that make it a program.
- "Atheoretical" → formalize the mechanism; show the model that the experiments test.
- "Better as a short report" → if it cannot sustain a long, integrative argument, it is the wrong venue.
Anti-patterns
- A single experiment reporting one isolated effect with no formal/theoretical payoff
- A "model" that is only verbal and never fit or compared
- A review that catalogues the literature without a theoretical advance
- A project whose modeling cannot be reproduced because code/data cannot be shared
Output format
【Question / phenomenon】one sentence
【Theoretical advance】which theory it moves, and how
【Scope】program of experiments and/or a fitted model? [Y/N]
【Formal backbone】can it be formalized + compared? [Y/N/NA]
【Reproducible】data + model code + materials shareable? [Y/N]
【Type】Multi-experiment / Experiment + model / Modeling-led / Review
【Fit verdict】strong / needs reframing / off-fit (why)
【Next】cogpsych-theory-and-hypothesesSupplementary resources
../../resources/external_tools.md— modeling and model-comparison tooling../../resources/official-source-map.md— scope, article types, and house style
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Cognitive-Psychology-Skills/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Cogpsych Topic Selection next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cogpsych Topic Selection this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Marketing Psychologynexu-io/open-design | 100k | — | ~317 | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Cognitive Patternruvnet/ruflo | 74k | — | ~384 | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Table Fitasgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks | 69k | — | ~772 | Automated safety check: Pass | CC0-1.0 | |
| Furniture Fit Checkpascalorg/editor | 25k | — | ~5.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| TopicsZimoLiao/scholaraio | 577 | — | ~294 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Cognitive Pattern
ruvnet/ruflo
Define and manage cognitive patterns for agent reasoning and decision-making
Table Fit
asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks
Keep a Markdown table readable in a narrow terminal of about 100 display columns - a wide table or one carrying prose in its cells wraps into unreadable ragged rows.
Furniture Fit Check
pascalorg/editor
Checks whether a sofa, table, bed or appliance fits in a measured Pascal room and reports only what the evidence supports, or asks for the missing measurements.
Topics
ZimoLiao/scholaraio
A skill your agent uses when the user asks about research themes, topic distribution, BERTopic clustering, topic overview, topic papers, topic merges, or HTML topic visualizations.
Topic Modeling
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills
Structural topic modeling: STM spec, topic count, coherence-exclusivity.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Questions about Cogpsych Topic Selection
What does Cogpsych Topic Selection do?
A skill your agent uses when deciding whether a cognition project fits Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) and what contribution shape to target. Cogpsych Topic Selection is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when deciding whether a cognition project fits Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) and what contribution shape to target.
When should I use Cogpsych Topic Selection?
Cogpsych Topic Selection fits situations like: deciding whether a cognition project fits Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier) and what contribution shape to target.
How do I install Cogpsych Topic Selection in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cogpsych-topic-selection -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Cognitive-Psychology-Skills/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Cogpsych Topic Selection in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cogpsych-topic-selection -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Cognitive-Psychology-Skills/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Cogpsych Topic Selection in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cogpsych-topic-selection -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection, .gemini/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection, .github/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection and .opencode/skills/cogpsych-topic-selection in your project.
What does Cogpsych Topic Selection need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Cogpsych Topic Selection is instructions for the agent only.
Does Cogpsych Topic Selection access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Cogpsych Topic Selection safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Cogpsych Topic Selection use?
Cogpsych Topic Selection is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Cogpsych Topic Selection use?
About 1.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Cogpsych Topic Selection?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Cogpsych Topic Selection: Marketing Psychology (nexu-io/open-design, 100k stars), Cognitive Pattern (ruvnet/ruflo, 74k stars), Table Fit (asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks, 69k stars) and Furniture Fit Check (pascalorg/editor, 25k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Cogpsych Topic Selection?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,228 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.