Nature Paper Card
Yuan1z0825/nature-skills
Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.
Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing.
Install Review Response
$ npx skills add Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar --skill review-response -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar review-response --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/review-response .claude/skills/review-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "review-response" agent skill from https://github.com/Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar/tree/main/skills/review-response into .claude/skills/review-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review-response", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar/tree/main/skills/review-responseType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar --skill review-response -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar review-response --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/review-response .agents/skills/review-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "review-response" agent skill from https://github.com/Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar/tree/main/skills/review-response into .agents/skills/review-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review-response", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar --skill review-response -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar review-response --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/review-response .cursor/skills/review-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "review-response" agent skill from https://github.com/Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar/tree/main/skills/review-response into .cursor/skills/review-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review-response", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar.git --path skills/review-response--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar --skill review-response -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar review-response --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/review-response .gemini/skills/review-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "review-response" agent skill from https://github.com/Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar/tree/main/skills/review-response into .gemini/skills/review-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review-response", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar review-responseInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar --skill review-response -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/review-response .github/skills/review-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "review-response" agent skill from https://github.com/Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar/tree/main/skills/review-response into .github/skills/review-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review-response", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar --skill review-response -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar review-response --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/review-response .opencode/skills/review-response && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "review-response" agent skill from https://github.com/Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar/tree/main/skills/review-response into .opencode/skills/review-response/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "review-response", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
review-response- GitHub stars
- 5.7k
- Used in
- 2 other repos
- Token cost
- ~1.4k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 606 words
- Files
- 6 (incl. references)
- Skills in repo
- 34
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing.
- Works in 5 steps: Acknowledge Strengths, Respond… → Provide Clarity and Intuitive… → Thorough Justification of Experimental… → …
- The user asks to write rebuttal
- SKILL.md covers Core Features, Workflow, When to Use and Usage Steps, plus 6 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Review Response is an agent skill from Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar. Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing. Use when the user asks to "write rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "draft review response", or "analyze review comments". Improves paper acceptance rates.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 6 other files, including reference files (for example `references/rebuttal-templates.md`, `references/response-strategies.md` and `references/review-classification.md`).
It sits in Research & Science, covering Literature review. The repository describes itself as: Semi-automated research assistant for academic research and software development. Supports Claude Code, Codex CLI, Kimi Code CLI, and OpenCode across ideation, coding… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- The user asks to write rebuttal
- Respond to reviewers
- Draft review response
- Analyze review comments
Example prompts
- “write rebuttal”
- “respond to reviewers”
- “draft review response”
- “/review-response”
Workflow steps
5 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 9037873. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Review Response loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs, and up to ~17k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 66 tokens; SKILL.md has 606 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar at commit 9037873, republished under its MIT licence (© Galaxy-Dawn). 606 words, ~1,440 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/review-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 5 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.- name
- review-response
- description
- Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing. Use when the user asks to "write rebuttal", "respond to reviewers", "draft review response", or "analyze review comments". Improves paper acceptance rates.
- tags
- Research, Academic, Rebuttal, Paper Writing
- version
- 0.1.0
Review Response
A systematic review response workflow that helps researchers efficiently and professionally reply to reviewer comments.
Core Features
- Review Analysis - Parse and classify reviewer comments (Major/Minor/Typo/Misunderstanding)
- Response Strategy - Develop response strategies for different comment types (Accept/Defend/Clarify/Experiment)
- Rebuttal Writing - Write structured, professional rebuttal documents
- Tone Management - Optimize tone to maintain professionalism, respect, and evidence-based arguments
Workflow
Receive reviewer comments -> Parse and classify -> Develop strategy -> Write responses -> Tone check -> Final rebuttalWhen to Use
Use this skill when you need to:
- "Help me write a rebuttal"
- "How to respond to reviewer comments"
- "Analyze these review comments"
- "Develop a review response strategy"
Usage Steps
- Provide reviewer comments - Share the reviewer comments text or file with Claude
- Analysis and classification - Claude automatically parses and classifies the comments
- Strategy recommendations - Receive response strategy suggestions for each comment
- Write rebuttal - Generate a structured rebuttal document based on the strategy
- Optimize tone - Review and optimize the professionalism and politeness of responses
Core Principles
- Professionalism - Maintain an academically professional tone and expression
- Respectfulness - Respect the reviewers' opinions and time
- Evidence-based - Support every response with sufficient reasoning and evidence
- Completeness - Ensure all reviewer comments receive a response
Success Factors (Based on ICLR Spotlight Paper Analysis)
Key lessons extracted from successful rebuttal cases:
1. Acknowledge Strengths, Respond Positively to Criticism
- Reviewers will first acknowledge the paper's strengths (novelty, impact, practical applicability)
- Even spotlight papers receive constructive criticism
- Strategy: Thank reviewers for acknowledged strengths first, then address criticism specifically
2. Provide Clarity and Intuitive Understanding
- Even high-quality papers may have clarity issues
- Need to provide intuition and detailed explanations for readers with different backgrounds
- Strategy: Expand key sections, move technical details to appendix, add step-by-step walkthroughs
3. Thorough Justification of Experimental Setup
- Need to justify experimental setup choices
- Consider and discuss alternative metrics
- Provide comprehensive experiments to support claims
- Strategy: Add ablation studies, explain why specific experimental setups were chosen
4. Emphasis on Ethical Considerations
- For research involving privacy, security, and other sensitive topics, ethical considerations are crucial
- Reviewers pay special attention to ethical implications
- Strategy: Proactively discuss ethical considerations, even if reviewers don't explicitly request it
5. Highlight Practical Application Value
- Reviewers value practical applicability and scalability of methods
- "Easily applicable" and "scalable" are important strengths
- Strategy: Emphasize practical benefits and scalability in the rebuttal
Show full SKILL.md (235 more words)Show less
Integration with active installed writing memory
When the rebuttal task involves:
- tone calibration,
- rebuttal phrasing,
- clarification language,
- structuring multi-point responses,
- or learning from strong prior paper/review writing,
read the active installed writing memory before drafting:
~/.claude/skills/ml-paper-writing/references/knowledge/paper-miner-writing-memory.mdon Claude Code installs- the equivalent installed skill-home path on Codex/OpenCode branches
- otherwise skip this optional memory and continue with the local review-response references
Default read order for rebuttal work
- reviewer comments and paper context
- optional
paper-miner-writing-memory.mdif available references/response-strategies.mdreferences/rebuttal-templates.mdreferences/tone-guidelines.md
Read narrowly:
- start with
How this helps our writing, - then inspect
Reusable phrasing, - then inspect
Venue-specific signalsif the rebuttal is venue-sensitive, - use
Writing patterns minedonly when the response needs stronger rhetorical structure.
Do not quote the memory mechanically. Use it to improve structure, clarity, restraint, and professionalism.
Evidence anchor rule
Every response row must include one of:
- paper location,
- result table / figure / analysis artifact,
- citation / Evidence Record ID,
- planned experiment with status,
unresolvedif no evidence exists yet.
Do not claim "we added experiments" or "the results show" without naming the artifact. If an objection has multiple atomic points, split it and cover each point separately.
Reference Documents
For detailed guides, refer to:
references/review-classification.md- Review comment classification criteriareferences/response-strategies.md- Response strategy libraryreferences/rebuttal-templates.md- Rebuttal templates and examplesreferences/tone-guidelines.md- Tone and expression guidelines
Related Tools
- Agent:
rebuttal-writer- Dedicated agent for rebuttal writing and optimization - Command:
/rebuttal <review_file>- Quick-start the rebuttal workflow
© Galaxy-Dawn, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
SKILL.md and 5 other files (references) in skills/review-response of Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar.
- SKILL.md
- references/rebuttal-templates.md
- references/response-strategies.md
- references/review-classification.md
- references/successful-cases.md
- references/tone-guidelines.md
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 9037873
Used in 2 other repositories
We found 2 copies of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 2 other GitHub owners. This page covers the copy in Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.
Compare with similar skills
Review Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Review Response this skillGalaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar | 5.7k | 2 repos | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills | 47k | 2 repos | ~2.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Systematic Review ScreenerImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~8.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Literature Reviewneflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent | 126 | 20 repos | ~5.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT | |
| Preprint Search on bioRxivLigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper | 739 | 12 repos | ~3.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills | 51k | — | ~16k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence |
Similar skills
Systematic Review Screener
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Screens records for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews against fixed eligibility rules, using two blinded AI reviewers and a third adjudicator, with traceable PRISMA counts.
Literature Review
neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).
Preprint Search on bioRxiv
LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper
Searches bioRxiv life sciences preprints by keyword, author, date range or category with a Python script, returning JSON metadata and optional PDF downloads.
Academic Paper Writing Pipeline
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.
Deep Research Workflow
TokenRhythm/opensquilla
Runs multi-round research in three stages with a persisted state file, evidence tracking and a long-form report with per-claim citations.
More from Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar
All 34 skills in this repoCitation Verification Guide
Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar
Reference guidance for checking every citation in academic writing against canonical sources such as DOI, arXiv, CrossRef and Semantic Scholar, to catch fake or wrong references.
Skill Improvement Plan Executor
Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar
Reads an improvement-plan file from a companion quality-review skill and applies its suggested fixes to a Claude Skill, backing up first.
Skill Quality Reviewer
Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar
Scores a skill across description, content organization, writing style and structure, then produces letter grades and a prioritized improvement plan.
UI/UX Design System Advisor
Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar
Turns a vague UI request into a concrete design system with style, palette, typography and layout guidance from a search script, plus stack-specific implementation advice.
Daily Paper Digest
Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar
Finds recent arXiv and bioRxiv papers on a topic, narrows them in stages to one pick per field, and writes bilingual Chinese and English summaries.
Nature Data
Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar
Prepare, audit, or revise Nature-ready Data Availability statements, data repository plans, dataset citations, and FAIR metadata checklists for manuscripts.
Related
Categories
Questions about Review Response
What does Review Response do?
Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing. Review Response is an agent skill from Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar. Systematic review response workflow from comment analysis to professional rebuttal writing.
When should I use Review Response?
Review Response fits situations like: the user asks to write rebuttal; respond to reviewers; draft review response; analyze review comments.
How do I install Review Response in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar --skill review-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/review-response in Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar) into .claude/skills/review-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Review Response in Codex?
Run `npx skills add Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar --skill review-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/review-response in Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar) into .agents/skills/review-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Review Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar --skill review-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/review-response, .gemini/skills/review-response, .github/skills/review-response and .opencode/skills/review-response in your project.
What does Review Response need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Review Response is instructions for the agent only.
Does Review Response access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Review Response safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Review Response use?
Review Response is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Review Response use?
About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 15k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.
What are the alternatives to Review Response?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Review Response: Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars), Systematic Review Screener (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars), Literature Review (neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent, 126 stars) and Preprint Search on bioRxiv (LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper, 739 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Review Response?
Galaxy-Dawn (a GitHub user) maintains it in Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar, which has 5,725 GitHub stars. The repository holds 34 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 23, 2026.
Source: Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.