Agent skill

Thinking Socratic

by tjboudreaux in tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

When a request is vague, assumption-laden, or "obvious," ask the few load-bearing questions that expose hidden requirements before building or committing.

MITAuto-check passedEducation

Install Thinking Socratic

skills CLI
$ npx skills add tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills --skill thinking-socratic -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills thinking-socratic --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/thinking-socratic .claude/skills/thinking-socratic && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
thinking-socratic
GitHub stars
1.6k
Token cost
~846 tokens
SKILL.md length
423 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
26
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

When a request is vague, assumption-laden, or "obvious," ask the few load-bearing questions that expose hidden requirements before building or committing.

  • Works in 5 steps: Name the gap. State what is undefined,… → Ask the load-bearing question first.… → Resolve or branch. From the answer,… → …
  • Tasks that involve Tutoring and explanations
  • SKILL.md covers When to Use, When NOT to Use, Procedure and Output, plus 1 more section
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Thinking Socratic is an agent skill from tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills. When a request is vague, assumption-laden, or "obvious," ask the few load-bearing questions that expose hidden requirements before building or committing.

Its SKILL.md is about 850 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Education, covering Tutoring and explanations. The repository describes itself as: 28 eval-informed mental models and critical-thinking skills for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Cursor, and other Agent Skills-compatible tools. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Tutoring and explanations

Example prompts

  • “obvious,”
  • “/thinking-socratic”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Name the gap. State what is undefined, assumed, or uncheckable. If you can fill it from tools/repo without the user, do that and stop.
  2. Ask the load-bearing question first. Prefer one question whose answer most changes what you will build. Categories (use only what the gap…
  3. Resolve or branch. From the answer, either (a) write the clarified requirement/decision and proceed, or (b) ask at most one follow-up that…
  4. Make assumptions explicit. Restate: "This assumes X; success means Y; out of scope is Z." Confirm only if still ambiguous after your…
  5. Stop at decision-ready clarity. When the next action no longer depends on a hidden premise, end questioning and act or hand off. Cap…

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 7b8fece. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Thinking Socratic loads about 846 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 43 tokens; SKILL.md has 423 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~43
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~846

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills at commit 7b8fece, republished under its MIT licence (© tjboudreaux). 423 words, ~846 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/thinking-socratic/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
thinking-socratic
description
When a request is vague, assumption-laden, or "obvious," ask the few load-bearing questions that expose hidden requirements before building or committing.
disable-model-invocation
true

Socratic Questioning

Core rule: Surface the load-bearing assumption or undefined term before you build. Ask only what you cannot resolve yourself; stop when the next action is decision-ready.

When to Use

  • Request is underspecified ("make it fast", "add a dashboard", "fix the bug") and a guess would misbuild.
  • Claim rests on an unstated assumption that may be the real problem.
  • Someone treats a premise as "obvious" or jumps to a solution before the problem is defined.
  • Debugging a vague symptom that needs a checkable specific before investigation.

When NOT to Use

  • Spec is already clear and actionable — do the work; do not interrogate for theater.
  • Ambiguity is resolvable by reading code, running a command, or checking docs — resolve it yourself.
  • Mid-execution of an agreed plan — re-questioning every step is friction, not rigor.
  • Emergency where one load-bearing fact is enough to act — clarify that fact, then act (prefer ooda).
  • You need the strongest opposing case, not clarification — use steel-manning.
  • You need causal chain depth on a defined failure — use five-whys-plus or scientific-method.

Procedure

  1. Name the gap. State what is undefined, assumed, or uncheckable. If you can fill it from tools/repo without the user, do that and stop.
  2. Ask the load-bearing question first. Prefer one question whose answer most changes what you will build. Categories (use only what the gap needs):
    • Clarification — "What does X mean / for whom / success looks like?"
    • Assumption — "What must be true? What if it is false?"
    • Evidence — "What supports this? What would disprove it?"
    • Perspective — "Who is affected / who would disagree?"
    • Implication — "What follows if we do this?"
    • Meta — "Is this the right question?"
  3. Resolve or branch. From the answer, either (a) write the clarified requirement/decision and proceed, or (b) ask at most one follow-up that still gates the work. Do not run all six categories by default.
  4. Make assumptions explicit. Restate: "This assumes X; success means Y; out of scope is Z." Confirm only if still ambiguous after your restatement.
  5. Stop at decision-ready clarity. When the next action no longer depends on a hidden premise, end questioning and act or hand off. Cap user-facing questions tightly; prefer batching the few that truly gate work.
Show full SKILL.md (60 more words)Show less

Output

text
gap: <what was vague or assumed>
resolved_by: self | user | mixed
questions_asked:
  - <only questions actually needed>
assumptions_made_explicit:
  - <X must be true / success = Y>
clarified_requirement: <decision-ready statement>
next_action: <build | investigate | re-scope | stop>
stop_reason: clear_enough | self_resolved | blocked_on_<fact>

Verification

  • Falsify / stop: If answers do not change the plan, you asked non-load-bearing questions — stop interrogating. If the "clarification" is still a guess, do not build; name the remaining blocker.
  • Over-application guard: Do not Socratic-interview a well-specified task. Do not outsource facts you can read or measure. Do not turn every step of execution into a new question round.

© tjboudreaux, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in skills/thinking-socratic of tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 7b8fece

Compare with similar skills

Thinking Socratic next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Thinking Socratic compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Thinking Socratic this skilltjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills1.6k—~846Automated safety check: PassMIT
DeepTutor CLIHKUDS/DeepTutor41k—~2.8kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
AI Engineering Project Tutorrohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch66k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Hung-Yi Lee Teaching Stylevoidful/hung-yi-lee-skill1.3k—~13kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Claude Certification Tutorrohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch66k—~3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
StudyVault Quiz Tutorbevibing/tutor-skills1.3k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • DeepTutor CLI

    HKUDS/DeepTutor

    Teaches the agent to set up and run DeepTutor from the command line: chat and capabilities, knowledge bases, partners, memory, sessions, notebooks and the server or Web app.

    41k GitHub stars~2.8k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    EducationAuto-check passed
  • AI Engineering Project Tutor

    rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch

    Tutors a learner through one stage of a hands-on AI engineering project per session: lesson, prediction, code, grader run and reflection, with hints but never full solutions.

    66k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated today
    EducationAuto-check passed
  • Hung-Yi Lee Teaching Style

    voidful/hung-yi-lee-skill

    Explains machine learning, LLMs, AI agents and speech modeling in a Hung-Yi Lee-inspired teaching style, drawing on a knowledge base built from his lectures and research references.

    1.3k GitHub stars~13k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    EducationAuto-check passed
  • Claude Certification Tutor

    rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch

    Guides a learner through one of four independent Claude certification tracks with onboarding, lessons, practice labs, mock exams and remediation.

    66k GitHub stars~3k tokensUpdated today
    EducationAuto-check passed
  • StudyVault Quiz Tutor

    bevibing/tutor-skills

    Quizzes you on the notes in an Obsidian StudyVault, tracks proficiency per concept and drills weak areas in four-question rounds.

    1.3k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 7 mo ago
    EducationAuto-check passed
  • Designs a review-and-practice lesson around an independent first attempt, targeted feedback, supported practice, a fresh independent check and a next step.

    40k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated today
    EducationAuto-check passed

More from tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

All 26 skills in this repo
  • Thinking Bounded Rationality

    tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

    A skill your agent uses when search or investigation could run forever.

    1.6k GitHub stars~703 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Thinking Circle Of Competence

    tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

    A skill your agent uses when a specific claim may lack grounding.

    1.6k GitHub stars~733 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Thinking Lindy Effect

    tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

    A skill your agent uses when longevity of a non-perishable option matters.

    1.6k GitHub stars~650 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Thinking Via Negativa

    tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

    A skill your agent uses when the reflex is to add a feature, layer, or process.

    1.6k GitHub stars~735 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Thinking Cynefin

    tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

    When the right response mode is unclear, classify the cause-effect domain first; decompose disorder.

    1.6k GitHub stars~651 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Thinking Five Whys Plus

    tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills

    When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.

    1.6k GitHub stars~881 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Thinking Socratic

What does Thinking Socratic do?

When a request is vague, assumption-laden, or "obvious," ask the few load-bearing questions that expose hidden requirements before building or committing. Thinking Socratic is an agent skill from tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills. When a request is vague, assumption-laden, or "obvious," ask the few load-bearing questions that expose hidden requirements before building or committing.

When should I use Thinking Socratic?

Thinking Socratic fits situations like: tasks that involve Tutoring and explanations.

How do I install Thinking Socratic in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills --skill thinking-socratic -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/thinking-socratic in tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills) into .claude/skills/thinking-socratic in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Thinking Socratic in Codex?

Run `npx skills add tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills --skill thinking-socratic -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/thinking-socratic in tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills) into .agents/skills/thinking-socratic in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Thinking Socratic in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills --skill thinking-socratic -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/thinking-socratic, .gemini/skills/thinking-socratic, .github/skills/thinking-socratic and .opencode/skills/thinking-socratic in your project.

What does Thinking Socratic need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Thinking Socratic is instructions for the agent only.

Does Thinking Socratic access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Thinking Socratic safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Thinking Socratic use?

Thinking Socratic is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Thinking Socratic use?

About 846 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Thinking Socratic?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Thinking Socratic: DeepTutor CLI (HKUDS/DeepTutor, 41k stars), AI Engineering Project Tutor (rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch, 66k stars), Hung-Yi Lee Teaching Style (voidful/hung-yi-lee-skill, 1.3k stars) and Claude Certification Tutor (rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch, 66k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Thinking Socratic?

tjboudreaux (a GitHub user) maintains it in tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills, which has 1,613 GitHub stars. The repository holds 26 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on August 7, 2026.

Source: tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.