Agent skill

Cpo Advisor

by borghei in borghei/Claude-Skills

Strategic product leadership for scaling companies: product vision, portfolio strategy, and PMF measurement.

MITAuto-check passedProduct & Project Management

Install Cpo Advisor

skills CLI
$ npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill cpo-advisor -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install borghei/Claude-Skills cpo-advisor --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/c-level-advisor/cpo-advisor .claude/skills/cpo-advisor && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
cpo-advisor
GitHub stars
881
Token cost
~4.9k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,844 words
Files
4 (incl. scripts)
Skills in repo
349
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Strategic product leadership for scaling companies: product vision, portfolio strategy, and PMF measurement.

  • Works in 3 steps: product_portfolio_analyzer.py → feature_prioritizer.py → product_health_scorer.py
  • Setting product vision
  • SKILL.md covers Keywords, The CPO Owns Three Things, Product-Market Fit Assessment and Portfolio Management, plus 10 more sections
  • Runs Python scripts from its folder; calls python

What it does

Cpo Advisor is an agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills. Strategic product leadership for scaling companies: product vision, portfolio strategy, and PMF measurement. Use when setting product vision, managing a product portfolio, measuring PMF, or designing product teams.

Its SKILL.md is about 4.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 4 other files, including scripts (for example `scripts/feature_prioritizer.py`, `scripts/product_health_scorer.py` and `scripts/product_portfolio_analyzer.py`).

It sits in Product & Project Management, covering Product strategy. The repository describes itself as: 385 AI skills, 77 expert agents, and 900 stdlib Python tools for every team: engineering, PM, marketing, C-level, compliance, business ops, research, and a LinkedIn toolkit… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Setting product vision
  • Managing a product portfolio
  • Designing product teams

Example prompts

  • “/cpo-advisor”

Requirements

  • Python 3

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. product_portfolio_analyzer.py
  2. feature_prioritizer.py
  3. product_health_scorer.py

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 4a698e8. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships 3 files in scripts/ (Python), which the agent can run.

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • python

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Cpo Advisor loads about 4.9k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 57 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,844 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~57
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from borghei/Claude-Skills at commit 4a698e8, republished under its MIT licence (© borghei). 1,844 words, ~4,853 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/cpo-advisor/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 3 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
cpo-advisor
description
Strategic product leadership for scaling companies: product vision, portfolio strategy, and PMF measurement. Use when setting product vision, managing a product portfolio, measuring PMF, or designing product teams.
license
MIT + Commons Clause
metadata.version
2.0.0
metadata.author
borghei
metadata.category
c-level
metadata.domain
cpo-leadership
metadata.updated
2026-03-09
metadata.frameworks
pmf-playbook, product-strategy, product-org-design, portfolio-management, north-star-framework, investment-posture
metadata.triggers
CPO, chief product officer, product strategy, product vision, product-market fit, PMF, portfolio management, product organization, roadmap strategy, product…

CPO Advisor

Strategic product leadership. Vision, portfolio, PMF, org design, and metrics. Not for feature-level work -- for the decisions that determine what gets built, why, and by whom.

Keywords

CPO, chief product officer, product strategy, product vision, product-market fit, PMF, portfolio management, product org, roadmap strategy, product metrics, north star metric, retention curve, product trio, team topologies, jobs to be done, JTBD, category design, product positioning, board product reporting, invest-maintain-kill, BCG matrix, switching costs, network effects, product-led growth, PLG, feature adoption, time to value, activation rate


The CPO Owns Three Things

Everything else is delegation.

OwnershipWhat It MeansKey Question
PortfolioWhich products exist, which get investment, which get killed"If we could only fund 2 of our 4 products, which 2?"
VisionWhere the product goes in 3-5 years and why customers care"What does the world look like if we succeed?"
OrganizationThe team structure that can execute the vision"Can this org ship the next 12 months of strategy?"

Product-Market Fit Assessment

PMF Scoring Matrix
DimensionWeightScore 1-3 (Weak)Score 4-6 (Emerging)Score 7-10 (Strong)
Retention30%D30 < 15% (consumer) or < 40% (B2B)D30 15-30% / 40-60%D30 > 30% / > 60%
Engagement25%DAU/MAU < 15%DAU/MAU 15-35%DAU/MAU > 35%
Satisfaction25%Sean Ellis < 25% "very disappointed"25-40%> 40%
Growth20%No organic growthSome organic, mostly paid> 50% organic
PMF Decision Tree
START: "Do we have PMF?"
  |
  v
[Check retention curve shape]
  |
  +-- Declining to zero --> NO PMF. Stop building. Talk to users.
  |
  +-- Declining but flattening --> EMERGING. Find the segment where it's flat.
  |
  +-- Flat or smiling --> [Check Sean Ellis score]
                          |
                          +-- < 25% "very disappointed" --> Weak PMF. Product is nice, not essential.
                          |
                          +-- 25-40% --> Moderate PMF. Find and double down on power users.
                          |
                          +-- > 40% --> [Check organic growth]
                                        |
                                        +-- < 30% organic --> PMF exists but distribution is weak.
                                        +-- > 30% organic --> STRONG PMF. Scale.
Post-PMF Traps
TrapDescriptionPrevention
Feature creepAdding features for new segments dilutes core valueMaintain a "jobs" focus, not feature focus
Premature scalingScaling sales/marketing before retention proves sustainableProve 3+ cohorts retain before scaling spend
Metric vanityCelebrating signups while ignoring retentionNorth star must be a retention/engagement metric
Founder departure from productCEO stops talking to customers post-PMFMonthly customer conversations are permanent
Platform too earlyBuilding platform capabilities before core is solidPlatform only after 3+ products need shared infra

Portfolio Management

Investment Posture Framework

Every product gets exactly one posture. "Wait and see" is a decision to lose share.

PostureSignalResource AllocationReview Cadence
InvestHigh growth, strong/improving retention, clear PMFFull team, aggressive roadmap, dedicated marketingMonthly
MaintainStable revenue, slow growth, good marginsBug fixes, incremental improvement, minimal new featuresQuarterly
HarvestDeclining growth, still profitable, no recovery pathMinimal investment, maximize cash extractionQuarterly
KillDeclining, negative margins, no recovery evidenceSet sunset date, migration plan, team reallocationImmediate
Portfolio Health Scorecard
MetricHealthyUnhealthy
% revenue from "Invest" products> 60%< 40%
% engineering on "Kill" candidates< 10%> 20%
Number of products without clear posture0> 1
Portfolio D30 retention (weighted)Improving QoQDeclining QoQ
# of "question marks" > 2 quarters0> 2
Portfolio Review Process
Quarterly Portfolio Review (Half-day workshop)

Step 1: Data Preparation (pre-meeting)
  - Revenue, growth rate, retention, margin per product
  - Engineering investment % per product
  - Customer satisfaction per product

Step 2: BCG Classification
  - Plot each product on Growth Rate (Y) vs Market Share (X)
  - Stars: high growth, high share --> Invest
  - Cash Cows: low growth, high share --> Maintain/Harvest
  - Question Marks: high growth, low share --> Invest or Kill (decide now)
  - Dogs: low growth, low share --> Kill

Step 3: Investment Allocation
  - Align engineering capacity to posture
  - Reallocate from Kill/Harvest to Invest
  - Set clear milestones for Question Marks (90-day decision point)

Step 4: Communication
  - Share portfolio decisions with all product teams
  - Update roadmaps to reflect postures
  - Communicate sunset plans for Kill products

North Star Metric Framework

Selection Criteria

The north star metric must satisfy ALL of these:

CriterionTest
Measures customer valueDoes improvement mean customers got more value?
Leading indicatorDoes it predict future revenue?
ActionableCan product teams influence it?
Single numberCan you state it as one metric?
Non-gameableIs it hard to improve without genuinely helping customers?
North Star by Business Model
ModelNorth StarWhy It Works
B2B SaaSWeekly active accounts using core featureCombines adoption + engagement + stickiness
Consumer socialDaily content creatorsCreators drive consumer engagement
MarketplaceSuccessful transactions per weekBoth sides active = healthy marketplace
PLGAccounts reaching activation within 14 daysActivation predicts retention
Data/AnalyticsQueries per active user per weekUsage intensity = value received
FintechMonthly active transactorsTransaction activity = core value
E-commerceRepeat purchase rate (90-day)Retention is everything in commerce
Metrics Hierarchy
North Star Metric (1, owned by CPO)
  |
  +-- Leading Indicator 1 (owned by PM Team A)
  |     e.g., Activation rate within 7 days
  |
  +-- Leading Indicator 2 (owned by PM Team B)
  |     e.g., Feature X adoption rate
  |
  +-- Leading Indicator 3 (owned by PM Team C)
  |     e.g., D7 retention rate
  |
  +-- Guard Rail Metrics (owned by CPO)
        e.g., NPS, support ticket volume, revenue per user

Product Organization Design

Team Topology Selection
TopologyWhen to UseOptimal SizeCommunication
Stream-alignedDefault. Teams own end-to-end customer journey.5-9 peopleLow cross-team dependency
PlatformShared infrastructure multiple streams need4-8 peopleAPI-first, self-service
EnablingTemporary teams to upskill stream teams2-4 peopleCoaching mode, time-limited
Complicated subsystemDeep specialist domain (ML, payments)3-6 peopleProvides service to streams
Product Team Ratios
Company SizePM : EngineersPM : DesignerTotal Product Team
10-301:4-61:11 PM, 1 Designer, 4-6 Eng
30-801:5-81:1-22-4 PMs, 2-3 Designers
80-2001:6-101:1-25-10 PMs, 4-6 Designers
200+1:8-121:210+ PMs, 8+ Designers
The Product Trio

Every product team should operate as a trio: PM + Designer + Tech Lead.

RoleOwnsDecides
PMWhat to build and whyPrioritization, scope
DesignerUser experience and usabilityInteraction patterns, research
Tech LeadHow to build and technical feasibilityArchitecture, implementation

Anti-pattern: PM writes spec, hands to design, design hands to engineering. This is waterfall with agile labels.


CPO Dashboard

CategoryMetricFrequencyTarget
GrowthNorth star metricWeeklyImproving MoM
RetentionD30 / D90 retention by cohortWeeklyFlattening or improving
AcquisitionNew activationsWeeklyPer plan
ActivationTime to first valueWeeklyDecreasing
EngagementDAU/MAU ratioWeekly> 30% (B2B) / > 20% (consumer)
SatisfactionNPS trendMonthly> 40
PortfolioRevenue per productMonthlyAligned to posture
PortfolioEngineering investment % per productMonthlyAligned to posture
QualitySupport tickets per 1K usersMonthlyDecreasing
MoatFeature adoption depthMonthlyIncreasing

Red Flags

  • Products stuck as "question marks" for 2+ quarters without a decision -- make the call
  • Engineering allocated to highest-revenue product while highest-growth product is understaffed -- misallocation
  • 30% of team time on products with declining revenue -- sunk cost fallacy

  • Retention curve never flattens -- no PMF, stop building features and start talking to users
  • PMs writing specs without talking to users -- product theater
  • Platform team has 6-week queue -- platform should be self-service, not a bottleneck
  • CPO has not talked to a customer in 30+ days -- disconnected from reality
  • North star trending up while retention trends down -- wrong metric
  • Roadmap built from sales requests instead of user data -- sales-driven product is a trap
  • No user research conducted in 90+ days -- team is guessing, not learning

Integration with C-Suite

When...CPO Works With...To...
Company directionCEO (ceo-advisor)Translate vision into product bets
Roadmap fundingCFO (cfo-advisor)Justify investment allocation per product
Scaling product orgCOO + CHROAlign hiring with product growth needs
Technical feasibilityCTO (cto-advisor)Co-own features vs. platform trade-off
Launch timingCMO (cmo-advisor)Align releases with demand gen capacity
Sales-requested featuresCRO (cro-advisor)Separate revenue-critical from noise
Compliance deadlinesCISO (ciso-advisor)Identify non-negotiable security items
Product strategyProduct Team (product-team/)Execute strategy through product managers
User researchUX Research (product-team/ux-researcher)Validate assumptions with data

Proactive Triggers

  • Retention curve not flattening -- PMF at risk, stop feature work and investigate
  • Feature requests piling up without prioritization framework -- propose RICE scoring
  • No user research in 90+ days -- product team is building on assumptions
  • NPS declining QoQ -- dig into detractor feedback, find the pattern
  • Portfolio has a "dog" everyone avoids discussing -- force the kill/invest decision
  • Engineering spending > 20% on a product with < 5% of revenue -- investment misalignment
  • New competitor launched with similar positioning -- competitive response needed

Show full SKILL.md (730 more words)Show less

Output Artifacts

RequestDeliverable
"Do we have PMF?"PMF scorecard across 4 dimensions with cohort data
"Prioritize our roadmap"Scored backlog with framework (RICE/ICE), stack-ranked
"Evaluate our portfolio"BCG map with invest/maintain/kill recommendations per product
"Design our product org"Org proposal with topology, ratios, reporting, and transition plan
"Product board section"Board slide: north star, retention, roadmap highlights, risks
"Set our north star"North star proposal with hierarchy, leading indicators, and guard rails
"Kill a product"Sunset plan: timeline, migration, communication, team reallocation

Tool Reference

1. product_portfolio_analyzer.py

Analyzes a product portfolio using BCG matrix classification (Star/Cash Cow/Question Mark/Dog), calculates portfolio health scores, identifies investment misalignment, and generates rebalancing recommendations.

bash
python scripts/product_portfolio_analyzer.py --input portfolio.json --json
python scripts/product_portfolio_analyzer.py --input portfolio.json
FlagTypeDescription
--inputrequiredPath to JSON file with products (revenue, growth rate, market share, engineering investment %, retention)
--jsonoptionalOutput in JSON format instead of human-readable text
2. feature_prioritizer.py

Prioritizes features using RICE scoring (Reach x Impact x Confidence / Effort). Supports custom weights, generates stack-ranked backlogs, and flags scoring anomalies.

bash
python scripts/feature_prioritizer.py --input features.json --json
python scripts/feature_prioritizer.py --input features.json --method rice
FlagTypeDescription
--inputrequiredPath to JSON file with features (reach, impact, confidence, effort, optional category)
--methodoptionalScoring method: rice (default), ice, or weighted
--jsonoptionalOutput in JSON format instead of human-readable text
3. product_health_scorer.py

Scores product health across 5 dimensions: retention (D30/D90), engagement (DAU/MAU), satisfaction (NPS/Sean Ellis), growth (organic %), and activation (time to value). Generates PMF assessment and trend analysis.

bash
python scripts/product_health_scorer.py --input product_data.json --json
python scripts/product_health_scorer.py --input product_data.json
FlagTypeDescription
--inputrequiredPath to JSON file with product metrics across retention, engagement, satisfaction, growth, and activation
--jsonoptionalOutput in JSON format instead of human-readable text

Troubleshooting

ProblemLikely CauseResolution
Products stuck as "question marks" for 2+ quartersNo decision framework or leadership avoidanceForce invest-or-kill decision at next portfolio review; set 90-day milestones with automatic kill trigger
Engineering allocated to highest-revenue product while highest-growth product starvesInvestment posture not aligned to growth potentialRun portfolio analyzer to quantify misalignment; reallocate using BCG classification
RICE scores gamed by PMs inflating reach or impactNo calibration process or shared scoring standardsRequire evidence for each score dimension; run quarterly calibration sessions across PM teams
North star metric trending up while retention trends downWrong north star metric selected or metric is gameableRe-evaluate north star against the 5 selection criteria; add retention as a guard rail metric
Roadmap built from sales requests instead of user dataNo structured intake process or CPO not filteringImplement feature request triage; require user research evidence before roadmap inclusion
Platform team has 6-week queue blocking stream teamsPlatform not self-service; too many dependenciesRedesign platform for self-service APIs; add enabling team to unblock highest-priority streams
No user research conducted in 90+ daysResearch not embedded in team workflow or understaffedEmbed researcher in product trio; set minimum research cadence (2 studies per quarter minimum)

Success Criteria

  • Every product has a clear investment posture (Invest/Maintain/Harvest/Kill) reviewed quarterly
  • North star metric improving month-over-month for "Invest" products
  • D30 retention flattening or improving for all active products
  • Engineering investment percentage aligned to portfolio posture within 10% tolerance
  • Feature prioritization uses a consistent scoring framework across all PM teams
  • Time to first value decreasing quarter-over-quarter
  • No product classified as "question mark" for more than 2 consecutive quarters

Scope & Limitations

In scope: Product-market fit assessment, portfolio management (BCG classification, investment postures), north star metric framework, product organization design (team topologies, ratios, product trio), feature prioritization (RICE/ICE scoring), product health scoring, CPO dashboard metrics, and board-level product reporting.

Out of scope: Feature-level product management (use product-team/product-strategist), UX design and research execution (use product-team/ux-researcher), engineering implementation planning (use engineering/ skills), pricing strategy (use cro-advisor pricing section), and customer success management. Tools analyze product metrics snapshots; continuous product analytics requires integration with analytics platforms.

Limitations: PMF scoring depends on cohort-level retention data that early-stage products may not have. BCG classification requires market share estimates that are inherently imprecise. RICE scoring is subjective; quality depends on calibration rigor. Product health benchmarks vary significantly by business model (B2B vs consumer, SaaS vs marketplace).


Integration Points

  • ceo-advisor -- Product strategy translates CEO vision into product bets; portfolio health feeds board reporting
  • cto-advisor -- Technical feasibility co-owned; features vs platform trade-off decisions require CTO partnership
  • cro-advisor -- Sales-requested features filtered through CPO; expansion revenue depends on product roadmap
  • cmo-advisor -- Launch timing aligned with demand gen capacity; product positioning informs marketing
  • cfo-advisor -- Investment allocation per product justified with portfolio health data
  • product-team/ -- CPO strategy executed through product managers; research and prioritization cascade down

© borghei, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 3 other files (scripts) in c-level-advisor/cpo-advisor of borghei/Claude-Skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • scripts/feature_prioritizer.py
  • scripts/product_health_scorer.py
  • scripts/product_portfolio_analyzer.py

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 4a698e8

Compare with similar skills

Cpo Advisor next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Cpo Advisor compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Cpo Advisor this skillborghei/Claude-Skills881—~4.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Game Changing FeaturesopenstatusHQ/data-table-filters2.3k3 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Company Research Briefdeanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills7.2k2 repos~3.8kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Organic Growth Path Advisordeanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills7.2k2 repos~5.2kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Product Strategistalirezarezvani/claude-skills28k2 repos~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
PlaidBuildGreatProducts/plaid217—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Game Changing Features

    openstatusHQ/data-table-filters

    Find 10x product opportunities and high-leverage improvements.

    2.3k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~2.1k tokens
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Company Research Brief

    deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills

    Builds a company research brief covering executive quotes, product strategy, transformation efforts and org context, tailored to interview prep, competitor or partnership work.

    7.2k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.8k tokens
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Organic Growth Path Advisor

    deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills

    Diagnoses where a growth constraint lives and recommends one organic growth path from the McKinsey Growth Pyramid to test first.

    7.2k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~5.2k tokens
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Product Strategist

    alirezarezvani/claude-skills

    OKR cascade toolkit for product leaders: generates aligned company-to-team OKRs from five strategy types and scores how well they line up.

    28k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~1.8k tokens
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Plaid

    BuildGreatProducts/plaid

    Product Led AI Development — guides founders from idea to launched product.

    217 GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 5 mo ago
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Product Competitive Analysis

    Fokkyp/claude-skills

    Produces product-manager competitive analysis reports in Chinese, with a confirm-first scoping gate, three-phase evidence collection and single or multi-product modes.

    226 GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed

More from borghei/Claude-Skills

All 349 skills in this repo
  • Agents In The Team

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Run delivery when AI coding and ops agents take tickets. An agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills.

    881 GitHub stars~4.2k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Content Disclosure

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Check AI-generated marketing content and reviews for required disclosures under the EU AI Act, FTC rules and platform AI-label policies.

    881 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Prototyping

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Idea to AI-generated prototype to customer validation to engineering handoff.

    881 GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Analytics Engineer

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Analytics engineering across data modeling, dbt, transformation, and semantic layers.

    881 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Ansoff Matrix

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Ansoff Matrix — 4-quadrant framework for growth options: market penetration, market/product development, and diversification.

    881 GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Brainstorm Okrs

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    OKR brainstorming and validation using the Radical Focus framework — outcome objectives, measurable key results, counter-metrics.

    881 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Cpo Advisor

What does Cpo Advisor do?

Strategic product leadership for scaling companies: product vision, portfolio strategy, and PMF measurement. Cpo Advisor is an agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills. Strategic product leadership for scaling companies: product vision, portfolio strategy, and PMF measurement.

When should I use Cpo Advisor?

Cpo Advisor fits situations like: setting product vision; managing a product portfolio; designing product teams.

How do I install Cpo Advisor in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill cpo-advisor -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (c-level-advisor/cpo-advisor in borghei/Claude-Skills) into .claude/skills/cpo-advisor in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Cpo Advisor in Codex?

Run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill cpo-advisor -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (c-level-advisor/cpo-advisor in borghei/Claude-Skills) into .agents/skills/cpo-advisor in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Cpo Advisor in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill cpo-advisor -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/cpo-advisor, .gemini/skills/cpo-advisor, .github/skills/cpo-advisor and .opencode/skills/cpo-advisor in your project.

What does Cpo Advisor need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Cpo Advisor needs Python for the scripts in its folder and the command-line tools its instructions call (python). Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Cpo Advisor access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Cpo Advisor safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.

What licence does Cpo Advisor use?

Cpo Advisor is published under the MIT licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Cpo Advisor use?

About 4.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 19k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Cpo Advisor?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Cpo Advisor: Game Changing Features (openstatusHQ/data-table-filters, 2.3k stars), Company Research Brief (deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills, 7.2k stars), Organic Growth Path Advisor (deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills, 7.2k stars) and Product Strategist (alirezarezvani/claude-skills, 28k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Cpo Advisor?

borghei (a GitHub user) maintains it in borghei/Claude-Skills, which has 881 GitHub stars. The repository holds 349 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 7, 2026.

Source: borghei/Claude-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.