Agent skill

Suede Competitor Profiling

by JasonColapietro in JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills

Suede-owned competitive-intelligence discipline for evidence-backed profiles of positioning, pricing, messaging, product, proof, and public-market signals.

MITAuto-check passedMarketing & SEO

Install Suede Competitor Profiling

skills CLI
$ npx skills add JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills --skill suede-competitor-profiling -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills suede-competitor-profiling --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/suede-competitor-profiling .claude/skills/suede-competitor-profiling && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
suede-competitor-profiling
GitHub stars
127
Token cost
~3.6k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,751 words
Files
6 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
78
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Suede-owned competitive-intelligence discipline for evidence-backed profiles of positioning, pricing, messaging, product, proof, and public-market signals.

  • Works in 4 steps: Public-Site Evidence → Optional SEO and Market Data → Synthesis → …
  • Researching named competitors from current public URLs
  • SKILL.md covers Initial Assessment, Saving Raw Data, Research Process and Output Format, plus 6 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Suede Competitor Profiling is an agent skill from JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills. Suede-owned competitive-intelligence discipline for evidence-backed profiles of positioning, pricing, messaging, product, proof, and public-market signals. Use when researching named competitors from current public URLs or refreshing a structured landscape. NOT FOR: publishing comparison pages (use suede-competitors), internal sales battle cards (use suede-sales-enablement), or deciding pricing changes (use suede-pricing).

Its SKILL.md is about 3.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 8 other files, including reference files (for example `CARD.md`, `agents/openai.yaml` and `evals/evals.json`).

It sits in Marketing & SEO, covering Competitor analysis, Programmatic SEO and Sales enablement. The repository describes itself as: Open-source AI skills for SEO, AI search visibility, conversion copy, marketing strategy, and business operations. Reusable workflows for Claude Code and Codex, plus code review… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Researching named competitors from current public URLs
  • Refreshing a structured landscape

Example prompts

  • “/suede-competitor-profiling”

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Public-Site Evidence
  2. Optional SEO and Market Data
  3. Synthesis
  4. Prove it before you hand it over

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit a9bf55e. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Suede Competitor Profiling loads about 3.6k tokens when it runs, and up to ~8.3k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 113 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,751 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~113
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~3.6k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~8.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills at commit a9bf55e, republished under its MIT licence (© JasonColapietro). 1,751 words, ~3,612 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/suede-competitor-profiling/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 5 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
suede-competitor-profiling
description
Suede-owned competitive-intelligence discipline for evidence-backed profiles of positioning, pricing, messaging, product, proof, and public-market signals. Use when researching named competitors from current public URLs or refreshing a structured landscape. NOT FOR: publishing comparison pages (use suede-competitors), internal sales battle cards (use suede-sales-enablement), or deciding pricing changes (use suede-pricing).
metadata.version
2.0.0

Suede Competitor Profiling

Use this Suede competitive-intelligence playbook to turn current public evidence into structured profiles with fact, inference, and unknowns kept separate.

Initial Assessment

Check for .agents/product-marketing.md (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md) and read it if present: your own positioning and ICP decide which competitors are actually comparable and which dimensions are worth profiling, and they are usually already written down there.

Then work the intake list under Task-Specific Questions below. If the user gave URLs and the context file covers the rest, proceed without asking.


Saving Raw Data

Before synthesizing the profile, persist all raw page captures, SEO inputs, and review evidence to disk so they can be re-read, audited, or reused without repeating provider requests or manual collection.

Directory layout (relative to project root):

competitor-profiles/
├── raw/
│   └── <competitor-slug>/
│       └── <YYYY-MM-DD>/
│           ├── scrapes/    # one .md file per captured page (homepage.md, pricing.md, ...)
│           ├── seo/        # one .json or .csv file per authorized metric source
│           └── reviews/    # one .md or .json file per review source (g2.md, capterra.md, ...)
├── <competitor-slug>.md    # final synthesized profile
└── _summary.md             # cross-competitor summary

Rules:

  • <competitor-slug> is lowercase, hyphenated (e.g. responsehub, safe-base)
  • <YYYY-MM-DD> is the date the data was pulled: supports re-running and diffing snapshots over time
  • Save each browser, manual, or authorized-fetch page capture as raw markdown to scrapes/<page-name>.md
  • Save each authorized SEO response or user-supplied export to seo/<source-name>.<json|csv>
  • Save each review source to reviews/<source>.md (cleaned text) or .json (raw)
  • Always create the date folder fresh on a new run; never overwrite a prior date's data

The synthesized profile (<competitor-slug>.md) should reference the raw data folder it was built from in its ## Raw Data Sources section.


Research Process

Phase 1: Public-Site Evidence

For each competitor URL, capture key public pages to extract positioning, features, pricing, and messaging.

Availability gate: Inspect the tools currently exposed in the session before selecting an acquisition method. A named connector is usable only when it is actually available, connected to the intended account when applicable, authorized for this task, and its current schema has been read. Do not invent a tool call from the examples below.

If no mapping or page-fetch tool is available, use a browser-neutral/manual fallback: open the public site, follow its primary navigation, inspect its public sitemap or search results when accessible, record the exact URLs and access date, and capture only evidence visible to the user. Respect access controls, site terms, robots directives where applicable, and rate limits.

When the gate blocks you: a source needs an account you were not given, a platform is not connected, a site's terms or robots directives put a page out of bounds, or the user wants a dossier published or sent onward without having authorized it, halt in four parts:

  1. Stop. Do not collect the blocked source or publish the dossier.
  2. Name the blocker in one line ("G2 reviews for <competitor> require a signed-in account; this session has no authorized G2 connection").
  3. Offer 2-4 options (proceed without that source and mark the fields not collected; the user supplies an export; the user authorizes the connection; substitute a permitted source).
  4. Wait for the answer. Do not pick one and continue.
Step 1: Map the site

If a current authorized connector exposes a site-map or crawl capability, use its documented schema to discover the site structure. For example, some Firecrawl connections expose a firecrawl_map operation, but that name is not guaranteed. Otherwise build the URL list through the manual fallback.

available map capability or manual navigation → verified competitor URLs

From the map, identify and prioritize these page types:

  • Homepage
  • Pricing page
  • Features / product pages
  • About / company page
  • Blog (top-level, for content strategy signals)
  • Customers / case studies page
  • Integrations page
  • Changelog / what's new (if exists)
Step 2: Capture key pages

If a current authorized connector exposes single-page fetch or extraction, use its documented schema on each identified URL. For example, some Firecrawl connections expose firecrawl_scrape. Otherwise open each public page and capture the relevant visible text manually.

available page-fetch capability or browser/manual capture → page evidence

Save each result to competitor-profiles/raw/<competitor-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>/scrapes/<page-name>.md before extracting fields.

Extract from each page:

PageWhat to Extract
HomepageHeadline, subheadline, value proposition, primary CTA, social proof claims, target audience signals
PricingTiers, prices, feature breakdown per tier, billing options, free tier/trial details, enterprise pricing signals
FeaturesFeature categories, key capabilities, how they describe each feature, screenshots/demo signals
AboutFounding story, team size, funding, mission statement, headquarters
CustomersNamed customers, logos, industries served, case study themes
IntegrationsIntegration count, key integrations, categories
ChangelogRelease velocity, recent focus areas, product direction signals
Step 3: Capture competitor reviews (optional but high-value)

If a connected search/fetch tool is available and authorized, use its current schema to find the sources below. Otherwise search or browse them manually. Platform-specific or account-only content may be accessed only when that platform is actually connected and the user has authorized it.

  • G2 reviews page for the competitor
  • Capterra reviews page
  • Product Hunt launch page
  • TrustRadius profile

Save each scraped review page to competitor-profiles/raw/<competitor-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>/reviews/<source>.md. Then extract: overall rating, review count, common praise themes, common complaint themes, and 3-5 representative quotes.


Phase 2: Optional SEO and Market Data

First inspect current available tools and user-provided files. If an authorized SEO-data connector is exposed, read its current schemas and gather the same metrics for every competitor. Some DataForSEO connections use the capability names below, but their presence and exact schemas are not guaranteed. If no provider is available, analyze a current user-supplied export or mark these fields not collected; never substitute guessed values.

Save each raw response or export to competitor-profiles/raw/<competitor-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>/seo/ before parsing. Record provider, access date, market, device, database, and that traffic, authority, and value metrics are provider estimates. See references/tool-reference.md for conditional capability mapping and manual fallbacks.

When the connected provider exposes an equivalent of backlinks_summary, collect:

  • Domain rank / authority score
  • Total backlinks
  • Referring domains count
  • Spam score

When it exposes an equivalent of backlinks_referring_domains, collect:

  • Top referring domains (quality signals)
  • Link acquisition patterns
Keyword & Traffic Intelligence

When it exposes ranked-keyword data, collect:

  • Total organic keywords ranking
  • Keywords in top 3, top 10, top 100
  • Estimated organic traffic

When it exposes a domain organic overview, collect:

  • Domain-level organic metrics
  • Estimated traffic value
  • Top keywords by traffic

When it exposes site-keyword discovery, collect:

  • What keywords they target
  • Content gaps vs. your site
Competitive Positioning Data

When it exposes organic-competitor overlap, collect:

  • Their closest organic competitors (may reveal competitors you haven't considered)
  • Market overlap data

When it exposes relevant-page estimates, collect:

  • Their highest-traffic pages
  • Content that drives the most organic value

Phase 3: Synthesis

Combine scraped content with SEO data to build the profile. Cross-reference claims (e.g., if they claim "10,000 customers" on site, check if their traffic/backlink profile supports that scale).

Show full SKILL.md (699 more words)Show less
Phase 4: Prove it before you hand it over

Run this before the profile leaves your hands. It is one ls against a structure Phase 1 and Phase 2 already produced:

ls -R competitor-profiles/raw/<competitor-slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>/
  • Every field not marked [unknown] and not marked not collected traces to a saved file in that folder. A [fact: ...] field traces to the scrapes/, reviews/ or seo/ file it was read from; an [inference] field traces to the scrape file it was inferred from, not to a separate artifact.
  • Any field that traces to nothing gets re-collected or re-marked [unknown]. It is never softened into confident prose: that is exactly what Boundaries forbids below.
  • The ## Raw Data Sources block names the date folder the profile was built from, so the same check is repeatable by someone else later.

Output Format

Profile Document Structure

Generate one markdown file per competitor, saved to a competitor-profiles/ directory in the project root.

Filename: competitor-profiles/[competitor-name].md

Read references/templates.md before writing the first profile of a run: it holds the evidence-marker legend that every field uses, the full Deep Profile Template, the Quick Scan Template, and the summary, positioning-map, SWOT and changelog templates. Do not reconstruct a profile structure from memory: consistency across profiles is what makes them comparable.

The deep profile runs these sections in order: At a Glance, Positioning & Messaging, Product & Features, Pricing, Customers & Social Proof, SEO & Content Strategy, Strengths & Weaknesses, Competitive Implications, Raw Data Sources.


Summary Document

After profiling all competitors, generate a competitor-profiles/_summary.md that includes:

  1. Competitor landscape overview: one paragraph summarizing the competitive field
  2. Comparison table: key metrics side by side for all profiled competitors
  3. Positioning map: where each competitor sits (e.g., simple↔complex, cheap↔premium)
  4. Key takeaways: 3-5 strategic observations from the research
  5. Gaps and opportunities: where the market is underserved

Quick Scan vs. Deep Profile

Quick Scan (faster, lower cost)
  • Public-site evidence: homepage + pricing page only
  • SEO: one consistent provider overview and ranked-keyword summary when an authorized source or user export is available; otherwise not collected
  • Skip: reviews, technology stack, backlink details
  • Output: abbreviated profile (At a Glance + Positioning + Pricing + SEO summary)
Deep Profile (comprehensive)
  • Public-site evidence: all key pages + available review sources
  • SEO: full backlink analysis + keyword intelligence + competitor discovery
  • Include: technology stack, content strategy analysis, review mining
  • Output: full profile template

Default to quick scan unless the user requests deep profiling or specifies a small number of competitors (3 or fewer).


Handling Multiple Competitors

When profiling more than one competitor:

  1. Parallelize only when supported: capture independent homepages or pricing pages concurrently only when the available tool supports it and its quota allows it; otherwise work sequentially
  2. Use consistent metrics: use the same available provider, market, device, database, date window, and metric definitions for every competitor; otherwise mark the comparison unavailable
  3. Build the summary last: after all individual profiles are complete
  4. Prioritize by relevance: if the user has 10+ competitors, suggest profiling the top 5 first based on domain overlap or market similarity

Updating Profiles

Profiles are snapshots. When updating:

  • Check pricing pages first (most volatile)
  • Refresh SEO metrics only through the same available provider and matching market/device/database parameters, or mark them unavailable
  • Scan changelog for product changes
  • Update the "Generated" date
  • Note what changed since last profile in a ## Change Log section at the bottom

Task-Specific Questions

Only ask if not answered by context or input:

  1. What competitor URLs should I profile?
  2. Quick scan or deep profile?
  3. Any specific dimensions to focus on (pricing, SEO, positioning)?
  4. Should I compare findings against your product?

Boundaries

  • Do not present inference, stale pricing, traffic estimates, review summaries, or feature availability as verified current fact.
  • Do not access private accounts, bypass controls, scrape prohibited sources, contact competitors, or publish a dossier without authorization.
  • Do not label a competitor weak, deceptive, or noncompliant without a stated comparison criterion and evidence.
  • Do not decide product, pricing, legal, or sales strategy; surface supported implications and unresolved questions.

Routing

  • Need a public comparison or alternative page -> use suede-competitors.
  • Need a sales battle card -> use suede-sales-enablement.
  • Need review and forum synthesis -> use suede-customer-research.
  • Need pricing, ad, or content implications -> use suede-pricing, suede-ads, or suede-content-strategy.
  • From those skills, route current-source competitor research back to suede-competitor-profiling.

© JasonColapietro, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 5 other files (references) in skills/suede-competitor-profiling of JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • CARD.md
  • agents/openai.yaml
  • evals/evals.json
  • references/templates.md
  • references/tool-reference.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit a9bf55e

Compare with similar skills

Suede Competitor Profiling next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Suede Competitor Profiling compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Suede Competitor Profiling this skillJasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills127—~3.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Competitor FinderOthmane-Khadri/YALC-the-GTM-operating-system317—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Competitive Intelborghei/Claude-Skills886—~4.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Competitive IntelTheCraigHewitt/skills157—~6.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Competitor Teardownirinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills4k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Competitor Alternativesfreekmurze/dotfiles1k24 repos~2kAutomated safety check: PassNone

Similar skills

  • Competitor Finder

    Othmane-Khadri/YALC-the-GTM-operating-system

    Conduct competitive analysis to identify direct and indirect competitors, map their positioning, surface strengths and weaknesses, and generate differentiation angles for outbound messaging.

    317 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Competitive Intel

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Systematic competitor tracking that feeds positioning, battlecards, and roadmap decisions.

    886 GitHub stars~4.5k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Competitive Intel

    TheCraigHewitt/skills

    When the user wants to build competitive battle cards, positioning statements, trap-setting questions, or displacement strategies for sales calls.

    157 GitHub stars~6.3k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Competitor Teardown

    irinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills

    Systematic competitive analysis covering positioning, messaging hierarchy, objection handling, and CTA strategy from landing page URLs or screenshots.

    4k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 15 days ago
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Competitor Alternatives

    freekmurze/dotfiles

    When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement.

    1k GitHub starsUsed in 24 repos~2k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed
  • Marketing Strategy Pmm

    davila7/claude-code-templates

    Product marketing, positioning, GTM strategy, and competitive intelligence.

    32k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~9.6k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check passed

More from JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills

All 78 skills in this repo
  • Suede Release Linter

    JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills

    Lints a local music or media release folder and scores its readiness, flagging missing files, weak metadata, artwork and stem problems, split gaps and rights blockers.

    127 GitHub stars~2.3k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check: notes
  • Creator Rights Passport

    JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills

    Turns messy creator materials into an offline rights-and-provenance transfer package: hashed asset inventory, intake manifest, credits, license notes and a missing-information report.

    127 GitHub stars~3.7k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check: notes
  • Suede Clip to Guide

    JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills

    Turns a video clip, interview moment or transcript into a package that bridges viewers to a long-form guide, with rights, claim and approval gates along the way.

    127 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Suede MCP Release QA

    JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills

    Checks a Suede AI MCP server release against a live process: the full JSON-RPC lifecycle, schemas, annotations, malformed input, catalog agreement and install docs.

    127 GitHub stars~2.1k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Android App Factory

    JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills

    Takes a native Android app from product idea to Google Play release, covering Compose architecture, policy checks, privacy, billing, testing, signing and rollout.

    127 GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Suede Ad Creative

    JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills

    Suede-owned paid-media creative system for hooks, headlines, primary text, static and motion concepts, platform specs, review pages, and test-ready variant batches.

    127 GitHub stars~5k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Suede Competitor Profiling

What does Suede Competitor Profiling do?

Suede-owned competitive-intelligence discipline for evidence-backed profiles of positioning, pricing, messaging, product, proof, and public-market signals. Suede Competitor Profiling is an agent skill from JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills. Suede-owned competitive-intelligence discipline for evidence-backed profiles of positioning, pricing, messaging, product, proof, and public-market signals.

When should I use Suede Competitor Profiling?

Suede Competitor Profiling fits situations like: researching named competitors from current public URLs; refreshing a structured landscape.

How do I install Suede Competitor Profiling in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills --skill suede-competitor-profiling -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/suede-competitor-profiling in JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills) into .claude/skills/suede-competitor-profiling in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Suede Competitor Profiling in Codex?

Run `npx skills add JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills --skill suede-competitor-profiling -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/suede-competitor-profiling in JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills) into .agents/skills/suede-competitor-profiling in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Suede Competitor Profiling in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills --skill suede-competitor-profiling -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/suede-competitor-profiling, .gemini/skills/suede-competitor-profiling, .github/skills/suede-competitor-profiling and .opencode/skills/suede-competitor-profiling in your project.

What does Suede Competitor Profiling need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Suede Competitor Profiling is instructions for the agent only.

Does Suede Competitor Profiling access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Suede Competitor Profiling safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Suede Competitor Profiling use?

Suede Competitor Profiling is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Suede Competitor Profiling use?

About 3.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 14k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 4.7k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Suede Competitor Profiling?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Suede Competitor Profiling: Competitor Finder (Othmane-Khadri/YALC-the-GTM-operating-system, 317 stars), Competitive Intel (borghei/Claude-Skills, 886 stars), Competitive Intel (TheCraigHewitt/skills, 157 stars) and Competitor Teardown (irinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills, 4k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Suede Competitor Profiling?

JasonColapietro (a GitHub user) maintains it in JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills, which has 127 GitHub stars. The repository holds 78 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 9, 2026.

Source: JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.