Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
A skill your agent uses when explaining or planning around AISTATS peer review, OpenReview review release, author-reviewer discussion, reviewer volunteer expectations, reviewer confidentiality…
Install Aistats Review Process
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aistats-review-process -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aistats-review-process --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-review-process .claude/skills/aistats-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "aistats-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-review-process into .claude/skills/aistats-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aistats-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-review-processType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aistats-review-process -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aistats-review-process --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-review-process .agents/skills/aistats-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "aistats-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-review-process into .agents/skills/aistats-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aistats-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aistats-review-process -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aistats-review-process --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-review-process .cursor/skills/aistats-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "aistats-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-review-process into .cursor/skills/aistats-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aistats-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-review-process--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aistats-review-process -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aistats-review-process --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-review-process .gemini/skills/aistats-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "aistats-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-review-process into .gemini/skills/aistats-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aistats-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aistats-review-processInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aistats-review-process -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-review-process .github/skills/aistats-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "aistats-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-review-process into .github/skills/aistats-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aistats-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aistats-review-process -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aistats-review-process --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-review-process .opencode/skills/aistats-review-process && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "aistats-review-process" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-review-process into .opencode/skills/aistats-review-process/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aistats-review-process", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
aistats-review-process- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~867 tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 360 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when explaining or planning around AISTATS peer review, OpenReview review release, author-reviewer discussion, reviewer volunteer expectations, reviewer confidentiality…
- Planning around AISTATS peer review
- SKILL.md covers Process model, Who reviews here, Scoring leverage table and Stage-by-stage realism, plus 1 more section
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- OpenReview review release
What it does
Aistats Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when explaining or planning around AISTATS peer review, OpenReview review release, author-reviewer discussion, reviewer volunteer expectations, reviewer confidentiality, decision criteria, meta-review dynamics, the statistician-heavy reviewer pool, and PMLR proceedings outcomes.
Its SKILL.md is about 870 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Planning around AISTATS peer review
- OpenReview review release
- Author-reviewer discussion
- Reviewer volunteer expectations
Example prompts
- “/aistats-review-process”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Aistats Review Process loads about 867 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 77 tokens; SKILL.md has 360 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 360 words, ~867 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/aistats-review-process/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- aistats-review-process
- description
- Use when explaining or planning around AISTATS peer review, OpenReview review release, author-reviewer discussion, reviewer volunteer expectations, reviewer confidentiality, decision criteria, meta-review dynamics, the statistician-heavy reviewer pool, and PMLR proceedings outcomes.
AISTATS Review Process
Use this to reason about review-stage strategy. Reopen the current CFP, OpenReview group, author instructions, reviewer instructions if posted, and code of conduct before making process claims.
Process model
- AISTATS uses OpenReview for submission and review workflow in recent cycles.
- Reviewers evaluate technical correctness, statistical and machine-learning contribution, empirical support, clarity, reproducibility, and relevance to artificial intelligence and statistics.
- Author discussion is limited. AISTATS 2026 used a discussion period after initial reviews, with text-only author-reviewer discussion and no links.
- Reviewer and author obligations include confidentiality, appropriate conflicts, professional conduct, and respect for anonymity.
- The most useful response is a decision-focused clarification that gives the area chair or meta-reviewer a clean rationale for acceptance or rejection.
- Accepted papers are published in PMLR, so final metadata and camera-ready compliance matter as much as the initial acceptance.
Who reviews here
- The pool mixes ML researchers with statisticians and statistical learning theorists; expect at least one reviewer to read proofs and assumption sets line by line.
- Because AISTATS is smaller and more specialized than NeurIPS or ICML, topical matches are closer, so vague proof sketches get caught rather than skimmed past.
- Borderline theory-plus-experiments papers usually fall on one of three edges: an assumption the experiments do not satisfy, a missing classical-statistics baseline, or a rate claim never checked empirically.
Show full SKILL.md (142 more words)Show less
Scoring leverage table
| Review dimension | What raises it | What sinks it |
|---|---|---|
| Correctness | Complete assumption statements with a main-text proof sketch | Hidden conditions; constants swept into O-notation when they matter |
| Significance | A guarantee the ML literature lacked, or a practical method statistics lacked | Incremental rate gain with no conceptual or practical payoff |
| Empirical support | Experiments engineered to probe the theory | Benchmarks disconnected from the theorem regimes |
| Clarity | Numbered assumptions and a single notation source | Notation collisions between sections |
Stage-by-stage realism
- Initial reviews: triage by what the meta-reviewer would weigh, not by reviewer tone.
- Discussion: windows are short; an early, precise reply is worth more than a late comprehensive one.
- Decision: the meta-review synthesizes; one unanswered correctness objection outweighs several resolved clarity complaints.
- Reviewer-volunteer expectations for submitting authors have appeared in recent cycles; confirm the current CFP rather than assuming either way.
Output format
[Current stage] submitted / reviews / discussion / decision / camera-ready
[Decision actors] <reviewers/meta-reviewer/chairs>
[Likely leverage] <correctness/statistics/experiments/clarity/reproducibility>
[Forbidden moves] <identity leak / external links if forbidden / new unsupported results>
[Next response move] <one action>© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-review-process of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Aistats Review Process next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aistats Review Process this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~867 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Aistats Review Process
What does Aistats Review Process do?
A skill your agent uses when explaining or planning around AISTATS peer review, OpenReview review release, author-reviewer discussion, reviewer volunteer expectations, reviewer confidentiality…. Aistats Review Process is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when explaining or planning around AISTATS peer review, OpenReview review release, author-reviewer discussion, reviewer volunteer expectations, reviewer confidentiality, decision criteria, meta-review dynamics, the statistician-heavy reviewer pool, and PMLR proceedings outcomes.
When should I use Aistats Review Process?
Aistats Review Process fits situations like: planning around AISTATS peer review; openReview review release; author-reviewer discussion; reviewer volunteer expectations.
How do I install Aistats Review Process in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aistats-review-process -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/aistats-review-process in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Aistats Review Process in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aistats-review-process -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (AISTATS-Skills/skills/aistats-review-process in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/aistats-review-process in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Aistats Review Process in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aistats-review-process -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/aistats-review-process, .gemini/skills/aistats-review-process, .github/skills/aistats-review-process and .opencode/skills/aistats-review-process in your project.
What does Aistats Review Process need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Aistats Review Process is instructions for the agent only.
Does Aistats Review Process access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Aistats Review Process safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Aistats Review Process use?
Aistats Review Process is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Aistats Review Process use?
About 867 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Aistats Review Process?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Aistats Review Process: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Aistats Review Process?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.