Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when responding to the Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) Editor's or Committee's peer-review letter on a delivered review, or to copyediting/proof queries.
Install Arpsych Revision
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-revision -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arpsych-revision --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-revision .claude/skills/arpsych-revision && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "arpsych-revision" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-revision into .claude/skills/arpsych-revision/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arpsych-revision", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-revisionType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-revision -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arpsych-revision --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-revision .agents/skills/arpsych-revision && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "arpsych-revision" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-revision into .agents/skills/arpsych-revision/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arpsych-revision", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-revision -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arpsych-revision --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-revision .cursor/skills/arpsych-revision && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "arpsych-revision" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-revision into .cursor/skills/arpsych-revision/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arpsych-revision", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-revision--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-revision -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arpsych-revision --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-revision .gemini/skills/arpsych-revision && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "arpsych-revision" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-revision into .gemini/skills/arpsych-revision/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arpsych-revision", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arpsych-revisionInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-revision -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-revision .github/skills/arpsych-revision && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "arpsych-revision" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-revision into .github/skills/arpsych-revision/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arpsych-revision", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-revision -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills arpsych-revision --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-revision .opencode/skills/arpsych-revision && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "arpsych-revision" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-revision into .opencode/skills/arpsych-revision/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "arpsych-revision", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
arpsych-revision- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.2k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 475 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when responding to the Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) Editor's or Committee's peer-review letter on a delivered review, or to copyediting/proof queries.
- Works in 6 steps: Point-by-point response letter. Quote… → Concede genuine coverage/accuracy gaps.… → Defend with evidence, not authority.… → …
- Responding to the Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) Editors
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, What ARPsych review focuses on…, How to respond and Checklist, plus 2 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Arpsych Revision is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when responding to the Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) Editor's or Committee's peer-review letter on a delivered review, or to copyediting/proof queries. Handles the post-delivery revision loop; it does not run the pre-delivery preflight (arpsych-submission) or re-audit balance from scratch (arpsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance).
Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Responding to the Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) Editors
- Committees peer-review letter on a delivered review
- Copyediting/proof queries
Example prompts
- “s or Committee”
- “/arpsych-revision”
Workflow steps
6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Point-by-point response letter. Quote each comment; state the change; cite the new section/figure/line. Be gracious — these are senior…
- Concede genuine coverage/accuracy gaps. A missed literature or an overstated effect is a real problem in a review of record; fix it, do…
- Defend with evidence, not authority. Where you disagree, make the case from the literature and the framework — never "as the invited…
- Protect the spine. Add requested coverage into existing framework cells; do not bolt on a disconnected section that breaks the organizing…
- Honor length. If adding material, cut elsewhere to stay within the assigned length (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
- Proof stage. At copyediting/proofs, check that house-style edits did not distort meaning and that re-rendered figures are accurate; answer…
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Arpsych Revision loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 90 tokens; SKILL.md has 475 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 475 words, ~1,173 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/arpsych-revision/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- arpsych-revision
- description
- Use when responding to the Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) Editor's or Committee's peer-review letter on a delivered review, or to copyediting/proof queries. Handles the post-delivery revision loop; it does not run the pre-delivery preflight (arpsych-submission) or re-audit balance from scratch (arpsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance).
Revision — Responding to the Editor & Committee (arpsych-revision)
When to trigger
- A review letter arrived from the ARPsych Editor or a Committee member on the delivered draft
- Copyediting or proof queries need responses
- Reviewers flag coverage gaps, balance problems, length over-run, or accuracy issues
- You must turn comments into a tracked, point-by-point revision
What ARPsych review focuses on (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准)
The Committee assesses delivered reviews for accuracy, rigor, and balance (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). So letters tend to cluster on a few predictable axes — diagnose which you are facing, because the fix differs:
| Comment type | What it really means | Fix route |
|---|---|---|
| "Missing literature X" | a coverage gap threatens authority | re-run targeted search; place X in a framework cell (arpsych-literature-synthesis) |
| "Reads as advocacy / under-covers camp Y" | balance failure | strengthen the rival account; re-weigh by credibility (arpsych-comprehensiveness-and-balance) |
| "Effect Z is overstated / didn't replicate" | accuracy/replication issue | recalibrate confidence language; flag replication status |
| "Over the assigned length" | scope too broad | narrow the organizing question, not just trim words (arpsych-organizing-framework) |
| "Hard to follow / too specialist" | accessibility | rewrite for the adjacent reader (arpsych-writing-style) |
| "Where does this come from?" | transparency | document the search / deposit meta-analysis materials (arpsych-transparency-and-reproducibility) |
How to respond
- Point-by-point response letter. Quote each comment; state the change; cite the new section/figure/line. Be gracious — these are senior colleagues curating a volume of record.
- Concede genuine coverage/accuracy gaps. A missed literature or an overstated effect is a real problem in a review of record; fix it, do not argue it away.
- Defend with evidence, not authority. Where you disagree, make the case from the literature and the framework — never "as the invited expert, I judge…".
- Protect the spine. Add requested coverage into existing framework cells; do not bolt on a disconnected section that breaks the organizing idea.
- Honor length. If adding material, cut elsewhere to stay within the assigned length (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准).
- Proof stage. At copyediting/proofs, check that house-style edits did not distort meaning and that re-rendered figures are accurate; answer queries promptly to protect the volume schedule.
Show full SKILL.md (141 more words)Show less
Checklist
- Every comment addressed in a quoted, point-by-point letter
- Genuine coverage/accuracy gaps conceded and fixed (not argued away)
- Disagreements defended from literature/framework, not authorial standing
- New material folded into existing framework cells (spine intact)
- Confidence/replication language recalibrated where accuracy was challenged
- Length kept within the assigned limit after additions (cut to fit)
- Transparency/meta-analysis materials updated if the search changed
- Proof/copyedit queries answered promptly; figure re-renders verified
Anti-patterns
- Arguing away a real coverage gap instead of filling it (fatal in a review of record)
- Defending overstated claims by authority rather than recalibrating to the evidence
- Bolting requested topics on as a disconnected section that breaks the spine
- Letting additions blow past the assigned length
- Ignoring the replication-status concern that prompted an "overstated" comment
- Treating copyediting/proof queries as optional and slipping the volume schedule
- A defensive, status-claiming tone toward Committee colleagues
Output format
【Letter triage】comment types present (coverage / balance / accuracy / length / accessibility / transparency)
【Concessions】genuine gaps conceded + fixed? Y/N
【Defenses】disagreements argued from evidence (not authority)? Y/N
【Spine intact】new material folded into existing cells? Y/N
【Length】within assigned limit after edits? Y/N
【Transparency】search/meta-analysis materials updated if needed? Y/N | N/A
【Proofs】house-style edits + figure re-renders verified? Y/N
【Next step】return point-by-point response + revised review to the Editor© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-revision of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Arpsych Revision next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arpsych Revision this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Arpsych Revision
What does Arpsych Revision do?
A skill your agent uses when responding to the Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) Editor's or Committee's peer-review letter on a delivered review, or to copyediting/proof queries. Arpsych Revision is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when responding to the Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) Editor's or Committee's peer-review letter on a delivered review, or to copyediting/proof queries.
When should I use Arpsych Revision?
Arpsych Revision fits situations like: responding to the Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) Editors; committees peer-review letter on a delivered review; copyediting/proof queries.
How do I install Arpsych Revision in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-revision -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-revision in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/arpsych-revision in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Arpsych Revision in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-revision -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (Annual-Review-of-Psychology-Skills/skills/arpsych-revision in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/arpsych-revision in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Arpsych Revision in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill arpsych-revision -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/arpsych-revision, .gemini/skills/arpsych-revision, .github/skills/arpsych-revision and .opencode/skills/arpsych-revision in your project.
What does Arpsych Revision need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Arpsych Revision is instructions for the agent only.
Does Arpsych Revision access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Arpsych Revision safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Arpsych Revision use?
Arpsych Revision is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Arpsych Revision use?
About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Arpsych Revision?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Arpsych Revision: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Arpsych Revision?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.