Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when writing the response to an American Anthropologist (AA) revise-and-resubmit.
Install Amanthro Rebuttal
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amanthro-rebuttal -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills amanthro-rebuttal --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/American-Anthropologist-Skills/skills/amanthro-rebuttal .claude/skills/amanthro-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "amanthro-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/American-Anthropologist-Skills/skills/amanthro-rebuttal into .claude/skills/amanthro-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "amanthro-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/American-Anthropologist-Skills/skills/amanthro-rebuttalType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amanthro-rebuttal -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills amanthro-rebuttal --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/American-Anthropologist-Skills/skills/amanthro-rebuttal .agents/skills/amanthro-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "amanthro-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/American-Anthropologist-Skills/skills/amanthro-rebuttal into .agents/skills/amanthro-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "amanthro-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amanthro-rebuttal -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills amanthro-rebuttal --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/American-Anthropologist-Skills/skills/amanthro-rebuttal .cursor/skills/amanthro-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "amanthro-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/American-Anthropologist-Skills/skills/amanthro-rebuttal into .cursor/skills/amanthro-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "amanthro-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path American-Anthropologist-Skills/skills/amanthro-rebuttal--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amanthro-rebuttal -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills amanthro-rebuttal --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/American-Anthropologist-Skills/skills/amanthro-rebuttal .gemini/skills/amanthro-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "amanthro-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/American-Anthropologist-Skills/skills/amanthro-rebuttal into .gemini/skills/amanthro-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "amanthro-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills amanthro-rebuttalInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amanthro-rebuttal -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/American-Anthropologist-Skills/skills/amanthro-rebuttal .github/skills/amanthro-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "amanthro-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/American-Anthropologist-Skills/skills/amanthro-rebuttal into .github/skills/amanthro-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "amanthro-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amanthro-rebuttal -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills amanthro-rebuttal --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/American-Anthropologist-Skills/skills/amanthro-rebuttal .opencode/skills/amanthro-rebuttal && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "amanthro-rebuttal" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/American-Anthropologist-Skills/skills/amanthro-rebuttal into .opencode/skills/amanthro-rebuttal/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "amanthro-rebuttal", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
amanthro-rebuttal- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.4k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 602 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when writing the response to an American Anthropologist (AA) revise-and-resubmit.
- Works in 6 steps: Read the editor's letter as the rubric.… → One point-by-point response, every… → Concede or rebut explicitly, with… → …
- Writing the response to an American Anthropologist (AA) revise-and-resubmit
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Strategy, Response-letter format and Triage table for an AA R&R, plus 4 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Amanthro Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when writing the response to an American Anthropologist (AA) revise-and-resubmit. AA uses anonymous peer review under an ethics of care, often with cross-subfield reviewers, so the response must convert each reviewer while keeping the editor confident and the ethnographic contribution intact. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new evidence.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Writing the response to an American Anthropologist (AA) revise-and-resubmit
- Tasks that involve Peer review
Example prompts
- “/amanthro-rebuttal”
Workflow steps
6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Read the editor's letter as the rubric. The editor signals which points are decisive and
- One point-by-point response, every comment addressed. Quote each comment, then respond. Never
- Concede or rebut explicitly, with evidence. For each: say where you revised (new text/section),
- Reconcile cross-subfield reviewers openly. When an archaeologist and a sociocultural reviewer
- Protect the contribution and the people in it. Add evidence and clarification, but resist changes
- Match the ethics of care. Keep the tone collegial and non-defensive; AA's review culture is
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Amanthro Rebuttal loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 96 tokens; SKILL.md has 602 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 602 words, ~1,353 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/amanthro-rebuttal/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- amanthro-rebuttal
- description
- Use when writing the response to an American Anthropologist (AA) revise-and-resubmit. AA uses anonymous peer review under an ethics of care, often with cross-subfield reviewers, so the response must convert each reviewer while keeping the editor confident and the ethnographic contribution intact. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new evidence.
R&R Rebuttal (amanthro-rebuttal)
An AA revise-and-resubmit is the normal route to acceptance — treat it as an invitation, not a near miss. But the paper still must satisfy expert, sometimes cross-subfield reviewers and the editor. The response letter must move every reviewer toward yes while protecting the four-field contribution and the integrity of the ethnography and ethics.
When to trigger
- An R&R decision arrived and you are planning the revision + response letter
- Reviewers disagree with each other (often across subfields) and you must reconcile them
- A reviewer requests changes that would alter your interpretation or expose interlocutors
- Writing the cover note to the editor summarizing the revision
Strategy
- Read the editor's letter as the rubric. The editor signals which points are decisive and adjudicates among reviewers. Solve those first and headline them in the cover note.
- One point-by-point response, every comment addressed. Quote each comment, then respond. Never skip one — silence reads as non-compliance, even under an ethics of care.
- Concede or rebut explicitly, with evidence. For each: say where you revised (new text/section), or push back respectfully with a reason (ethnographic evidence, theoretical logic, or ethics). A well-argued disagreement is respected more than a hollow concession that flattens the argument.
- Reconcile cross-subfield reviewers openly. When an archaeologist and a sociocultural reviewer want opposite things, choose a principled path, explain the tradeoff, and answer each in that tradition's idiom (AA's four-field pluralism).
- Protect the contribution and the people in it. Add evidence and clarification, but resist changes
that dilute the four-field claim — and never add detail that would de-anonymize or endanger
interlocutors to satisfy a reviewer (see
amanthro-transparency-and-data). - Match the ethics of care. Keep the tone collegial and non-defensive; AA's review culture is constructive, and a gracious, substantive letter helps.
Response-letter format
For each reviewer comment:
> [Quoted reviewer comment]
Response: [What we did / why we respectfully disagree].
Change: [Section/page/figure number where the revision appears].Open with a short summary of the main changes to the editor; group by reviewer; end each entry with the location of the change so the editor can verify quickly.
Show full SKILL.md (271 more words)Show less
Triage table for an AA R&R
| Comment signal | Who owns the call | Default move in the response |
|---|---|---|
| Editor flags it as decisive | editor | solve first, headline it in the cover note |
| Two reviewers want opposite things (often cross-subfield) | editor | pick a principled path, explain the tradeoff openly |
| Reviewer asks for more identifying detail about interlocutors | author | decline on ethics grounds; explain the consent/harm constraint |
| Reviewer wants the case generalized beyond its scope | author | add scope conditions; resist over-claiming |
| Reviewer disputes a method across traditions | author | answer on that tradition's own terms (four-field pluralism) |
Anti-patterns
- Ignoring or merging away a comment without a visible response
- Capitulating to a request that breaks the argument or endangers interlocutors
- Defensive or dismissive tone (out of step with AA's ethics of care)
- "We thank the reviewer" with no actual change or argued reason
- Adding ethnographic detail that compromises anonymity to please a reviewer
- Letting the revision quietly drift away from the four-field framing that earned the R&R
Worked micro-example (illustrative)
A hypothetical R&R draws three reviews. The editor names two decisive points (four-field significance and an ethics question about a photograph). R1 (sociocultural) wants more interlocutor detail; R2 (linguistic) wants a tighter discourse analysis. The disciplined letter opens with a three-sentence summary, addresses significance and the photograph first (replacing the image with a consented, anonymized alternative), then reconciles R1/R2 by deepening the discourse analysis while declining the request for identifying detail on consent grounds — stated plainly. Of 27 comments, 27 receive a quoted response; 20 conceded with a location, 7 rebutted with a reason. (Counts illustrative.)
Output format
【Editor's decisive points】addressed first? [list]
【Coverage】every reviewer comment answered? [Y/N]
【Concede vs rebut】each tagged with evidence + change location
【Cross-subfield conflicts】reconciled and explained to editor? [Y/N]
【Contribution + ethics protected】no dilution, no de-anonymization? [Y/N]
【Next】resubmit via Research ExchangeSupplementary resources
../../resources/official-source-map.md— decision categories, ethics-of-care review culture
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in American-Anthropologist-Skills/skills/amanthro-rebuttal of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Amanthro Rebuttal next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanthro Rebuttal this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Amanthro Rebuttal
What does Amanthro Rebuttal do?
A skill your agent uses when writing the response to an American Anthropologist (AA) revise-and-resubmit. Amanthro Rebuttal is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when writing the response to an American Anthropologist (AA) revise-and-resubmit.
When should I use Amanthro Rebuttal?
Amanthro Rebuttal fits situations like: writing the response to an American Anthropologist (AA) revise-and-resubmit; tasks that involve Peer review.
How do I install Amanthro Rebuttal in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amanthro-rebuttal -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (American-Anthropologist-Skills/skills/amanthro-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/amanthro-rebuttal in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Amanthro Rebuttal in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amanthro-rebuttal -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (American-Anthropologist-Skills/skills/amanthro-rebuttal in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/amanthro-rebuttal in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Amanthro Rebuttal in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amanthro-rebuttal -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/amanthro-rebuttal, .gemini/skills/amanthro-rebuttal, .github/skills/amanthro-rebuttal and .opencode/skills/amanthro-rebuttal in your project.
What does Amanthro Rebuttal need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Amanthro Rebuttal is instructions for the agent only.
Does Amanthro Rebuttal access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Amanthro Rebuttal safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Amanthro Rebuttal use?
Amanthro Rebuttal is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Amanthro Rebuttal use?
About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Amanthro Rebuttal?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Amanthro Rebuttal: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Amanthro Rebuttal?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.