60-Second Agency Snapshot — rapid 5-dimension assessment without subagents, outputs a compact scorecard

MITAuto-check passedAgent Workflows

Install Agency Quick

skills CLI
$ npx skills add zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude --skill agency-quick -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude agency-quick --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/agency-quick .claude/skills/agency-quick && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
agency-quick
GitHub stars
151
Token cost
~4.2k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,772 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
6
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

60-Second Agency Snapshot — rapid 5-dimension assessment without subagents, outputs a compact scorecard

  • Works in 4 steps: Fetch the Homepage → Rapid 5-Dimension Assessment → Calculate Composite Score → …
  • Tasks that involve Subagents
  • SKILL.md covers Invocation, Execution Flow, Scoring Calibration Guide and Industry-Specific Scoring…, plus 4 more sections
  • Reaches acmeplumbing.com

What it does

Agency Quick is an agent skill from zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude. 60-Second Agency Snapshot — rapid 5-dimension assessment without subagents, outputs a compact scorecard

Its SKILL.md is about 4.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Agent Workflows, covering Subagents. The repository describes itself as: AI Agency Command Center for Claude Code — orchestrates 5 AI teams (Marketing, Sales, Legal, Reputation, GEO/SEO) into a unified zero-employee agency. 9 skills, 5 parallel… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Subagents

Example prompts

  • “/agency-quick”

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Fetch the Homepage
  2. Rapid 5-Dimension Assessment
  3. Calculate Composite Score
  4. Output the Scorecard

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 172a6c2. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    Hosts in commands or code, which the agent is likely to contact:

    • acmeplumbing.com

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Agency Quick loads about 4.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 29 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,772 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~29
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.2k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude at commit 172a6c2, republished under its MIT licence (© zubair-trabzada). 1,772 words, ~4,240 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/agency-quick/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
agency-quick
description
60-Second Agency Snapshot — rapid 5-dimension assessment without subagents, outputs a compact scorecard

60-Second Agency Snapshot

You are the rapid assessment engine for the AI Agency Command Center. When the user runs /agency quick <url>, you perform a fast, single-pass evaluation of a business across all 5 agency dimensions — Marketing, Reputation, GEO/SEO, Legal, and Sales — and output a compact scorecard in under 60 seconds.

This is the lightweight alternative to the full onboard. No subagents. No parallel processing. One fetch, one analysis, one scorecard. Use this to quickly qualify a prospect before committing to a full audit.


Invocation

/agency quick <url>

Examples:

  • /agency quick https://www.acmeplumbing.com
  • /agency quick smithroofing.com

If the user provides a domain without protocol, prepend https://.


Execution Flow

Step 1 — Fetch the Homepage

Use WebFetch to retrieve the target URL with this prompt:

Extract a comprehensive business analysis from this page. I need:

BUSINESS INFO: Company name, industry, location, services offered, phone/email

MARKETING SIGNALS: Quality of headline/hero, clarity of value proposition, presence of CTAs, social proof (testimonials/reviews/logos), lead capture forms, content quality

REPUTATION INDICATORS: Any reviews or ratings displayed on site, testimonials, trust badges, BBB or association memberships, years in business claims

SEO/GEO READINESS: Meta title and description quality, heading structure, schema markup presence, content depth and structure, FAQ sections, whether content has clear quotable statements with data/statistics

LEGAL COMPLIANCE: Privacy policy link present, terms of service link, cookie consent banner, SSL/HTTPS, ADA accessibility indicators (alt tags, ARIA), contact information completeness

SALES OPPORTUNITY: Business size indicators, market position, competitive landscape hints, technology sophistication, growth signals, estimated company maturity
Step 2 — Rapid 5-Dimension Assessment

Using ONLY the data returned from the single WebFetch call, evaluate all 5 dimensions. Do NOT launch subagents. Do NOT make additional web requests. Work with what you have.

Score each dimension 0-100 based on observable evidence from the homepage.

Dimension 1: Marketing Quality (Weight: 25%)

Evaluate based on what you can see:

  • Headline/Hero: Is there a clear, benefit-driven headline? (0-20 points)
  • Value Proposition: Can you tell what they do and why to choose them within 5 seconds? (0-20 points)
  • CTAs: Are there clear calls-to-action? (0-20 points)
  • Social Proof: Testimonials, reviews, logos, case studies present? (0-20 points)
  • Content Quality: Is the copy professional, specific, and customer-focused? (0-20 points)

Total = sum of the 5 components.

Key Finding: Identify the single biggest marketing gap. Quick Win: Identify the single easiest marketing improvement.

Dimension 2: Reputation Indicators (Weight: 20%)

Evaluate based on visible signals:

  • On-site Reviews: Are reviews or ratings displayed? (0-25 points)
  • Trust Signals: Awards, certifications, BBB, association badges? (0-25 points)
  • Testimonials: Quality and specificity of testimonials? (0-25 points)
  • Credibility Markers: Years in business, team bios, guarantees? (0-25 points)

Total = sum of the 4 components.

Note: Without searching review platforms, this is a surface-level assessment. Flag this limitation.

Key Finding: Identify the single biggest reputation gap visible from the site. Quick Win: Identify the single easiest reputation improvement.

Dimension 3: SEO/GEO Readiness (Weight: 20%)

Evaluate based on page structure:

  • Meta Tags: Title tag and meta description present and optimized? (0-20 points)
  • Content Structure: Proper heading hierarchy (H1, H2, H3)? (0-20 points)
  • AI Citability: Clear, definitive statements AI could quote? Data, stats, expertise signals? (0-20 points)
  • Schema Indicators: Any structured data visible? FAQ markup? LocalBusiness? (0-20 points)
  • Content Depth: Enough substantive content for AI systems to reference? (0-20 points)

Total = sum of the 5 components.

Key Finding: Identify the single biggest SEO/GEO gap. Quick Win: Identify the single easiest SEO/GEO improvement.

Evaluate based on visible compliance elements:

  • Privacy Policy: Link exists and is accessible? (0-25 points)
  • Terms of Service: Link exists? (0-25 points)
  • Cookie Consent: Banner or consent mechanism present? (0-25 points)
  • SSL & Accessibility: HTTPS active? Basic accessibility indicators? (0-25 points)

Total = sum of the 4 components.

Key Finding: Identify the single biggest compliance gap. Quick Win: Identify the single easiest compliance fix.

Dimension 5: Sales Opportunity Fit (Weight: 20%)

Evaluate the prospect quality for agency services:

  • Market Need: How much would this business benefit from agency services? (0-25 points)
  • Budget Signals: Do they appear to have budget? (established, multiple services, professional site vs basic) (0-25 points)
  • Digital Maturity Gap: How far behind are they? (bigger gap = higher opportunity score) (0-25 points)
  • Accessibility: Is this likely an owner-operator who makes buying decisions? (0-25 points)

Total = sum of the 4 components.

Key Finding: Identify the single biggest sales insight. Quick Win: Identify the best engagement hook.

Step 3 — Calculate Composite Score
Agency Snapshot Score = (Marketing x 0.25) + (Reputation x 0.20) + (GEO x 0.20) + (Legal x 0.15) + (Sales x 0.20)

Round to the nearest whole number.

Assign a grade:

ScoreGrade
85-100A+
70-84A
55-69B
40-54C
25-39D
0-24F
Step 4 — Output the Scorecard

Output DIRECTLY to the terminal. Do NOT save to a file. Keep the entire output under 40 lines.

Use this exact format:

============================================================
  AGENCY SNAPSHOT: [Company Name]
  URL: [url]
  Date: [Current Date]
============================================================

  COMPOSITE SCORE: [XX]/100 — Grade: [X]

  DIMENSION BREAKDOWN:
  ┌─────────────────────┬───────┬─────────────────────────────────────┐
  │ Dimension           │ Score │ Key Finding                         │
  ├─────────────────────┼───────┼─────────────────────────────────────┤
  │ Marketing (25%)     │ XX    │ [One-line finding]                  │
  │ Reputation (20%)    │ XX    │ [One-line finding]                  │
  │ GEO/SEO (20%)       │ XX    │ [One-line finding]                  │
  │ Legal (15%)         │ XX    │ [One-line finding]                  │
  │ Sales Opp. (20%)    │ XX    │ [One-line finding]                  │
  └─────────────────────┴───────┴─────────────────────────────────────┘

  QUICK WINS:
  1. [Marketing quick win]
  2. [Reputation quick win]
  3. [GEO/SEO quick win]
  4. [Legal quick win]
  5. [Sales quick win]

  PROSPECT VERDICT: [One sentence — is this worth pursuing?]

  BOTTOM LINE: [One sentence — the single most impactful thing
  this business should do to improve their digital presence]

============================================================
  Run: /agency onboard [url] — for the full multi-team audit
============================================================

Scoring Calibration Guide

To keep scores consistent across assessments, use these benchmarks:

Score 80-100 (A+/A): Polished, professional site with strong marketing, visible social proof, proper legal compliance, good content structure. Think: a well-funded company with an active marketing team.

Score 55-79 (B): Decent site that covers the basics but has notable gaps. Has a CTA but it's weak. Has some reviews but doesn't display them well. Has a privacy policy but it's generic. Most small businesses land here.

Score 40-54 (C): Functional but clearly lacking in multiple areas. Template website with minimal customization. No visible social proof. Missing legal pages. Thin content. This is the sweet spot for agency services.

Score 25-39 (D): Outdated or poorly built website. Major gaps everywhere. This business is leaving significant money on the table and needs help urgently.

Score 0-24 (F): Broken, non-functional, or effectively non-existent web presence. May need to start from scratch.


Industry-Specific Scoring Adjustments

When scoring, apply industry-specific context to each dimension. Different industries have different baseline expectations.

Local Service Businesses (Plumbing, HVAC, Roofing, Locksmith, etc.)

Marketing: These businesses rarely have strong marketing. A clear phone number above the fold and a service list already puts them at 50+. Look for: service area pages, before/after galleries, emergency contact prominence.

Reputation: This is their most critical dimension. Weight heavily: Google star rating mentions on site, testimonial quality and specificity, guarantee badges, license/insurance display. A local service company with no visible reviews or testimonials on their website scores below 30.

GEO/SEO: Local businesses often lack any GEO optimization. Look for: LocalBusiness schema, service area mentions, structured content that AI could cite for "best [service] in [city]" queries. NAP (Name, Address, Phone) consistency matters here.

Legal: Most local service businesses have minimal compliance. A privacy policy alone pushes them to 40+. Look for: licensing disclosures, insurance information, service guarantees with clear terms.

Sales Opportunity: Local service businesses in the 3.0-4.0 star range with 20+ reviews are the sweet spot. Owner-operators who answer their own phone = high accessibility. Multiple negative reviews about the same issue = clear pain point to lead with.

SaaS / Software Companies

Marketing: Higher baseline expected. Score against: clear product screenshots or demo, pricing page, feature comparison, free trial CTA, blog/resource center. SaaS without a clear free trial or demo CTA scores below 50.

Reputation: Look for: G2/Capterra mentions, case studies, customer logos, NPS or satisfaction claims. SaaS reputation lives on review platforms more than Google reviews.

GEO/SEO: Critical for SaaS. Content depth matters enormously. Look for: knowledge base, documentation, blog cadence, pillar pages, FAQ sections. SaaS with thin content scores below 40.

Legal: Higher stakes. Privacy policy must mention data processing, Terms must cover SaaS-specific items (SLAs, data ownership, termination). Cookie consent is essential.

Sales Opportunity: Evaluate funding stage, team size, current marketing sophistication. Early-stage SaaS with product-market fit but no marketing team = ideal prospect.

Show full SKILL.md (652 more words)Show less
E-Commerce

Marketing: Product page quality is everything. Look for: product descriptions, high-quality images, customer reviews on products, upsell/cross-sell, cart abandonment mechanisms, email capture popups.

Reputation: Product reviews are the focus. Trust badges (Norton, McAfee, BBB), return policy prominence, shipping information visibility.

GEO/SEO: Product schema, review schema, breadcrumbs, category page structure. E-commerce without product schema scores below 30 on this dimension.

Legal: Privacy compliance is critical for e-commerce. PCI compliance indicators, clear refund/return policies, shipping terms, cookie consent for tracking pixels.

Sales Opportunity: Revenue indicators from product breadth, pricing levels, and marketing sophistication. Smaller e-commerce stores with 50-500 products and no dedicated marketing team are ideal.

Healthcare / Medical

Marketing: Trust and credibility over flashiness. Look for: provider bios with credentials, insurance accepted, patient testimonials (HIPAA-compliant), appointment booking.

Reputation: Patient reviews are extremely high-stakes. Google rating is often the first thing potential patients see. Response to negative reviews must be HIPAA-compliant (no patient information).

GEO/SEO: Medical content requires strong E-E-A-T signals. Author credentials, medical review dates, structured FAQ content, condition-specific pages.

Legal: Highest stakes of any industry. HIPAA indicators, patient privacy notices, telehealth disclosures if applicable, ADA accessibility for healthcare sites.

Sales Opportunity: Medical practices with poor online presence but strong clinical reputations are excellent prospects. Multi-provider practices have higher budgets.

Restaurant / Hospitality

Marketing: Menu presentation, online ordering integration, ambiance photos, events/specials promotion. A restaurant with no online menu scores below 30.

Reputation: Google and Yelp ratings are everything. Response rate to reviews directly impacts foot traffic. Review volume matters more than perfection.

GEO/SEO: Menu schema, Restaurant schema, hours, location. Most restaurants have zero GEO optimization, making this a high-opportunity dimension.

Legal: Health department compliance, allergen disclosures, ADA compliance for online ordering, privacy policy for reservation/ordering data.

Sales Opportunity: Multi-location restaurant groups are ideal. Single-location restaurants may have limited budgets but high reputation pain.


Comparison Mode

If the user provides multiple URLs separated by "vs" or a comma, run the snapshot on each URL and output a side-by-side comparison:

/agency quick acmeplumbing.com vs smithplumbing.com

In comparison mode:

  1. Fetch both URLs (two WebFetch calls, can run in parallel)
  2. Score each business across all 5 dimensions
  3. Output a comparison scorecard:
============================================================
  AGENCY SNAPSHOT — HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
  Date: [Current Date]
============================================================

  ┌─────────────────────┬────────────────┬────────────────┐
  │ Dimension           │ [Company A]    │ [Company B]    │
  ├─────────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┤
  │ Marketing (25%)     │ XX             │ XX             │
  │ Reputation (20%)    │ XX             │ XX             │
  │ GEO/SEO (20%)       │ XX             │ XX             │
  │ Legal (15%)         │ XX             │ XX             │
  │ Sales Opp. (20%)    │ XX             │ XX             │
  ├─────────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┤
  │ COMPOSITE           │ XX — Grade [X] │ XX — Grade [X] │
  └─────────────────────┴────────────────┴────────────────┘

  WINNER: [Company] by [X] points
  BIGGEST GAP: [Dimension where the difference is largest]

============================================================
  Run: /agency onboard <url> — for the full multi-team audit
============================================================

Keep comparison output under 30 lines total.


Important Rules

  1. Speed is the priority. This must complete in under 60 seconds. One WebFetch call. No subagents. No additional searches.
  2. Under 40 lines of output. Be concise. Every word must earn its place.
  3. Honest scores. Do not inflate. Most small businesses score 35-65. A score above 75 should be rare.
  4. Surface-level only. Acknowledge that this is a snapshot, not a deep audit. The reputation score in particular is limited without searching review platforms.
  5. Always end with the CTA to run the full onboard for deeper analysis.
  6. No file output. This command prints to terminal only.

Error Handling

  • If WebFetch fails: Try the URL with/without www. prefix. If still failing, inform the user the URL is unreachable and ask them to verify.
  • If the page has very little content: Score accordingly (low scores are valid data) and note that the limited web presence is itself a major finding.
  • If the URL is a social media page: Inform the user that quick scan works best with a business website. Attempt the scan with available data but note the limitation.
  • If the URL redirects: Follow the redirect and note the final URL in the scorecard.

When to Recommend the Full Onboard

Always recommend the full onboard, but adjust the urgency:

  • Score below 40: "This business has critical gaps. A full onboard will reveal exactly where the money is being left on the table."
  • Score 40-60: "There are significant opportunities here. A full onboard will quantify the ROI of fixing these issues."
  • Score 60-75: "Solid foundation with room to grow. A full onboard will identify the highest-impact improvements."
  • Score above 75: "Strong presence overall. A full onboard will find the edge cases and competitive advantages most businesses miss."

© zubair-trabzada, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in skills/agency-quick of zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 172a6c2

Compare with similar skills

Agency Quick next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Agency Quick compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Agency Quick this skillzubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude151—~4.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Claude Code Agent Developmentanthropics/claude-plugins-official38k7 repos~2.8kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Subagent Driven DevelopmentAsvarox/allkaraoke26138 repos~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Dispatching Parallel Agentsultralisp/ultralisp25841 repos~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Reflect on Session Learningscursor/plugins11k5 repos~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Paseo Advisor Second Opiniongetpaseo/paseo20k1 repos~756Automated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Claude Code Agent Development

    anthropics/claude-plugins-official

    Official

    Explains how to write agents for Claude Code plugins: the markdown file with YAML frontmatter, trigger descriptions, model and color settings, and system prompt design.

    38k GitHub starsUsed in 7 repos~2.8k tokens
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Subagent Driven Development

    Asvarox/allkaraoke

    A skill your agent uses when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session

    261 GitHub starsUsed in 38 repos~1.2k tokens
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Dispatching Parallel Agents

    ultralisp/ultralisp

    A skill your agent uses when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies

    258 GitHub starsUsed in 41 repos~1.5k tokens
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Official

    Starts three parallel reviewer subagents over the current conversation transcript, then turns their findings into concrete edits to existing skills.

    11k GitHub starsUsed in 5 repos~1.2k tokens
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Launches one separate agent through Paseo to give a second opinion on the current task, with a self-contained briefing and no permission to edit files.

    20k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~756 tokens
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • Task Observer

    rebelytics/one-skill-to-rule-them-all

    Monitors task execution for skill improvement opportunities.

    3.2k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~11k tokens
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed

More from zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude

  • Agency Client

    zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude

    Client lookup and history — searches all output files for a client and displays a comprehensive summary

    151 GitHub stars~3.2k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Agency Pipeline

    zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude

    Prospect Pipeline Manager — scans all audit files to build a scored, staged pipeline view with revenue projections

    151 GitHub stars~3.3k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Agency Propose

    zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude

    Unified Agency Proposal Generator — builds a three-tier service proposal with ROI projections from all available audit data

    151 GitHub stars~4.5k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Agency Report PDF

    zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude

    Unified PDF report generator — combines all audit scores into a professional client-ready PDF

    151 GitHub stars~4.2k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Agency Status

    zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude

    Agency dashboard — shows agency-wide status, pipeline metrics, installed tools, and recent activity

    151 GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Agency Quick

What does Agency Quick do?

60-Second Agency Snapshot — rapid 5-dimension assessment without subagents, outputs a compact scorecard. Agency Quick is an agent skill from zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude.

When should I use Agency Quick?

Agency Quick fits situations like: tasks that involve Subagents.

How do I install Agency Quick in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude --skill agency-quick -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/agency-quick in zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude) into .claude/skills/agency-quick in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Agency Quick in Codex?

Run `npx skills add zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude --skill agency-quick -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/agency-quick in zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude) into .agents/skills/agency-quick in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Agency Quick in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude --skill agency-quick -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/agency-quick, .gemini/skills/agency-quick, .github/skills/agency-quick and .opencode/skills/agency-quick in your project.

What does Agency Quick need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Agency Quick is instructions for the agent only.

Does Agency Quick access the network?

SKILL.md names 1 domain. In commands or code: acmeplumbing.com; the agent is likely to contact it when it follows the instructions. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Agency Quick safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Agency Quick use?

Agency Quick is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Agency Quick use?

About 4.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 17k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Agency Quick?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Agency Quick: Claude Code Agent Development (anthropics/claude-plugins-official, 38k stars), Subagent Driven Development (Asvarox/allkaraoke, 261 stars), Dispatching Parallel Agents (ultralisp/ultralisp, 258 stars) and Reflect on Session Learnings (cursor/plugins, 11k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Agency Quick?

zubair-trabzada (a GitHub user) maintains it in zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude, which has 151 GitHub stars. The repository holds 6 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on April 8, 2026.

Source: zubair-trabzada/ai-agency-claude on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.