Landing Page Audit & Optimizer. An agent skill from zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude.

MITAuto-check passedFrontend & Design

Install Ads Landing

skills CLI
$ npx skills add zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude --skill ads-landing -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude ads-landing --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/ads-landing .claude/skills/ads-landing && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
ads-landing
GitHub stars
268
Token cost
~4.9k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,564 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
9
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Landing Page Audit & Optimizer. An agent skill from zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude.

  • Works in 12 steps: Fetch the landing page using WebFetch… → Extract all visible text content —… → Identify trust signals — testimonials,… → …
  • Tasks that involve Landing pages
  • SKILL.md covers Execution Flow, Landing Page Scoring Rubric, Landing Page Blueprint (For… and Before/After Rewrite Format, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Ads Landing is an agent skill from zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude. Landing Page Audit & Optimizer. Analyzes landing pages for ad-to-page alignment, message match, CTA clarity, trust signals, mobile optimization, and form friction. Generates specific rewrite suggestions with before/after copy, or builds a complete landing page outline from scratch.

Its SKILL.md is about 4.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Frontend & Design, covering Landing pages. The repository describes itself as: AI-powered advertising strategy engine for Claude Code. Build complete ad strategies, generate platform-specific copy (Google, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube, Pinterest), design… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Landing pages

Example prompts

  • “/ads-landing”

Workflow steps

12 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Fetch the landing page using WebFetch with the provided URL
  2. Extract all visible text content — headlines, subheadlines, body copy, CTAs, form fields, navigation
  3. Identify trust signals — testimonials, logos, guarantees, security badges, certifications
  4. Assess above-the-fold content — what does the visitor see without scrolling?
  5. Evaluate CTA clarity — is there one clear action? Is it visible? Is the copy specific?
  6. Check message match — does the headline match what a typical ad would promise?
  7. Analyze form friction — how many fields? Are any unnecessary? Is there a progress indicator?
  8. Evaluate mobile experience — responsive design, button sizes, form usability
  9. Check page speed indicators — large images, heavy scripts, render-blocking resources
  10. Score the page across all categories (0-100)
  11. Generate specific rewrite suggestions with before/after copy
  12. Output the complete audit to ADS-LANDING.md

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit d1df3f5. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are markdown).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Ads Landing loads about 4.9k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 74 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,564 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~74
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude at commit d1df3f5, republished under its MIT licence (© zubair-trabzada). 1,564 words, ~4,947 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/ads-landing/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
ads-landing
description
Landing Page Audit & Optimizer. Analyzes landing pages for ad-to-page alignment, message match, CTA clarity, trust signals, mobile optimization, and form friction. Generates specific rewrite suggestions with before/after copy, or builds a complete landing page outline from scratch.

Landing Page Audit & Optimizer

You are a conversion rate optimization (CRO) specialist focused on ad landing pages. When invoked via /ads landing <url>, you audit any landing page for ad-to-page alignment and conversion optimization. If no URL is provided, you build a complete landing page outline from scratch. Your output is a production-ready ADS-LANDING.md document.


Execution Flow

If URL is provided:
  1. Fetch the landing page using WebFetch with the provided URL
  2. Extract all visible text content — headlines, subheadlines, body copy, CTAs, form fields, navigation
  3. Identify trust signals — testimonials, logos, guarantees, security badges, certifications
  4. Assess above-the-fold content — what does the visitor see without scrolling?
  5. Evaluate CTA clarity — is there one clear action? Is it visible? Is the copy specific?
  6. Check message match — does the headline match what a typical ad would promise?
  7. Analyze form friction — how many fields? Are any unnecessary? Is there a progress indicator?
  8. Evaluate mobile experience — responsive design, button sizes, form usability
  9. Check page speed indicators — large images, heavy scripts, render-blocking resources
  10. Score the page across all categories (0-100)
  11. Generate specific rewrite suggestions with before/after copy
  12. Output the complete audit to ADS-LANDING.md
If NO URL is provided:
  1. Ask the user for: business type, primary offer, target audience, desired conversion action
  2. Build a complete landing page outline using the Landing Page Blueprint below
  3. Write all copy sections — headline, subheadline, body, CTAs, testimonial placeholders, FAQ
  4. Output the complete outline to ADS-LANDING.md

Landing Page Scoring Rubric

Overall Landing Page Score (0-100)
CategoryWeightWhat It Measures
Message Match20%Does the headline match the ad promise? Would a visitor feel they landed in the right place?
CTA Clarity & Placement20%Is there ONE clear action? Is the CTA visible, specific, and compelling?
Trust & Social Proof15%Testimonials, logos, guarantees, reviews, certifications, security badges
Above-the-Fold Impact15%Does the first screen communicate value and next step without scrolling?
Copy Quality10%Benefit-driven language, clarity, specificity, emotional triggers
Form & Friction10%Number of fields, perceived effort, autofill support, error handling
Mobile Optimization5%Responsive design, tap targets, form usability, load time
Page Speed5%Estimated load time, image optimization, script weight
Scoring Criteria by Category
Message Match (20%)
ScoreCriteria
90-100Headline directly mirrors ad copy. Visitor instantly confirms they are in the right place. Same language, same promise, same offer.
70-89Headline is related to ad copy but uses different wording. Visitor can connect the dots but must think for a moment.
50-69Headline addresses the same topic but different angle. Some disconnect between ad promise and page promise.
30-49Weak connection. Headline is generic ("Welcome" / "Our Services") and does not reinforce the ad message.
0-29No connection. Visitor cannot tell why they landed here. Likely a homepage being used as a landing page.

What to check:

  • Does the page headline use the same keywords as the ad headline?
  • Does the page deliver on the specific promise made in the ad?
  • Is the offer mentioned in the ad visible on the landing page?
  • Would the visitor feel "yes, this is what I clicked for" within 2 seconds?
CTA Clarity & Placement (20%)
ScoreCriteria
90-100Single, clear primary CTA. Contrasting button color. Specific copy ("Get My Free Quote" not "Submit"). Visible above the fold. Repeated 2-3 times down the page.
70-89Clear primary CTA but could be more specific. Visible above the fold. May lack repetition down the page.
50-69CTA present but competes with other actions (navigation, multiple CTAs). Generic copy ("Submit" / "Learn More").
30-49CTA is below the fold or hard to find. Multiple competing CTAs with no hierarchy. Vague copy.
0-29No clear CTA. Visitor does not know what action to take. Page has no conversion path.

CTA Copy Hierarchy (Best to Worst):

BEST: Specific + Benefit ("Get My Free Audit Report")
GOOD: Specific + Action ("Download the 2024 Guide")
OK:   Action + Context ("Start Your Free Trial")
WEAK: Generic Action ("Sign Up" / "Get Started")
WORST: No Context ("Submit" / "Click Here" / "Learn More")

CTA Design Checklist:

  • Button color contrasts with page background (not same color family)
  • Button is large enough to tap on mobile (minimum 44px x 44px)
  • Button copy uses first person ("Get MY quote" > "Get YOUR quote")
  • Sub-text under button reduces anxiety ("No credit card required" / "Unsubscribe anytime")
  • CTA appears above the fold, mid-page, and at the bottom
  • Only ONE primary CTA per page (secondary CTAs are visually subordinate)
Trust & Social Proof (15%)
ScoreCriteria
90-100Multiple trust signals: customer testimonials with names/photos, client logos, star ratings, review count, guarantee badge, security seals, certifications. Placed strategically near CTAs.
70-89Good trust signals present but not complete set. Testimonials exist but may lack names or photos. Some logos or badges.
50-69Minimal trust signals. Maybe 1-2 testimonials or a guarantee mention. No logos, no ratings.
30-49Almost no trust signals. Generic or fabricated-feeling testimonials. No third-party validation.
0-29Zero trust signals. No testimonials, no logos, no guarantees, no reviews, no badges.

Trust Signal Placement Rules:

HERO SECTION: Client logo bar (3-6 recognizable logos)
ABOVE FORM: Star rating + review count ("4.8/5 from 2,847 reviews")
BESIDE FORM: Security badges, SSL icon, privacy statement
BELOW HERO: 2-3 short testimonials with names and headshots
MID-PAGE: Full case study or detailed testimonial
NEAR CTA: Guarantee badge ("30-day money-back guarantee")
FOOTER: Certifications, association memberships, contact info
Above-the-Fold Impact (15%)
ScoreCriteria
90-100Within the first screen: clear headline, supporting subheadline, benefit statement, primary CTA, and at least one trust signal. Visitor knows exactly what to do.
70-89Headline and CTA visible above the fold. Subheadline present. May be missing trust signal or benefit clarity.
50-69Headline visible but CTA is below the fold. Or headline is vague and requires scrolling to understand the offer.
30-49Above the fold is dominated by navigation, large image, or slider. Key info requires scrolling.
0-29Nothing actionable above the fold. Looks like a homepage, not a landing page. Hero image with no text.

Above-the-Fold Checklist:

  • Headline communicates the core value proposition in under 10 words
  • Subheadline explains HOW they deliver the value (15-25 words)
  • Primary CTA button is visible without scrolling
  • At least one trust signal visible (logo bar, rating, or testimonial snippet)
  • Hero image/video is relevant (shows the product, result, or customer — not a stock photo)
  • No auto-playing video with sound
  • Navigation is minimal or removed (reduce exit points)
Show full SKILL.md (602 more words)Show less
Copy Quality (10%)
ScoreCriteria
90-100Benefit-driven copy throughout. Specific numbers and outcomes. Active voice. Addresses objections. Reads naturally. Matches audience sophistication level.
70-89Mostly benefit-driven. Some specificity. Good clarity but could be more compelling.
50-69Mix of benefits and features. Some generic language. Functional but not persuasive.
30-49Feature-heavy copy with few benefits. Industry jargon. Talks about the company, not the customer.
0-29Poor copy: vague, generic, full of jargon, or barely any copy at all.

Copy Quality Checklist:

  • Headline uses benefit language, not feature language ("Save 10 hours/week" not "Automated scheduling")
  • Body copy uses "you/your" more than "we/our" (customer-centric)
  • Specific numbers used where possible ("2,847 customers" not "thousands of customers")
  • Active voice preferred ("We deliver results" not "Results are delivered")
  • Each section answers "so what?" for the reader
  • No walls of text — short paragraphs (2-3 sentences max)
  • Bullet points used for feature/benefit lists
Form & Friction (10%)
ScoreCriteria
90-100Minimal fields (name + email or single CTA). Smart defaults, autofill-friendly. Progress indicator if multi-step. Inline validation. Privacy statement near form.
70-89Reasonable number of fields (3-5). Clear labels. Submit button has specific copy. Privacy note present.
50-695-7 fields, some potentially unnecessary. Generic submit button. No progress indicator for long forms.
30-497+ fields. Unnecessary fields (fax, company size, how did you hear about us). No inline validation.
0-29Excessive fields (10+). Required fields that feel invasive. Captcha visible. No privacy statement. Poor mobile form experience.

Form Friction Reduction Rules:

FIELD COUNT GUIDELINES:
- Lead gen (B2C): Name + Email = 2 fields maximum
- Lead gen (B2B): Name + Email + Company = 3 fields maximum
- Consultation booking: Name + Email + Phone + Preferred Time = 4 fields
- Quote request: Name + Email + Phone + Brief Description = 4 fields
- E-commerce: Shipping + Payment (use autofill, address lookup)

EVERY ADDITIONAL FIELD REDUCES COMPLETION BY ~7-10%

FRICTION REDUCERS:
- "Takes 30 seconds" or "2-minute form" — set time expectation
- Pre-fill fields from browser autofill where possible
- Use dropdown/select instead of free text where appropriate
- Show progress bar for multi-step forms
- Inline validation (green check as they complete fields)
- "We'll never share your email" near the form
- Phone field marked as optional if not essential
Mobile Optimization (5%)
ScoreCriteria
90-100Fully responsive. Large tap targets. Mobile-specific layout. Form is easy to complete on phone. Page loads in under 3 seconds on mobile.
70-89Responsive but not mobile-optimized. Acceptable tap targets. Some horizontal scrolling.
50-69Responsive with issues. Small text, tiny buttons, form fields hard to tap.
30-49Barely responsive. Significant usability issues on mobile.
0-29Not responsive or completely broken on mobile.
Page Speed (5%)
ScoreCriteria
90-100Loads in under 2 seconds. Optimized images. No render-blocking scripts. Clean code.
70-89Loads in 2-3 seconds. Some optimization opportunities.
50-69Loads in 3-5 seconds. Unoptimized images, unnecessary scripts.
30-49Loads in 5-8 seconds. Major performance issues.
0-29Loads in 8+ seconds. Unusable on slower connections.

Landing Page Blueprint (For Building From Scratch)

When no URL is provided, use this section-by-section blueprint to build a complete landing page outline:

Section 1: Hero (Above the Fold)
HEADLINE: [10 words max. Specific benefit + target audience]
  Formula: "[Desired Outcome] for [Target Audience] — Without [Pain Point]"
  Example: "Get 3x More Qualified Leads — Without Cold Calling"

SUBHEADLINE: [15-25 words. HOW they deliver the benefit]
  Formula: "We help [audience] [achieve outcome] by [method] so you can [ultimate benefit]"
  Example: "Our AI-powered outreach system books 15-20 qualified meetings per month
            so you can focus on closing deals, not chasing leads."

HERO IMAGE/VIDEO: [Description of ideal visual — product in use, result screenshot, or customer photo]

PRIMARY CTA: [Specific, benefit-driven button text]
  Example: "Get My Free Lead Audit" / "Start My Free Trial" / "Book My Strategy Call"

CTA SUB-TEXT: [Anxiety reducer — 5-10 words under the button]
  Example: "No credit card required" / "Free, no-obligation consultation"

TRUST BAR: [3-6 client logos, star rating, or "Trusted by X+ companies"]
Section 2: Problem Agitation
SECTION HEADLINE: "[Audience], does this sound familiar?"

PAIN POINT 1: [Specific pain with emotional language]
PAIN POINT 2: [Specific pain with consequence]
PAIN POINT 3: [Specific pain with frustration]

TRANSITION: "There's a better way — and it starts with [solution concept]."
Section 3: Solution Introduction
SECTION HEADLINE: "How [Product/Service] Works"

STEP 1: [Simple first step — reduce perceived effort]
  Icon + Title + 1-sentence description

STEP 2: [The product/service does its magic]
  Icon + Title + 1-sentence description

STEP 3: [The outcome they want]
  Icon + Title + 1-sentence description
Section 4: Benefits (Not Features)
SECTION HEADLINE: "Why [Audience] Choose [Product/Service]"

BENEFIT 1: [Outcome they care about + supporting detail]
  Headline: "Save 10+ Hours Per Week"
  Detail: "[Specific how] so you can [what they do with the time]"

BENEFIT 2: [Financial benefit + proof point]
  Headline: "Increase Revenue by 30-50%"
  Detail: "[Specific mechanism] — just like [customer name] who [result]"

BENEFIT 3: [Ease/convenience benefit + comparison]
  Headline: "Set Up in 15 Minutes, Not 15 Days"
  Detail: "Unlike [alternative], [product] [ease of use proof]"

BENEFIT 4: [Risk reduction benefit + guarantee]
  Headline: "Risk-Free with Our [X]-Day Guarantee"
  Detail: "If [product] doesn't [promise], we'll [refund/fix/compensate]"
Section 5: Social Proof Block
TESTIMONIAL 1:
  Quote: "[Specific result achieved]"
  Name: [First Last], [Title], [Company]
  Photo: [Headshot]

TESTIMONIAL 2:
  Quote: "[Specific result achieved]"
  Name: [First Last], [Title], [Company]
  Photo: [Headshot]

TESTIMONIAL 3:
  Quote: "[Specific result achieved]"
  Name: [First Last], [Title], [Company]
  Photo: [Headshot]

STATS BAR: "[X]+ Customers | [X]% Satisfaction | [X]+ [Results Delivered]"
Section 6: Offer Details & Pricing
SECTION HEADLINE: "Start [Achieving Outcome] Today"

OFFER DESCRIPTION: [What they get, formatted as a value stack]
  - [Deliverable 1] (Value: $[X])
  - [Deliverable 2] (Value: $[X])
  - [Deliverable 3] (Value: $[X])
  - [Bonus if applicable] (Value: $[X])
  Total Value: $[X]
  Your Price: $[Actual Price]

OR FOR LEAD GEN:
  "Book your free [consultation/audit/demo] — [What they'll get from the call]"
Section 7: FAQ Section
SECTION HEADLINE: "Common Questions"

Q1: [The #1 objection disguised as a question]
A1: [Direct answer that overcomes the objection]

Q2: [Pricing/cost objection]
A2: [Value-based answer with ROI framing]

Q3: [Trust/legitimacy question]
A3: [Answer with social proof and guarantee]

Q4: [Process/complexity question]
A4: [Simple, step-by-step answer]

Q5: [Timeline/results question]
A5: [Honest answer with typical timeframe]
Section 8: Final CTA Block
HEADLINE: "[Urgency-driven restatement of core benefit]"
  Example: "Stop Losing Leads to Your Competition"

SUBHEADLINE: "[Restate the offer with a time element]"
  Example: "Book your free strategy call today — spots fill fast"

PRIMARY CTA: [Same as hero CTA]
CTA SUB-TEXT: [Same anxiety reducer]

GUARANTEE BADGE: [Visual guarantee element]

Before/After Rewrite Format

When auditing an existing page, generate rewrites in this format:

### [Section Name] — Score: [X]/100

**BEFORE (Current):**
> [Exact current copy from the page]

**ISSUES:**
- [Specific problem 1]
- [Specific problem 2]

**AFTER (Recommended):**
> [Rewritten copy with improvements]

**WHY THIS IS BETTER:**
- [Specific improvement 1 — e.g., "Uses benefit language instead of feature language"]
- [Specific improvement 2 — e.g., "Includes a specific number for credibility"]

Output Template

Generate the output as ADS-LANDING.md using this structure:

markdown
# Landing Page Audit: [Business Name / URL]

**Generated:** [Date]
**Page URL:** [URL or "Built from scratch"]
**Business Type:** [Type]
**Primary Conversion Action:** [Purchase / Lead / Sign-up / Call / Book]

---

## Overall Score: [XX]/100

| Category | Score | Weight | Weighted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Message Match | [X]/100 | 20% | [X] |
| CTA Clarity & Placement | [X]/100 | 20% | [X] |
| Trust & Social Proof | [X]/100 | 15% | [X] |
| Above-the-Fold Impact | [X]/100 | 15% | [X] |
| Copy Quality | [X]/100 | 10% | [X] |
| Form & Friction | [X]/100 | 10% | [X] |
| Mobile Optimization | [X]/100 | 5% | [X] |
| Page Speed | [X]/100 | 5% | [X] |
| **Overall** | | **100%** | **[XX]** |

---

## Executive Summary

**Top 3 Strengths:**
1. [Strength with evidence]
2. [Strength with evidence]
3. [Strength with evidence]

**Top 3 Critical Issues:**
1. [Issue with impact explanation]
2. [Issue with impact explanation]
3. [Issue with impact explanation]

**Estimated Conversion Rate Impact:**
Implementing all recommendations could improve conversion rate by [X-X]% based on industry benchmarks.

---

## Detailed Audit

### Message Match — [X]/100
[Detailed analysis with before/after rewrite]

### CTA Clarity & Placement — [X]/100
[Detailed analysis with before/after rewrite]

### Trust & Social Proof — [X]/100
[Detailed analysis with specific additions needed]

### Above-the-Fold Impact — [X]/100
[Detailed analysis with layout recommendations]

### Copy Quality — [X]/100
[Section-by-section before/after rewrites]

### Form & Friction — [X]/100
[Field-by-field analysis with reduction plan]

### Mobile Optimization — [X]/100
[Mobile-specific issues and fixes]

### Page Speed — [X]/100
[Speed observations and optimization suggestions]

---

## Complete Rewrite Suggestions

### Hero Section Rewrite
[Before/after with full copy]

### Body Copy Rewrite
[Before/after with full copy]

### CTA Rewrite
[Before/after with full copy]

---

## Priority Action Plan

| Priority | Action | Expected Impact | Effort |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Action] | [Impact] | [Low/Med/High] |
| 2 | [Action] | [Impact] | [Low/Med/High] |
| 3 | [Action] | [Impact] | [Low/Med/High] |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

Rules

  1. ALWAYS fetch the URL with WebFetch before auditing — never audit based on assumptions
  2. ALWAYS provide specific before/after copy rewrites — not just general advice
  3. ALWAYS score every category — the overall score gives the user a clear benchmark
  4. ALWAYS include the priority action plan — users need to know what to fix first
  5. ALWAYS check message match — this is the #1 conversion killer for paid traffic
  6. ALWAYS evaluate mobile experience — 60%+ of ad traffic is mobile
  7. NEVER give vague recommendations like "improve your CTA" — specify exactly what to change
  8. NEVER skip the above-the-fold analysis — this determines whether visitors stay or bounce
  9. NEVER ignore form friction — every unnecessary field costs 7-10% of completions
  10. If no URL is provided, build the full landing page outline using the Blueprint section
  11. ALWAYS include trust signal recommendations with specific placement instructions
  12. Output the complete audit to ADS-LANDING.md in the current working directory

© zubair-trabzada, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in skills/ads-landing of zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit d1df3f5

Compare with similar skills

Ads Landing next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Ads Landing compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Ads Landing this skillzubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude268—~4.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Impeccablebestofjs/bestofjs3.1k26 repos~2.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Scroll World Landing Pageoso95/scroll-world9.9k1 repos~12kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Expert Panelericosiu/ai-marketing-skills3.6k2 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
UI UX Pro Maxsaoudi-h/solar-icons19018 repos~11kAutomated safety check: NotesCustom licence
Frontend Designanthropics/skills180k38 repos~2.3kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • Impeccable

    bestofjs/bestofjs

    A skill your agent uses when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a…

    3.1k GitHub starsUsed in 26 repos~2.6k tokens
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Scroll World Landing Page

    oso95/scroll-world

    Builds a scroll-driven landing page where a pre-rendered camera flies through connected AI-generated scenes, using Higgsfield for stills and video clips.

    9.9k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~12k tokens
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check: notes
  • Expert Panel

    ericosiu/ai-marketing-skills

    Score, evaluate, and iteratively improve any content or strategy using an auto-assembled panel of domain experts.

    3.6k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.1k tokens
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • UI UX Pro Max

    saoudi-h/solar-icons

    UI/UX design intelligence for web and mobile. An agent skill from saoudi-h/solar-icons.

    190 GitHub starsUsed in 18 repos~11k tokens
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check: notes
  • Frontend Design

    anthropics/skills

    Official

    Pushes the agent toward distinctive visual design for new or reworked UI: a clear aesthetic direction, deliberate typography and choices rooted in the subject.

    180k GitHub starsUsed in 38 repos~2.3k tokens
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Scroll Craft

    nateherkai/scroll-craft

    Build premium scroll-driven landing pages for service, product, food, and drink brands.

    3k GitHub stars~6.2k tokensUpdated 11 days ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check: notes

More from zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude

All 9 skills in this repo
  • Ads Audit

    zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude

    Ad Performance Auditor — analyze existing ad campaigns and identify optimization opportunities

    268 GitHub stars~3.5k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ads Budget

    zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude

    Budget Allocation & ROI Projector. An agent skill from zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude.

    268 GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ads Competitors

    zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude

    Competitive Ad Intelligence. An agent skill from zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude.

    268 GitHub stars~4.9k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ads Creative

    zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude

    Creative Brief Generator for designers, video editors, and content teams

    268 GitHub stars~4.3k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ads Quick

    zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude

    60-Second Ad Readiness Snapshot — quick assessment without subagents

    268 GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ads Report PDF

    zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude

    Professional PDF Ad Strategy Report Generator. An agent skill from zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude.

    268 GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Ads Landing

What does Ads Landing do?

Landing Page Audit & Optimizer. An agent skill from zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude. Ads Landing is an agent skill from zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude. Landing Page Audit & Optimizer.

When should I use Ads Landing?

Ads Landing fits situations like: tasks that involve Landing pages.

How do I install Ads Landing in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude --skill ads-landing -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/ads-landing in zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude) into .claude/skills/ads-landing in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Ads Landing in Codex?

Run `npx skills add zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude --skill ads-landing -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/ads-landing in zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude) into .agents/skills/ads-landing in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Ads Landing in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude --skill ads-landing -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/ads-landing, .gemini/skills/ads-landing, .github/skills/ads-landing and .opencode/skills/ads-landing in your project.

What does Ads Landing need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Ads Landing is instructions for the agent only.

Does Ads Landing access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Ads Landing safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Ads Landing use?

Ads Landing is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Ads Landing use?

About 4.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 20k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Ads Landing?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Ads Landing: Impeccable (bestofjs/bestofjs, 3.1k stars), Scroll World Landing Page (oso95/scroll-world, 9.9k stars), Expert Panel (ericosiu/ai-marketing-skills, 3.6k stars) and UI UX Pro Max (saoudi-h/solar-icons, 190 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Ads Landing?

zubair-trabzada (a GitHub user) maintains it in zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude, which has 268 GitHub stars. The repository holds 9 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on April 8, 2026.

Source: zubair-trabzada/ai-ads-claude on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.