Agent skill

Steve Jobs Design Review

by wondelai in wondelai/skills

Review designs, products, and features with Steve Jobs' standards: ruthless simplicity, focus, and end-to-end excellence.

MITAuto-check passedMedia & Creative

Install Steve Jobs Design Review

skills CLI
$ npx skills add wondelai/skills --skill steve-jobs-design-review -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install wondelai/skills steve-jobs-design-review --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wondelai/skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/steve-jobs-design-review .claude/skills/steve-jobs-design-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
steve-jobs-design-review
GitHub stars
2.4k
Token cost
~4.5k tokens
SKILL.md length
2,378 words
Files
6 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
62
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Review designs, products, and features with Steve Jobs' standards: ruthless simplicity, focus, and end-to-end excellence.

  • Works in 7 steps: Simplicity Is the Ultimate Sophistication → Focus Means Saying No → Design Is How It Works → …
  • The user mentions Steve Jobs review
  • SKILL.md covers Core Principle, Scoring, Framework and Common Mistakes, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Steve Jobs Design Review is an agent skill from wondelai/skills. Review designs, products, and features with Steve Jobs' standards: ruthless simplicity, focus, and end-to-end excellence. Use when the user mentions "Steve Jobs review", "design review", "product review", "what would Steve do", "insanely great", "this feels too complicated", "too many features", "product taste", "saying no", or "is this good enough to ship". Also trigger when critiquing a UI, feature, or roadmap for focus and simplicity, cutting scope to the essential, or pressure-testing the whole experience…

Its SKILL.md is about 4.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 6 other files, including reference files (for example `references/case-studies.md`, `references/demo-culture.md` and `references/end-to-end-experience.md`).

It sits in Media & Creative, covering Design review and critique, UI design and UX design. The repository describes itself as: Wondel.ai Agent Skills — Business, Marketing, UX & Coding Frameworks from Bestselling Books. 50 skills + 12 guided journeys for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor & other agentskills.io… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • The user mentions Steve Jobs review
  • What would Steve do
  • This feels too complicated
  • Too many features

Example prompts

  • “Steve Jobs review”
  • “design review”
  • “product review”
  • “/steve-jobs-design-review”

Workflow steps

7 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Simplicity Is the Ultimate Sophistication
  2. Focus Means Saying No
  3. Design Is How It Works
  4. Own the Whole Experience
  5. Demo or It Doesn't Exist
  6. Taste and the Back of the Fence
  7. Running the Review

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit c172996. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    Links to these hosts (documentation or services it may open):

    • amazon.com

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Steve Jobs Design Review loads about 4.5k tokens when it runs, and up to ~20k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 215 tokens; SKILL.md has 2,378 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~215
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.5k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~20k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from wondelai/skills at commit c172996, republished under its MIT licence (© wondelai). 2,378 words, ~4,492 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/steve-jobs-design-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 5 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
steve-jobs-design-review
description
Review designs, products, and features with Steve Jobs' standards: ruthless simplicity, focus, and end-to-end excellence. Use when the user mentions "Steve Jobs review", "design review", "product review", "what would Steve do", "insanely great", "this feels too complicated", "too many features", "product taste", "saying no", or "is this good enough to ship". Also trigger when critiquing a UI, feature, or roadmap for focus and simplicity, cutting scope to the essential, or pressure-testing the whole experience from first run to daily use. Covers the simplicity audit, the no list, design-is-how-it-works, end-to-end ownership, demo culture, and a Jobs-style review protocol with binary verdicts. For visual design fundamentals, see refactoring-ui. For usability audits, see ux-heuristics. For detail polish, see microinteractions.
license
MIT
metadata.author
wondelai
metadata.version
1.2.0

Steve Jobs Design Review

Run design and product reviews the way Steve Jobs ran them: start from the customer experience, subtract until only the essential remains, and refuse to call anything done that isn't insanely great.

Core Principle

"You've got to start with the customer experience and work backwards to the technology." Review every product from what a customer sees, feels, and accomplishes — never from the feature list, the org chart, or the technology that happened to be available. And remember the standard: "Design is not just what it looks like and feels like. Design is how it works."

Scoring

Goal: 10/10. Count how many of the 7 Quick Diagnostic rows the product passes, then map to 0-10: 7/7 = 10, 6/7 = 9, 5/7 = 7, 4/7 = 6, 3/7 = 4, ≤2/7 ≤ 3. Bands: 9-10 = insanely great, ships; 5-8 = real cuts and fixes required; ≤4 = not done, back to demos. There is no "pretty good"; state the score, the exact rows that failed, and the specific cuts or fixes required to reach 10/10.

Framework

1. Simplicity Is the Ultimate Sophistication

Core concept: Simplicity is not the absence of features — it is complexity conquered. Keep subtracting until removing one more thing would break the product's purpose.

Why it works: Every element a user must perceive, parse, or decide about taxes attention and erodes confidence. Simplicity that survives deep understanding of the problem feels inevitable; simplicity achieved by hiding things feels broken.

Key insights:

  • "It takes a lot of hard work to make something simple, to truly understand the underlying challenges and come up with elegant solutions"
  • The iPod shipped with no on/off switch — the need was designed away, not the button hidden
  • Measure steps-to-value: Jobs demanded any song in three presses; the original iDVD pitch was one window, drag video in, click "Burn"
  • Prefer one good default over a setting; every preference is a decision you failed to make
  • If you must explain it, redesign it — instructions are apologies

Review applications:

ContextApplicationExample
Feature auditCount steps to core value; cut anything off the main pathSignup → first value in 3 steps, not 9
UI critiqueRemove elements until the screen states one intentOne primary button per screen
Settings reviewReplace options with opinionated defaultsAuto-save always on; no toggle

Review prompts:

  • "What can we remove and have this still work better?"
  • "Why is this here? Who asked for it, and does the core user need it?"
  • "Explain this screen in one sentence. Can't? It's two screens — or none."

Ethical boundary: Simplify by solving complexity for the user, never by burying necessary controls or costs (pricing, privacy, cancellation) where they can't be found.

See references/simplicity-and-focus.md when running a simplicity audit — the 5-step subtraction method, steps-to-value measurement, and the surface-vs-deep simplicity table.

2. Focus Means Saying No

Core concept: "Focusing is about saying no." Deciding what not to build is as important as deciding what to build — innovation is saying no to 1,000 things.

Why it works: Effort spread across many decent things produces nothing great. Killing good ideas concentrates the team's best people and attention on the few products that matter, and protects the product from becoming a committee's wish list.

Key insights:

  • In 1997 Jobs cut dozens of Apple products to a 2×2 matrix: consumer/pro × desktop/portable — focus saved the company
  • At retreats, the team's top-10 priority list got cut to three: "We can only do three"
  • "I'm as proud of the things we haven't done as the things we have done"
  • A roadmap with no recently killed items isn't focused, it's unexamined
  • Saying no includes features already shipped — deletion is a feature

Review applications:

ContextApplicationExample
Roadmap reviewForce-rank, then cut everything below #3Q3 plan: 3 bets, not 14 backlog items
Scope creepRequire a kill for every addNew dashboard widget = retire one
Product lineCollapse overlapping SKUs/tiersOne plan per customer type

Review prompts:

  • "If we could ship only one thing this quarter, which — and why isn't the rest cut?"
  • "What is this product deliberately bad at?"
  • "What did we say no to this cycle? Nothing? Then we said yes to mediocrity."

Ethical boundary: Say no to scope, never to evidence — killing a feature is strategy; ignoring user pain that contradicts your vision is vanity.

See references/review-protocol.md for the saying-no rituals — the force-rank-to-three exercise, the kill-for-every-add rule, and how to run a no list in a live review.

3. Design Is How It Works

Core concept: Design is not a veneer applied at the end — it is the architecture of how the product behaves. Judge flows, speed, and failure states, not just the mockup's beauty.

Why it works: Users don't experience screenshots; they experience latency, errors, interruptions, and sequences. A beautiful product that stutters, loses work, or confuses on failure is badly designed no matter how it looks.

Key insights:

  • The iPhone keyboard succeeded through behavior (aggressive autocorrect), not visuals — engineering and design are one discipline
  • Review the slowest moment, not the happy path: cold start, empty state, offline, error recovery
  • "It just works" is a design spec: zero configuration, zero manual, zero ceremony
  • Beauty that fights function is decoration; reject it
  • Latency is a design property — a 2-second wait is a design flaw, wherever it lives in the stack

Review applications:

ContextApplicationExample
Mockup reviewDemand the interaction, not the stillClick through states, not slides
PerformanceSet experience budgets in the reviewFirst screen < 1s or it fails review
Failure designWalk error/empty/offline pathsPayment fails → user knows exactly what next

Review prompts:

  • "Show me what happens when it fails."
  • "How does this feel after the 100th use, not the demo?"
  • "Where does the user wait, and what did we do about it?"

See references/end-to-end-experience.md when reviewing behavior over visuals — the daily-use and failure/support stages cover how to walk the slow moments, error paths, and offline states most demos skip.

4. Own the Whole Experience

Core concept: The product is every touchpoint: discovery, purchase, unboxing or first run, onboarding, daily use, failure, support, billing, and leaving. Review the whole widget, not the app in isolation.

Why it works: Customers judge the experience as one thing. Apple built unboxing rituals, its own stores, and the Genius Bar because a great device sold badly or supported rudely becomes a bad product in memory.

Key insights:

  • Packaging got design-lab treatment at Apple — first impressions are part of the product
  • The first run is your unboxing: what users see at minute zero deserves hero-screen care
  • Support tickets, invoices, and cancellation flows are product surfaces — usually nobody designed them
  • Every handoff between teams (marketing → onboarding → product → support) is where experience seams show
  • Map the journey end to end; the worst touchpoint sets the perceived quality

Review applications:

ContextApplicationExample
Launch reviewAudit every touchpoint as one journeyAd promise matches first-run reality
OnboardingTreat first session as theaterFirst 60 seconds rehearsed like a keynote
LifecycleReview billing, support, offboardingCancellation takes one screen, keeps dignity

Review prompts:

  • "Walk me from hearing about this to recommending it — where does it crack?"
  • "Who designed the invoice? The error email? The cancel flow?"
  • "Does the experience keep its promise after the sale?"

Ethical boundary: Owning the whole experience means owning failures too — never design a polished entrance and a hostile exit.

See references/end-to-end-experience.md when mapping the journey — the 7-stage touchpoint map from discovery to offboarding, the worst-touchpoint rule, and the org seams that produce undesigned surfaces.

5. Demo or It Doesn't Exist

Core concept: Review working artifacts, not specs or slideware. Concrete demos expose truth that documents hide; decisions are made by a decider reacting to the real thing.

Why it works: Abstractions let everyone imagine a different product and agree on nothing. A demo at real size on the real device forces specific feedback, surfaces dealbreakers early, and converges by decision rather than committee drift.

Key insights:

  • Apple's software culture (Kocienda's "creative selection"): build a demo, show a decision-maker, get direct feedback, iterate — that loop is the process
  • The iPhone keyboard was chosen by a derby of competing working demos, not a requirements doc
  • Review on the target device at target data scale — a phone UI judged on a projector lies
  • Prototype the riskiest moment first; a demo of the easy 80% proves nothing
  • "Real artists ship": demos exist to force decisions, not to delay them

Review applications:

ContextApplicationExample
Design reviewBan slide-only reviewsFigma prototype or build, never static deck
Competing ideasRun a demo derby, pick oneTwo nav models built, one verdict
Stakeholder alignmentDemo to the decider weekly30-min demo replaces 3 status docs

Review prompts:

  • "Don't tell me — show me. On the device."
  • "Which of these two demos wins? Pick one; we're not shipping a compromise of both."
  • "What's the riskiest assumption, and where's the demo that tests it?"

Ethical boundary: Demos must show honest state — a staged demo that hides known breakage is a lie with a UI.

See references/demo-culture.md when setting up a demo-driven review — the creative-selection loop, how to run a demo derby, the decider role, and honest-demo rules.

Show full SKILL.md (868 more words)Show less
6. Taste and the Back of the Fence

Core concept: A great carpenter doesn't use plywood on the back of the cabinet, even though nobody will see it. Care invested in unseen surfaces — and the taste of the people applying it — is what quality actually is.

Why it works: Users sense craft subliminally: aligned pixels, coherent copy, graceful edge cases add up to trust. Teams that cut corners where "nobody looks" train themselves to cut corners everywhere; excellence is a habit enforced by standards, not inspections.

Key insights:

  • The original Mac team signed the inside of the case; Jobs made engineers redo the circuit board layout for beauty no customer would see
  • "Technology alone is not enough" — products live at the intersection of technology and the liberal arts
  • Audit the back-of-fence surfaces: empty states, error copy, settings pages, loading screens, emails
  • "Be a yardstick of quality" — A-players raise each other; tolerated mediocrity compounds
  • Taste is trainable: study great products, articulate why they're great, apply the standard ruthlessly

Review applications:

ContextApplicationExample
Detail auditReview the screens nobody demos404 page held to homepage standard
Copy reviewRead every string aloudError messages sound human, specific
Team standardCritique to the best work, not the average"Is this the best you've ever done?"

Review prompts:

  • "Show me the ugliest screen in the product — that's our real quality bar."
  • "Would you sign your name inside this?"
  • "Where did we use plywood?"

See references/case-studies.md for worked examples of the standard in action — the original Mac circuit board redone for unseen beauty, the iMac's opinionated subtraction, plus the MobileMe and antenna-gate failure reviews and what each teaches a reviewer.

7. Running the Review

Core concept: Structure the review: experience the product cold as a customer, name the One Thing it must do, audit against principles 1-6, then deliver a binary verdict — insanely great, or not done — with a specific cut list and fix list.

Why it works: Reviews fail through vagueness and politeness. A fixed walkthrough order, brutal specificity, and a binary verdict prevent "good enough" from shipping while giving the team an exact path to 10/10. Products get judged against their own promise — "What is this supposed to do? Then why doesn't it do that?"

Key insights:

  • Always experience the product cold before the meeting — first impressions can't be re-run
  • Open with the promise: state what the product claims, then test only that
  • Feedback must be specific and actionable: "this is confusing" fails review too — say what, where, why, and the fix direction
  • End binary: ship-worthy or a ranked fix list; never "polish it a bit"
  • One decider owns the verdict; input is wide, decision is narrow

ALWAYS output reviews in this format:

# Design Review: [Product/Feature]
**Verdict:** INSANELY GREAT / NOT DONE (score X/10)
**The One Thing:** [what this must do]
**Keeps its promise?** [yes/no — evidence]
**Cut list:** [what to remove]
**Fix list:** [ranked, specific, with fix direction]
**Back of the fence:** [unseen surfaces that fail the bar]

See references/review-protocol.md when running an actual review session — the timed 5-step agenda, the fix-item specificity test, the candor rules (brutal on work, decent on people), review cadence, and how to adapt the protocol for solo or async reviews.

Common Mistakes

MistakeWhy It FailsFix
Reviewing only aestheticsDesign is how it works; pretty-but-clunky still fails usersWalk flows, latency, and failure states
Fixing problems by addingEach addition taxes attention and breeds more complexitySubtract first; additions need a kill
Consensus verdictsCommittees average ideas into mushOne decider, wide input, narrow decision
Reviewing specs and slidesAbstractions hide dealbreakers; everyone imagines a different productDemand working demos on the real device
"Good enough" verdictsMediocrity compounds into brand damageBinary: insanely great or not done
Skipping unseen surfacesUsers sense plywood; teams learn to cut cornersAudit empty/error/settings/email states
Cosplaying crueltyFear stops demos and candor, killing the feedback loopBe brutal about work, decent to people

Quick Diagnostic

QuestionIf NoAction
Can you state the One Thing this product must do in one sentence?No focus — everything is the priorityWrite it; cut what doesn't serve it
Does a new user reach core value in ≤3 steps?Complexity is unconqueredMap steps-to-value; remove, don't reorder
Did the reviewer experience it cold, as a customer?You reviewed the team's story, not the productUse it before the meeting, no walkthrough
Is there a working demo on the real device?You're approving an imagined productReschedule until there's a demo
Was anything removed this cycle?Roadmap is accreting, not focusingAdd a cut list to every review
Do error, empty, and edge states match hero-screen quality?Back of the fence is plywoodAudit and fix unseen surfaces
Would the team proudly use it daily and sign it?The bar is "acceptable", not "insanely great"Hold the binary verdict until pride is real

About the Author

Steve Jobs (1955-2011) co-founded Apple and led it to create the Mac, iPod, iPhone, and iPad, building the most valuable company in the world on design-led product development. This skill distills his documented review practices and standards from Walter Isaacson's authorized biography, Ken Segall's Insanely Simple, and Ken Kocienda's Creative Selection.

Further Reading

This skill is based on documented accounts of Steve Jobs' product and design review practices:

© wondelai, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 5 other files (references) in steve-jobs-design-review of wondelai/skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/case-studies.md
  • references/demo-culture.md
  • references/end-to-end-experience.md
  • references/review-protocol.md
  • references/simplicity-and-focus.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit c172996

Compare with similar skills

Steve Jobs Design Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Steve Jobs Design Review compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Steve Jobs Design Review this skillwondelai/skills2.4k—~4.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Design Reviewjezweb/claude-skills1.1k—~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Design Critiquemohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.4k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Interface Design for Dashboards and Appsholaboss-ai/holaOS11k3 repos~6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Product Design Workflow BundleXiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code14k—~721Automated safety check: PassMIT
UI Reviewespennilsen/pi122—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Design Review

    jezweb/claude-skills

    Review a web app or page for visual design quality — layout, typography, spacing, colour, hierarchy, consistency, interaction patterns, and responsive behaviour.

    1.1k GitHub stars~2.1k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Design Critique

    mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

    Give structured, constructive feedback on any design using UX frameworks.

    1.4k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Pushes an agent past generic defaults when designing dashboards, admin panels, SaaS apps and tools, with attention to structure, type, navigation and how data is shown.

    11k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~6k tokens
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Product Design Workflow Bundle

    XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code

    Entry point to a bundle of product design workflows covering context, research, audits, ideation, URL or image to code, design QA and sharing a prototype.

    14k GitHub stars~721 tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • UI Review

    espennilsen/pi

    Review UI designs and implementations for accessibility, consistency, usability, and visual quality.

    122 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 19 days ago
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Design Audit

    jdrhyne/agent-skills

    Premium UI/UX design auditor with Jobs/Ive philosophy. An agent skill from jdrhyne/agent-skills.

    240 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Media & CreativeAuto-check passed

More from wondelai/skills

All 62 skills in this repo
  • Crossing The Chasm

    wondelai/skills

    Navigate the technology adoption lifecycle from early adopters to mainstream market.

    2.4k GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Design Everyday Things

    wondelai/skills

    Apply foundational design principles: affordances, signifiers, constraints, feedback, and conceptual models.

    2.4k GitHub stars~4k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Design Sprint

    wondelai/skills

    Run a structured 5-day process to prototype, test, and validate product ideas with real users.

    2.4k GitHub stars~3.8k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Hooked UX

    wondelai/skills

    Design habit-forming product loops using the Hook Model (Trigger, Action, Variable Reward, Investment).

    2.4k GitHub stars~3.5k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Improve Retention

    wondelai/skills

    Diagnose and fix retention problems using behavior design (B=MAP).

    2.4k GitHub stars~3.8k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Monetizing Innovation

    wondelai/skills

    Design products and pricing around validated willingness to pay, from Ramanujam & Tacke's "Monetizing Innovation".

    2.4k GitHub stars~5.2k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Steve Jobs Design Review

What does Steve Jobs Design Review do?

Review designs, products, and features with Steve Jobs' standards: ruthless simplicity, focus, and end-to-end excellence. Steve Jobs Design Review is an agent skill from wondelai/skills. Review designs, products, and features with Steve Jobs' standards: ruthless simplicity, focus, and end-to-end excellence.

When should I use Steve Jobs Design Review?

Steve Jobs Design Review fits situations like: the user mentions Steve Jobs review; what would Steve do; this feels too complicated; too many features.

How do I install Steve Jobs Design Review in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add wondelai/skills --skill steve-jobs-design-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (steve-jobs-design-review in wondelai/skills) into .claude/skills/steve-jobs-design-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Steve Jobs Design Review in Codex?

Run `npx skills add wondelai/skills --skill steve-jobs-design-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (steve-jobs-design-review in wondelai/skills) into .agents/skills/steve-jobs-design-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Steve Jobs Design Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add wondelai/skills --skill steve-jobs-design-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/steve-jobs-design-review, .gemini/skills/steve-jobs-design-review, .github/skills/steve-jobs-design-review and .opencode/skills/steve-jobs-design-review in your project.

What does Steve Jobs Design Review need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Steve Jobs Design Review is instructions for the agent only.

Does Steve Jobs Design Review access the network?

SKILL.md names 1 domain. As links in the text: amazon.com. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Steve Jobs Design Review safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Steve Jobs Design Review use?

Steve Jobs Design Review is published under the MIT licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Steve Jobs Design Review use?

About 4.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 18k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 15k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Steve Jobs Design Review?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Steve Jobs Design Review: Design Review (jezweb/claude-skills, 1.1k stars), Design Critique (mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills, 1.4k stars), Interface Design for Dashboards and Apps (holaboss-ai/holaOS, 11k stars) and Product Design Workflow Bundle (XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code, 14k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Steve Jobs Design Review?

wondelai (a GitHub organization) maintains it in wondelai/skills, which has 2,371 GitHub stars. The repository holds 62 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 10, 2026.

Source: wondelai/skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.