Peer Review
spacering-net/codeg
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.
Agent skill
Aejmic Referee Strategy
by brycewang-stanford in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when anticipating referee objections or calibrating review expectations for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript before submission.
Install Aejmic Referee Strategy
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aejmic-referee-strategy -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aejmic-referee-strategy --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/AEJ-Microeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy .claude/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "aejmic-referee-strategy" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AEJ-Microeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy into .claude/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aejmic-referee-strategy", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AEJ-Microeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmic-referee-strategyType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aejmic-referee-strategy -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aejmic-referee-strategy --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/AEJ-Microeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy .agents/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "aejmic-referee-strategy" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AEJ-Microeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy into .agents/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aejmic-referee-strategy", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aejmic-referee-strategy -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aejmic-referee-strategy --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/AEJ-Microeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy .cursor/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "aejmic-referee-strategy" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AEJ-Microeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy into .cursor/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aejmic-referee-strategy", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git --path AEJ-Microeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aejmic-referee-strategy -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aejmic-referee-strategy --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/AEJ-Microeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy .gemini/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "aejmic-referee-strategy" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AEJ-Microeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy into .gemini/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aejmic-referee-strategy", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aejmic-referee-strategyInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aejmic-referee-strategy -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/AEJ-Microeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy .github/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "aejmic-referee-strategy" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AEJ-Microeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy into .github/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aejmic-referee-strategy", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aejmic-referee-strategy -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills aejmic-referee-strategy --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/AEJ-Microeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy .opencode/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "aejmic-referee-strategy" agent skill from https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/AEJ-Microeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy into .opencode/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "aejmic-referee-strategy", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
aejmic-referee-strategy- GitHub stars
- 1.2k
- Token cost
- ~1.2k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 539 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 2,387
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when anticipating referee objections or calibrating review expectations for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript before submission.
- Anticipating referee objections
- SKILL.md covers When to trigger, The AEJ: Micro process (检索于…, Objections AEJ: Micro referees… and Checklist, plus 4 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Calibrating review expectations for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript before submission
What it does
Aejmic Referee Strategy is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when anticipating referee objections or calibrating review expectations for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript before submission. Pre-empts the objections theory referees raise and reads the editorial process; it does not draft the response letter (see aejmic-rebuttal).
Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Research & Science, covering Peer review. The repository describes itself as: Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. ｜ 覆盖主流期刊的… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Anticipating referee objections
- Calibrating review expectations for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript before submission
Example prompts
- “/aejmic-referee-strategy”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 932eb23. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Aejmic Referee Strategy loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 83 tokens; SKILL.md has 539 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills at commit 932eb23, republished under its MIT licence (© brycewang-stanford). 539 words, ~1,231 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- aejmic-referee-strategy
- description
- Use when anticipating referee objections or calibrating review expectations for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript before submission. Pre-empts the objections theory referees raise and reads the editorial process; it does not draft the response letter (see aejmic-rebuttal).
Referee Strategy (aejmic-referee-strategy)
When to trigger
- Before submission, to stress-test the paper against the objections experts will raise
- Deciding whether the contribution clears the desk-reject bar
- Choosing JEL codes / framing that route the paper to the right co-editor
- Unsure what the AEJ: Micro review process looks like
The AEJ: Micro process (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准)
- AEJ: Micro uses single-blind review via the AEA submission system: the referee sees the author, but referees are anonymous to authors. There is no anonymization burden — reputation is visible, so the paper must stand on rigor.
- There is a submission fee (AEA member $200 high-income / $100 middle / $0 low; nonmember higher — 检索于 2026-06，volatile), and JEL classification per AEA practice helps route the paper to the right co-editor and expert referees.
- Decisions run the usual ladder: desk reject → reject after review → R&R (minor/major) → accept. Theory referees verify proofs; a flawed or non-tight proof is a common reject reason.
- Re-confirm fee, timelines, and co-editor list on the official AEA AEJ: Micro page (see
resources/official-source-map.md).
Objections AEJ: Micro referees actually raise — and the pre-emption
| Likely objection | Pre-empt it by (skill) |
|---|---|
| "The result is a knife-edge artifact of assumption A." | Name the load-bearing assumption; show necessity / a counterexample on failure (aejmic-identification) |
| "This is too specialized / maximal-generality for AEJ: Micro." | Re-frame the broad-interest message; cut generality that hides it (aejmic-topic-selection, aejmic-theory-model) |
| "How does this differ from [closest result]?" | State the theorem-relative delta in one sentence (aejmic-literature-positioning) |
| "Does it survive [a continuum / asymmetry / perturbation]?" | Provide the earned extension or a clean negative result (aejmic-robustness) |
| "A step in the proof is asserted, not shown." | Complete the lemma scaffolding; self-contained proofs (aejmic-replication-package) |
| "The model is overloaded; the mechanism is invisible." | Reduce to the minimal environment; lead with intuition (aejmic-theory-model, aejmic-writing-style) |
| "This is an empirical paper, not theory." | Either restore the theoretical contribution or redirect to AEJ: Applied (aejmic-topic-selection) |
| (Applied) "Identification / inference is shaky; asterisks used." | Branch B/C identification; SEs not asterisks (aejmic-identification, aejmic-tables-figures) |
Show full SKILL.md (221 more words)Show less
Checklist
- Listed the three most likely referee objections for this paper and mapped each to a fix
- The load-bearing assumption is named and defended before submission
- The theorem-relative delta is crisp (one sentence)
- The broad-interest message is explicit (not specialist-only)
- Every proof step a referee will check is complete
- JEL codes chosen to route to the right co-editor (single-blind: no anonymization needed)
- Decided the venue is right (not actually an AEJ: Applied paper)
Anti-patterns
- Submitting without anticipating the single most obvious expert objection
- Relying on generality to impress when the audience-fit objection is the real risk
- Leaving a checkable proof gap for a referee to find
- Mis-routing via vague JEL codes so a non-expert co-editor handles it
- Assuming anonymity protects a thin result — single-blind means the referee knows whose work it is
Worked vignette (illustrative)
Before submitting a matching paper, the author lists likely objections: (1) "rides on substitutability" → already pre-empted in aejmic-identification with a counterexample; (2) "how does it differ from the deferred-acceptance literature?" → one-sentence delta ready; (3) "is the existence proof complete?" → lemma scaffolding done. The remaining risk is audience fit, so the intro is rewritten to foreground the broad market-design message rather than the technical condition. JEL codes C78/D47 route it to a market-design co-editor.
Output format
【Top 3 likely objections】[...] → 【Fix / owning skill】[...]
【Load-bearing assumption defended】[Y/N]
【Delta crisp】[Y/N] 【Broad-interest message explicit】[Y/N]
【Proof gaps closed】[Y/N]
【Routing】JEL codes [...] (single-blind — no anonymization)
【Venue confirmed】AEJ: Micro (not AEJ: Applied)? [Y/N]
【Next step】aejmic-submissionSupplementary resources
../../resources/README.md— links to the shared reviewer-objection checklist (applied subset)
© brycewang-stanford, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in AEJ-Microeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy of brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 932eb23
Compare with similar skills
Aejmic Referee Strategy next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aejmic Referee Strategy this skillbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills | 1.2k | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 17 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg | 3.9k | 11 repos | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~11k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Peer ReviewK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
Scholar Evaluation
spacering-net/codeg
Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Academic Paper Reviewer
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.
Peer Review
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.
Academic Research Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Orchestrates a ten-stage academic workflow from research to finished manuscript, including integrity checks, two rounds of peer review and revision.
More from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
All 2,387 skills in this repoAaag Data Analysis
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running and reporting the analysis for an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial statistics and modeling, remote-sensing accuracy, or…
Aaag Literature Positioning
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when positioning an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript in the literature — engaging geographic scholarship across the relevant area and the…
Aaag Rebuttal
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when responding to an Annals of the American Association of Geographers decision letter (major/minor revision) — building a point-by-point response to the subject editor and…
Aaag Research Design
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when defending the research design of an Annals of the American Association of Geographers manuscript — spatial/quantitative analysis and GIScience, remote-sensing and…
Aaag Review Process
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when you need to understand how the Annals of the American Association of Geographers evaluates a manuscript — double-anonymous review routed through a subject editor by…
Aaag Submission
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
A skill your agent uses when running the final pre-submission preflight for the Annals of the American Association of Geographers via ScholarOne Manuscripts — area/article-type selection…
Related
Categories
Questions about Aejmic Referee Strategy
What does Aejmic Referee Strategy do?
A skill your agent uses when anticipating referee objections or calibrating review expectations for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript before submission. Aejmic Referee Strategy is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills. Use when anticipating referee objections or calibrating review expectations for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript before submission.
When should I use Aejmic Referee Strategy?
Aejmic Referee Strategy fits situations like: anticipating referee objections; calibrating review expectations for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript before submission.
How do I install Aejmic Referee Strategy in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aejmic-referee-strategy -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (AEJ-Microeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .claude/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Aejmic Referee Strategy in Codex?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aejmic-referee-strategy -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (AEJ-Microeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills) into .agents/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Aejmic Referee Strategy in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aejmic-referee-strategy -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy, .gemini/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy, .github/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy and .opencode/skills/aejmic-referee-strategy in your project.
What does Aejmic Referee Strategy need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Aejmic Referee Strategy is instructions for the agent only.
Does Aejmic Referee Strategy access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Aejmic Referee Strategy safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Aejmic Referee Strategy use?
Aejmic Referee Strategy is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Aejmic Referee Strategy use?
About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Aejmic Referee Strategy?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Aejmic Referee Strategy: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and Academic Paper Reviewer (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Aejmic Referee Strategy?
brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, which has 1,231 GitHub stars. The repository holds 2,387 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.
Source: brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.